Gawker 
Enter your username and password.
New York, 11:45 AM
Sun Nov 15
12 posts in the last 24 hours
Tip Your Editors:
tips@gawker.com
Tipline: 646-214-8138
Editor-in-Chief:
Gabriel Snyder | Email
West Coast Editor:
Richard Rushfield | Email
Contributing Editors:
Valleywag:
Ryan Tate | Email
Media:
Hamilton Nolan | Email
Politics:
Alex Pareene | Email
Investigations:
John Cook | Email
Entertainment:
Brian Moylan | Email
Nights:
Adrian Chen | Email
Azaria Jagger | Email
Ravi Somaiya | Email
Weekends:
Foster Kamer | Email
Video Editor:
Richard Blakeley | Email
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.
09/24/09
09/24/09
09/24/09
Sub groups do not define a party.
09/24/09
09/24/09
09/24/09
09/24/09
09/24/09
09/24/09
09/24/09
09/24/09
09/24/09
09/25/09
08/18/09
08/18/09
08/18/09
08/18/09
The Attorney General appoints special prosecutors and independent counsels; The Bush White House was rightly tarred because they used DoJ as part of their political wing. Justice may be part of the executive branch, but they're confirmed by the Senate and charged with enforcing the law of the land. I really don't think I'd like it, if an appointed official or an underling lawyer was given the power of a pocket veto.
Though, now that they have better guidance, perhaps they'll fall back toward the "don't pursue" method applied to medical marijuana and in the meantime, hopefully activists will keep trying to change the law.
08/12/09
08/13/09
08/13/09
09/09/09
08/12/09
Look, mid-year election turnout is always quite low. Those that do vote are the same ones who voted yes on Prop. 8 in the first place. The legalization of gay marriage is heavily dependent on getting a population to vote who normally does not vote. It would be a Sisyphean task to try to pass a repeal or a new constitutional amendment in California during a mid-year cycle.
Although I care deeply and personally about this issue, I'm also ok with fighting the good fight in 2012 when we're that much more likely to succeed than to suffer another defeat in 2010. Besides, it's not like the federal government would recognize our marriage...
08/13/09
I'm sorry, but having seen the results of the best thinking of these people last fall, I'm not prone to trust their judgment. I have the e-mail that tells how they gathered their data, but it sort of blows my mind that they never took one simple step: they never asked their membership what they felt about the effort. I've been getting e-mails from them all year, and not once did they ask, "What do you think? Should we move in 2010 or 2012?" Instead, they make this top-down, authoritarian announcement from on high, and actually promote it to news outlets as if someone had anointed them the decision-makers for all gay people and straight supporters in California.
It's the same paternalistic, "we know best" approach that they took last fall, except they didn't know best, and we got our ass kicked. Instead of learning from that and developing some humility, they seem to have become that much more entrenched in their attitude.
When I watched "Milk", I cried in frustration, not only from my grief at having lost this wonderful man, but because he showed us thirty years ago that we could take on the forces of homophobia and intolerance and win, by running a passionate, well-organized grassroots effort. Courage Campaign has been doing this, and I don't know why Equality California wouldn't want to.
08/13/09
08/12/09
08/12/09
08/12/09
I went to one of the LGBT meetings in Oceanside where a friend of mine was getting honored for some work she did at school promoting tolerance, and the whole thing was a joke. If you ran a business like they run their society, you'd end up broke.
08/12/09
08/12/09
08/13/09
08/12/09
08/12/09