Gawker 
Enter your username and password.
New York, 4:17 PM
Sun Nov 29
12 posts in the last 24 hours
Tip Your Editors:
tips@gawker.com
Tipline: 646-214-8138
Editor-in-Chief:
Gabriel Snyder | Email
West Coast Editor:
Richard Rushfield | Email
Contributing Editors:
Valleywag:
Ryan Tate | Email
Media:
Hamilton Nolan | Email
Politics:
Alex Pareene | Email
Investigations:
John Cook | Email
Entertainment:
Brian Moylan | Email
Nights:
Adrian Chen | Email
Azaria Jagger | Email
Ravi Somaiya | Email
Weekends:
Foster Kamer | Email
Video Editor:
Richard Blakeley | Email
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.
06/18/09
fuck you and the horse you rode in on, george.
06/18/09
06/18/09
its little 40-gallon hat wearing turd head.
06/18/09
06/18/09
Exactly.
"a story so big and important that the Times didn't bother to insert quotation marks before posting it to their website."
And when you wrote that -- I'm just getting to coffee this morning -- I read 'New York Times'.
I mean if you want to refer to the London Times as 'the Times', I'm okay. But this litterbox liner? REALLY.
06/18/09
06/18/09
If it takes the former President coming out and making a speech in favor of Supply Side Economics (of which Bush is not the sole proponent) to draw attention to that pile of crap "stimulus" package that was crammed down America's throats in February, then I'm okay with it. You should be too. This is your savings and salaries that are being devalued. Why wouldn't anyone want questions being raised?
Now before I get the "where were you when Bush was running up the deficit" crowd coming after me, I didn't even know Gawker existed at that time. Otherwise you would have heard me talking about that spending being the greatest failure of his Presidency. However, in this area, Obama hasn't made any change. He merely amped up the spending. I don't know who said this first, but it' not my original thought: "The biggest difference between Obama and Bush is not direction. It's velocity."
06/18/09
Watch it ChillbearLatrigue. You're talking to people who are begging the government to take their earnings. You're talking to people who honestly believe in total government. You're talking to people who no longer believe in the original ideal of free enterprise.
06/18/09
With all due respect, most of us just see you guys as people who have totally missed the point in favor of spitting up the same old, tired, devoid of new ideas points. As for Republicans trying to "nip this in the butt" (sic), please inform me of how many Republicans tried to check Bush's spending when they could have done so.
06/18/09
Shut up George W. Bush. Just STFU. You didn't have anything to say when you were in-country and now that you are out (Texas seceded, right?), we don't care what you think. Please send in Laura to lunch with other millionaire wives so they can help the poors because certainly all of you can relate. Jeez. Sickening, the whole lot of you. Phuck it sideways. Aggravation at the complexity of so much ignorance.
The economy, a dwindling middle class, a stupid war, our standing in the world... Its going to be a big clean-up job after your turn in the kitchen so just stop, please. We have to live here, in case you forgot...
And Drudge. Don't get me started on that 3-day-old clam.
Best,
Pinekatz
06/18/09
06/18/09
06/18/09
05/14/09
05/14/09
05/14/09
05/14/09
To use their image in a story about murdered children is a "little" over the line.
05/14/09
05/14/09
Also I use parentheses just to piss off some people around here who don't like these punctuation devices. So to them, I'd like to add- make sure you picture me doing air-quotes at the same time (with eyebrows lifted, natch).
05/14/09
05/14/09