They probably counted each "email" as one email message per recipient. Meaning, one message sent by Scooter Libby to 30 recipients would count as 30 emails.
Now figure that one of those recipients responded to the entire thread; you now have 60 such emails.
If each of the 30 people on the thread sent an average of 10 messages throughout the life of the thread, that would result in a total count of 9,000 of these "emails" (300 messages sent to 30 recipients).
Now, with the statistic of 180 staffers, you could have 6 similar, distinct groups of 30 people. If each group had a similar type of email thread, that brings you to 54,000 emails.
And if each of these thread groups are busy emailing all day, which presidential staffs probably are (despite any probable lack of competence), there could reasonably be 5-10 of these types of threads going on any given day, if not more, within each group. If each group had just 5 of these threads described above, that would result in a total count of 270,000 emails.
When I was in college, back in the early '00s, I dated a certain law grad who constantly e-mailed me from her Blackberry (I e-mailed from my university account). Our e-mail exchanges went: "Hey," then, "What," "Proust?" and "No," then finally, "Whatever." I'm sure that's what most of these e-mails will be like...numerous, no content, zero thinking, completely homone-driven, except with torture.
Yep, forwarded "FUNNY!!!1!" emails and an awful lot of "I gave you my bank details, but the money transfer hasn't shown up yet. Was Nigeria's internet down?"
@raincoaster: Yahoo Groups. Some groups can generate huge amounts of emails. I've had to turn off notifications from a few myself because the incoming volume became unmanageable.
I never got on board with Facebook or any of the other ones but I can say it's officially over when my mother, who can barely use the computer, is on there now with a bunch of friends. I just found this out this morning when I got one of those automatic e-mail friend requests from her account. Yawn. If I need you to know something I've got e-mail, text and phone, otherwise, I'll keep my privacy thanks. I do like Twitter, although I just use it to follow people/groups.
Considering you can join a network and block users from viewing your profile, I don't understand why Facebook is doing away with the option due to "privacy" concerns. I think you're on to something, Ryan.
I log onto Facebook, I see that a distant friend from grade school has been busy in Farmville, I log off of Facebook. If you can build a business model on that, god bless you.
@daveyjonesisdead: They make money by aggregating and selling data about users. Mostly for marketing, market research, that sort of thing, although it doesn't necessarily end there. They may make some money from those stupid, annoying ads, but I doubt that's the biggest element of their revenue stream.
How about they just make FB work without all the "oops, an error has occurred..."
How about being able to view photo's in a group that someone posted that are of interest to you, and being able to hit the BACK button and return to the originating point -- NOT the beginning of the news feed.
How about making some upgrades to the network so that during busy times of the day when all the 40-somethings log in to check what's happening in the world that the NETWORK actually has enough gas to display pages?
Oh wait, we need to change security aspects first before blasting even more nonsense and information out to everyone on our existing systems.
How exactly does Facebook make more money by convincing people to make the data world-readable? It just exposes it to shitty social screen-scrapers who compete with Facebook to sell ads. This conspiracy theory has no motive.
@Inescapable Picnic: Supposedly, it's about "realtime search." Twitter has convinced a lot of tech "experts" that the ability to see what milllions of people with too much time on their hands are tweeting about is a valuable tool for measuring public opinion and finding out what's popular.
And by "useful," they mean "monetizable," although the only people who've made any money off the idea would be the start-ups that create Twitter search engines and sell them to bigger companies.
Facebook wants a piece of that imaginary market. If they trick users into making all of their status updates and shared links/videos/whatevers public info, Facebook will have a mass of alleged zeitgeist they can sell to corporations. Facebook doesn't really care if some Joe Schmoe in Peoria can read your status updates; they care if Nike, Pepsi, and General Motors can.
@Michael Bauser: If it's public, corporations don't need to pay for it. They just dip into the API like anyone else. All Facebook gets is the top branding as the biggest pool with the most popular free-swim. In fact, where once Pepsi could only get at me by paying Facebook for targeted advertising based on my unseen profile info, Pepsi could instead walk away with my data and not pay anything, and market directly to me.
What I'd like to see in FB, and which would be great for members, is being able to create groups that are stand-alone networks. So, say, my Lushes group can see and post amongst each other picts, updates and comments that Family can't (and vice-versa). Each network would see a flow of information, but not other groups' info flows.
And, the ability to add one person to multiple groups (work, school or friends, school and friends, work and school..., say).
Right now, my only option is to block ALL trinkets to a specific group, which leaves suspicious gaps on my page (Really, Mom, you DON'T want to see me doing my half-naked Jiggy Dance on the Go-Go stage at 4AM, even though you think you do).
It's such a common sense way to do things that I suspect that FB doesn't do this on purpose, all the more to propagate personal data. Which might be better for their IPO, but lousy for their long-term success since Moms (and potential bosses) are instead completely locked out.
I suspect that, like Regional settings, FB doesn't like its members to be selective with who sees what, and rather than delivering what users want, works against it. No successful company has enjoyed long-term success (without breaking Anti-Trust law).
Regional-network privacy is meaningless. Anything you can share with all of New York you can share with the world.
If you like regions as a way to group your friends, you can create Lists representing different regions. Since Facebook allows friends to be assigned to more than one List, you can even have overlapping regions (for example, city and state membership; or, multiple cities for friends who move around).
@iplaudius: but i have to make it! it was so convenient when say - attending a wedding in houston - to search (which took fucking forever since regions got hidden in the bowels of FB) for my friends who were there!
12/15/09
12/15/09
They probably counted each "email" as one email message per recipient. Meaning, one message sent by Scooter Libby to 30 recipients would count as 30 emails.
Now figure that one of those recipients responded to the entire thread; you now have 60 such emails.
If each of the 30 people on the thread sent an average of 10 messages throughout the life of the thread, that would result in a total count of 9,000 of these "emails" (300 messages sent to 30 recipients).
Now, with the statistic of 180 staffers, you could have 6 similar, distinct groups of 30 people. If each group had a similar type of email thread, that brings you to 54,000 emails.
And if each of these thread groups are busy emailing all day, which presidential staffs probably are (despite any probable lack of competence), there could reasonably be 5-10 of these types of threads going on any given day, if not more, within each group. If each group had just 5 of these threads described above, that would result in a total count of 270,000 emails.
12/15/09
Would you LIKE a LARGER penis?
Yes you would.
we KNOW you would.
Use our product!!1!!!!11111!1!!
CONDI will be happy.
12/15/09
12/15/09
- "Hey Dick."
- "Yeah Don?"
- "Torture."
- "Yeah Don."
- "Dogs?"
- "No Don."
- "Bamboo shoots?"
- "No Don."
- "Ladies undergarments?"
- "No Don."
- "Then what?"
- "Water-boarding."
- "Oh..."
- "Yeah."
- "Bitch."
12/15/09
12/15/09
12/15/09
12/15/09
12/15/09
12/15/09
12/15/09
12/15/09
12/03/09
12/03/09
But seriously, why is he so obssesed with trying to be twitter? specially considering FB is closer to what a real business should be.
12/02/09
12/02/09
12/02/09
12/02/09
12/02/09
12/02/09
12/02/09
How about being able to view photo's in a group that someone posted that are of interest to you, and being able to hit the BACK button and return to the originating point -- NOT the beginning of the news feed.
How about making some upgrades to the network so that during busy times of the day when all the 40-somethings log in to check what's happening in the world that the NETWORK actually has enough gas to display pages?
Oh wait, we need to change security aspects first before blasting even more nonsense and information out to everyone on our existing systems.
12/02/09
12/03/09
And by "useful," they mean "monetizable," although the only people who've made any money off the idea would be the start-ups that create Twitter search engines and sell them to bigger companies.
Facebook wants a piece of that imaginary market. If they trick users into making all of their status updates and shared links/videos/whatevers public info, Facebook will have a mass of alleged zeitgeist they can sell to corporations. Facebook doesn't really care if some Joe Schmoe in Peoria can read your status updates; they care if Nike, Pepsi, and General Motors can.
12/03/09
12/02/09
And, the ability to add one person to multiple groups (work, school or friends, school and friends, work and school..., say).
Right now, my only option is to block ALL trinkets to a specific group, which leaves suspicious gaps on my page (Really, Mom, you DON'T want to see me doing my half-naked Jiggy Dance on the Go-Go stage at 4AM, even though you think you do).
It's such a common sense way to do things that I suspect that FB doesn't do this on purpose, all the more to propagate personal data. Which might be better for their IPO, but lousy for their long-term success since Moms (and potential bosses) are instead completely locked out.
I suspect that, like Regional settings, FB doesn't like its members to be selective with who sees what, and rather than delivering what users want, works against it. No successful company has enjoyed long-term success (without breaking Anti-Trust law).
12/02/09
If you like regions as a way to group your friends, you can create Lists representing different regions. Since Facebook allows friends to be assigned to more than one List, you can even have overlapping regions (for example, city and state membership; or, multiple cities for friends who move around).
12/02/09