Enter your username and password.
New York, 8:15 AM
Thu Dec 10
57 posts in the last 24 hours

Tip Your Editors:
Tipline: 646-214-8138
Editor-in-Chief:
Gabriel Snyder |
West Coast Editor:
Richard Rushfield |
Contributing Editors:
Valleywag:
Ryan Tate |
Media:
Hamilton Nolan |
Politics:
Alex Pareene |
Investigations:
John Cook |
Entertainment:
Brian Moylan |
Nights:
Adrian Chen |
Azaria Jagger |
Ravi Somaiya |
Weekends:
Foster Kamer |
Video Editor:
Richard Blakeley |
Please enter your email address to have your password reset.
Registering will give you a user profile and the ability to add other users as friends. To become a commenter, however, you need to audition.
Want to know more? Consult the Comment FAQ and legal terms.
You don't need to login to comment. Just enter your email address below.
See how your address will be displayed in the Comment FAQ.
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
I vote, homophobic for the movie in general. Every single commercial I saw for this comedy abortion had some sort of gay panic joke: speedo clad guru's crotch hanging over some guy's face. Isn't that hilarious!
I think the 12% rating on Rotten Tomatoes speaks for itself.
11/16/09
Here we go:
So by trade I'm a graphic designer, primarily doing web design for doctors and their practices. And just like any other field, the worst part about it is working with customers & clients.
Without fail, I can expect two things when I give them an initial design: they want a bigger logo and they want more people of varying color in there.
Their rationale here is that people are too stupid to know that their service caters to people of that particular race if they aren't represented on the poster. Since I rarely ever meet my clients in person, they say this to me assuming that I'm a white guy who is insensitive to the racial diversity of our modern culture.
Reality is I'm not a white guy, but instead just a guy who looks at stock photos and goes, "that's a good composition" and drops them in, hoping the client won't care during presentation whether or not the gal in the photo is Asian.
When they do notice, it's hours and hours of conversation amongst themselves, the doctor and their hell-forsaken board, about what the race ratio should be. How many white guys? Girls? How old? What kind of money do black people bring in right now, and what's that growth potential? So on and so forth.
And ultimately, if I can't talk them out of it, I shoe-horn a ton of people onto the homepage, ruining the original composition and generally feeling like a sellout.
Fact of the matter is, if you guys heard the discussion about why Faizon Love and Kali Hawk were featured on the American poster to begin with, you'd think it was more racist than their omission on the overseas version.
Just think about when you've spotted racial diversity needlessly injected into any other ad and how disingenuous it felt. The only difference here is that it wasn't as easy to catch that it was tacked on right away.
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
#couplesretreat
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
This is marketing- bad marketing, but simply marketing nonetheless. They may have gotten a few black Brits in the theaters if they'd used the American version of the poster. MAYBE.... #racism
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
As for the poster, I don't think it's racist, it's just British which often is the same thing. #racism
11/16/09
11/16/09
But Time consistently has the slowest servers on planet Earth. It's like they are powered by hamsters. #racism
11/16/09
Anyway, I know the above guess is a stretch. My point is that I'm too busy pressing the "THE ENTIRE US FILM INDUSTRY IS RACIST" button to be outraged by this.