<![CDATA[Gawker: covers]]> http://tags.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gawker.com.png <![CDATA[Gawker: covers]]> http://gawker.com/tag/covers http://gawker.com/tag/covers <![CDATA[Oprah's Secret Message?]]> Maybe this is just a Rohrschach test for whether you're a gay leftist gossip site, but we think the holiday-card treatment on the Ellen Degeneres cover of O makes the word "Joy" look like "Gay." (Or "Goy" if you're Jewish.)

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5406123&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Levi Johnston Wrote a Piece For the October Vanity Fair, Everybody]]> Ugh. What a terrible cover. "JACKIE: HER LONELIEST BATTLE," really? Was she furious that Audrina sided with Heidi? Did Brad stop calling her? Oh, but wait! Levi Johnston wrote a piece for the issue? Double really?

Sure. Sure he did. The story is not online, so we don't know how long it is or what form it takes but it does explain why Levi was at Monkey Bar. Because now he's a Vanity Fair contributor! Si will probably lend him money to buy some real estate in Wasilla.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5349535&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Bright Lights, Big City Gets Fancy New Cover For 25th Birthday]]> Happy 25th anniversary of coked-out young dudes writing novels about being coked-out young dudes! To celebrate, Random House is finally updating the cover of Bright Lights, Big City.

Which is kind of a shame! The old "Vintage Contemporaries" cover was as much of an awesome time capsule as Jay McInerney's book is. It's perfect! The oddly colored illustration of an anonymous guy in a trench coat wandering toward The Odeon with the Twin Towers in the background, those bold colors and the justified text makes it look like an '80s video game, which is perfect for a novel that reads like a text-based RPG in which YOU are a DISSATISFIED FACT CHECKER SEEKING SOLACE IN DRUGS AND EMPTY HEDONISM.

But now it is 2009, and, weirdly, the Twin Towers are gone but The Odeon is not. And so, a new cover. This one just looks like the opening credits of Saturday Night Live.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5349392&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[How OK! Faked Its Jessica Simpson Weight-Loss Cover]]> OK! magazine wanted to drum up sales with this cover about Jessica Simpson's weight loss. When Us Weekly ran the same basic cover, it was their best-selling cover of 2007 — the same year, incidentally, OK! found Jessica's "new" body.

The cover is a before/after spread, tied to a story about how Simpson has "already peeled off 10 pounds in 10 days" (last time around, Us had her losing "20 pounds in two months"). Their "Before!" picture is from a couple weeks after Simpson's infamous chili cookoff pics surfaced and ex-boyfriend Tony Romo took her to the Waverly Inn for Valentine's Day:

Click for larger images





Now, OK! hasn't laid eyes on the allegedly svelte Jessica Simpson, that's just what "sources" told them. So to illustrate Simpon's purported weight loss, it went to the photo archives and found a picture of her jogging on the set of Major Movie Star in September 2007, more than a year before, we'd point out, the picture labeled with the big "BEFORE!" caption:




It would appear the cash-bleeding celebrity weekly really is done paying for fresh art.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5326541&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Time's Commemorative Michael Jackson Issue To Hit Stands Monday]]> The image associated with this post is best viewed using a browser.Another iconic cover: Time's special edition issue to commiserate the death of Michael Jackson arrives Monday. They lined up an absurd amount of tributes; the last time Time published a "special" edition between issues was right after 9/11. [Chartini]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5303330&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Time Puts Twitter on Cover, at Vanguard of American Economy]]> The image associated with this post is best viewed using a browser.What could Time magazine possibly have to say about Twitter that hasn't been said in a thousand prior magazine and newspaper articles, and on Oprah? That it drives the American economy. In fact, Twitter is the new GM!

Park Sloper and Gawker hobby horse Steven Johnson delivers that depressing punchline at the end of his Twitter cover story, out tomorrow:

It was the Japanese who would destroy us in the '80s; now it's China and India. But what actually happened to American innovation during that period? We came up with America Online, Netscape, Amazon, Google, Blogger, Wikipedia, Craigslist, TiVo, Netflix, eBay, the iPod and iPhone, Xbox, Facebook and Twitter itself. Sure, we didn't build the Prius or the Wii, but if you measure global innovation in terms of actual lifestyle-changing hit products and not just grad students, the U.S. has been lapping the field for the past 20 years.

That's right: America might not make actual things any more, but at least we've learned to occupy our time talking endlessly and unprofitably to one another, in an entirely massless location, about which other entirely massless things deserve our time and/or increasingly worthless borrowed dollars.

It's a sort of self-eating economy only slightly more sophisticated than the financial services orgy of the prior 10 years, which ended disastrously. We just can't stop doing this sort of thing. Yay?

This is what I ultimately find most inspiring about the Twitter phenomenon. We are living through the worst economic crisis in generations, with apocalyptic headlines threatening the end of capitalism as we know it, and yet in the middle of this chaos, the engineers at Twitter headquarters are scrambling to keep the servers up, application developers are releasing their latest builds, and ordinary users are figuring out all the ingenious ways to put these tools to use. There's a kind of resilience here that is worth savoring.

That's the sort of sweeping, certain conclusion sure to please Time's Economist- loving editor Rick Stengel. How's it doing on the media platform of the future, though? Time's James Poniewozik reports:


]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5278878&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[OK! Magazine's Extreme Dieting Advice]]> OK! Magazine has had some issues with Photoshop on their cover before. This week, they show how amputating a leg may be the easiest and fastest way to lose 90 pounds. Diet secrets revealed, indeed.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5204363&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[The Michelle Obama Cover Guide]]> The magazine industry had sincere, desperate hopes that Michelle Obama could be the next Princess Di, moving copies automatically with her smile. Not gonna happen. But following these simple Michelle Magazine Cover Rules can help:

Ad Age found that putting Michelle Obama on the cover has been a mixed bag in terms of newsstand sales. As you can see from our fancy graphic, some covers did give a big sales boost, while others tanked. The lessons:

  • Having a black readership helps: Essence and Ebony, win; New York mag (NILLAS), lose.
  • Having an old audience hurts: Newsweek, Ladies Home Journal, More—all these magazines are read by over-the-hill people who have already passed the point when they would be excited by "glamor." Their desire is for soothing consistency. Give them Laura Bush.
  • Think of a good cover line, if it's not too much trouble: Just look at the LHJ cover. They got the freaking first couple on there, and the biggest eye-grabber is "Save money at the gas pump." Maybe play up that photo?
  • Pray: If the Obamas aren't going to save the magazine industry, what is?
]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5200792&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[How Barack Obama Got Snared In Portfolio's Crazy-Making]]> Joanne Lipman, the diva editor of Portfolio, is becoming known for her disastrous cover decisions. The worst, perhaps, involved the president and Annie Leibovitz.

One might call Lipman's tastes erratic. The business magazine editor, said to find business journalism uninteresting, is known around the office for spiking piles and piles of copy, enough even to prompt comparisons to Tina Brown in her fussy Condé Nast heyday.

From the outside, Lipman's impulsiveness is apparent in her curious cover choices. After the outbreak of the worst economic crisis in 70 years, she put a picture of clothier Dov Charney on the front of Portfolio. Next month, amid talk of bank nationalization and CEO immolation, the magazine's cover will feature Sarah Palin.

From inside the publication comes a tragic story involving a cover that never was: Barack Obama, shot by photo legend Annie Leibovitz at Lipman's behest, for the December-January cover. Worried that everyone else would put the president-elect on the cover, Lipman is said to have killed the portrait after it was taken.

So instead of what was believed to be exclusive work from star photographer Leibovitz, of the newly-elected president, timed exquisitely to front-run the inaugural buzz, Portfolio ended up with a concept image of a dead bull on Wall Street; clever, but severely tardy for a meltdown that shifted into overdrive nearly a full financial quarter earlier.

"Clever, but severely tardy" could also be used to summarize much of what has ended up inside the magazine — and to describe whatever Condé Nast chairman Si Newhouse will inevitably have to have done to Portfolio in Lipman's wake.


]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5173088&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Bob Dylan's Gay Kiss]]> How to tenderize Bob Dylan's "bleak... sneering" new album, built around the song "Life is Hard?" With the title "Together Through Life" and a black-and-white, backseat gay kiss on the cover. (Click to enlarge.)

"Lay Lady Lay, it ain't," the Sun writes.

No. More like "Jet Pilot."


]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5171617&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Another Irrelevant Portfolio Cover Coming]]> What is wrong with Joanne Lipman? Does the Portfolio editor detest business journalism? Is she trying to finally get fired? There must be some reason she's putting Sarah Palin on next month's cover.

That's easily Lipman's worst call since fronting with American Apparel founder Dov Charney in the first Portfolio following the economic meltdown — greeting the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression with a story about a t-shirt vendor.

Staff tried to warn Lipman about the Palin cover, according to Women's Wear Daily, just as they did before she disastrously published stale scuttlebutt about a Nixon-era scandal last January. Lipman, defiantly ignorant of business news, was no more compliant this time around.

As with November's Charney issue, April's Portfolio will ignore an historic fulcrum in American finance, when anti-Wall Street populism is at an all-time high and calls for wholesale bank nationalization are gaining real ground (establishment figures like former IMF man Stephen Johnson having come to concur with once-fringe economists like Nouriel Roubini).

Sure, famed Nixon campaign-chronicler Joe McGinniss is penning the Palin piece, and there's some sort of vague business angle involving oil, but come on: Even Lipman's heretofore steadfast boss Si Newhouse has to be able to see how out of touch his business magazine now looks. Even if the glamour-mag publisher wasn't much concerned with finance six months ago, the imploding advertising market ensures he's up to speed now. And he'll be wondering why Lipman isn't.


]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5171476&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[September's Awesomest New Magazines!]]> Who says the magazine industry is in trouble, besides all informed analysts? Plain old pessimists, they are! For example, did you know that according to prominently quoted guy "Mr. Magazine," new magazine launches are actually up this year? We looked back at the dozens of hot new titles that launched just last month, and we've selected the twelve most promising. Hobbies for the poor, escapism through porn and pets, and information about your various afflictions are especially popular! Gaze upon the future of media:

















[The last one is trashy, we know.]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5067736&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[A Gentle Critique Of Esquire]]> Let's play the game "Who said it, and about what?": "It was a silly gimmicky thing." "Ridiculous." "I was embarrassed by it. I think most people at Hearst were embarrassed by it." "I was embarrassed that the Esquire name was on it." "That wasn't great, that was just ridiculous." "This Mickey Mouse light clicking on an off. It's not an idea." "When will they learn, oh lord? How long will it take for them to learn?"



All quotes from George Lois—the man who designed all of Esquire's greatest covers—about Esquire's recent, blinking, plastic "cover of the future." That's unfortunate, Esquire, you must be very disappointed at being PWND!!1! Watch the Lois interview with Ad Age here. He's cranky about other things too.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5067683&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[The Greatest Depression, as Seen on the Covers of The Economist]]> It's always fun to get slammed by a disaster and then to look back and discover that some people had been warning you about it forever. Well, The Economist has been publishing scary covers warning of DOOM for years, and they are compiled in a nifty slide show here. We've put together a tasty little sampler after the jump.


[via MagCulture]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5065684&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Barack Obama: More Popular Than Jesus, Angelina Jolie]]> Barack Obama is on the cover of Rolling Stone again! So soon after the last one. And just one week after he showed up on the front of publisher Jann Wenner's UsWeekly! In fact, if you have a magazine, you have probably put Barack Obama on the cover. It's summer, so nothing is really going on besides Batman and this Barack Obama character. Does anyone without a pair of breasts sell so many magazines? Did our prettiest president even get this much ink until he tragically died? Attached, a composite of the media maelstrom. (The Tiger Beat one, sadly, is from The Onion. It was our favorite too.)

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5019689&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[The Weirdest Sports Illustrated Covers Of 1978]]> SI.jpegSports Illustrated has put a huge gallery of its archived content online for free. The best part is the selection of old covers, from back in the grainy days of short shorts and wild hair. Some of the production meetings back then probably involved drugs. We've selected the five weirdest covers from 1978, a year we picked because SI put Clint Hurdle on the cover that year, and you have to admit that man has a fine name. Look at the covers below!

Leon Spinks is good at spitting between his teeth.

SI3.jpeg


Stop poking Al Unser, lady!

SI5.jpeg


George Foster is always ready to sneak up from behind and hit you with a bat.

SI4.jpeg


Occasionally, basketball players will pull each others' shorts down, just for fun.

SI2.jpeg


You don't want to meet Nancy Lopez in a dark alley.

SI6.jpeg

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=372410&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[People's Empty Web Boast]]> People boasts 4m visitors to the Time Inc. magazine's web site on the day photos of Jennifer Lopez' newborn twins went up. So, is that supposed to be impressive? Well, it is more than New York magazine drew for its cunningly classy recreation of Marilyn Monroe's last photo shoot, with the troubled actress played by a modern-day trainwreck, Lindsay Lohan. Adam Moss' stunt drew 1.3m US visitors per day at the peak of public interest, according to Quantcast. However, People simply directed web visitors to the print magazine, while New York milked the interest for all it was worth, generating nearly 20 pageviews per visitor. And, while People paid a record $6m to Jennifer Lopez for rights to the actress' babies, New York gave Lohan only a boost to her faltering credibility, which cost nothing, except Moss' reputation for high-mindedness. On the web, at least, People got the poorer deal; and that makes their chest-thumping all the more silly. (Data on New York magazine's traffic comes from Quantcast.)

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5004520&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Self-Hating 'Time' Offers Its Worst Covers For Your Mocking]]> Time Magazine is so with it. Their cover story this week is about Hillary Clinton. She's really important these days. They also know that in this post self-esteem era, nothing is more appealing that being self-hating. So for a special online feature (the internet is huge!) Time rounds up its all time worst covers. Of course, their choice of covers is a little safe. Those Asian whiz kids didn't make the list, and, for our money, they were totally robbed. Please send in any offensive Time covers that go beyond the "ha-ha, were so silly back then" ones they gave. In the meantime, our round up of their round up, with open captions.

"Boo Japan"boo%20japan.jpg

"Fishing Fills The Hole In My Heart"fishing%20fills%20the%20hole%20in%20my%20heart.jpg

"The Evergreen Blooms"The%20evergreen%20blooms.jpg

"Six Is The Perfect Number To Express This Trend" Six%20is%20the%20perfect%20number%20to%20express%20the%20ice%20cream%20trend%20visually.jpg

"Print Will Never, Ever Die"print%20will%20never%20die.jpg

"Cocktails: You're Doing It Rong" breaking%20hard%20liquor.jpg

"Not A Conflict Of Interest"the%20internet%20is%20going%20be%20huge.jpg

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=366592&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Demi Moore Loves Her Vagina! 'Vanity Fair' And 'V' Love It Too!]]> Oh Demi Moore, with your naughty magazine cover splashes. What does the gestating kid (that would be Scout LaRue) pictured at left in your iconic 1991 Vanity Fair portrait think about the magazine's February cover of you? How about your racy appearance on the cover of the subtly-titled V? And she thought her exit from the womb sixteen years ago would be the last time she had to take an up-close-and-personal look at her mom's vadge.]]> http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5002505&view=rss&microfeed=true <![CDATA[Colbert, Ladies on Buildings, Big Fleshy Orbs Rule ASME Cover Contest]]> The American Society of Magazine Editors revealed the finalists of their second annual Best Cover Contest today. We find out the winners next week! Oh boy! 9/11 covers from The New Yorker and New York, the day Time decided to just run a huge picture of an elephant's ass (it's a metaphor!), and a cover from Skiing with the headline "secret powder" that is apparently actually about skiing and not coke are just some of the highlights of this year gone by. Overall, as this sampling of the nominees suggests, you had a winner on your hands if you featured the inescapable Stephen Colbert, a lady on a roof somewhere, or a disembodied sphere of lady-part on the right half. Also we're glad to see that New York's coverline question "What If 9/11 Never Happened?" just still refuses to resonate.

2007 Best Cover Contest [ASME]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=313588&view=rss&microfeed=true