in case anyone is still reading, dolnick has his first story in the paper today. a fluff piece, which is what he seems to specialize in. he's a decent writer but definitley wouldn't have landed a job at NYT without the family connections.
i knew him and his wife heidi while they were here in delhii. he's a true american hipster, and she's a twit who tried to be a journalist but couldn't get anything published despite being married to a sulzburger.
Will Salman Rushdie be discussing what it's like to nail Padma Lakshmi? Because that'll definitely bump my interest level in this event up a few notches...
@The Lone Scout:
Were I single, prolly. But my one single-guy experience with that sort of eye candy makes me wonder if, at least sometimes, foxy=loxy.
@Smitros: I would try to come back with something involving lemon juice and dill sprigs, but I think I've already worn out the whole brunch-in-the-sack metaphor.
@Iceland Spar: I would come to the Gawker Festival only if other commenters really looked like their avatars. (I'm not ready to have cold water poured on my randy fantasies about certain commenters.)
PS Yes, I'm male, I ride and shoot, and I do prefer the wild trail to my cubicle, but I'm not a Native American.
@The Lone Scout: Well I know it's hard not to have randy fantasies about my avatar, but in all honestly, this isn't my usual shade of lipstick. The rest is dead on though, so hopefully I won't disappoint.
@BookishLookish: The attendees to the Malcom Gladwell talk should bring along pillows, blankets and canned food supplies. Can't stop, won't stop until he hits the 2.5 billion-word mark.
I worked with Sam and he's one of the most intelligent, unassuming, funny, sincere people I've been on deadline with. He's also really cute! A boon to any newsroom, bloodline or not.
Sounds like a first-cousin-once-removed deal to me. That being out of the way:
As fashionable as it is to sneer at anyone who gets a job because of inside connections, is there anyone here who is too proud to use them?
I didn't think so.
To be honest, I think it's a good sign for the NYT that the younger generation is getting involved with the business. You know how Ford has managed to struggle through the last couple of years? Smart/lucky financial management, and strong involvement from the folks whose name is on the building. Had GM and Chrysler not been playthings for financiers for so long, they might have been in better shape to weather this crisis.
The reason Hearst was able to take over its hereditary enemy (the SF Chronicle) is because the deYoung-Therriot heirs wanted to cash out, like now. And now Hearst is threatening to shut down the paper, because its real estate in SoMa is worth more than the business.
In other words, if you care about the future of the Times, you'd better pray that young Sulzbergers and their cousins want to work there. Otherwise, it's just another asset to be liquidated when convenient or necessary.
@Cynical Media Bitch: I am all for NYT getting the youngins involved. But as someone who used to work with another media clusterf*ck, Cablevision, the only thing the younger relatives do is spy and report back to the crypt keepers. There are plenty o' young folk who really need jobs who can keep the paper fresh. You know, ones without trust funds?
@HypocriticalOath: I think that says more about the Dolans and Cablevision than it does anything else. No, it's not good when the next generation is just a weaselly front for Mom and Pop. (I'm looking at you, Jed York.)
I don't have a trust fund either, should I be putting that I my resume? Being someone who "really needs a job" isn't reason enough to get hired, as I can tell you from first-hand experience.
Why do I fear that making the Times "fresh" is not good for the quality of journalism? Just a hunch, maybe?
Well at least the New York Times hasn't laid off dozens of qualified journalists! Otherwise this would be rather insulting to everyone else who has to actually work to get a job.
09/28/09
i knew him and his wife heidi while they were here in delhii. he's a true american hipster, and she's a twit who tried to be a journalist but couldn't get anything published despite being married to a sulzburger.
10/12/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
I don't know how you verify this, but I'm betting she's a lox in the sack.
09/18/09
09/18/09
Were I single, prolly. But my one single-guy experience with that sort of eye candy makes me wonder if, at least sometimes, foxy=loxy.
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
PS Yes, I'm male, I ride and shoot, and I do prefer the wild trail to my cubicle, but I'm not a Native American.
09/18/09
09/18/09
This probably doesn't involve your fantasies (I hope), but I look almost exactly like my avatar.
09/18/09
09/18/09
I'm scrawny (only 4K of memory, I think), so you can find better.
09/18/09
[Gratuitous equine humor in the absence of actual SJP post]
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
W/Leprosy!
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
08/21/09
08/21/09
08/21/09
08/21/09
08/21/09
08/21/09
08/21/09
As fashionable as it is to sneer at anyone who gets a job because of inside connections, is there anyone here who is too proud to use them?
I didn't think so.
To be honest, I think it's a good sign for the NYT that the younger generation is getting involved with the business. You know how Ford has managed to struggle through the last couple of years? Smart/lucky financial management, and strong involvement from the folks whose name is on the building. Had GM and Chrysler not been playthings for financiers for so long, they might have been in better shape to weather this crisis.
The reason Hearst was able to take over its hereditary enemy (the SF Chronicle) is because the deYoung-Therriot heirs wanted to cash out, like now. And now Hearst is threatening to shut down the paper, because its real estate in SoMa is worth more than the business.
In other words, if you care about the future of the Times, you'd better pray that young Sulzbergers and their cousins want to work there. Otherwise, it's just another asset to be liquidated when convenient or necessary.
08/21/09
08/21/09
I don't have a trust fund either, should I be putting that I my resume? Being someone who "really needs a job" isn't reason enough to get hired, as I can tell you from first-hand experience.
Why do I fear that making the Times "fresh" is not good for the quality of journalism? Just a hunch, maybe?
08/21/09
08/21/09
Pinch
Punk'd
Prepped
08/21/09