Originally from the area, but whenever I drive up from NYC and want to take family out for dinner, there are like one or two decent restaurants in the whole area. And when you quiz locals about good places to eat, they get that whole "upstate/downstate" argument, as in "Why don't you go back to where you came from." So I do.
I have no idea why Bradley Cooper is a lead in a feature film. Still can't wrap my head around it. Clive Owen, Gerald Butler, this fool, it's like Hollywood wants to lose money.
@jasonelias: Someone was trying to save money and convinced themselves that he was a serviceable substitute for Josh Lucas or Patrick Dempsey or someone of that ilk. Someone was wrong.
@pushupbraaah: You really think he "led" The Hangover? You think a significant percentage of the people who went to see that movie went because he was in it, and not because they'd heard the movie was hilarious? I'm so tired of the fallacy that actors are what make movies profitable.
I was hoping this movie would be so awful that it was sublime (see "Showgirls" and the "Star Wars" prequels), but it sounds like it's just awful. Too bad -- I like Sandra Bullock. But I gotta say, Kyle Smith has been my favorite movie critic for the past couple of years -- he's mean, spot-on, and usually pretty funny. (Yes, I know he works for the NYP, but still.)
His finest hour came two years ago, when he reviewed Nic Cage's "National Treasure: Book of Secrets." He wrote it from he actor's perspective. Here's just the beginning:
"THIS is Nicolas CAGE. Remember when I used to make quiet movies for smart people? Things have CHANGED.
"National Treasure: Book of Secrets" is my latest LOUD movie for IDIOTS. It's another flick about maps, landmarks and buried treasure that makes "The Da Vinci Code" look like TOLSTOY. Remember how cleverly one clue led to the next in "National Treasure"? The sequel is more like CONNECT-THE-DOTS. And yes, I do continue to develop my HABIT of suddenly YELLING in the middle of a sentence."
I re-read this whenever I need a giggle. (Is that wrong? Perhaps I need help . . .)
snugbug promoted this comment
Edited by The_Lovely_Miss_Bronx at 09/04/09 10:34 PM
The_Lovely_Miss_Bronx was starred
The_Lovely_Miss_Bronx was unstarred
@The_Lovely_Miss_Bronx: Last night I was entertained by Roger Ebert's review of The Spirit:
"To call the characters cardboard is to insult a useful packing material...At one point, The Spirit takes three bullets in the forehead, leans forward and shakes them out. At another, he is skewered by a broadsword. Why, oh why, does he never die, he asks himself. And we ask it of him."
Nothing is wrong with you. I have a fondness for reading reviews of bad movies.
His review of Blood Diamond is one for the books, too. I loved that movie, because it's so enjoyable in that retarded, throwaway Big Hollywood way, and I also love the hating review K Smith wrote about it.
Yah, I knew this movie was going to suck balls once I saw the sheep-shag wig Sandy was wearing. And you know, she, Cooper and Haden Church were on Bravo or something doing a junket appearance for this shite, and Bullock said all of two words the entire time, and her face looked like she was in abdominal distress. I'm thinking she desperately didn't want this movie to come out and ruin her Proposal high. She probably totally thought it would be shelved indefinitely or go direct to DVD, but Bradly Cooper had to get all Hungover and crap, so now she has to wear a shit-suit and tell everyone it's a ball gown. Just like with Miss Congeniality 2: Armed and Fucking Awful.
@Spirit Fingers: Thomas Hayden-Church and Bradley Cooper also seem utterly cowed by the lameness as well. They both come across as charmless, unfunny dolts in all the publicity I've seen them doing for this junk. The highlight was Norm MacDonald steamrollering Hayden-Church on Conan.
11/21/09
11/20/09
11/20/09
11/20/09
First he tweets of Albany, then he tweets of psycho restaurateur:
[gawker.com])&utm_content=Google+Reader
11/20/09
09/06/09
How could this movie NOT be great?
09/05/09
09/05/09
09/05/09
09/05/09
09/05/09
09/05/09
09/05/09
09/05/09
09/05/09
09/04/09
09/04/09
09/05/09
09/04/09
09/05/09
09/04/09
His finest hour came two years ago, when he reviewed Nic Cage's "National Treasure: Book of Secrets." He wrote it from he actor's perspective. Here's just the beginning:
"THIS is Nicolas CAGE. Remember when I used to make quiet movies for smart people? Things have CHANGED.
"National Treasure: Book of Secrets" is my latest LOUD movie for IDIOTS. It's another flick about maps, landmarks and buried treasure that makes "The Da Vinci Code" look like TOLSTOY. Remember how cleverly one clue led to the next in "National Treasure"? The sequel is more like CONNECT-THE-DOTS. And yes, I do continue to develop my HABIT of suddenly YELLING in the middle of a sentence."
I re-read this whenever I need a giggle. (Is that wrong? Perhaps I need help . . .)
09/04/09
"To call the characters cardboard is to insult a useful packing material...At one point, The Spirit takes three bullets in the forehead, leans forward and shakes them out. At another, he is skewered by a broadsword. Why, oh why, does he never die, he asks himself. And we ask it of him."
Nothing is wrong with you. I have a fondness for reading reviews of bad movies.
09/04/09
His review of Blood Diamond is one for the books, too. I loved that movie, because it's so enjoyable in that retarded, throwaway Big Hollywood way, and I also love the hating review K Smith wrote about it.
09/04/09
09/05/09