Gawker 
Enter your username and password.
New York, 12:02 AM
Mon Dec 7
13 posts in the last 24 hours
Tip Your Editors:
Tipline: 646-214-8138
Editor-in-Chief:
Gabriel Snyder |
West Coast Editor:
Richard Rushfield |
Contributing Editors:
Valleywag:
Ryan Tate |
Media:
Hamilton Nolan |
Politics:
Alex Pareene |
Investigations:
John Cook |
Entertainment:
Brian Moylan |
Nights:
Adrian Chen |
Azaria Jagger |
Ravi Somaiya |
Weekends:
Foster Kamer |
Video Editor:
Richard Blakeley |
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.
11/04/09
11/04/09
1. Even if you look stupid while stealing art, I may still want to have sex with you for reasons I can't explain.
2. Having a look of perpetual creepy, vapid psychopath plastered to your face at all times can make you look like a half-decent actress if your role is playing a perpetually creepy and vapid psychopath.
3. Being the best-looking guy on the show won't necessarily keep you there as long as Nick Zano is lurking in the background. And Nick Zano is always lurking in the background.
4. Nothing on Earth is as good without Amanda Woodward. Nothing. #melroseplace
11/04/09
11/04/09
11/04/09
Also, the writers may want to consider picking up some of their own threads. I mean, Jane Mancini happened, yet no mention! In the last episode, we thought Violet would start making Michael's life a living hell, which would've been entertaining to watch --
Yet no mention last night!
These guys also do not understand the concept of the Melrose Cliffhanger. Something shocking and sexy/creepy happens at the end and then we pick it right back up the following week. I swear if they got their cliffhangers right they'd be on the right track. #melroseplace
11/04/09
11/05/09
10/21/09
Is it just me, or are they kind of throwing the former characters under the bus to prop up the news ones?
I was fine with how they developed Sydney. In the absence of Amanda, it made sense that they turned her into a bitch (when she used to be an airhead).
But Mancini hasn't a cracked single smarmy joke since this thing began. Mancini is meant to be a funny douchebag. not an angry one.
Jane always loses, and they kept that going, but that was the most pathetic I've ever seen her, and she was way better off when the original series ended.
As for Jo, I don't need Ella of all people telling her off. Old Jo would've told Ella to go suck one.
At this point, how can they not screw up Amanda?
10/21/09
10/21/09
10/21/09
10/14/09
Also, counting down the days until 11/17, when Amanda Woodward returns. Jo coming back next week is not going to cut it, especially if they just vaporize her a week later like they've apparently done to Jane.
10/14/09
Wheee!
(Is there really someone on the show named Kimber? If so, I'm much less amused and more angry at the blatant thievery from one of the greatest cartoons of all time. If not...Brian more please. Who's Jerrica, Pizzazz and Rio?)
10/14/09
10/14/09
10/14/09
10/14/09
Also, I've resisted thinking that the guy who plays David is hot for as long as I possibly can, but it's over. I'm going to need to see him wearing less clothing, and soon.
10/14/09
08/15/09
08/15/09
@Solomon Grundy: So bloody true. If you think this is chunky, then you definitely have some body image issues.
08/14/09
08/14/09
08/14/09
08/14/09
08/14/09
08/14/09