<![CDATA[Gawker: daily candy]]> http://tags.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gawker.com.png <![CDATA[Gawker: daily candy]]> http://gawker.com/tag/dailycandy http://gawker.com/tag/dailycandy <![CDATA[DailyCandy Sours on Most of Its Cities]]> DailyCandy is eliminating the special editions for seven of its twelve cities, according to an internal memo we've obtained, resulting in almost as many layoffs. NBC Universal, take heed: Even inside Comcast's profitable umbrella, no one is safe from cutbacks.

Comcast paid an un-fucking-believable $125 million for DailyCandy — just a simple shopping e-newsletter, if you're not familiar with it — just over a year ago, greatly enriching former AOL exec Bob Pittman, who had previously acquired it for $3 million. Amid all the investment, DailyCandy expanded from New York to London, Los Angeles, Chicago, San Francisco, Miami, Dallas, DC, Boston, Atlanta, Seattle and Philly.

DailyCandy will now stop publishing city-specific editions in all but five of those 12 cities: New York, London, LA, Chicago and San Francisco. Subscribers in the other cities will now receive an "Everywhere" edition, supplemented with local news and events twice a week.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5418414&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Barry Diller's Not-So-Exclusive 'Very Short List']]> Very Short List has been a favorite bauble of Barry Diller since the IAC chief established it nearly three years ago, after failing to buy Daily Candy. He envisioned VSL as a smart, tidy newsletter. But it looks worrisomely distended.

The email publication appears to have been bulking up dramatically. When last we checked it had 20,000 subscribers, too few to get much attention from advertisers. A year ago, VSL contributor Kurt Andersen told Charlie Rose it was up to 100,000 subscribers.

We checked in today with VSM general manager Gary Foodim, who says the list is up to 200,000 subscribers.

Tenfold growth is a commendable achievement for a list that targets a "smart set" of well-to-do would-be sophisticates. The question is whether VSL still has any claim on that set or whether, as we hear, the list has been diluted with users from other IAC brands, resulting in an open ad rate surprisingly low for a database of upscale consumers. One anecdote making the rounds even says that Diller's friends have abandoned the service; of 25 buddies he used to seed the VSL list, all but one is said to have unsubscribed.

Apparently retaining at least some highbrow airs, VSL hasn't responded to our request for comment on that scuttlebutt.

But it's easy to imagine that Diller, who once said he would be "much diminished" without VSL, has moved on. Rumors that he wants to offload the site have been rife this year. Now VSL is said to be in talks with Jared Kushner's ailing New York Observer. And Diller would appear to have a new favorite toy, judging by the $18 million he's feeding into the bonfire that is Tina Brown's Daily Beast.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5286295&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Did A Friend Swindle Daily Candy's Founder?]]> DanylevyNo one will shed tears for Dany Levy. The Daily Candy founder made close to $25 million, by our calculations, on the sale of her email shopping newsletter to Comcast. But former AOL honcho Bob Pittman's Pilot Group took the lion's share of the $125 million windfall, after paying Levy and her family investors just $3.5 million for the privilege five years ago. Pittman's incredible return on investment has helped rehabilitate his tarnished image. But, despite her cheery public pronouncements, Levy must lose some sleep wondering whether she could have driven a harder bargain in the dark post-dot-com days of 2003. Perhaps, one tipster wonders, her thoughts turn to Andy Russell, Pittman's junior partner at Pilot Group, and the "close family friend of Dany since childhood" who is said to have advised her on the $3.5 million valuation.

On the one hand, a childhood pal — Russell's mom was reportedly best friends with Levy's mom — can do far worse than guiding one to tens of millions of dollars in wealth. And Pilot Group did more than passively watch its investment grow. From what we hear, Pittman's salesmanship was key to growing Daily Candy's advertising base. Such involvement would be in keeping with Pilot Group's focus on taking a "control position" in its investments. After the investment firm acquired Daily Candy, the newsletter's subscriber count grew tenfold to 2.5 million.

But not everyone buys that version of events. Said the tipster, an AOL veteran who followed Daily Candy closely:

For Pittman to brag that subscribers have increased since he made

the investment is just private equity puffery and delusion. That

would be like my grandmother taking credit for the business success of

the stocks she owns.

Perhaps Russell's help was not so selfless. As our source notes, Russell's advice on the deal would have been "highly conflicted," Russell having worked for Pittman for several months before the Daily Candy investment closed in late 2003.

His line to other potential portfolio

companies and strategic partners is that through his friendship with

Dany, HE was responsible for the early success of Daily Candy as a

startup, so he didn't feel compunction about duping the original

shareholders... Whatever the case, Pittman was not a genius to have his

junior guy abuse a family friendship in a predatory deal.

Let this be a lesson to startup founders who are not yet sufficiently cautions about venture capital investment, or who spend too much time worrying about whether their fameball girlfriends really truly love them for the right reasons: If you're not careful, you might have to settle for a paltry $25 mil when the big payday comes. After taxes, you'll barely be able to afford a decent loft!

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5036860&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Dany Levy Is Richer Than You Think]]> Daily Candy, the email newsletter for women who like to buy things, was improbably successful. Former journalist Dany Levy founded it in 2000; it quickly became profitable, and she sold a controlling stake in the business to the private investment firm Pilot Group in 2003 for $3.5 million. Pilot Group sold the newsletter to Comcast last week for (an unbelievable) $125 million. But Levy, we hear, retained about a 20% interest in Daily Candy—which would mean that she walked away from the sale with $25 million. That would make her the undisputed internet cash queen of New York media. Take that, Laurel Touby!

A year ago, the boa-sporting Touby sold Mediabistro.com for $23 million. But lots of other people had smaller stakes in that company, so Touby walked off with a significantly smaller amount of cash than the total purchase price. She can't even afford to move out of her sixth-floor walkup! Meanwhile, Levy can now afford to buy as many Daily Candy-endorsed trinkets as she wants, forever until the end of time and beyond.

Still, Touby and Levy are the two most cash-rich media-centric internet entrepreneurs NYC has thus far produced. And they're both women! Is that notable? Not yet, but if Arianna Huffington decides to sell the HuffingtonPost for an ungodly sum and turn Republican again, it will make three, and an official trend. Until that time it means nothing.

[More about Levy's privileged family background at CityFile]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5035590&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[DailyCandy deal sweet for Pittman, bitter for employees]]> Selling DailyCandy to Comcast for $125 million, Bob Pittman earned a 36x return on his 2003 $3.5 million acquisition of the company. Pretty sweet. But investors who bought into the company during its last funding round in 2006, and any employees who joined the the email newsletter for women since then, didn't do nearly so well. As VentureBeat reminds us, that round set DailyCandy's value as high as $140 million. Any shareholders who bought in then are going to lose money on the deal, unless they had a liquidation preference which allowed them to get their money back. That money, in turn, would have come out of the hide of employees, whose common shares would be diluted by shares issued to make the investors whole. So while DailyCandy's sale will renew respect for the one-time, one-eyed AOL boss Bob Pittman's dealmaking abilities — we heard Comcast wanted to pay just $75 million — working for him seems to be a suckers' bet.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5033651&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[DailyCandy sold to Comcast for $125 million]]> In selling DailyCandy to Comcast for $125 million, Bob Pittman has notched a 36x return on the email newsletter he bought in 2003 for $3.5 million. We had heard that Comcast was trying to get it for $75 million, marking sharp dealmanship by Pittman to get the higher price. The long-rumored deal has done much to restore Pittman's reputation as a businessman after the disastrous AOL-Time Warner merger. [Silicon Alley Insider}

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5033517&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[The Rehabilitation Of Bob Pittman]]> It is one of the wonders of America, that business celebrities like junk-bond salesman Michael Milken can be disgraced and then redeemed, often within the span of a decade. Tarnished former media mogul and social climber, Bob Pittman, has secured the first big payday of his new career as an internet investor: his Daily Candy, the email newsletter for women who buy handbags, has sold to cable giant Comcast for $125m, according to Silicon Alley Insider. That's more than had been rumored, and way more than Pittman in 2003 paid for his stake: $3.5m.

Bob Pittman's claims to have founded MTV were overstated, but he was closely associated with the cable music channel's gigantic success in the 1980s. It was said of his wife Sandy, who later attempted to conquer Everest, that she gave a new meaning to the term "social climber." And Pittman himself was equally ambitious on the Manhattan circuit, though he scaled the social and business heights with a good deal of charm and grace.

The one-eyed mogul, now 54 years old, came tumbling down after he took over management of revenue-inflating AOL during the bubble. The online access service cashed in on the funds being invested in late 1990s dotcoms, much of which was spent on advertising partnerships which gave the startup brands a place on AOL pages.

The Dulles-based online service was never going to survive unscathed a downturn and the erosion of the dial-up market, and Pittman's reputation would have suffered anyway. But the infamous 2000 merger between AOL and media giant Time Warner ensured he would not merely be despised by investors who bought into AOL at its revenue-inflated peak; he personified to Time Warner veterans the arrogance and empty rhetoric of the AOL upstarts. Pittman managed to sell $94m in stock in the aftermath of the merger, but the dilution of Time Warner shareholders ensured the hatred of a large part of Manhattan's media establishment.

Pittman's contribution to Daily Candy has been more constructive. His salesmanship transformed Dany Levy's cute little newsletter into a marketing machine for fashion and retail brands. Pittman's reputation as a canny internet investor is made by this transaction, by some measure the best return of his fund. To be sure, the web may eclipse email as the preferred online medium for advertisers, and Comcast may have bought a property that's past its peak. But the cable company's bosses are in Philadelphia, a city that Pittman can easily avoid. In terms of Manhattan media, the former wonderboy is back.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5033494&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[DailyCandy is for sale, but Comcast might need more than $75 million]]> Former AOL boss Bob Pittman's Pilot Group Ventures is rumored to have sold its popular email list DailyCandy to Comcast for $75 million. We're not so sure. DailyCandy is for sale — we hear Pittman's lieutenants have acted like absentee landlords during site's redesign — but that if sold, "it would be for much much more." Gossips have also suggested Yahoo as a potential buyer — all of which may well be noise issuing from the Pittman camp, meant to extract a higher price from Comcast.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5028709&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Daily Candy To Comcast For $75 Million?]]> Picture 304We heard last week that Daily Candy, the email newsletter for lady shopaholics, was about to be sold. Now digital PR man Adam Isserlis is floating the name of the rumored acquirer: Comcast, one of the two consumer-unfriendliest companies in America! The rumored price is $75 million, a bit below the $100 million+ controlling shareholder and former AOL second-in-command Bob Pittman has been seeking since 2006. But that's still not bad for an email list. The question is: Why Comcast? What the hell is a cable company doing buying a content play? Shouldn't the very presence of Bob Pittman, spectre of the darkest days of the failed AOL-Time Warner merger, remind Comcast of how ill-advised this sort of vertical empire building can be? Meh, Comast is on a roll and doesn't want to hear it.

Comcast, mind you, also recently bought internet address book Plaxo. Its explanation of the acquisition was mind-numbingly non-sensical:

Comcast’s ambition is to make more and more content available to consumers across all platforms,” said Samuel Schwartz, executive vice president for strategy and development at Comcast Interactive Media, in an interview. “When you add the social dimension to these products, you can navigate through those platforms based on what your friends are doing.”

Uh, right. Whatever. Schwartz went on to say that people would be able to use Plaxo to send an episode of Lost to their friends, which is also bizarre, because the hard part of sending a TV show to a friend (WTF?) is not finding your friend's email address — it's sending the show.

Since Comcast is famous for canceling the service of its most Web-savvy customers and for sneakily disallowing certain programs from connecting to the internet, some (smart) people think the company should maybe focus on fixing those problems instead of spending tens of millions of dollars on awkward internet acquisitions. But where's the glory in that? Being a media company is way more fun than trying to meet the needs of millions and millions of customers!

[IssTumBul]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5028471&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Who's Buying Daily Candy?]]> Daily Candy, the email newsletter for women addicted to expensive handbags, has been on sale for more than two years. But word is that the highly profitable internet property—founded by Dany Levy but now controlled by former MTV and AOL boss Bob Pittman—is finally about to find a buyer. Details, anyone?

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5025489&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[DailyCandy backer overheard in sale talks with Yahoo]]> DailyCandy100million.jpgWill one-time AOL exec Bob Pittman sell email newsletter DailyCandy to Yahoo? That's what DailyCandy execs are said to have discussed over dinner last week at the Village Restaurant in New York. Ben Lerer, publisher of Thrillist, another online publication backed by Pittman, told us he's heard no talk of a sale. But, tellingly, he was very curious to know what we've heard. That's because while Yahoo might be a surprise suitor, Pittman's desire to sell DailyCandy is no secret. In 2006, the WSJ reported Pittman had put DailyCandy on the block, hoping to sell his $3.5 million investment for more than $100 million. If the dinner happened, it's surprising Pittman didn't clue Lerer in. Ben's dad Ken, a cofounder of the Huffington Post, was a close ally of Pittman at AOL.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=370283&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Bob Pittman Will Buy You Now]]> Taking up an austere few thousand square feet on Madison Avenue are the offices of the Pilot Group, a shadowy private investment firm run by Robert Pittman, the poor sap who took the fall for the AOL/Time-Warner merger. Of course, they're not really shadowy, just secretive and private and investy, and Bob Pittman is anything but poor. The Pilot Group specializes in "control positions" (i.e. they like to top) on emerging new media and Internet companies. Most famously, the P-Group purchased a controlling stake in girly e-newsletter Daily Candy for $3.5 million in 2003, then put DC on the block earlier this year for $100 million. That sale ultimately didn't happen, as really — $100 million for an email list? Even so, Pittman and Pilot still managed to score an undisclosed minority investment to placate those other stakeholders who wanted their Bubble 2.0 money right now. Comes the rumor that Pilot has inscrutably made a deal for music blog Stereogum. (Perhaps this will console Stereogum's Scott Lapatine after last night's altercation with Jared Leto.) No doubt, you're asking yourself — hey, I have a blog, how can I get Robert Pittman to cover me in bags of filthy lucre? Know your quarry, after the jump.

Pittman's history within Time-Warner lay primarily with MTV, so he's cool with what the kids are saying. He's also done boardroom time at places like Cendant and videogame factory Electronic Arts. He definitely has a thing for the e-mails, as in addition to Daily Candy, Pilot reputedly tossed about $300K into the manly coffers of male-mail service Thrillist. Incestuous side note: Thrillist lordling Ben Lerer is the son of Ken Lerer, cofounder of the Huffington Post, which Pilot may also have a minority stake in. Beyond that, Pilot has amassed a small portfolio of net-friendly small media properties, like the Double O radio network, 21 TV stations via Barrington Broadcasting, and a net marketing company (and former iFilm subsidiary) called OTX.

And Pittman has his socially conscious side as well, from throwing money at Eliot Spitzer to the "venture philanthropy" of the Robin Hood group. One assumes he's perhaps not quite so cavalier these days about personally flying planes at shareholder expense. There is one puzzling component of Pilot's portfolio, that being the Contours Express chain of women's gyms. Not sure what that has to do with new media, but to their credit, Daily Candy hasn't started gushing about the benefits of positve and negative resistance.

That aside, Daily Candy remains Pilot's prize, but you have to wonder — how does one realistically turn even an admittedly fine e-mail list into an $130 million valuation? Skittish investors didn't buy it either — at least not yet — even though DC's self-projected 2006 revenue comes in it at "somewhere less than $20 million." Given that, the asking price could have been even higher than $100 million, and yet it wasn't, and nobody bought it anyway. The AOL/Time-Warner merger debacle aside, Pittman and the Pilot Group have a reputation for being among the most canny new media investors out there, but the deciding hand in their big buy remains mostly unplayed.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=210450&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Remainders: It doesn't help that the ads sell something called "iLoad"]]>

  • New York-based e-mail startup Daily Candy gets a sweet deal: an investment valuing the company at $130 mil, which lets the company take down its "For Sale" sign and get back to the important business of making urban women feel inadequately shoed. [Gawker, link being fixed]
  • So some big-city bloggers had a party for Six Apart's new Vox blogging service, right? And some guys sat in a hot tub on the roof? And probably someone called this the bubble? Hon, it's not a bubble until what's in the hot tub can get you drunk. Anyway, click through for topless shots of Gawker Media managing editor Lockhart Steele. [Teen Drama]
  • Damn it, Gawker's stealing all the tech news today. As our catty sister notes, the New York Times is proud to name-drop Dodgeball.com founder Dennis Crowley, the man responsible for every New Yorker and San Franciscan constantly updating their friends on how drunk they're about to get. [Gawker]
  • Pictured: The Times also uses a photo illustration to remind everyone of those wild days of free drink coasters for all. [NYT]
  • Mooching off the "Get a Mac" commercials: You can make a clever parody or a creepy knock-off ad. (Please make the parody.) [iLoad]
]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=186355&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Daily Candy Off the Block, Finds Minority Crackhead Investor]]> Well look who's got themselves a new sugar daddy: the pretty ladies at Daily Candy have found themselves a minority investor valuing the company at $130 million. Back in February, Daily Candy's controlling investor Bob Pittman put the trendy email service on the auction block with a minimum bid of $100 million — but the ballsy number was enough to scare off the New York Times Co., News Corp., and Hearst. Instead, the Wall Street Journal reports that the company is no longer for sale, the ladies having decided to whore themselves to just one minority investment, the money from which shall go towards maintaining their well-stocked closets.

But the 130-million-dollar question remains: who's the investor? Seriously, who the fuck would put down that kind of cash to validate their opinion on some fabulous little peep-toes from a Park Slope cobbler you've never heard of?

Idle and uninformed speculation is always welcome.

DailyCandy Sells Stake in Itself, Valuing Web Firm at $130 Million [WSJ]
Earlier: Like Candy From a Pittman

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=186192&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[DailyCandy Is Testing You]]> dailycandytaxbracketToday, rather than tell you pretty ladies how to be even prettier, DailyCandy has a reader survey. Just be careful: answer incorrectly, and you may be blackballed from Intermix — or their mailing list.


Daily Candy New York Reader Survey 2006

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=175625&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Team Party Crash: Daily Candy's Book Party]]>
Daily Candy editor-at-large Dannielle Romano grabs hold of DC founder Dany Levy. We fear we have pictures of Dannielle displaying similar enthusiasm for us.

Tuesday night wasn't just the BlackBook party for A.M. Homes; it was also the fete for Daily Candy's new book, Daily Candy A to Z : An Insider's Guide to the Sweet Life. Staff photog Nikola Tamindzic and erstwhile Intern John Carney hit them both, but the Daily Candy affair left Carney too spent to write about it till today. After the jump, Nikola and John's adventures in Candyland — which, shockingly, was apparently populated with a lot of girls.

If you don't know what Daily Candy is, you must have a below-average tolerance for shopping tips dressed up with sickly sweet cartoon graphics. Either that, or you're a guy. You see, every last un-fat chick in New York — and dozens of other cities — gets a mind-numbingly chipper email every day from these ladies. If you don't believe me, ask your girlfriend. This is how they know where to shop and what color lipstick to wear and which day in spring is the official "Girls Start Wearing Skirts Day."

But that's only part of why I thought this party would suck. Also, there wasn't going to be anyone to fight. And also it was at Guest House, which is on 27th Street, the heartland of "Clubs You Won't Like." Then there was also... oh wait... never mind. Holy shit there were a lot of girls at this party.

dailycandy09.jpg
See. There were lots and lots of girls at the party. They were cute, and soaked with free vodka.

dailycandy20.jpg
This is Dany Levy. DailyCandy is her fault.

dailycandy05.jpg
Smut king Rufus Griscomb was actually overheard giving parenting advice to DailyCandy CEO Pete Sheinbaum. Snore. But both were thinking, "Holy shit there are lots of girls at this party."

dailycandy12.jpg
Daily Candy's Danielle Buffalini and former DCer Allison Griffin, now of Teen Vogue, had to guard the Rorschach Personality Test wallpaper from the vodka soaked guests.

dailycandy02.jpg
DailyCandy investor Bob Pittman — the $100 million man — took time out from counting his money to drop by the party and thank all the little girls who are about to make him even richer.

dailycandy03.jpg
amNew York's Justin Silverman and furniture porn king David Galbraith were thinking "Holy shit there are lots of girls at this party."

dailycandy18.jpg
This girl was there. She hates you.

dailycandy21.jpg
This is the famous metro metrosexual of The New York Times, Nick Confessore. You know what he was thinking? Yep. "Holy shit there are lots of girls at this party."

dailycandy22.jpg
ICM super-agent Kate Lee stood by while Maxim's Eric Gillin and IAC's Mo Koyfman whispered to each other, "Holy shit there are lots of girls at this party."

dailycandy23.jpg
Thrillist's AJ Daulerio and David Galbraith. Do I really even have to say it again?

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=170147&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[DailyCandy: Wait, do I work for them?]]> The only thing more old-school than a dot-com (okay, except a BBS, grandpa) is an at-dot-com — an e-mail newsletter like DailyCandy. The Manhattan-based shopping guide snagged a feature story in New York Magazine, and every detail seemed eerily familiar.

  • The tone is described as "gossipy," "cliqueish," and defensively independent.
  • It's rumored that the writers aren't exactly raking in the dough.
  • And yet the company manages to rack up a mythical $100-million selling price.
  • There's precious little office space, and the staff would rather tease than invite a journalist over.
  • It's really just Old Media with the Internet stirred in.
  • It tries oh so hard to be sexy and trendy.
  • All the guys involved are probably gay.

It just felt...eerie. As if...as if I already worked for this company. But one line relieved all Twilight Zone heebie-jeebies.

  • "The company...fiercely combats any perception of impropriety."

Well fuck that.

How Sweet Is It? [New York Magazine]
Illo: Daily Candy [DailyCandy.com]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=169324&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Media Bubble: Who Cares About Rate Base, So Long as Your Shirt Is Tucked In?]]> &#8226; Details missed its rate base on eight of 10 issues in 2005. Fun. [Ad Age]
&#8226; Martha Stewart launches Blueprint today in a bid to reach younger readers. There should probably be a joke about Alexis here, but we can't think of one. [NYP]
&#8226; Daily Candy remains for sale. [NYM]
&#8226; Punch Sulzberger has allegedly said that he'll read the Times on the computer when he can take a computer into the bathroom with him. Now, apparently, he can. [NYT]
&#8226; Kurt Andersen thinks we're in a tech bubble again. How does he know? Because Michael Wolff wants in. [NYM]
&#8226; Simon Dumenco answers the questions you didn't ask, including whether he has a clothing line and what his jingle sounds like. [Ad Age]
&#8226; Existentially speaking, who is Brian Williams? [MW]
&#8226; NYT M.E. Jill Abramson's grandfather could have invested early in Paramount Pictures but didn't. [NYSun]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=169248&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Daily Candy: Because You're Fat and You Know It]]> dcaz.jpgDaily Candy was just on the Today Show to promote their new book, Daily Candy A-Z (on sale tomorrow), which features chapters like "L is for Luxury" and "P is for Party." In honor of their literary achievement, they've really pulled out the stops in today's edition of their email newsletter:

Given up on being trim by spring? Let Lace Embrace Atelier whittle away that waist of yours. The Vancouver firm constructs custom corsets fit to your precise measurements. Or choose from one of their Victorian or Edwardian ready-to-wear styles. All promise to nip in your midriff and deliver excess flesh exactly where it belongs: spilling over your bodice cups.

From Chapter 2, "B is for Backtracking Female Progress."

Cleavage to Beaver [Daily Candy]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=166139&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Daily Candy: So Cute and, Like, Literary]]> From today's Daily Candy email newsletter:

It s Monday, people. The word of the day is ambition.

Your inspiration: Sascha Lyon, the David Foster Wallace of chefs.

Other former sous-chefs might play it safe for their first solo outing. Not Lyon. His, appropriately (if immodestly) named Sascha, opens today. And it s the culinary equivalent of a 1,000-page first novel.

Sigh. DFW's first novel wasn't Infinite Jest, and even if it were, we doubt the menus at Sascha are weighed down with footnotes. Pretty Candygirls, please just steer clear of bookish stuff — it's horrible for your complexion.

Lyon's Den [Daily Candy]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=161600&view=rss&microfeed=true