Okay, this is a VERY insider comment -- which I usually try to avoid.
The real person that got damaged by Dan Brown's hesitation is Steve Rubin, the former President and Publisher of Doubleday/Broadway. If The Lost Symbol had been published last year, he'd still have his job.
Steve is a intelligent, perceptive man who worked for the company in various ways for almost 20 years. If you asked him a question, he would give you a clear answer.
So Dan Brown dithers...
Rubin is kicked upstairs to a vague job...
And Sonny glides down the hallway with a smile on his face.
@smithhimself: Had Steve Rubin done a better job managing Doubleday's outsized advances and the cash flow problems they caused, he would still be publisher. And I feel much more sorry for the many Doubleday employees who lost their jobs than for Steve. He's still drawing a significant paycheck in his "vague" job.
But answer me this much: Is it the Templars, the Catholic Church, or the Masons who secretly run everything on this planet? Which one is IT?
Or is your point that they're all one and the same uber-org headquartered 1) in the Louvre 2) under the Pope's robe 3) in a broom closet at the Lincoln Memorial?
@Claire Buoyant: I believe he was busy rolling around in a bed of money, and lighting cigars with burning money, and well, doing other related money things.
@TedSez: I bet readers who innocently enjoyed Dan Brown get to go to heaven.
People like you and I, who despise his illiterate, ill-informed pseudo-historical bs but bought it/read it anyway for sh*ts and giggles? We're going to HELL.
@snugbug: I'll join your handbasket. Though I'm pretty proud that I knew some of the codes before they characters did. "C'MON! It's backward, for god's sake, you morons!"
"Everyone acknowledges that the book isn't actually any good . . ." (See @Jeangenie: on Washpost review)
Yet the NYT review seemed overall pretty favorable, taking the book as a "guilty pleasure" and crediting Brown with "...bringing sexy back to a genre that had been left for dead. The new book clicks even if at first it looks dangerously like a clone." And other nuggets of praise. [www.nytimes.com]
Not that most folks who read book reviews would buy Dan Brown or that most folks who buy Dan Brown read book reviews.
09/17/09
09/17/09
09/17/09
09/17/09
The real person that got damaged by Dan Brown's hesitation is Steve Rubin, the former President and Publisher of Doubleday/Broadway. If The Lost Symbol had been published last year, he'd still have his job.
Steve is a intelligent, perceptive man who worked for the company in various ways for almost 20 years. If you asked him a question, he would give you a clear answer.
So Dan Brown dithers...
Rubin is kicked upstairs to a vague job...
And Sonny glides down the hallway with a smile on his face.
09/17/09
09/29/09
No. He's gone.
09/17/09
09/17/09
09/17/09
But answer me this much: Is it the Templars, the Catholic Church, or the Masons who secretly run everything on this planet? Which one is IT?
Or is your point that they're all one and the same uber-org headquartered 1) in the Louvre 2) under the Pope's robe 3) in a broom closet at the Lincoln Memorial?
09/17/09
For what? To craft his prose? To research facts? I'm having a hard time coming up with a reason here.
09/17/09
09/17/09
Ohhh, it looks like someone likes sour-grape flavor Hater-Ade!
09/17/09
09/17/09
09/17/09
(It already has a book deal, too.)
09/16/09
Now I think Dan Brown is Victor Fucking Hugo.
09/16/09
09/16/09
09/16/09
But seriously. Fuck you, Dan Brown.
09/16/09
09/16/09
09/16/09
It was a fast, stupid, forward-propelled good read that kept me mildly entertained for three hours.
09/16/09
People like you and I, who despise his illiterate, ill-informed pseudo-historical bs but bought it/read it anyway for sh*ts and giggles? We're going to HELL.
09/16/09
Also, it was free.
09/16/09
Although I have to admit, it finally helped me understand what The Chalice and the Blade was all about.
09/16/09
09/15/09
Yet the NYT review seemed overall pretty favorable, taking the book as a "guilty pleasure" and crediting Brown with "...bringing sexy back to a genre that had been left for dead. The new book clicks even if at first it looks dangerously like a clone." And other nuggets of praise. [www.nytimes.com]
Not that most folks who read book reviews would buy Dan Brown or that most folks who buy Dan Brown read book reviews.
09/15/09
[gawker.com]