I remember an early 80's episode of The Love Boat (yes, I'm embarrassed) where a woman (I think it was Michelle Brunette Knots Landing whosit whatever) grows bored because all the men at her table want to do it talk business, while she's sitting there dying for a fuck.
One of the men says, "I'm investing heavily in music videos- it's the new fantastic opportunity!" or somesuch, and all the men nod in agreement.
Only bringing it up because the preposterousness of music videos as a money-making thing was in the air; it seems like it took a decade for people to admit that they're mere commercials- they cost money, they don't directly make money.
Blogs are the new music videos. With less horribly awkward dancing. Making money from them is mostly beside the point.
@Claire Buoyant: No. It is just facile. Hard work means doing actual journalism and talking to sources -- ostensibly, his job -- and maybe doing it well enough to win some awards. Hard work is not waking up at 3am with a snarky idea and hoping the Google search gods gift you with attention.
The blog could have been a springboard to other things. My year as Fake Steve Jobs book and then talk show circuit. Hire a publicist and then get paid gigs waxing philosophic on shit he knows nothing about. Write another book. Talk shows. Repeat as necessary.
@Owen Thomas: Aw, c'mon Owen, we're in the new '5 words or less' woof woof world of CNBC. Tho' Vaquero cheated; you're not supposed to use contractions in an insult.
The sublime commenter outrage makes these horrible posts - and good God are they ever horrible - worth it for me. And I may even find myself disappointed when Owen gets himself fired for throwing Gabriel off a cliff, because I do so love it when you all gang up.
These sort of posts are happening enough that I think they merit their own terminology:
Dickrolled: To be enticed to click on a post that seems about a real story but is actually a random collection of insults, allegations and conspiracy theories that cause the reader to say "what a ....". Inspired by "rickroll."
@They Shoot Journalists, Don't They?: Beautiful. I wish I could do better but I'm recovering from being quite, quite dead and the fact that I'm less than stellar. I am a Black Dwarf. I'm not Gary Coleman though, lest you thought I was confessing cryptically or something.
I have been fond of short men. I like the way they look up at me in awe. And flat on their backs, all men are the same height, if I may paraphrase Maurice Chevalier.
@contradicto: I really don't want to be critical, but if we're going to do this then we might as well whip out the MS Paint and draw cum droplets all over his face.
What the fuck was this? If you're going to criticize a journalist, can we stick to criticizing his journalism and not his physical characteristics? This is playground bullying bullshit that commenters usually get canned for and, in theory, should be above you guys, Owen.
@Lysergic Asset: Isn't the point that the journalists that have been covering Apple have their heads so far up Apple's shiny colorful plastic ass they failed to accurately report an issue that the stock market has been pacing back and forth about? And that this douche makes cracks like "I'm a big man, I can take it" without actually responding to any of Lyons' legitimate criticisms and while being extremely short? This is a website that has played David Gregory dancing roughly 500 times. I really don't understand the wailing and gnashing of teeth. Lyons made his height the issue, not Owen.
And Steve Jobs' health IS a news story. He's ensured that.
@GW06: Like we said, criticize the journalism, not the physical characteristics of a person. You can even call him a douche, for fuck's sake, because that's what a reporter who parrots the company line IS. And - quoting Owen here:
"Ridiculing a man behind his back for his height? So low. Valleywag would never stoop to that level. We'd say it to his face. Even if it hurts our neck a little."
So even if it was Lyons who "made his height the issue", it's Owen who is picking up the ball and running with it. And that is fucking bullshit.
This kind of post is beneath Gawker. But maybe not nowadays. And, reminder, Owen: posting an ad hominem attack on someone isn't saying "it to his face". Go ahead, you know where to find Goldman. Literally say it to his face. And do it on camera, so we can all watch you being the bigger man.
@Aaron Altman: Thirded. I was looking back at the archives today and saw a bunch of commenters being executed for fat jokes a few months ago. This is different how?
@Aaron Altman: I would do that as soon as he gets around Brooklyn.
And then give him a full plate of fist for the attacks on me and Gizmodo for getting the real cat out of the bag.
Jim Goldman has zero credibility now. He's a disgrace to the profession. I've been in professional print journalism since I was 18. Now I'm 36. I've never seen anyone trying to cover his ass so badly.
And the same goes to the hundreds of commenters who attacked Giz for reporting the truth and even accused us of doing this for financial benefit.
02/08/09
One of the men says, "I'm investing heavily in music videos- it's the new fantastic opportunity!" or somesuch, and all the men nod in agreement.
Only bringing it up because the preposterousness of music videos as a money-making thing was in the air; it seems like it took a decade for people to admit that they're mere commercials- they cost money, they don't directly make money.
Blogs are the new music videos. With less horribly awkward dancing. Making money from them is mostly beside the point.
02/08/09
02/08/09
02/09/09
02/08/09
01/15/09
01/15/09
01/15/09
01/15/09
No less than 8 bobbing head boxes discussing the mans pancreas. How shameful.
01/15/09
01/15/09
01/15/09
01/15/09
01/15/09
"I am HE-MAN and MASTER of the Universe."
"Kids, Today's lesson is in humility."
01/15/09
01/15/09
Since we're back in high school, I say we go after the uggos next. Oh and don't forget the fat chicks, bro. High five.
01/14/09
OK, now that helped me overcome any feelings of wasted time resentment after reading this...
The next cracker jack who calls me shrimp (5'6") is going to get a serious lesson. That is Lilliputian to you and me, buddy.
01/15/09
01/15/09
01/14/09
01/14/09
01/14/09
01/15/09
01/15/09
01/14/09
Dickrolled: To be enticed to click on a post that seems about a real story but is actually a random collection of insults, allegations and conspiracy theories that cause the reader to say "what a ....". Inspired by "rickroll."
01/14/09
01/14/09
Owen Thomas: A John Thomas by every other name.
Yes, juvenile and unclever: Just like that post.
01/14/09
01/14/09
01/15/09
01/15/09
01/14/09
01/14/09
01/14/09
01/14/09
01/14/09
01/14/09
01/14/09
01/14/09
Ridiculous.
01/14/09
And Steve Jobs' health IS a news story. He's ensured that.
01/14/09
"Ridiculing a man behind his back for his height? So low. Valleywag would never stoop to that level. We'd say it to his face. Even if it hurts our neck a little."
So even if it was Lyons who "made his height the issue", it's Owen who is picking up the ball and running with it. And that is fucking bullshit.
This kind of post is beneath Gawker. But maybe not nowadays. And, reminder, Owen: posting an ad hominem attack on someone isn't saying "it to his face". Go ahead, you know where to find Goldman. Literally say it to his face. And do it on camera, so we can all watch you being the bigger man.
01/14/09
Tacky, childish, and pathetic.
01/14/09
01/15/09
01/15/09
And then give him a full plate of fist for the attacks on me and Gizmodo for getting the real cat out of the bag.
Jim Goldman has zero credibility now. He's a disgrace to the profession. I've been in professional print journalism since I was 18. Now I'm 36. I've never seen anyone trying to cover his ass so badly.
And the same goes to the hundreds of commenters who attacked Giz for reporting the truth and even accused us of doing this for financial benefit.
Where are all of you know, bozos?
01/15/09