• Profile logout login

#deadtrees

Gawker

Share Cancel
   
Upload an image | Add an image URL
×

logging in
  • FAQ. Include # before tag:
  • #tips,
  • #stalker,
  • #opencaption,
  • #internalmemos,
  • etc.

New York, 5:58 PM
Fri Nov 27
13 posts in the last 24 hours

Team

Tip Your Editors:
tips@gawker.com
Tipline: 646-214-8138

Editor-in-Chief:
Gabriel Snyder | Email

West Coast Editor:
Richard Rushfield | Email

Contributing Editors:

Valleywag:
Ryan Tate | Email

Media:
Hamilton Nolan | Email

Politics:
Alex Pareene | Email

Investigations:
John Cook | Email

Entertainment:
Brian Moylan | Email

Nights:
Adrian Chen | Email
Azaria Jagger | Email
Ravi Somaiya | Email

Weekends:
Foster Kamer | Email

Video Editor:
Richard Blakeley | Email

SUBSCRIBE TO Gawker RSS

New: Breaking news and daily top stories via email
4260 Subscribers
Gawker
  • posts about #deadtrees more →

    Online Subscriptions Weighed At Times, Time Inc.

    Seattle Paper Migrates Self, Pay To Internet

    From Failed Paper To Blog

    Twitter May Find News Profits That Eluded Publishers

    Big Raises for New York Times Web Staff

    Entertainment Weekly Lives

    Times Finally Runs Display Advertising on Front Page

    Arianna Huffington Says She Believes In Newspapers. Buy It?

    Newsweek Nukes Itself Into Printed Blog

    The Bright Side Of Magazine Armageddon

  • Your version of Internet Explorer is not supported. Please upgrade to the most recent version in order to view comments.

    Dsmvwl  Admin  Promote to frontpage Approve user Ban user ×
    Image of El Matardillo El Matardillo
    03/11/09

    In reply to Online Subscriptions Weighed At Times, Time Inc.
    Send me $4.99 and I'll tell you how it will all unfold.
     Reply
    El Matardillo was starred El Matardillo was unstarred
    Image of Ricki-Oh Ricki-Oh
    03/11/09

    In reply to Online Subscriptions Weighed At Times, Time Inc.
    Charge for all content. All of it.


    Where people got the idea that they have a right to consume the work of others without paying for it is beyond me.


    Full disclosure, I produce content, and strangely, I expect to get paid to do this.

     Reply
    Ricki-Oh was starred Ricki-Oh was unstarred
    Image of oopsidoo oopsidoo
    03/11/09

    @Ricki-Oh: and you're supposed to get paid by advertisers. Most magazines and newspapers lose money on subscription and newsstand revenue. They just do it to make the advertisers happy that someone had to actually pay for it, and therefore would more likely read it. Online, there's none of that problem because only ads that are viewed are counted.
     Reply
    oopsidoo was starred oopsidoo was unstarred
    Image of Aaron Altman Aaron Altman
    03/11/09

    In reply to Online Subscriptions Weighed At Times, Time Inc.
    Go ahead, old media. I DARE ya to charge for online access to your product. I DOUBLE DARE YA.
     Reply
    Aaron Altman was starred Aaron Altman was unstarred
    Image of PandoraSpocks PandoraSpocks
    03/11/09

    In reply to Online Subscriptions Weighed At Times, Time Inc.
    Plans for unringing the bell = the swan song of the truly desperate.
     Reply
    PandoraSpocks was starred PandoraSpocks was unstarred
    Image of PandoraSpocks PandoraSpocks
    03/11/09

    @PandoraSpocks: Also, it's national cliche week! How many can I work into single comments??
     Reply
    PandoraSpocks was starred PandoraSpocks was unstarred
    Image of miss_msry miss_msry
    03/11/09

    In reply to Online Subscriptions Weighed At Times, Time Inc.
    If "Times Select" couldn't survive, how will NYT Daily survive online?
     Reply
    miss_msry was starred miss_msry was unstarred
    Image of belltolls belltolls
    03/11/09

    In reply to Online Subscriptions Weighed At Times, Time Inc.
    I like David Carr's idea that newspapers should engage in collusion in order to make this happen. Then only people with money will get the "news". Unused online views could be discarded on park benches as bedding.
     Reply
    belltolls was starred belltolls was unstarred
    Image of oopsidoo oopsidoo
    03/11/09

    In reply to Online Subscriptions Weighed At Times, Time Inc.
    The minute Nisenholtz was forced by the powers that be to say that, he quietly went to the men's room, threw up a little and started cutting himself. I love how all these people who say they'll never lurch from one strategy to another, proceed to lurch from one strategy to another as soon as the economic winds are no longer behind the advertising sail. I got a better idea - why don't you cut down on your still bloated staff, cut all your secretaries, and reduce your print circulation instead of expanding it? The ad revenue is never going to make it worthwhile.
     Reply
    oopsidoo was starred oopsidoo was unstarred
    Image of MrInBetween MrInBetween
    03/03/09

    In reply to From Failed Paper To Blog
    Let me see if I follow: So the few newspapers left with a pulse are requiring paid staffers to write blogs that few people read, the very same thing that dead newspapers' unemployed staffers are doing for free... Okayyyyy. What's wrong with this picture?
     Reply
    MrInBetween was starred MrInBetween was unstarred
    Image of Weegee's bored Weegee's bored
    03/03/09

    In reply to From Failed Paper To Blog
    I had the flu this weekend and blogged all over the Sunday Times.
     Reply
    Weegee's bored was starred Weegee's bored was unstarred
    Image of Aaron Altman Aaron Altman
    03/03/09

    In reply to From Failed Paper To Blog
    How long before Sly Stallone pens a guest column?


    And, good on them. On the surface, there's an elegiac tone to the whole venture, but here's hoping something good comes of it.

     Reply
    Aaron Altman was starred Aaron Altman was unstarred
    Image of GuyBitchy GuyBitchy
    03/02/09

    In reply to Twitter May Find News Profits That Eluded Publishers
    Maybe Twitter should accept that it's basically worthless.
     Reply
    GuyBitchy was starred GuyBitchy was unstarred
    Image of marcsiry marcsiry
    03/02/09

    In reply to Twitter May Find News Profits That Eluded Publishers
    I'm going to flip what @NewYorkez said a different way:


    When you go to Google, you're thinking about the future: I am going to buy a snowblower and want to find information about it. It's easy to target ads at an intention of future action, as you can more easily profit from the result.


    With Twitter, you're looking for reactions or information about something that's happening in the present- what do people think about this awards ceremony? Once you've read the tweets, that transaction is over- targeting you for awards ceremony related merchandise is unlikely to pay back.


    I think Twitter is going to be more useful as an early warning radar for emerging trends- and that means looking at the data as an aggregate and acting upon that broadly, rather than targeting individual users for actions based on their inputs or searches.


    Question is, does Twitter have the patience or the long view to become the Lexis-Nexis of the Zeitgeist?

     Reply
    marcsiry was starred marcsiry was unstarred
    Image of britneyspearstears britneyspearstears
    03/02/09

    @marcsiry: Wow. Great observation/idea!
     Reply
    britneyspearstears was starred britneyspearstears was unstarred
    Image of Nick Douglas Nick Douglas
    03/02/09

    In reply to Twitter May Find News Profits That Eluded Publishers
    Whoa, this is almost as huge as that time Flickr added search and totally destroyed Google! And that time Facebook added search and utterly obliterated Google! And that time Blogger added search and thoroughly trounced...
     Reply
    Nick Douglas was starred Nick Douglas was unstarred
    Image of oopsidoo oopsidoo
    01/15/09

    In reply to Big Raises for New York Times Web Staff
    hey, considering that the web is their only hope of ever saving themselves, and unlike the print people, the web people actually still have job prospects, this is a good thing. The Times website has been bleeding talent for a while and it's time they got some incentives to stay.
     Reply
    oopsidoo was starred oopsidoo was unstarred
    Image of garbanzo314 garbanzo314
    01/15/09

    In reply to Big Raises for New York Times Web Staff
    Union and the internet? That's a winning combination.
     Reply
    garbanzo314 was starred garbanzo314 was unstarred
    Image of Tremonius Tremonius
    01/15/09

    @garbanzo314: Yeah, but where do you draw the picket line?
     Reply
    Tremonius was starred Tremonius was unstarred
    Earlier discussions Other discussions Show all discussions Show featured discussions only Start a new discussion

Login

Enter your username and password.

Please enter a username.
Please enter your password.
logging in
Login via Facebook | Sign Up | Forgot Password?

Reset Password

Please enter your email address to have your password reset.

Please enter your email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
requesting password reset

Register

Registering will give you a user profile and the ability to add other users as friends. To become a commenter, however, you need to audition.

Want to know more? Consult the Comment FAQ and legal terms.

Please enter a username.
Please enter a password.
Please confirm your password.
Passwords are not identical.
Please enter a valid email address.
registration sent, waiting for reply

Submit Your Comment

You don't need to login to comment. Just enter your email address below.

See how your address will be displayed in the Comment FAQ.

Please enter a valid email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
logging in

Login with your Facebook or Gawker account.

Sign up here.



  • Archives
  • About
  • Advertising
  • Legal
  • Help
  • Report a Bug
  • FAQ
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.