<![CDATA[Gawker: demographics]]> http://tags.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gawker.com.png <![CDATA[Gawker: demographics]]> http://gawker.com/tag/demographics http://gawker.com/tag/demographics <![CDATA[How Are We Empowering Our Tweens Today?]]> Tween girls: They're not just "sexting" and squealing all the time, as the media would lead you to believe. Instead, they're attending the "National Tween Girl Summit" to overcome juvenile, ignorant media stereotypes and be empowered, like so:

America's current reigning Junior Miss touts the pageant-cum-scholarship program. "It's awesome," Michelle Rodgers tells awestruck fans.

Cum scholarship? No wonder our tweens are in trouble! Hahaha.
You can't beat the media.

[The full story in the Washington Post is actually very good. Pic: Flickr]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5380568&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Hasselbeck Is The View's Designated Breeder]]> Attractive blonde piranha Elisabeth Hasselbeck is pregnant again. She and her husband Tim Hasselbeck already have two kids, Grace, 3, and Taylor, 1. Now a third is coming. Oh lord, make it stop!


Let's not get too carried away here. Grace Elisabeth and Taylor Thomas are pretty adorable kids. But their mother, from whom they've drawn half of their genetic material, is less adorable than she is scary/crazy/sexy/weird. And if the breeding habits of The View are any indication of what the future holds, the world will soon be run over by little blonde proto-Fascist Hasselbecks. Let's take a look at why.

Out of the show's five co-hosts—Goldberg, Walters, Behar, Shepherd and Hasselbeck—only Hasselbeck is still in babymaking range. (Shepherd is 41 so her clock is still ticking but it is in its Daisy countdown.) By age 31, Hasselbeck has produced more offspring than the rest of the show's hosts combined. Whoopi only has one daughter, Alexandrea; Joy also has one daughter, Eve; and Sherry has a son named Jeffrey. (Also Baba Wawa has daughter named Jacqueline Dena Guber but for our purposes she doesn't count because she's adopted.] As one can see, the genetic material existent in the world of the View's hosts is inversely proportional to the esteem in which we hold them. Interestingly, it also corresponds to the degree of political rightwingedness of the hosts.

The righter you are, the more babies you have. This is nothing new. But I did just watch Idiocracy, that great 2006 Mike Judge comedy, in which this sort of demographic spread is noted and have been reading in shock and awe about Jim Bob and Michelle Duggar who have 18 kids and who won't stop because G-d tells them not to. Their stunty horny fundamentalism got them on The View where Hasselbeck seemed genuinely stoked. You could see 18 lightbulbs above her head. Might it not be only a matter of years before there are 18 Hasselbeck children and then only a matter of decades before Hasselbeck replaces Smith as the most common surname in America? President Hasselbeck, imagine!
]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5143455&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Disney to Give Boys Their Own Screeching Icons]]> For years, the likes of Hannah Montana and the Jonas Bros. have ruled the kiddie icon market. No more. Soon, heterosexual boys will have their own channel full of crappy Disney tween characters from hell.

Disney corporate executives noticed that they weren't wringing enough revenue out of the souls of young boys, so they're rebranding an entire station for them called Disney XD, with such (future) classic boy shows as "Aaron Stone," starring a kid "who was for a time a barista at a Starbucks down the street from Disney Channel headquarters." What you need to know is that this is maybe the best sentence from a business news story yet this year:

"[blah blah blah] collaborate on original programming and other sports-themed topics for Disney XD. (Disney says the letters don't refer to anything.)"

Now you know. And knowing is half the battle. Bring back GI Joe. [WSJ]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5126196&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Mark Penn Has a Well-Compensated Newspaper Job, Still No Justice in Universe]]> Mark Penn should be shot from a cannon into the deepest part of the ocean. Instead he has a new Wall Street Journal column! Let's read it, and cry.

This is the first half of the first sentence of the article, and in our fantasies, publishing this where people can read it would actually be illegal!

As the financial crisis swept across the nation these past few months, one of the first microtrend groups to emerge is

We bet you're excited to read further! Mark Penn should be ashamed to show his byline in public, as the pollster is famous for being one of the worst political minds of his generation, inventing meaningless demographic groups instead of winning elections. He took over Democratic front-runner Hillary Clinton's campaign and then she lost to a completely untested outsider (and it was all his fault!). Let's read the rest of that first sentence:

the New Mattress Stuffers — people who have lost their trust in the financial world, and are preparing for the next meltdown.

The proof that this cutely named demographic group exists? Anecdotal evidence, plus a Holiday Spending Survey that suggests that people are spending less. And also they're using cash they have, instead of credit cards, not because they're a crazy new demographic group but because people finally wised the fuck up. Anyway Mark Penn suggests you invest in guns and safes!

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5107649&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Online Privacy Threatens Ads! Is It Worth It?]]> Online marketing companies: do we give them enough information about our lives? Emily Steel, a 24-year-old reporter for the WSJ, bravely uses herself as a guinea pig to determine that, no, these shadowy firms don't know quite enough about us to be able to target us with ads effectively. If the threat of missing out on perfectly customized ads doesn't convince Americans to throw open our private data to unaccountable corporations, I don't know what will:

A couple of ad targeting firms let Steel look at what they had on her, and guess what: it was not totally accurate! They guessed that she liked luxury boats and was a newlywed, when actually she just had friends getting married, and has no boat. That's because tracking can't follow you across different computers, and guessing about demographics based on internet cookies is an inexact science. You might think that keeping these people in the dark would be a good thing, but Emily gives props to the firm that correctly pegs her as "someone who spends time exercising and socializing at bars and nightclubs." Psht, well that's not exactly ESP territory. She ends with this:

Meanwhile, marketers, here is some free intelligence about me that you won't find in my Revenue Science or Acxiom profile: I'm a bargain shopper who loves reading fiction, and I'm a huge Tar Heels fan. And for the last several months, I've been scouring the Web for running gear.

I'll be looking for the targeted ads.

As soon as every other American writes a WSJ feature on their shopping preferences we'll have this whole industry straightened out.

[WSJ; pic via]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5052989&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Tweeting Towards Gomorrah]]> Did you know that any taxi driver in any city on earth is able to sum up the mood of his entire nation on cue with a single pithy yet heartfelt quote? It's lucky, since every foreign correspondent in the world (especially Thomas Friedman) bases his or her understanding of a country on what a taxi driver says. It's the classic easy quote. But now that old misguided trope may be dying! It's being overtaken by something even worse: the Twitter "hypergrapevine." Just what journalism needs, more lazy quote-whoring from a voluble unrepresentative minority!

Twitter CEO (nice business card, ha) Jack Dorsey says the teeny-typing service is a boon for reporters:

Dorsey: We've heard from a number of organizations — even as old as Reuters — that are building tools to monitor what's going on with Twitter to help conform what they need to focus on in terms of writing their articles.

Twitter provides a great man-on-the-street account of what's happening right now.

That's where you're wrong, Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey. You know what provides a great man-on-the-street account of what's happening right now? People on the street!

See, streets tend to be full of all types of people: all races, creeds, subcultures, and economic strata tend to utilize streets. But Twitter is full of—we're generalizing slightly here, but not too much—upwardly mobile white tech obsessives. It's certainly easy to shop for a quote on Twitter. And reporters love easy quotes, I say from personal experience! But it's the modern equivalent of asking your taxi driver in Mumbai what he thinks about the upcoming elections or whatever, except more likely to be delivered in 140-character increments. By an affluent tech nerd. A demographic which does not yet represent a reasonable cross-section of citizens for any story outside of, you know, tech stories.

It's a lot like our own relationship with our commenters. We love you, but you're a voluble minority, and if we guided the site based solely on commenter feedback, it would consist exclusively of live blogs and notices for commenter meetups. Which is fine, no backlash please! But we've seen the problem more important arenas, too: Howard Dean thought his massive lead in Meetup.com events would help him win the presidency. It didn't!

Reporters still have to leave their cubes to find the people on the street. They're outside, you see; out there, on the streets. And remember, Obama fans:

IWM: Who are some big-name Twitterers?

Dorsey: The biggest one at the moment is Barack Obama.

That's not necessarily a good sign.

[I Want Media]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5050151&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Corrected Singles Map Means Ladies Get to Have Standards Again]]> Remember that male:female demographic map that statistically charted the surplus single females across the nation and made every single woman in New York want to hang herself? Turns out it was somewhat misleading, because it counted everyone between the ages of 20 and 64 and most of the women who read about it on some blog—and who then accordingly expanded the universe of Dudes With Whom They'd Potentially Go Home to include, like, actuaries or men with off-putting tribal tattoos—were probably younger than 40. An amateur statistician named Jonathan Soma with an apparent surplus of free time and something to prove coded the map to make it adjustable by age (and divided by local population), and the sudden sprouting of big blue single male dots makes the situation seem a lot rosier for women…

…until they reach their mid-forties at least! So there is, it turns out, probably a surplus of single young dudes, and an absolute paucity of single old dudes. Oh yeah, and none of this counts unmarrieds in relationships, which decidedly includes The Gays:

Sure, there are some issues with the map. The first: homosexuality! This data and this map are completely heteronormative, but please direct invective at our pal the Census Bureau. Also, I don't think I can really trust the internet on this one, but men are about twice as likely to identify as gay than women - what's this mean for the map? It'll skew hard towards there being a ton of unmarried men!

Ha ha ha, guess that's Javascript for "blueballs," ladies! Next time.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5046816&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Why MSNBC Will Only Get More Liberal]]> 82029175MSNBC is still not comfortable with the idea that it is the liberal counterweight to Fox News. Executives at the cable news network bristle at the comparison, claiming that while individual "point of view" shows like Keith Olbermann's Countdown skew leftward, the network as a whole has no unifying ideology, as at Fox. But demographics may be making such a bias inevitable. The Times points out today that, amid heightened political activity among young, mostly liberal voters, MSNBC has added nearly 40,000 18-to-34-year-old viewers during prime time, far more than either Fox News or CNN. It is now number one among the young in those hours, while Fox News is dead last. That makes sense politically: Republicans are, as a group, significantly older the Democrats. Perhaps most revealing are the news nets' seemingly bizarre choices of internet partners.

Fox News just partnered with Facebook, even though the social networking website directly competes with its News Corporation sibling MySpace. MySpace, meanwhile, is working with MSNBC to cover the political conventions, despite a notorious rivalry between other News Corp. properties and Olbermann.

But the partnerships make sense when you consider demographics. With its popularity among rock bands and its garish design sensibility, MySpace is the social network of high school students and young adults — MSNBC viewers. Facebook, meanwhile, has a buttoned-down presentation that has made it more popular in corporate environments and thus among older people, making it a better fit for Fox.

As MSNBC adds coveted young viewers, who are overwhelmingly Democratic, it becomes less likely to ever seek, say, a conservative counterweight to Olbermann, or a barking pseudo-populist curmudgeon like Lou Dobbs. It would no more do such things than MTV would. And the temptation to become the winning cable network of the Obama years will be too great for MSNBC to ever truly balance its present leftward political tilt.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5038165&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Can Logo Survive With Gays 2.0?]]> The Viacom-owned gay network recently did some "who the hell is our audience, anyway?" market research and came up with some fairly interesting numbers. One such data point: "Less than half of gay people want to live in the city and a majority want to live in suburbia or small-town America. Regardless of where they want to live, 58 percent want to live closer to other gay people." Really! But the gays always live in the city. The South End of Boston would be a dump if it weren't for them. But, I guess the times they are a blah blah. The second half of that data poses some problems for the folks polled, as there aren't too many already-established gay suburban or small-town enclaves. I mean, there are only so many Northamptons in this world, eh? But, those could be good numbers for Logo.

Picture a gay who wants to hang out with other gays, but lives in Westport, Mass. There aren't many other 'mos in the immediate area, and there certainly aren't any gay bars. He could drive to New Bedford or maybe Fall River or maybe even Providence, but who wants to go all that way on a Friday night? What's the other option? Go to the high end of the dial and settle down with some crappy, low-budge gay flick or TV series. So, the newly provincial gays may need queer programming, Logo! Good news!

But, other statistics about gay men and women having even numbers of straight and gay friends, being out to family members, and believing "it’s important to integrate into the greater culture," could spell trouble. If things get too normalized, then there may not be a need for "here you go, girl" programming. Though, an obvious example of "niche" television enduring through the years would be BET, which, demographically speaking, holds a mirror up to African-Americans the way nearly every other network on television holds one up to white Americans. It's hard to imagine that there will soon be complete symphony between all of these seemingly disparate sets of tastes—not to mention satisfactory representation on the bigger nets—so maybe the "need," or at least a small audience, for Logo will remain.

Anyway, poor social theorizing aside, these numbers represent the 1,800 gay people from New York and Dallas who were polled. Let's poll that made-up gay in Westport (I like to think his name is Barney Joy) and see what he has to say. In the meantime, maybe there should be a focus on, you know, quality. I'd watch then. And I subscribe to here! for Christ's sake.

[via Manhattan Offender, who thinks these numbers spell doom for Logo]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5033456&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[American teenagers spend more time online than watching television]]> While the amount of time American teenagers spent online and watching television both increased year-over-year, average time online increased from 10.7 hours last year to 12.5 hours this year, surpassing the amount of time spent in front of the television, 11.9 hours. If television viewing isn't losing eyeball share, what is? Reading. The number of teens and tweens who read a magazine for fun were both down from last year. [MediaWeek] (Photo by Derek Baird)

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5018080&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Regional DVD Rentals Reveal Citizenry's Collective Psyche]]> Former Gawker Joshua "Joshy" Stein, ever-enamored of his new 'hood of Williamsburg, points out that a new Netflix feature allows people to see what films others in their zip code are renting. For 11211, he's found that the top five movies are La Jetée, The Holy Mountain, Blow Up, Do The Right Thing, and Solaris. (As Stein puts it, "Despair, pretension, easy sex, pop music, violence, hate, photography, isolation, trouble.") We put this search function to the test. What are they watching in Bridgeport, Connecticut? San Francisco? Do they conform to regional stereotypes?

In rough-and-tumble Bridgeport, CT:

#1: "I Think I Love My Wife"
#7 is "Why Did I Get Married?"

Theme: Oh noes. Families are disintegrating.

San Francisco:
#1: "24 Hours on Craiglist"
#3: "Commune"
#7: "Burning Man: Beyond Black Rock"

Theme: Techies and hippies!

In the geek-boy Google capital of Mountain View, CA:

#1: "Tell Me You Love Me, Season 1"
#2 and #6: "Battlestar Galactica

Theme: We work for Google. There aren't a lot of girls here and we're sad.

In fancy Easthampton, NY:

#1 is "Becket": "When King Henry II (Peter O'Toole) names his friend and former drinking partner Thomas à Becket (Richard Burton) the new Archbishop of Canterbury, he counts on his unbending loyalty when it comes to religious matters..."

Theme: Inaccessibility, old money.


[Photo: librarygeek's Flickr]


]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=391841&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Network News Needs Hip Young Viewers Such As You]]> brianwilliams.jpegThe 18-34 year old demographic is most frequently described as "coveted," so those of us lucky enough to be in it know that the things we do are important. Not just to ourselves, but to the media, advertisers, and the nation at large. We set the trends, not the olds! So it's a big deal when they discover that out of all the things our sweet demographic does—eat cereal, purchase pogo sticks ironically, have sexual relations in the new style—one thing we're definitely not doing is watching the evening news. In fact, the latest numbers show network news ratings among important people like me and you are falling straight off a cliff, into what may prove to be the final resting place of the 6:30 news broadcast.

In the last six months, cable news ratings have risen, but network news ratings in our key demographic have fallen. CBS is down 21%, ABC is down 14%, and NBC is off 10%. The conclusion? Those shows are on too early for youngsters!


One reason is that the traditional newscasts air too early in the evening, when a lot of younger people are still working or on their way home. Others are in school. Or they're eating dinner or picking up kids from after-school activities.

They simply never got into the evening news habit. Their TV watching comes later in the evening.

Also, there's the internet. Nightly network news still puts up big numbers relative to other TV news shows, but their figures are on a downward slope that doesn't show any sign of reversing itself. Of course, every new form of media is put on a deathwatch when a strong challenger arises—they thought radio was dead when TV was invented. Instead, mediums usually adapt and settle into a more specific audience base.

So what can Katie C, Brian W, and Charles G do to connect with coveted viewers like us? Move the shows to midnight, crack lots of sarcastic jokes about stuff, and make enough appearances on the nightlife scene to be perceived as a credible object of sexual desire. Consider this free advice from the generation that will soon, scarily enough, be running things.

[via Media Life Magazine]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=367544&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Website To Separate Good Cop From Bad]]> Internet first amendment rights were threatened yesterday when RateMyCop.com was shut down. As the name implies, the site allows users to rate local uniformed cops. The host, GoDaddy.com, told the owner that it was taken offline for "suspicious activity." The site is back up, but Rate My Cop's inevitable failure is a good reminder that the internet is still a playground for rich kids.

The site is based on a Wikipedia model, with users adding and editing information about their local cops. The only problem is that people who are interested in wasting their time on online directories don't really notice their local cops. Until they're mugged and need help (A+ cop would call again) or they're unexpectedly harassed by the pigs for smoking on a train platform (abuse of power!). There's a reason this model works best for rating the hotness and lax grading policies of college professors.

The people who might actually benefit from a site like this are likely poor, and since they're poor, they can't contribute via iPhone or BlackBerry. In fact, they might not even have an internet connection in their home. (I don't know how they survive either.) Gawker jailbird Sheila is the exception. The internet has democratized knowledge, sure, but only for the people who can afford a DSL connection.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=367094&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Zorba the Greek is the Ideal New Yorker Reader]]> Judging from those little black-and-white ads that line the outer edges of the pages of the New Yorker the ideal reader is a gentleman nearing the end of his life who is comfortable both wearing a Greek fisherman's hat ($28) and a European beret ($12) with wide feet (EEE-EEEEEE). He is reasonably affluent but only recently and therefore must buy (from the pages of the New Yorker natch) a ring emblazoned with his family crest (research included. from $790) to pass on to his children (no doubt estranged) before he's shunted into an old folks home in the country (The Watermark, Unretirement Living.) [L Magazine]]]> http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5002184&view=rss&microfeed=true <![CDATA[Who is the "living embodiment of possibly the most desired demographic of all"?]]> New York magazine's food dude Adam Platt recently visited Danny Abram's Central Village resto Smith's. The food was good, try the squid but really who cares. We want to know who was there! Or do we!

[I]n the mini dining room, the mini-tables were filled with animated parties of diners, many of them female, happily chatting in the soft, carefully calibrated light. At one of the banquettes sat a magazine food editor, a regular judge on the reality series Top Chef. And across from her sat the living embodiment of possibly the most desired demographic of all. "Do you know who that is?" said one of the hulking gentlemen at my table. "That's Anna Wintour's personal assistant."
Really? The ""living embodiment of possibly the most desired demographic of all" is some overworked underpaid whisp of a girl afraid to breathe out of turn or make eye contact with animate things? As sad/crazy/ree-ree as this sounds, it does explain the enduring popularity of the small sullen simian Olsen twins.]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=342033&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Watches and Teddy Bears are the New Tits and Sex]]> It was Benjamin Franklin who said the only thing certain in this world is tits and beer but apparently, he got it all wrong. Apparently men, or at least the men who buy magazines specifically designed to make them feel more manly, are eschewing tits, sex, beer, sports, butts, bands, bongs, and boobs in favor of "groovy sunglasses, titanium mobile phones and flat-screen television." At least in Britain where traditional "lad mags" like Arena, FHM and Loaded are down between 23 and 35%.

But times are a-changing. Print media is so versatile. Arena recently relaunched. Their website features zero tits but does include an article about a teddy bear. Exactly what the "urban playboy" needs. According to Arena editor Giles Hattersley, the new man "works hard - probably pulling in a packet at an investment bank - and is very sophisticated in his tastes, be it a new gadget, car, type of wine or a new shirt. The days when most British men were poorly dressed oafs are long gone." Not exactly true! Also, if men are only interested in engaging in consumer culture moreso than in sex, who's doing all the screwing that is swelling Britain's population to 75 million by 2051?

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=339885&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[For SUV-Driving Hipsters, Marlow and Sons Is The Spot]]> Those few of you watching the commercials during Desperate Housewives last night might have been buoyed to spot Williamsburg hipster feeding trough Marlow and Sons, the home of the world's worst hipster date conversation ever. It was in a commercial for an SUV called Edge. So now it is confirmed that Marlow & Sons is where all the hipsters with $30K to drop on a SUV go for oysters and artisanal American cheese. Related: We hear that the creative director for J. Walter Thomspon, the ad firm that produced the spot, quit today!

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=329157&view=rss&microfeed=true