<![CDATA[Gawker: design]]> http://tags.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gawker.com.png <![CDATA[Gawker: design]]> http://gawker.com/tag/design http://gawker.com/tag/design <![CDATA[New York 'Map Cuts' Aren't for Traveling, But Sure Are Purdy]]> I can't imagine how long it took to cut out these extremely detailed maps of NYC. By removing the bustle of street names, traffic flows and landmarks, nothing is left but the city's organizational beauty.

There are four separate 3'x4' panels that represent Brooklyn, Manhattan, Queens and the Bronx. When they're combined, you've got one gorgeous piece of wall art.

I wouldn't try and take it on a road trip though. [Dude Craft via Neatorama]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5394287&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Esquire Betting it All on Flashing Electronic Doo-Dads]]> When you think "Esquire's Greatest Achievements in Its 70+ Years of Design Innovation," you think "Hidden ads on the cover" and "That other weird flashing electronic cover gadget." Until this new doohickey!

With the December issue of Esquire, all you do is fire up your computer, turn on the webcam, turn to the part of the magazine with those strange little black-and-white box-looking things, in ads or whatever, and point it at the webcam, and you will witness, right there on your screen, an uninteresting video. Says the WSJ:

A fashion spread about dressing in layers, for example, shows actor Jeremy Renner shedding a coat and sweater as the weather turns from rainy to sunny. Turning the magazine triggers a snow flurry, and Mr. Renner puts on more clothes and throws snowballs. Esquire says there are several minutes of video footage in the magazine

The ability to watch a moving-picture on your computer? The future is now. George Lois would be proud.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5392665&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[So Let's All Hate This Kid Now]]> Hey, New York wants you to know about this little budding interior designer kid, a senior at Drew College out in Jersey. He is a treat, if you're into really precocious youngsters. And aren't we?

Hah, no, we're not. No, instead NYM is just exposing this kid—who goes by "Maximilian" of course—to the ridicule and vitriol of people like us, who decorated their own dorm room with empty whiskey bottles and cigarette ash.

This kid, though! He is going places! Really terrible places!

Maxamilian, voted "preppiest in class" at Choate, "has a sincere love for Stubbs & Wootton slipper shoes and melon-colored pants."

Look at everything about this paragraph!

When other 15-year-olds were going to lacrosse camp, Sinsteden worked for David Easton, a neoclassical decorator in the Albert Hadley/Bunny Williams school. After his first year of college, he interned for Moss and still works for her one day a week. "I finish her sentences," he says. "And she reads my mind."

No, New York. That is not what "other 15-year-olds" were doing. Other 15-year-olds were playing Xbox and texting lewd photos of themselves to one another and getting high and maybe working at the ice cream stand at the park. Also, Maxy, anyone can read your mind. Your mind is a 30-year-old novelty book. Look, we're reading your mind right now: "I'm a tool."

Still, we cannot fault his one gesture toward the sacred duty of a guy not to be THAT fucking guy:

It's not unusual to find twenty friends crammed into Sinsteden's room, enjoying the contents of his well-stocked bar.

Ah, college. Anyone with liquor or drugs is tolerable for a night!

Make sure to check out the slideshow! It features this immortal phrase: "The tie-backs are repurposed ascots."

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5239800&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Google Designer Heads to Way Cooler Job at Twitter]]> So much for Twitter being a source of real-time news! Nearly three weeks after Valleywag first reported the startup's poaching of top Google designer Doug Bowman, cofounder Biz Stone confirms the hire.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5191297&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Marissa Mayer Is Right 80 Percent of the Time]]> Continuing her unstoppable PR rampage, Google executive Marissa Mayer took to NBC's Press:Here, a Silicon Valley interview show. The cupcake princess of search defended her by-the-numbers approach to Google's design.

The rigid philosophy of testing every little aspect of a Web page's appearance — Mayer's team once tested 41 different shades of blue to determine which generated the optimal number of clicks — has driven away top design talent tired of the endless testing. But perhaps the problem is that Mayer's restive designers just aren't as smart as she is! Here's her explanation:

Every design starts with an instinct: It should look like this, or it should look like that. You can actually test it with data. The humbling thing about that is sometimes the data proves you wrong. So for every change I propose, you know, three out of four, four out of five the data will support the change.

It doesn't matter if Google's ugly — the data is on Mayer's side, see?

Wait a second: Mayer famously dismissed a Googler's application for a job transfer because they'd gotten a single C. "Good students are good at all things," she said at a meeting witnessed by a reporter. But Mayer has just admitted that she gets a C, a B-minus at best, at Web design. She recently touted a design featuring unpopular insurance giant AIG. By her own rules, shouldn't she be fired in favor of someone less tone-deaf on design?

Here's a segment from her appearance:


]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5189298&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[The Unflinching Stare of Marissa Mayer]]> Is Marissa Mayer, Google's cupcake princess, driving away talent with her icy indifference and utter lack of management skills? One ex-Googler says yes. Here's Anne Halsall's tale of getting dissed by Mayer at a meeting:

Since assuming leadership of the consumer web team, I started attending the legendary weekly UI review meeting. I did this both as a representative of the web group, and also to help keep my team on track with what Marissa and her team expected of us. By this point in my career I had worked with her many, many times, and I had been attending the review regularly for a couple of months. She had even shaken my hand once to thank me for launching a particularly big and difficult campaign.
One of the last times I sat in that meeting, as we were dispersing, she looked right at me and asked her assistant to "cut down on the number of guests - there are too many random people here." I knew then that despite all the work I had done for her team, she didn't recognize me at all. I had earned no influence. I stopped going to the reviews after that.
A few weeks later, after thinking about my experiences and opportunities there, I decided to resign.

Halsall then calls for a change in Google's "creative leadership" — a veiled way of asking for Mayer's head on a platter.

Her tale comes after Doug Bowman, Google's top designer, criticized Google's obsession with numbers in making design decisions, a strategy advanced by Mayer. Another former designer, Kevin Fox, now at a startup called FriendFeed, doesn't wholly agree with Bowman — but notes that Google's design group has "had a glass ceiling from the very beginning." That, too, seems like a veiled reference to Mayer's iron grip on the look and feel of Google's consumer Web products. It doesn't take a degree in visual design to notice a pattern here.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5182552&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Google's Data Fetish Drives Away Its Top Designer]]> As we reported last week, Doug Bowman, Google's top designer, has confirmed that he's leaving (we hear to Twitter). Bowman's reasons for quitting are fascinating — and they show why Google's losing its cool.

Bowman joined Google three years ago — too late, he now says. The company's engineers-first culture was firmly in place, meaning every decision had to be proven through exhaustive testing, rather than a reliance on a clear vision of Google's design. And in a backhanded slam at Google VP Marissa Mayer, the head of "user experience," he notes that top management in charge of design had not background in the field:

When a company is filled with engineers, it turns to engineering to solve problems. Reduce each decision to a simple logic problem. Remove all subjectivity and just look at the data. Data in your favor? Ok, launch it. Data shows negative effects? Back to the drawing board. And that data eventually becomes a crutch for every decision, paralyzing the company and preventing it from making any daring design decisions.


Yes, it's true that a team at Google couldn't decide between two blues, so they're testing 41 shades between each blue to see which one performs better. I had a recent debate over whether a border should be 3, 4 or 5 pixels wide, and was asked to prove my case. I can't operate in an environment like that. I've grown tired of debating such miniscule design decisions. There are more exciting design problems in this world to tackle.

Exciting design problems, like those at Twitter? A source tells us that's where he's going, but Bowman hasn't confirmed that yet. (He promises to disclose his new employer in a followup blog post.)

Bowman adds that he "can't fault Google for this reliance on data," but "won't miss a design philosophy that lives or dies strictly by the sword of data." It's a microcosm of what's going wrong at Google: The rigorous culture of making every decision quantitative, every process algorithmic, results in a coldly efficient experience, with no room for the human quirkiness that makes sites like Flickr so appealing. It's hard to argue with Google's financial results. But who wants to work inside the bowels of a perfectly tuned machine? If Google runs by the numbers, it hardly needs humans. And that's why people like Bowman are leaving.

(Photo by gorriti)

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5177144&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Deborah Needleman Is in Cahoots With New White House Decorator]]> We're not sure why but Domino editor Deborah Needleman is determined to let some Hollywood interior designer run roughshod over the White House.

We've no idea how or for how long Needleman (middle, above) has known celebrity decorator Michael Smith (far left), but she's been slobbering in her magazine since last April, when he expressed his desire to get his paws on the Lincoln Bedroom. Smith and Needleman have been conspiring together for years, according to this SECRET MEMO.

Well, now Michelle Obama has selected Smith as her official White House decorator, and Needleman continued crowing:

But Smith's work does have a look that's distinctive. His unique talent is marrying Old World pedigree with a clean Californian sensibility. Think about what a grand English country house might look like if it were owned by a beach-loving movie executive who grew up worshipping the studios, and you get the idea. His interiors combine a crisp, polished sense of glamour with a laid-back ease, comfort and lightness—you can practically feel the breeze when you look at pictures of his work. Smith brings his clients the class and history of Europe but in a well-ordered, uncluttered American package, and this has proven to be a golden formula. His clients are mostly politically active members of Hollywood royalty, with a fair smattering of media moguls and socialites. The rooms he designs for them are luxurious but livable, layered but not stuffed, patinated but not dusty, individual but not eccentric.

Needleman is, of course, married to Slate editor and political journo Jacob Weisberg, which almost explains her recording an odd story of getting drunk at a party and Smith calling her "Martha Mitchell."

And so today Needleman took her White House makeover fantasy to the pages of the New York Times op-ed section, in an odd column attacking, of all things, the Committee for the Preservation of the White House as some sort of attack of bad taste launched by Jackie Kennedy (and Pat Nixon?) from beyond the grave.

Now, of course, she paints Michelle Obama as a new Jackie O, who'll add crazy Mark Rothkos and 20th-century furniture to the Green Room. Of course the last First Lady to really have her way with the place was not Jackie O, but Nancy Reagan, with her famous $200k state china and complete renovations of the second and third floors of the White House and her Oscar de la Renta dresses. That is a comparison that is probably not so complimentary to Michelle Obama and Deborah Needleman's BFF Michael Smith, though, because everyone in America hated Nancy Reagan, except Peggy Noonan.

Anyway, sure, let Deborah's fave designer add some new curtains to the room where one of Abe Lincoln's kids died.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5136545&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Web Art in 256 Pixels]]> Sometimes the best art is the tiniest. Google's revamped favicon, a 16-pixel-by-16-pixel representation of the website, may be the best design work yet from a company not known for its visual flair.

Pixel art has long had its adherents. But the use of favicons as symbols for websites in bookmarks and Web browser tabs has turned it into a mass medium. (Gawker's is a square red splotch, harking back to the original Gawker logo designed by Jason Kottke; Valleywag's a green "V".)

Google replaced an older "G" icon with a lowercase blue "g" last summer, to indifferent reaction. The new icon, an Art Deco-inspired outline of a "g" surrounded by Google's signature bright colors, is arguably better than Google's regular logo. But would it work as well if blown up full-size? That's part of the charm of designing with pixels, picking the shade of each bit carefully to play tricks on the eye and create a recognizable symbol.

Michael Pierce has a gallery of favicons, as does Digg designer Daniel Burka. Offer up your favorite micrologos in the comments.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5128948&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[FT.com Redesign Is Blogalicious]]> The FT, the Western world's last remaining respected financial paper not owned by Rupert Murdoch, has unveiled an early version of the redesign of its website's homepage. And we'll be damned if it doesn't look way more like a blog than like a traditional newspaper site. The clear messages: the online medium continues to assert its precedence over print; even the rich love blogs; and bloggers all deserve to be paid more money. Click here to peruse the prototype, or click through for a larger picture.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5082390&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[A Gentle Critique Of Esquire]]> Let's play the game "Who said it, and about what?": "It was a silly gimmicky thing." "Ridiculous." "I was embarrassed by it. I think most people at Hearst were embarrassed by it." "I was embarrassed that the Esquire name was on it." "That wasn't great, that was just ridiculous." "This Mickey Mouse light clicking on an off. It's not an idea." "When will they learn, oh lord? How long will it take for them to learn?"



All quotes from George Lois—the man who designed all of Esquire's greatest covers—about Esquire's recent, blinking, plastic "cover of the future." That's unfortunate, Esquire, you must be very disappointed at being PWND!!1! Watch the Lois interview with Ad Age here. He's cranky about other things too.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5067683&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Bad Buzz]]> Remember that minor fuss over the curious resemblance of the logo of the Daily Beast, Tina Brown's supposedly pathbreaking news site, to that of the Philadelphia Daily News? It won't go away. The Philly tabloid has now sent a cease-and-desist letter to the one-time Queen of Buzz.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5061623&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Tina's Homage To Philadelphia]]> Magazine-turned-web guru Tina Brown has never claimed her design sense was that original. At the stillborn Talk, she opted for a portable format, a magazine published on thin paper that could be rolled up and carried around like a European newsweekly such as Stern. And that same inspiration is shared by her baby news website, the Daily Beast. "I've always loved the look of the European smart tabloids," she says with the sophistication that comes from a media career on both sides of the Atlantic. There's just one problem: the logo of the new IAC-backed website looks more like that of the Philadelphia Daily News, the tabloid paper of New York's rather dowdy southern neighbor.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5059390&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Yahoo's worldwide identity crisis]]> Do you Yahoo? What that means depends on where in the world you are.Racing to reach markets before its rivals established themselves, Yahoo started dozens of country-specific websites with a frenzy of joint ventures in the 1990s. Its haste still haunts it; Yahoo's international websites may cater to local preferences, but at the cost of consistent branding. Look at this collection of Yahoo logos. Is the Yahoo logo red, or purple? Reversed out, or solid? Mirrored shadow underneath? Take your pick of stylized designs; somewhere in the world, Yahoo has it. The problem is more than homepage-deep; despite countless reorganizations, Yahoo hasn't created a truly global product organization, which adds to its costs and slows down development.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5053659&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[InTouch Celebrates Dave Navarro's Tasteful Murder Art]]> Tacky interior design cliches—like lampshades fashioned out of human flesh, umbrella stands made from bones, solidified organ paperweights—are so over. So it's refreshing to see, in the austere pages of InTouch magazine, that pretend rock star Dave Navarro is celebrated for his more subdued and updated design aesthetic, which includes artwork by John Wayne Gacy. Gacy, you'll recall, is that charming fella who dressed like a clown and brutally raped and murdered 30 young men and boys back in the 1970's, burying their bodies under his house. Killer! Click for larger. [via Gigglesugar]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5053798&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Million-member march begs for old Facebook back]]> The surprise isn't that someone created a Facebook group to demand that Mark "Zomberg" — a pun on Zuckerberg and Facebook's famous Zombie app — bring back the old Facebook. What's surprising is that nearly 800,000 members have found and joined the group as of this morning. The probability of Facebook's old look and feel coming back are exactly zero, but the group serves a purpose: It proves that people who claim to be cutting-edge and ahead of the curve hate change just as much as the rest of us.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5052891&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Screenshots of Yahoo's redesign]]> Here are the screenshots Yahoo published of its upcoming homepage redesign. The big change is that instead of including a long list of Yahoo products and services on the left side of the very popular homepage, there's now a large gray box for Yahoo and third-party created widgets, which will link to places like Yahoo's photo-sharing service Flickr and auction site eBay. The redesign also reveals that like AOL, Yahoo seems to think people will use the portal more if they can check their Gmail there.

I'm skeptical, because since when are Gmail users looking for a portal to bookmark as their homepage? We heard Yahoo tried to get Facebook to design a widget for the new space on Yahoo's homepage, but that so far Mark Zuckerberg and company have refused. Kind of like how they refused Yahoo's $1 billion offer to buy the company two years ago, relegating Yahoo to redesigns that seem little more than deckchair shuffling on a sinking ship.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5051640&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Zuckerberg wants Facebook to look like Windows]]> Shortly after Facebook bought Parakey, the Web-desktop startup cofounded by star engineers Joe Hewitt and Blake Ross, Mark Zuckerberg talked about making his goof-off site the "social operating system of the Web." It was just one of a series of failed big-picture metaphors for the tongue-tied young entrepreneur. Facebook may never be an operating system. But is it such a terrible idea to make it look like one? The latest redesign is a virtual copycat of Windows.

As Silicon Alley Insider's Dan Frommer first pointed out, Facebook has removed its applications dropdown menu from the top of the screen and put it down in the bottom-left corner — you know, right where Windows keeps its "Start" button. Just like Windows, alerts pop up in the lower right-hand corner of the screen.

Microsoft Windows isn't deemed sexy by San Francisco's Web-designer crowd, who brag about having to launch VMware to test out Google Chrome. But, like Facebook, Microsoft has a user base in the nine digits. Zuckerberg shows he hasn't just taken Microsoft's money — he's picked up some of the software giant's mass-market, commonsense design.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5049282&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Microsoft goes Googley with its new offices in Seattle]]> Microsoft announced plans for new offices in Seattle's South Lake Union area a year ago. They're open now. According to photos from Microspotting — a PR blog for Microsoft human resources written by Ariel Meadow Stallings, who describes herself as "the person you thought would never work at MSFT" — they look pretty Googley. There's a red room and a blue room, for example. And the Microsofties have one trump card over the Googleplex: Minutes from downtown Seattle, South Lake Union is a much better location than an office park off 101. Check out the slide show below.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5048493&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA["New Flickr" controversy to replace "New Facebook" controversy]]> Like it or not, we're stuck with Mark Zuckerberg's ego-driven redesign of Facebook, which becomes mandatory for all users today. What to complain about now? Why, Flickr! The Yahoo-owned photo-sharing site has introduced a new look which emphasizes its social features. Like Facebook's redesign, it's currently optional, but will be forced on all users in a few weeks. (Screenshot by Stephen Shankland/News.com)

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5048139&view=rss&microfeed=true