• Profile logout login

#details#discussed

Gawker

Share Cancel
   
Upload an image | Add an image URL
×

logging in
  • FAQ. Include # before tag:
  • #tips,
  • #stalker,
  • #opencaption,
  • #internalmemos,
  • etc.

New York, 5:57 PM
Tue Dec 1
55 posts in the last 24 hours

Team

Tip Your Editors:

Tipline: 646-214-8138

Editor-in-Chief:
Gabriel Snyder |

West Coast Editor:
Richard Rushfield |

Contributing Editors:

Valleywag:
Ryan Tate |

Media:
Hamilton Nolan |

Politics:
Alex Pareene |

Investigations:
John Cook |

Entertainment:
Brian Moylan |

Nights:
Adrian Chen |
Azaria Jagger |
Ravi Somaiya |

Weekends:
Foster Kamer |

Video Editor:
Richard Blakeley |

SUBSCRIBE TO Gawker RSS

New: Breaking news and daily top stories via email
4260 Subscribers
Gawker
  • Your version of Internet Explorer is not supported. Please upgrade to the most recent version in order to view comments.
    Dsmvwl  Admin  Promote to frontpage Approve user Ban user ×
    Image of Hiphopopotamus Hiphopopotamus
    10/27/09

    In reply to Who Are These Rich Jerks?
    I think the real estate broker thing is just a cover for Nick Denton. #therich
     Reply
    Hiphopopotamus was starred Hiphopopotamus was unstarred
    Image of BadUncle BadUncle
    10/27/09

    In reply to Who Are These Rich Jerks?
    "Jon," continue to spend us out of the recession, please. But put that $10,000 on a painting. #therich
     Reply
    BadUncle was starred BadUncle was unstarred
    Image of BookishLookish BookishLookish
    10/27/09

    In reply to Who Are These Rich Jerks?
    A dominatrix pal of mine says tips are down but they're coming in more often and want more dramatic beatdowns. #therich
     Reply
    BookishLookish was starred BookishLookish was unstarred
    Image of TableNein TableNein
    10/27/09

    @BookishLookish: I'll do it for half price. #therich
     Reply
    TableNein was starred TableNein was unstarred
    Image of BookishLookish BookishLookish
    10/27/09

    @TableNein: T9 with a whip in hand? Be still, my heart. #therich
     Reply
    BookishLookish was starred BookishLookish was unstarred
    Image of Parah_Salin Parah_Salin
    10/27/09

    @BookishLookish: "dominatrix pal of mine" If I only had a nickel for every time I've used that phrase. #therich
     Reply
    britneyspearstears promoted this comment Parah_Salin was starred Parah_Salin was unstarred
    Image of britneyspearstears britneyspearstears
    10/27/09

    @Parah_Salin: So then I--I mean my friend... #therich
     Reply
    britneyspearstears was starred britneyspearstears was unstarred
    Image of BookishLookish BookishLookish
    10/27/09

    @britneyspearstears: I don't do pro work, toots. Love not money is my motto. #therich
     Reply
    BookishLookish was starred BookishLookish was unstarred
    Image of phlox✔ phlox✔
    10/27/09

    In reply to Who Are These Rich Jerks?
    Yay! The Gays are single-handedly gentrifying the economy. #therich
     Reply
    phlox✔ was starred phlox✔ was unstarred
    Image of resipsaloquacious resipsaloquacious
    10/27/09

    In reply to Who Are These Rich Jerks?
    $300 for a pool cabana!?

    Jon, baby! You should head to the Asser Levy Pool on 23rd and C!

    $300, a willingness to have your cavities searched by security and a strong immunity to e coli will get you a lifetime of relaxation by a pool! #therich
     Reply
    resipsaloquacious was starred resipsaloquacious was unstarred
    Image of Spirit Fingers Spirit Fingers
    10/27/09

    @resipsaloquacious: I know that place and you're not joking. #therich
     Reply
    Spirit Fingers was starred Spirit Fingers was unstarred
    Image of Spirit Fingers Spirit Fingers
    10/27/09

    In reply to Who Are These Rich Jerks?
    So, yeah, "Jon," here's betting somebody's paying $301 so they don't have to see you. #therich
     Reply
    Spirit Fingers was starred Spirit Fingers was unstarred
    Image of ArgusRun ArgusRun
    10/27/09

    In reply to Who Are These Rich Jerks?
    Ummmm.... If you have money, you should be spending it. I'm sure all those workers and manufacturers were thrilled with the million dollar renovation. #therich
     Reply
    goetz promoted this comment ArgusRun was starred ArgusRun was unstarred
    Image of Rozelle’s Bagman Rozelle’s Bagman
    10/27/09

    @ArgusRun: Don't trickle on my pants and tell me it's raining. #therich
     Reply
    Rozelle’s Bagman was starred Rozelle’s Bagman was unstarred
    Image of Clare Clare
    10/21/09

    In reply to What Do Adam Lambert and Details Have in Common?
    Has anyone else pointed out that that cover shot makes Adam Lambert look like a young, sexy, gay Elvis? #adamlambert
     Reply
    Clare was starred Clare was unstarred
    Image of BBooms BBooms
    10/20/09

    In reply to What Do Adam Lambert and Details Have in Common?
    Bottom line, reason they should've used a male model, is because Adam Lambert looks like an awkward virgin who has no idea what to do with a woman. Which makes sense, but still. Not sexy. #adamlambert
     Reply
    BBooms was starred BBooms was unstarred
    Image of ms_priestypants ms_priestypants
    10/20/09

    In reply to What Do Adam Lambert and Details Have in Common?
    What I find most disturbing here is that, in fig. 2, the model is so not turned on that her legs seem to have fused mid-thigh. #adamlambert
     Reply
    ms_priestypants was starred ms_priestypants was unstarred
    Image of ms_priestypants ms_priestypants
    10/20/09

    @ms_priestypants: Also, that the front page puts "Are you living beyond your means?" right above "The return of the corduroy suit!".

    Because everyone knows corduroy suits are for The Poors. #adamlambert
     Reply
    ms_priestypants was starred ms_priestypants was unstarred
    Image of iplaudius iplaudius
    10/20/09

    In reply to What Do Adam Lambert and Details Have in Common?
    I think they were just trying to balance out all of those other photo shoots—you know, the dozens upon dozens of edgy editorials in which they made staunchly heterosexual leading men pose in flagrante with dudes. #adamlambert
     Reply
    iplaudius was starred iplaudius was unstarred
    Image of MattGaymon MattGaymon
    10/20/09

    @iplaudius: Ha, touché! I sort of think that is a separate issue, one I wholly support. Although it has almost been done before. #adamlambert
     Reply
    MattGaymon was starred MattGaymon was unstarred
    Image of iplaudius iplaudius
    10/20/09

    @MattGaymon: Thanks for pointing out that article. I wonder what it felt like to be a Rock Hudson in those situations. It cracks me up that sweating and massage used to be called “body-building.” How far we’ve come (sad trombone). #adamlambert
     Reply
    iplaudius was starred iplaudius was unstarred
    Image of MattGaymon MattGaymon
    10/20/09

    @iplaudius: Whereas Tony Curtis was a proto-Lambert! (not really)
     Reply
    Edited by MattGaymon at 10/20/09 2:57 PM MattGaymon was starred MattGaymon was unstarred
    Image of snugbug snugbug
    10/20/09

    In reply to What Do Adam Lambert and Details Have in Common?
    What do Adam Lambert and Details have in common? They're both worshiped by hairdressers. #adamlambert
     Reply
    snugbug was starred snugbug was unstarred
    Image of Meg Meg
    10/20/09

    In reply to What Do Adam Lambert and Details Have in Common?
    I don't know. I think there is room for debate on whether the pics are just sexy or catering to the straight fan base or blurring lines or just for some cheap, easy publicity. And I think there is also room for debate on the tone chosen for the article, which was "as a gay man, how do you deal with all these crazy, horny ladies throwing their underwear and shit at you?" And to some extent "how is this possible?" Which I find the more insulting.

    But I think it's a bit much to pull that one quote (which was part of a larger quote about an especially aggressive female fan) from the rest and make it seem as if he's somehow stepping into the closet, or starting "freaky" talk. I mean, he mentions repeatedly that he is gay, mentions his bf, but also mentions that he thinks it's great if women can find him sexy, see him as a sex symbol, even though they -- and everyone else -- are well aware of his sexual orientation. #adamlambert
     Reply
    Meg was starred Meg was unstarred
    Image of Pizza!Pizza!Pizza! Pizza!Pizza!Pizza!
    10/20/09

    In reply to What Do Adam Lambert and Details Have in Common?
    How many times have we heard a female starlet say she likes kissing women sometimes but isn't sleeping with them or gay? #adamlambert
     Reply
    Pizza!Pizza!Pizza! was starred Pizza!Pizza!Pizza! was unstarred
    Image of Spirit Fingers Spirit Fingers
    10/20/09

    In reply to What Do Adam Lambert and Details Have in Common?
    It's entirely possible that I watch too much Real World...but don't some of the gay boys actually like tongue-slobbing the ladeeez just to hear them squeal and develop big comical inert crushes while they try to get the boy in bed in order to fake make-out, possibly dry hump, and then go in the confessional to say how much they "will totally turn Davis straight if it's the last thing I do!"

    This does happen, right? #adamlambert
     Reply
    Spirit Fingers was starred Spirit Fingers was unstarred
    Image of DahlELama DahlELama
    10/20/09

    @Spirit Fingers: I had the exact same thought (though considerably less well-developed). I'm pretty sure this means we need to turn off the TV and make some real-life gay friends. #adamlambert
     Reply
    DahlELama was starred DahlELama was unstarred
    Image of Spirit Fingers Spirit Fingers
    10/20/09

    @DahlELama: True. But does this mean they won't all touch your boobies and tell you that something... your hair/clothes/nails/shoes/Martha Stewart serving bowls are just "simply dreadful?"

    This, I would actually like and find helpful. #adamlambert
     Reply
    Spirit Fingers was starred Spirit Fingers was unstarred
    Image of blix blix
    10/20/09

    @Spirit Fingers: Heh. "Who picked out that outfit, a blind rodeo clown"? #adamlambert
     Reply
    blix was starred blix was unstarred
    Image of Spirit Fingers Spirit Fingers
    10/20/09

    @blix: What? Just because Dress Barn doesn't fit your example of "fashion forward" doesn't mean double-knit dungarees with front pleating and tapered ankles, in Calico floral, can't be rockin' hot. #adamlambert
     Reply
    Spirit Fingers was starred Spirit Fingers was unstarred
    Image of blix blix
    10/20/09

    @Spirit Fingers: I like your style. #adamlambert
     Reply
    blix was starred blix was unstarred
    Image of ms_priestypants ms_priestypants
    10/20/09

    @DahlELama: I do have a certain couple who, when they get very very drunk, text me and request an egg for their baby. Sort of similar? #adamlambert
     Reply
    ms_priestypants was starred ms_priestypants was unstarred
    Image of DahlELama DahlELama
    10/20/09

    @ms_priestypants: Ah, yes--I believe I learned from Sex and the City that that can happen, even while sober. #adamlambert
     Reply
    DahlELama was starred DahlELama was unstarred
    Earlier discussions Other discussions Show all discussions Show featured discussions only Start a new discussion

Login

Enter your username and password.

Please enter a username.
Please enter your password.
logging in
Login via Facebook | Sign Up | Forgot Password?

Reset Password

Please enter your email address to have your password reset.

Please enter your email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
requesting password reset

Register

Registering will give you a user profile and the ability to add other users as friends. To become a commenter, however, you need to audition.

Want to know more? Consult the Comment FAQ and legal terms.

Please enter a username.
Please enter a password.
Please confirm your password.
Passwords are not identical.
Please enter a valid email address.
registration sent, waiting for reply

Submit Your Comment

You don't need to login to comment. Just enter your email address below.

See how your address will be displayed in the Comment FAQ.

Please enter a valid email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
logging in

Login with your Facebook or Gawker account.

Sign up here.



  • Archives
  • About
  • Advertising
  • Legal
  • Help
  • Report a Bug
  • FAQ
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.