<![CDATA[Gawker: details]]> http://tags.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gawker.com.png <![CDATA[Gawker: details]]> http://gawker.com/tag/details http://gawker.com/tag/details <![CDATA[Who Are These Rich Jerks?]]> Doree Shafrir has a new story in Details about rich guys who just won't stop spending money, during this recession. And all the guys have pseudonyms, like criminals! Do you know any evil rich people who fit these descriptions?

  • "Paul": A 43 year-old "academic who specializes in antiquities," Paul's "partner" (gay) is a law firm partner, and together they bring in more than $2 mil a year, no thanks to academia. They have houses in Hong Kong, NYC, and the Hamptons—and they've poured $1 million into a renovation of the Hamptons place. "There's a perilous, exciting feeling to having zigged when other people zagged," he explains. He's referring to spending lots and lots of money, there.
  • "Jon": A 30 year-old commercial real estate broker in NYC, Jon's income has fallen during the recession, but he can't stand to regress from $10,000 watches and $2,000 suits. It's hard not to spend, you see: "Then you go to the pool, and it's another $300 for a cabana-and you want the good cabana, not the one on the second floor where no one can see you."
If you know either of these rich evil bastards, out them in the comments at once.
[Details]]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5391134&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[What Do Adam Lambert and Details Have in Common?]]> Oh, look: metrosexual Bible Details landed America's biggest gay pop star for a cover shoot. A very heterosexual cover shoot. (He sorta kisses a girl!!) No, Details doesn't look gay at all.

Isn't this just the problem with closeted Details in the first place? It's always been so obviously gay, but at the same time it's like your college roommate who would blast Liza Minnelli and then talk about how he loved fucking his girlfriend who lives in Canada. The mag's closet mentality has even rubbed off on Lambert and they get him to say some really freaky things.

I am gay, but I like kissing women sometimes. Women are pretty. It doesn't mean I'm necessarily sleeping with them.

Yeah, that was really convincing. Adam, why are you going along with this? Say it loud, you're queer and you're proud. And now is not the time to be ashamed.

What is pretty shameful is the press release announcing his cover story. It says the American Idol runner up talks about "getting bras thrown at him onstage, kissing gorgeous women, and living the American dream." Yes, being a gay man making out with a woman really is the American dream—if you're a member of Exodus and trying to convince yourself you're straight.

And just check out the awkward photo shoot.

In order to get Lambert to make out with the model, they gave her jockstrap flavored lip gloss, which our man is now trying to devour. This is possibly the first men's magazine shoot where the male and female models are wearing matching nail polish.
This pose is so awkward that it has never been found in nature or heterosexual lovemaking ever in the history of the world. It shows Adam Lambert doesn't even know where the vagina lives. "Is it over here? No. Is it over here? No."
Lambert stares off into the distance at a monitor playing scenes from College Dudes 24/7. He needs to keep his motivation up, because in a minute, they're going to make him touch that yucky girl again.
Here is the cover. Adam looks pouty. That is the usual reaction when mean magazine editors make gay guys spend a whole day touching boobs.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5385793&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Which Magazine Would NYC Be?]]> In your controversial Tuesday media column: A magazine tries to claim NYC as its own, Details loses a publisher, Nancy Grace is the next Judge Judy, and Madonna wants to suck a newspaper's life blood (money).


Claim from an incredibly biased source
(the editor of Paper): "If New York City were a magazine, it would be Paper." No, it would be F.E.D.S.


John Koblin reports that the publisher of Details, Steven DeLuca, is getting canned, and his duties will be taken over by Bill Wackermann, current publisher of Glamour. The fact that the rest of Details didn't get canned in yesterday's Conde purge is actually kind of amazing. So this is low collateral damage.


Here's a needlessly titillating headline: "CTD Developing Nancy Grace Strip." Comic strip? Strip mall? Strip show? No, it's just some dumb Judge Judy-esque TV show. Go to hell then, Nancy Grace.


The UK's Mail on Sunday newspaper has paid "substantial damages" to Madonna after she sued the paper for publishing photos of her wedding to Guy Ritchie. After that happened, everyone knew she was married, so, damages. Or something. British laws suck so bad.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5375459&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Will the Weakest Survive at Conde Nast?]]> Conde Nast! Every scrap of news about it is precious, because everyone's afraid that this McKinsey review is just an excuse to gut the once-fancy magazine empire. But! Conde's weakest magazines might even make it through this alive.

Keith Kelly reports today that Teen Vogue, Allure, and Details—three of the company's shakiest titles—will not be killed. At least not right away!

A report from management consultants McKinsey & Co., now in the preparation stage, is expected to provide a blueprint for keeping all the magazine brands intact, although there will be some major ratcheting down of expenses, as has been widely reported.

Still. If those three mags and both Gourmet and Bon Appetit are all around a year from now, I will eat my shoe (which is made of pizza).

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5362534&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Hipsters Are Ruining Twitter, Say Hipsters on Twitter]]> Dear Facebook employee: If you're going to do something obvious and cliché like wearing cowboy boots to SXSW's geek spring break, please have the decency not to tell Twitter about it. Other Twitter idiocies today:

VentureBeat blogger Eric Eldon, who lives in the hipster San Francisco neighborhood of the Lower Haight and rides a hipster bicycle to other hipster neighborhoods and wears hipster glasses and has a hipster job and is generally in denial about being a hipster, criticized hipsters and their cowboy-boot affectations, just in time for them all to pack up their cowboy boots and fly to Austin for SXSW.

Facebook platform manager Dave Morin, who lives in the San Francisco hipster neighborhood of North Beach and is in such denial about being a hipster he doesn't even realize he should be in denial about being a hipster, packed up his cowboy boots and flew to Austin for SXSW.

Cutie-pie CBS Internet correspondent Natali Del Conte got stalked in Texas by Luke Wilson and Paul Rudd.

Chris Lehmann, better known as Mr. Wonkette Emerita, grokked a fundamental truth about Del Conte and Morin's destination. (Psst, Chris: SXSW has hotels, a complete lack of boot-ruining playa dust, and better food. But other than that, you're on to something there.)

Hipster-mongering Details editor Daniel Peres doesn't read Gawker unless told to, Columbia J-school student James Sims, who we suspect is himself a hipster, wrily noted.

See something worth noting on Twitter? Please email us your favorite tweets — or send us more Twitter usernames.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5169647&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Details Editor Exudes Optimism]]> In your sunny Friday media column: Dan Peres has balls, high school reporters have dreams, Arthur Sulzberger has an honest moment, and the media at large has nothing to look forward to:

Details editor Dan Peres had a little red meat for the crowd at his speech at Columbia J-school last night: "He called a neighbor in Westchester an 'asshole' after the man wondered aloud why anyone would pay j-school tuition... 'We'll be around a lot longer than his investment bank will,' said Mr. Peres." No comment. Whatsoever.


Sure, high school journalists like Josiah Jones of Lee's Summit, Missouri, know that the journalism industry is in rough shape, but "Jones plans to pursue a journalism career, completely undeterred by the forces buffeting the profession." Yea well millions of high school kids also plan on being NBA players and rock stars. The odds are against you, my friend.


Bad media news roundup: Media General is closing its DC bureau and laying off six journalists; NPR, of all places, is canceling all of its newspaper subscriptions; and a new report from Barclays Capital predicts that US advertising revenue will decline by 13% this year. Only three things, it's a good day!


NYT publisher Pinch Sulzberger: ""The immediate future looks, at a minimum, grim...Traditional revenue streams are anemic and getting worse." This is true. Though admirably direct, by NYT standards! He says the paper may start charging for some of its online content, which is inevitable.


See a family resemblance here? Eh? That's right, it's young AG Sulzberger, intrepid rookie NYT reporter and son of the man pictured above! The Observer reports he has the "attitude and presence of an intern." Buck up son! [Pic via]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5169546&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[You Demand: Let Wired Live!]]> In the past 24 hours, more than 8,000 of you voted on which Conde Nast magazine most deserves to live. You care, you really care! Your full results—and what they mean—below:

Winner: Wired. A deserving one! Wired is, it's safe to say, the most fully developed and cerebral magazine of the bunch. It's been thin lately, but it obviously has plenty of fans. And we'll be buying ten subscriptions and handing them out to you. Stay tuned.

Runner-up: Portfolio. A thoroughly respectable showing! Especially considering the amount of trash talk directed at Fort Polio around here. It does have some great content every once in a while. But the money Conde spends to put this magazine out may prove to be its downfall.

The Tie: Bon Appetit and Gourmet. Two separate food magazines, with different approaches, both of which are losing advertising at an alarming rate, separated by just six votes. We wondered: does Conde need two food magazines? Answer: no. Combined, they would have won this poll running away. Deciding which title to keep was just as hard for you as it would be at 4 Times Square.

The Dregs: Allure, Teen Vogue, Cookie. None of these got a lot of support, but we're guessing your demographics and their demographics aren't the best match. So call it even. Ironically, Cookie, which came in last, is perhaps the most promising start-up at Conde Nast, business-wise.

The Real Loser: Details. It didn't come in last. But around here—considering our audience—Details really should have been able to pull at least 10% or so — or at least beat out Teen Vogue. The fact that it didn't is an ominous sign.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5147143&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Details Moving Into Nicer, Unlucky Offices]]> The good news: Details staffers were just told that they're moving out of their second class offices on Third Avenue into the big time, Conde Nast headquarters at 4 Times Square! The bad news:

They're moving into the former offices of Domino, which folded last week. So in exchange for access to a grand cafeteria and the chance of spotting Anna Wintour in the elevators, they get to relocate to the jinxed Offices of Doom. Kind of like if you're on the front lines with the Russian army in WWII in the wintertime, and your buddy gets shot and killed, but hey, at least you can take his shoes.

Our tipster tells us this "Just in case you want to make a joke about how we'll probably be in and out of the space pretty quickly." Hey, Details might not be around that long itself anyhow, amirite? Hey-o!

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5145708&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Kashkari Kopykats!]]> Oh we see how it is. First we make Republican ski bum and national bailout chief Neel Kashkari a total object of desire by showing you how Ferrari-tastic he was in high school. Then People magazine goes and names him one of the sexiest guys in the world. And now, Details has named Neel #2 on their "Power List," if you can imagine "Details" and "Power" together in the same sentence. Kashkari kopykats are going krazy! We saw him first. That means we're first in line for some of that sweet bailout money in 09, baby. [Details; pic by ineffable.me]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5098672&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Details, Like Any Proud Gay Mag, Joins Fight Against AIDS]]> We've been dedicated to the idea that Details is in fact a gay magazine for some time, and more proof has arrived. Earlier this month we reported that the men's magazine sold its subscriber list to the gay themed Advocate, and now there's further evidence:

Our tipster subscribes to magazines under different names to see who's selling their subscribers list where, and he received this solicitation in the mail:

The GMHC in question is of course Gay Men's Health Crisis, a nonprofit advocacy organization that claims to be "first in the fight against AIDS." We look forward to the day when Details can openly serve its many audiences instead of us having to find out this way.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5069229&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Actual Proof That Details Is Gay]]> Ever since gay men's magazine Details launched, sharp-sighted observers—those with two eyeballs—have pointed out that it is, essentially, a gay magazine. We were writing about it five years ago! It's led to years and years of jokes about the magazine's gay contests and gay covers and gay vending machines. But now, at long last, we have actual proof that Details is, without a doubt, a solid member of the homosexual magazine cabal:

One of our tipsters subscribes to different magazines under different names, in order to smoke out those that are selling his name to various marketers. He's a Details subscriber. And lo and behold, which other magazine just sent him a discount voucher? The Advocate—the oldest LGBT magazine in America:

Why does The Advocate seek the same subscribers as Details? Because Details is so gay.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5060727&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Details' Gayness Increases Tenfold With Gossip Girl Cover]]> This here website (among many others) has been asking the same question for years. Is Details magazine gay? I mean, yeah, they pretty much are with all their fancy fashion ads and fancy men who are always gracing the cover. This month's bois are the dudes from teen soap Gossip Girl, and look! The cover is eerily similar to the fellas' Out cover appearance from back in March. (Heck, when New York Magazine featured the show, they included the ladies.) Note in these two gayish covers that resident twink Chace Crawford is sandwiched in the middle on both. Heh. Subtle. Click for larger comparison.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5059560&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Correct out-of-touch New York style rag's Internet gossip!]]> It's complicated. God, is it ever. The same October Details story that follows around New York's "Internet playboys" and their bicoastal hangers-on runs with this chart of who dated, funded, or hated in this overdocumented side of the Web scene. So sweet to know we're not the only ones keeping a scorecard, but one of its subjects, Caroline McCarthy, claims there's inaccuracies! Let's do Details and the kids recently fanning their fameballs from the coverage a favor and fix it up then. Ready? Let loose in the comments with your errata.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5057647&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Is This Porn, Or Just The Hills?]]> Is this woman having an orgasm, or simply on The Hills? That is the question of the day on the Details (a gentleman-on-gentleman's monthly) and GQ (same, basically) website. They've taken a smattering of extreme facial expression close ups from the sun-soaked MTV reality "smash" (sometimes that's what the Brits call a car wreck), and interspersed some regular old porno o-faces. Can you tell the difference between Hills-face and o-face? Take the test here. It's not really that hard, though, because (for me at least) those braying idiots have seared their visages into my memory forever. One day, when I am old and gray and hopefully in the glorious denouement of a serious horse tranquilizer addiction, I imagine that I'll see a bright flash of Whitney Port's bovine face and will immediately feel the mild warmth of an indifferent God and shuffle off this broken, mortal coil. I don't want to experience this alone, so please take the test over and over again until they are a part of you, too.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=386187&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Sexy Lounge Threatens Brooklyn With 'Details' Crowd]]> detailscover.jpegDetails Magazine executive editor Greg Williams was caught by a Times reporter sipping Snow Mosquitos, twee blueberry/ mint/ vodka drinks, at a terrifying den of yuppiedom called The Hideout in the already teetering hood of Fort Greene, Brooklyn . Look how precious:

It's the kind of place where the neighborhood's aggressively coupled recent transplants can forget about astronomical housing prices and in vitro fertilization for a few hours while nibbling on chocolates from Dean & DeLuca or watching a mixologist squeeze fresh juice for a Blackberry Caipirinha. The sole beer is Grimbergen, served in a snifter. On this night, a student with a messenger bag peeked inside, then promptly left.

"I want to attract an international crowd," said Asio Highsmith, a model and one of the owners, adding, "This bar could be anywhere."

Like... HELL.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=351999&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA['Details' Ed Has A Baby (With His Wife!)]]> Details editor Dan Peresnot gay but ok with that, unrepentant douchebag and totally ok with that—just had a kid! Peres' son, Oscar Dallas Wynter Peres, was born Monday and will be impeccably groomed. [WWD]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=345483&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Fabio On George Clooney: "He Is A Dog Whose Noise Is Worse Than His Bite"]]> "I was using the industry. I used the fashion industry, the whole business, for money, for chicks, for a lifestyle. But I never let them use me. And now they think I'm still desperate for a job, for work. Like I'll do anything. I don't care if I'm never on TV again." Ah, how we love the smell of bitterness in the morning! Especially when it emanates from the lips of the one, the only...Fabio. The "hunk" is profiled in this month's issue of Details magazine, and if you think he's a little pissy about the fashion industry, he's downright disgusted by George Clooney. And what, you might ask, could these two men possibly have to do with one another? Glad you asked!



"According to Fabio," says Details, "Clooney called [Fabio's female] dinner companions — who'd won the date at a charity auction benefiting the California Highway Patrol — names." What names? "Bitches [and] even badder words," says Fabio, who continues:

This guy, he ate more than he could chew. He laid a hand on me, so it would have been self-defense if I had beaten him down. I could have fucked him up. Oh my god, I could have beaten the shit out of him. I was so pissed off. So I go over and I'm like, 'Listen, I will fuck you up.' Right then, I could have knocked him over and beat him. I could have punched him in the face while he was on his back. That's how you really hurt someone — their face can't amortize the punch so it takes, it takes the whole impact. I am still so pissed at him. To insult women like that. He is a dog whose noise is worse than his bite.
Such tender words from the man who calls himself "a testosterone machine"! And so sensitive to the needs of women! Take Fabio's tale of losing his virginity at age 14 to a 17-year old girl: "She was telling me 'Don't make me pregnant,' and I was like, 'Don't worry, I don't even have sperm yet.'"

Fabio [Details]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=344606&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Details has finally ended its backpager,...]]> Details has finally ended its backpager, "Gay or...?" We did not realize it was still running! In any event, the sometimes-apologized-for "humor column" is now dead. [Ad Age]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=322228&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ So the tussle between the Details freelancer...]]> So the tussle between the Details freelancer and Ben Affleck gets murkier. Says a spokesperson about the mag's correction, which says the piece quotes Affleck saying things he did not say: "Statements taken out of context.... Nothing fabricated." Well, they can't have it both ways. The New York Observer asks: "Will Details run a correction of their correction?"

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=316770&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA['Details' Tosses Freelancer Under Ben Affleck's Hybrid SUV]]> Today's Page Six provides a vehicle for Details editor Dan Peres to either school or destroy his former staffer and current freelancer Bart Blasengame. In a December editor's letter editor's note, Peres claims that Blasengame (who goes unnamed) printed a quote by Ben Affleck that Affleck "never made." Also, the article (which lacked the writer's byline) "implied" that Affleck might leave L.A.—but Peres writes that was a "statement" that Affleck never issued. A Details publicist then says that the Details editor and Ben Affleck are "good friends," and says that "Dan realized there were things taken out of context." What now? Were things taken out of context—or were they invented, as Peres says? Because there's a really serious line there to be considered before destroying someone's career in journalism to appease a snippy star. These are the kind of things that keep lawyers very busy! Blasengame did not return an email this morning. Details recently killed his story on Sarah Silverman, which then appeared in Nerve.

detailsednoteNot Ben's Words [Page Six]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=316678&view=rss&microfeed=true