<![CDATA[Gawker: Details]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gawker.com.png <![CDATA[Gawker: Details]]> http://gawker.com/tag/details http://gawker.com/tag/details <![CDATA[ Actual Proof That <em>Details</em> Is Gay ]]> Ever since gay men's magazine Details launched, sharp-sighted observers—those with two eyeballs—have pointed out that it is, essentially, a gay magazine. We were writing about it five years ago! It's led to years and years of jokes about the magazine's gay contests and gay covers and gay vending machines. But now, at long last, we have actual proof that Details is, without a doubt, a solid member of the homosexual magazine cabal:

One of our tipsters subscribes to different magazines under different names, in order to smoke out those that are selling his name to various marketers. He's a Details subscriber. And lo and behold, which other magazine just sent him a discount voucher? The Advocate—the oldest LGBT magazine in America:

Why does The Advocate seek the same subscribers as Details? Because Details is so gay.

]]>
Wed, 08 Oct 2008 16:55:55 EDT Hamilton Nolan http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5060727&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ <i>Details</i>' Gayness Increases Tenfold With <i>Gossip Girl</i> Cover ]]> This here website (among many others) has been asking the same question for years. Is Details magazine gay? I mean, yeah, they pretty much are with all their fancy fashion ads and fancy men who are always gracing the cover. This month's bois are the dudes from teen soap Gossip Girl, and look! The cover is eerily similar to the fellas' Out cover appearance from back in March. (Heck, when New York Magazine featured the show, they included the ladies.) Note in these two gayish covers that resident twink Chace Crawford is sandwiched in the middle on both. Heh. Subtle. Click for larger comparison.

]]>
Mon, 06 Oct 2008 13:18:00 EDT Richard http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5059560&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Is This Porn, Or Just <i>The Hills</i>? ]]> Is this woman having an orgasm, or simply on The Hills? That is the question of the day on the Details (a gentleman-on-gentleman's monthly) and GQ (same, basically) website. They've taken a smattering of extreme facial expression close ups from the sun-soaked MTV reality "smash" (sometimes that's what the Brits call a car wreck), and interspersed some regular old porno o-faces. Can you tell the difference between Hills-face and o-face? Take the test here. It's not really that hard, though, because (for me at least) those braying idiots have seared their visages into my memory forever. One day, when I am old and gray and hopefully in the glorious denouement of a serious horse tranquilizer addiction, I imagine that I'll see a bright flash of Whitney Port's bovine face and will immediately feel the mild warmth of an indifferent God and shuffle off this broken, mortal coil. I don't want to experience this alone, so please take the test over and over again until they are a part of you, too.

]]>
Thu, 01 May 2008 13:00:00 EDT Richard http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=386187&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Sexy Lounge Threatens Brooklyn With 'Details' Crowd ]]> detailscover.jpegDetails Magazine executive editor Greg Williams was caught by a Times reporter sipping Snow Mosquitos, twee blueberry/ mint/ vodka drinks, at a terrifying den of yuppiedom called The Hideout in the already teetering hood of Fort Greene, Brooklyn . Look how precious:

It's the kind of place where the neighborhood's aggressively coupled recent transplants can forget about astronomical housing prices and in vitro fertilization for a few hours while nibbling on chocolates from Dean & DeLuca or watching a mixologist squeeze fresh juice for a Blackberry Caipirinha. The sole beer is Grimbergen, served in a snifter. On this night, a student with a messenger bag peeked inside, then promptly left.

"I want to attract an international crowd," said Asio Highsmith, a model and one of the owners, adding, "This bar could be anywhere."

Like... HELL.

]]>
Sun, 03 Feb 2008 08:19:54 EST Hamilton Nolan http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=351999&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ 'Details' Ed Has A Baby (With His Wife!) ]]> Details editor Dan Peresnot gay but ok with that, unrepentant douchebag and totally ok with that—just had a kid! Peres' son, Oscar Dallas Wynter Peres, was born Monday and will be impeccably groomed. [WWD]

]]>
Wed, 16 Jan 2008 09:57:19 EST Pareene http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=345483&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Details has finally ended its backpager, ... ]]> Details has finally ended its backpager, "Gay or...?" We did not realize it was still running! In any event, the sometimes-apologized-for "humor column" is now dead. [Ad Age]

]]>
Tue, 13 Nov 2007 14:55:46 EST Choire http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=322228&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ So the tussle between the Details freelancer ... ]]> detailsednoteSo the tussle between the Details freelancer and Ben Affleck gets murkier. Says a spokesperson about the mag's correction, which says the piece quotes Affleck saying things he did not say: "Statements taken out of context.... Nothing fabricated." Well, they can't have it both ways. The New York Observer asks: "Will Details run a correction of their correction?"

]]>
Tue, 30 Oct 2007 12:20:04 EDT Choire http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=316770&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ 'Details' Tosses Freelancer Under Ben Affleck's Hybrid SUV ]]> AFFLECKToday's Page Six provides a vehicle for Details editor Dan Peres to either school or destroy his former staffer and current freelancer Bart Blasengame. In a December editor's letter editor's note, Peres claims that Blasengame (who goes unnamed) printed a quote by Ben Affleck that Affleck "never made." Also, the article (which lacked the writer's byline) "implied" that Affleck might leave L.A.—but Peres writes that was a "statement" that Affleck never issued. A Details publicist then says that the Details editor and Ben Affleck are "good friends," and says that "Dan realized there were things taken out of context." What now? Were things taken out of context—or were they invented, as Peres says? Because there's a really serious line there to be considered before destroying someone's career in journalism to appease a snippy star. These are the kind of things that keep lawyers very busy! Blasengame did not return an email this morning. Details recently killed his story on Sarah Silverman, which then appeared in Nerve.

detailsednoteNot Ben's Words [Page Six]

]]>
Tue, 30 Oct 2007 10:10:23 EDT Choire http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=316678&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Even though there aren't any gay neighborhoods ... ]]> Even though there aren't any gay neighborhoods anymore, all the gays in Latin America are still moving to New York to be Out and Proud. But they don't really need those lame old homosexualist ghettos because they're all super-rich. They can never go home again, despite their massive wealth, so they're forced to live like kings in New York and read Details. [Details]

]]>
Tue, 30 Oct 2007 10:00:14 EDT Pareene http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=316567&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ 'Details': Is It All Right To Make Her Take It Up The Butt? ]]> SP32-20070709-120044.jpgGood question, Details! We asked our resident sexual etiquette expert. "Absolutely not," says My Cock. "Beg, wheedle, cajole, whatever you need to do. But a true gentleman never demands. Of course, that's not to say that you can't buy a certain pill and make her slightly more receptive. Nah, I'm kidding - it's flat-out wrong. As wrong as the image Details used for this story. Seriously, shouldn't that be a man butt? Anyway, if you are lucky enough to be granted the favor of anal congress, it's only polite to shove a dozen roses in that train tunnel once you're done."

Is it Ok to Demand Anal Sex? [Details]

]]>
Mon, 09 Jul 2007 15:40:11 EDT abalk http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=276285&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Supposedly formerly cool Details editor Dan ... ]]> Supposedly formerly cool Details editor Dan Peres doesn't want to be the new Dave Zinczenko, but, okay, he'll "get out there and shill" the new Details men's style book. [WWD]

]]>
Wed, 20 Jun 2007 10:58:52 EDT abalk http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=270529&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Is 'Details' Nearly Done? ]]> detailsMight Details go the way of ElleGirl, Teen People, Life and all those other magazines that close their print versions to go web? A source in the advertising industry has begun thinking that Details' days are numbered, spurred by the fact that many of latest issue's ads came through from bundled corporate ad sales, instead of from the Details team, as a cross-magazine buy. But would it be so crazy if the content (but presumably not all of its staff!) were folded into men.style.com, "the online home of Details and GQ"? Let's look at the numbers!

A former Fairchild title, Details is a smallish magazine within the Conde Nast stable (not as small as Jane, though), so it's not surprising that its 2006 revenues were $65 million vs. GQ's 2006 comparatively whopping $190 million. That $65 million was a 13.5% increase over 2005. Its ad pages were also up 5.5 percent. And in the first three months of 2007, revenues were up a nice 24.4% and ad pages 9.7% compared to the previous year's period.

Hey, that's great! But let's remember the staff of ElleGirl, who were shocked when Hachette Filipacchi closed the magazine in May 2006 despite its strong numbers—they were showing better growth than Details. Your theories and speculation welcome!

Earlier: Dan Peres Okay With Being A Douchebag

]]>
Fri, 15 Jun 2007 10:39:34 EDT Doree Shafrir http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=268987&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Conrad Black Even Swears Like Nixon ]]> conrblalordladyblack.jpg
  • In an interview with the Guardian, Conrad Black calls his fraud trial "bullshit" and announces that he's at war with the U.S. government. The paper also has an excerpt from Black's forthcoming biography of Richard Nixon, which praises the former president's "surpassing dignity." Read into that what you will. [Guardian]
  • Fashion mag ad pages sales: Count Vogue, W, Cosmopolitan, Elle, Marie Claire, Lucky, Men's Health, Men's Journal, and (maybe) Details and Teen Vogue as winners. Your losers: Esquire, InStyle, Seventeen, Cosmogirl, and Maxim. [WWD]
  • San Francisco Chronicle to cut 100 jobs, or 25% of the staff. [WSJ]

  • The business magazine segment is getting too crowded. That's bad news for titles like Business 2.0. [AdAge]
  • AM New York, Metro take their battle to the web. We've just realized that the guys at the subway entrances shoving their papers at you are the real world equivalent of pop-up ads. [NYT]
  • Time Warner shareholders passed resolutions calling for more control over the company's decisions. CEO Dick Parsons says the board will "carefully consider" the proposals, which sounds a lot like "no way in hell" to us. [WSJ]
  • Former Bloomberg employee Jon Friedman says that Bloomberg has nothing to worry about from the recent Thomson-Reuters merger. [MarketWatch]
  • Simon Dumenco: "The print-media industry is not only filled with f—k-ups, it coddles them." [AdAge]
  • Who reads England's Daily Mail? The paper says "web-savvy early adopters," the paper's critics say "troglodytic, white van-driving bigots." [Independent]
  • Former veep Dan Quayle wrote a book review for the weekend Wall Street Journal. Insert your own spelling joke here. [NYT]
  • Is Jane Pratt headed west? The former Sassy/Jane editor has put her townhouse on the market for $3.65 million. She once had sex with Drew Barrymore, you know. [NYM]

  • ]]>
    Mon, 21 May 2007 10:20:26 EDT abalk2 http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=262078&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Patrick Dempsey Shills For Conde Nast ]]> Conde Nast is rolling out its celeb-studded print ads, in a campaign called "Point of Passion." It's this nifty thing where people who might be in the magazines are shilling for the magazines! So you have Mary-Louise Parker posing for the New Yorker, and Patrick Dempsey working it for Details, and Richard Branson hawking Wired, and Diane von Furstenberg clutching Vanity Fair, and, naturally, Stanley Tucci caressing Gourmet. See, if famous people like magazines, well, then clearly you will enjoy them and buy them too! We thought we'd make some revisions—you know, to aim for that youthful demo that Conde is opting out on.

    branson_conde_small.jpg

    dvf_conde_small.jpg

    dempsey_conde_small.jpg

    tucci_conde_small.jpg

    ]]>
    Mon, 14 May 2007 18:16:10 EDT Choire http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=260369&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ The $40 Million Question: Define "Nappy" ]]> Don Imus
  • Don Imus' contract with CBS said: "Services to be rendered are of a unique, extraordinary, irreverent, intellectual, topical, controversial, and personal character." Legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin thinks that makes Imus's $40 million lawsuit against CBS a bit more plausible. [CNN]
  • Grocery store magnate/alleged Radar investor Ron Burkle in talks to merge with American Media Inc. (Star, National Enquirer, etc.). [NYP]
  • Former Maxim EIC Keith Blanchard has left Wenner Media, where he's been since October. [WWD]
  • Time Warner's cable business is carrying the can for its sorry publishing component. [NYP]
  • Details douchebag Dan Peres rises a bit in our estimation. His take on Mark Whitaker's branding Adam Moss "the new David Remnick": "Remnick is beloved, as you know. It would have been much funnier if it had been about someone we all can't stand." [WWD]

  • ]]>
    Thu, 03 May 2007 09:56:24 EDT abalk2 http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=257358&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ 'Details' Mandingo Article Not Afraid To Be Servicey ]]> mandingoLate to the party with this one, but what a party it is: a Mandingo party, to be precise! This phenomenon, detailed in March's Details, entails a bunch of rich white men getting together a bunch of well-hung black men and then paying these persons to do their saggy wives. Wait, maybe not paying them: "Each guest at Hammer's parties pays an annual membership—couples pay $30 and Mandingos $75. Everyone pays an additional fee of $30 for each party." Wait, so these men are paying to be whores?

    Paying to have sex with soccer moms, one of whom is described as a "pudding of cellulite?" We think someone got confused amidst all the hot action. Anyway, in that particular instance, an "inner attraction" was cited (riiight), but the real appeal for "Mandingos" seems to be that these events enable them to forge connections to rich white people: "the way [one "Mandingo"] sees it, interracial orgies are the new golf."

    Wow, there is so much information here for anyone who might be looking either to be a Mandingo or to have his wife boned by one. The only conclusion possible, maybe, is that the Details is looking to totally own the "leisure interests" category at next year's ASMEs. Seriously, take that, Golf Digest!

    Meet the Mandingos
    [Details]

    ]]>
    Fri, 06 Apr 2007 14:21:47 EDT Emily Gould http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=250333&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Dopesmoking Metrosexual Mag Editors Dig Queens ]]> pot-leaf-big.jpgDamn, you people know a lot about pot. The flood of tips engendered by our solicitation for expert advice on current spot pricing resulted in a number of e-mails, but our favorite came late in the day:
    I used to work for a now-defunct delivery service in Manhattan in the early years of the millenium. Runners would be dispatched by pager all over the city (from 96th street down, naturally). The going price was $60 for a 2 gram box of hydroponic ( Cannabis Cup winning varieties like Juicy Fruit, White Widow, White Rhino, Blueberry, AK47, Humboldt Harvest, Bulldozer, G13). At $30 a gram, the price per ounce would be $810, so certainly $560 is nowhere close to the most expensive weed that exists, unless there were a volume discount. A funny blind item anecdote: Among many other low-grade celebs, I once delivered to the editor-in-chief of a certain magazine that rhymes with "Retails". Apropos of wide speculation as to the sexual proclivities of its readership, this editor chose a box of the cannabis varietal named "Closet Queen".
    We knew it! Retails readers, you are so ray!

    Earlier: 'Post': $560 Per Oz. Pot "Most Expensive In City History?"

    ]]>
    Mon, 18 Dec 2006 17:55:08 EST abalk2 http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=222693&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Dan Peres Okay With Being a Douchebag ]]> "If my 20-year-old self could see me now at 35, he'd want to kick my ass," says Dan Peres in the opening of his Letter From The Editor in the current Details. It's the yuppie issue, and Dan wants you to know that while he used to be pretty cool (smoked pot, wore flannel, lived in the Village), he's grown and changed, and now he's the kind of douche that he used to despise. He lets you know this in painful, painstaking detail. Since the piece is not online, and God knows you don't want anyone to see you actually buying Details we've taken the liberty of reproducing it below. It's a long read, but ultimately worth it, because, as Dan comes to terms with his own douchery, so must we all. Enjoy.

    ]]>
    Wed, 29 Nov 2006 11:30:01 EST abalk2 http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=217928&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ 'Details' Making It Too Easy ]]>

    Oh, come on.

    IS STRAIGHT THE NEW SQUARE? [Details]

    ]]>
    Wed, 30 Aug 2006 16:30:31 EDT abalk2 http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=197671&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ September Issues: Fall Fashion Weigh-In #3 ]]> You see that? That's 28.5 POUNDS OF MAGAZINE. 28.5 lbs. is the ridiculous sum total of all our fall fashion magazine weigh-ins; the combined weight of these 13 glossies exceeds that of all the models who appear in them.

    But anyhow: Last night we made our last trip to the newsstand for magazine-weighing purposes; naturally, it was our most grueling burden. But, for the sake of research, we lugged 13.5 pounds of aspirational luxury back to HQ and added them to the monstrous pile. Our back could be feeling better, thanks.

    After the jump, the final weigh-in, featuring heavyweight champ Vogue and the other fatties.

    sf1.jpg

    sf2.jpg

    sf3.jpg

    sf4.jpg

    sfrandom.jpg

    Notes:
    • Good to see Bazaar hanging in there with the African queen.
    • Fuck you, Vogue.
    • You know exactly why we included Details.


    Earlier: September Issues: The First Fall Fashion Weigh-In
    September Issues: Fall Fashion Weigh-In #2

    ]]>
    Thu, 17 Aug 2006 15:00:06 EDT Jessica http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=194923&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ 'Details' Loves Your Fat, Fugly Ass Just the Way It Is ]]> Hot on the trail of the "man flab" trend, those progressive dandies over at Details feature an article on the return of curves in Hollywood — "FAT IS BACK," etc. Otherwise likeable writer Holly Millea argues that actresses like Rachel Weisz, Kate Winslet and Catherine Zeta-Jones are paving the way for calorie-loving girls everywhere, fighting the Nicole Richies of the world one sandwich at a time. Notes Salon's Broadsheet Broad Rebecca Traister:

    Details is a men's magazine and it's clearly pretty proud of itself for its enlightened celebration of flesh over sinew. And so it illustrates its story with a pig — a pig's ass, no less. And, in doing so, suggests that all the beautiful women name-checked in the story for being healthy and sexy are actually farm animals. But wait! The pig photo isn't enough. No, click on the accompanying feature, the "Curves Ahead" slide show, featuring "a visual smorgasbord of the sexiest plate-scrapers ever." Notice that the slug for the slide show includes the word "Fatties."

    And, to drive the point home, they included Miss Piggy in the slide show.

    Hollywood and Swine [Broadsheet]
    Why Fat Is Back in Hollywood [Details]

    ]]>
    Wed, 16 Aug 2006 10:22:54 EDT Jessica http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=194555&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Is It Nature or Nurture That Makes This Contest Sooo Gay? ]]> Second Place: Getting ass-raped by a Production Assistant. At home.

    Win a Trip to the Set of Prison Break and Meet Wentworth Miller [Details]

    ]]>
    Fri, 11 Aug 2006 16:40:22 EDT gdelahaye http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=193714&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Media Bubble: Time Inc. Lives on the Edge ]]> Time Inc. to launch SI Edge, fitness mag that won't offer abs tips. Retorts Zinczenko: "[W]e promise not to point out that he's naming his magazine after a shaving cream." [NYP]
    • Hey, remember the big USA Today expose on how the phone companies were colluding with the government to create a big database of all sorts of domestic phone-call records? Yeah, well, the paper's still convinced about the database, but it's not so sure anymore the telcos played along. [USAT]
    • Was Pemberton's Spin too much like Blender? Plus, a Detailser leaves to become — wha? — a morning-show DJ. In Oregon. [WWD]

    ]]>
    Fri, 30 Jun 2006 15:40:46 EDT Jesse http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=184644&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Gossip Roundup: Lisa Turtle Missed the Drug Awareness Episode ]]> lisaturtle.jpg• The National Enquirer finds itself getting sued, yet again — but this time it's not Tom Cruise unleashing the lawyers. It's little Lisa Turtle (aka Lark Voorhies), who is suing for unspecified damages after the rag quoted a source as saying she was bipolar and addicted to cocaine. Honestly, she did look a little tweaked when she and Screech did "the sprain" dance. [TMZ]
    • Britney Spears suspects hubby K-Fed may be the source of leaks to the tabloids. He may not be the best husband for her, but Federline sure is loyal to America. [Scoop]
    • Shiloh Jolie-Pitt's grandfather, Jon Voight, launches a public campaign to see the new baby. Considering his contact with the press was a major reason behind his estrangement with Angelina Jolie, this strikes one as a not-so-good plan. [Lowdown]
    Three Days of Rain may not have been stellar, but was it really so bad as to kick Julia Roberts down to the new face of Avon? [Page Six]
    • Nobody's quite sure whether or not Anna Nicole Smith is pregnant, particularly because she's yet to figure out how to pee on a stick. [R&M]
    Details gives a rundown of the city's most hump-friendly public restrooms; the Plumm, Bungalow 8, and Bar 89 make the list. And yet there's no mention of the bathrooms at the Christopher Street Pier. C'mon, Details. We know you know. [Page Six]

    ]]>
    Wed, 31 May 2006 12:05:37 EDT Jessica http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=177352&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ In Which 'Details' Baits Us to Make the Same Old Tired Joke ]]> A headline from the new Details, out today:
    20060425details.jpg
    Is it? Really? Well, then, after five years of watching you dance around it (with, say, headlines like this one): Um, hey, Details, are you gay?

    Details [Style.com]

    ]]>
    Tue, 25 Apr 2006 12:10:07 EDT Jesse http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=169433&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Media Bubble: Who Cares About Rate Base, So Long as Your Shirt Is Tucked In? ]]> Details missed its rate base on eight of 10 issues in 2005. Fun. [Ad Age]
    Martha Stewart launches Blueprint today in a bid to reach younger readers. There should probably be a joke about Alexis here, but we can't think of one. [NYP]
    Daily Candy remains for sale. [NYM]
    • Punch Sulzberger has allegedly said that he'll read the Times on the computer when he can take a computer into the bathroom with him. Now, apparently, he can. [NYT]
    Kurt Andersen thinks we're in a tech bubble again. How does he know? Because Michael Wolff wants in. [NYM]
    Simon Dumenco answers the questions you didn't ask, including whether he has a clothing line and what his jingle sounds like. [Ad Age]
    • Existentially speaking, who is Brian Williams? [MW]
    NYT M.E. Jill Abramson's grandfather could have invested early in Paramount Pictures but didn't. [NYSun]

    ]]>
    Mon, 24 Apr 2006 16:46:17 EDT Jesse http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=169248&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Media Bubble: Gossip Columns Important to Those Concerned About Gossip ]]> Page Six traffics in buzz, apparently. [NYT]
    • Uncle Bob Schieffer might stick around to do end-of-show commentaries on Couric-led CBS Evening News. And also to show off his legs, of course. [Philadelphia Inquirer]
    • Breaking: Daily News distributes sponsored copies! [NYT]
    • It's hard to be a teen magazine. [Mediaweek]
    Real Simple loses two top editors; Details's Dan Peres tucks in. [WWD]

    ]]>
    Mon, 17 Apr 2006 13:50:43 EDT Jesse http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=167710&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Brian Farnham Ankles 'Details' to Helm 'TONY' ]]> 20060404tony.jpgAs WWD reported this morning, Details wunderkind Brian Farnham — who in five years there rose to the No. 2 position at the mag — resigned yesterday to become the new editor-in-chief of Time Out New York. TONY has been EIC-less since Joe Angio left at Christmastime to focus on promoting his documentary on Melvin Van Peebles. There were apparently "many, many, MANY
    candidates interviewed" for the job — which presumably explains why it was open for so long — and Farnham will be starting May 1. After the jump, dueling memos: A terse — and head-patting — farewell from Details chief Dan Peres, and a gushing welcome from Time Out president Alison Tocci.

    From: Peres, Dan
    Sent: Mon Apr 03 18:17:00 2006
    To: FP Details Edit
    Subject:

    Please join me in congratulating Brian Farnham, who has just been named the new Editor-in-chief of Time Out New York. Clearly, this is a bittersweet moment for me —- as I would imagine it is for all of you, as well. Brian will be greatly missed, as his contributions to Details these last 5 years have been instrumental to our success. For as much as this is a blow to the magazine, I couldn't be happier for — not to mention — more proud of Brian.

    D.
    You've all been seeing the black smoke coming out of my office these past months, but I've just officially changed it to white... we have an Editor-in-Chief!

    Our new EIC is Brian Farnham. He resigned today from his position as Deputy Editor at Details magazine to accept our offer. His first day at TONY will be May 1st.
    Brian came up through the ranks at Details, and previously held the titles Senior Associate Editor and Senior Editor. His focus was on the front of the book, developing writers, and conceiving new packages such as the annual Power issue.

    He has worked freelance for the NY Times, New York, (where he also worked as a reporter early on), Harpers Bazaar, Newsday and Nerve, and he wrote a book about the creation of iWon.com, a $100 million CBS-backed web venture for which he followed the site's two founders for eight months. He was also a producing editor for Sidewalk.com.

    Brian graduated from Bowdoin, and has an M.F.A from the Graduate Writing Program at Columbia. He was born and raised on the East side of NYC.

    He is smart, funny, articulate, hungry, web-savvy, and an information junkie like the rest of us. I think he'll make a fantastic addition to the mix and take Time Out exactly where we want to go next. Of the many, many, MANY candidates interviewed, Brian stood out for his ability to articulate a vision for TONY and to generate package and front-of-book ideas that screamed TONY in a most refreshing way.

    Brian's arrival also coincides nicely with the May 3 launch of our redesign. Get those binoculars ready, it's time for a new look!

    I know you'll make Brian welcome, and I look forward to announcing an all staff soiree the week of May 1st to officially say hello.

    Alison Tocci
    President/Group Publisher
    Time Out New York
    475 Tenth Ave., 12th floor
    NY NY 10018
    ]]>
    Tue, 04 Apr 2006 13:40:46 EDT Jesse http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=165014&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Study: 'GQ' Is the Gayest Magazine Ever ]]> 20060223gq.jpgIf you're anything like us, you often wonder what magazines have the gayest readerships. Thankfully, Fairchild's DNR got hold of the research this week, and it told us. (On Monday. None of you saw this and could pass it on before now? Jesus, people.)

    And the gayest magazine is — tasteful drumroll, please — GQ, where 10.39 percent of male readers are gay or bisexual. EW comes in a very close second, with 10.35 percent of its male readers identifying itself as gay or bi, and then there's a big drop to third place.

    Details, shockingly, is nowhere on the list. We were all set to apologize to Dan Peres and crew for years of jokes, but then we read the small print:

    The study only includes titles with certain circulation levels (eliminating Details), and does not include gay-interest titles like Out.

    So Details is both faggy and unpopular. It's like high school all over again.

    After the jump, the full top-ten list — plus the top ten straightest pubs, which features a tough contest for first place among the likes of North American Hunter, Four Wheeler, and Guns and Ammo.

    20060223dnr.jpg
    Click to enlarge. Or read the lists below:

    Gayest
    1. GQ, 10.39% of male readers are gay/bi
    2. Entertainment Weekly, 10.35%
    3. TV Guide, 5.46%
    4. People, 5.1%
    5. Newsweek, 4.74% (tie)
    6. Time, 4.74% (tie)
    7. Men's Health, 4.68%
    8. National Geographic, 4.1%
    9. Consumer Reports, 3.96%
    10. U.S. News, 3.9%

    Straightest
    1. North American Hunter, 99.9% of male readers are straight
    2. North American Fisherman, 99.5%
    3. Four Wheeler, 99.45%
    4. Guns & Ammo, 99.43%
    5. Sporting News, 99.41%
    6. American Rifleman, 99.37%
    7. Cycle World, 99.25%
    8. Stuff, 99.23% (tie)
    9. Field & Stream, 99.23 (tie)
    10. Midwest Living, 99.23 (tie)

    ]]>
    Thu, 23 Feb 2006 13:30:13 EST Jesse http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=156585&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Media Bubble: Icahn Cahn't ]]> • Carl Icahn's quixotic attempt to split up Time Warner starts to "falter." As quixotic bids are wont to do. [NYT]
    • Is the blog boggle about to burst? One certainly hopes so. [Slate]
    • Sixteen months after the last one left, Details names a new executive editor: Bill van Parys, snagged from sister pub Jane. Insert Details-is-gay joke here.[WWD]
    • Yahoo News was all Jerry Garcia's fault. Or something like that. [MW]

    ]]>
    Fri, 17 Feb 2006 12:30:34 EST Jesse http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=155532&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Media Bubble: Nachos, Beer, and, Maybe, a Free Football-Phone! ]]> Maxim, Sports Illustrated, and Playboy to spend up to $1 million each to host dueling pre-Super Bowl parties. Maybe some of those recently laid off from Time Inc. and Dennis Publishing will be invited. [NYP]
    • Brandon Holley digs 20-something smart chicks. [NYT]
    Daily News TV guy Richard Huff still doesn't like Jon Stewart. [NYDN]
    • The Observer redesigns its blogs, which now look thoroughly swell (if, sadly, less pink). [The Real Estate/NYO]
    • Missed In Style: Celebrity Weddings on ABC Monday night? Then you missed your chance to see highlights from Details editor Dan Peres' wedding. We're sure you're as sad as we are. [WWD]

    ]]>
    Fri, 03 Feb 2006 13:51:11 EST Jesse http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=152655&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Media Bubble: Arthur Sulzberger Would Like to Teach the World to Sing in Perfect Harmony ]]> • Everything at the Times is great, says Sulzberger! He loves Bill Keller! His job is totally secure! The staff is all happy! And he still believes, in spite of everything, that people are still truly good at heart! [MW]
    Stephen Colbert, fake blowhard political pundit, to emcee annual White House Correspondents Association dinner, filled with real blowhard political pundits. Also, universe to collapse just a little bit further. [FishbowlDC]
    • Finally, some good news: Magazines aren't necessarily going away. [National Journal]
    • Hed: "'First-Ever' Urban Gay Men's Lifestyle Magazine to Get U.S. Debut." You know, except for Details. (And we won't even get started on its name.) [Folio:]

    ]]>
    Fri, 27 Jan 2006 15:13:08 EST Jesse http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=151252&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Media Bubble: Fewer Americans Get Their News From ABC News ]]> • New anchors ain't helping World News Tonight's ratings. [WSJ]
    Details publisher Chris Mitchell was trying to get out, but Conde kept pulling him back in. [WWD]
    • Cathie Black, feminist, and Bill Buckley, conservative, get MPA lifetime-achievement awards. [Ad Age]
    • Whither poor, UPN-less Channel 9? [NYT]

    ]]>
    Thu, 26 Jan 2006 15:01:03 EST Jesse http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=150975&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Sometimes You Feel Like a Nut ]]> We've never before heard of the "Nut Lovers" candy bar from Hershey's.
    20051130nutlovers.jpg
    But of course a spy would find it in the vending machine at Details.

    Not that there's anything wrong with that.

    Details [men.style.com]

    ]]>
    Wed, 30 Nov 2005 12:40:29 EST Jesse http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=140164&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Slutty Sis Tried to Steal Away Our Anderson! ]]> If anything was going to come between us and our beloved Wonkette, we always knew it would be a man. And so we're both entirely distraught and, deep down, not at all surprised, that she's trying to take Anderson Cooper away from us. So, though we're ashamed she brought her readers this news before we brought it to ours, we'll just steal her writeup and remind her that, when all's said and done, he's not on her team, anyway.*

    (* By which, of course, we mean the Nationals. Yeah, that's it. Because he's a New Yorker, not a Washingtonian. So he's gotta be a Yankees fan. That's all we're saying.)

    Herewith, Wonk's attempt to steal our man:

    The Many Moods of Anderson Cooper

    Who among us does not delight in Anderson Cooper's breezy-yet-caring columns for not-gay-at-all Details magazine, thoughtfully reprinted on CNN.com? He writes on Katrina, on going gray, on his brother's suicide and on being a Jeopardy champion — each month we are reminded the multitudes that Anderson contains. Multitudes of experiences and emotions but only two facial expressions:

    20051129wonkcooper.jpg

    Of course, around here, "Talking sex with Mom" would also have the sad face. If not the run-screaming-from-the-room face.

    Or even the why-are-you-talking-to-our-sister-about-this-instead-of-us face.

    Anderson Cooper Commentary [CNN via Wonkette]

    ]]>
    Tue, 29 Nov 2005 17:48:28 EST Jesse http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=139993&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ New 'Details' Outs 'NYT,' Except That It Doesn't ]]> 20051122detailsnyt.jpgThe new Details is out today, and Simon Dumenco has an essay in it about the Times's strange fixation on defining the borders of heterosexuality — and ensuring that The Gays remain safely classified as The Other.

    Over the last year or so, he notes, that fixation has encompassed examinations of "metrosexuals," "ubersexuals," "gay vague," and the "man date." It entailed an expose of closeted suburbanites who may make "A Sex Stop on the Way Home," as the B1 headline put it, and included a Style Magazine feature musing on a Soho brunch with a quarter of gay men, at which Cher — who else? — was discussed.

    Dumenco writes, somewhat bitterly and entirely fairly:

    [T]he paper's ongoing Kinsey-esque project of parsing moderning masculinity is a time-consuming journalistic undertaking — sort of like searching for weapons of mass destruction. Relentlessly defining, charting, and quantifying the mysterious modern condition known as masculinity, as the Times sees it, it serious work.

    That said, men who appear in public in pairs would be well advised to avoid Italian restaurants, SoHo brunch spots, parks, and other wooded areas when Times reporters are in the vicinity. The Times has its eyes on you, guys. Don't try anything funny.

    But, hey, feel free to say something funny — about Cher and whatnot.

    So, how does Details coverline Dumenco's smart take on the Times's habit of, as he says, "[o]bsessing about The Gays ... while aiding and abetting gay panic?" Like this"

    When Did The New York Times Come Out of the Closet?

    Um, it didn't, at least not according to the article. But totally misconstruing the article is forgivable: We all know how much Details likes the closet cases.

    Details [men.style.com]

    ]]>
    Tue, 22 Nov 2005 16:43:10 EST Jesse http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=138937&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Anderson Cooper Needs a New Year's Date ]]> 20051101anderson.jpgCNN pops on its homepage today a fresh Anderson Cooper Details column from the archives, this one from December 2004, about New Year's Eve. (Because, hey, who's not ready to read about New Year's on the first day of November?) The Coopster first reveals his profound distaste for the holiday — "If you go to a party and drink on New Year's Eve, it's inevitable: You will at some point find yourself alone and despondent," he writes, and we can't imagine why he'd feel alone — but confesses that ultimately, when he started covering New Year's for CNN, he grew to like it. Oh, the wacky times he had doing the broadcast:

    I started a new tradition for CNN, although I'm not sure it's going to last.

    In addition to the ball drop in Times Square, we had cameras covering the Drag Queen Drop in Key West, where, at the stroke of midnight more or less, a drag queen named Sushi, sitting inside a giant ladies' shoe, is lowered from the roof of a gay bar.

    We'd interviewed Sushi live a couple of times throughout the night, and by midnight ... well, let's just say that Sushi was no longer too fresh.

    When she started to descend, something malfunctioned, and the shoe stalled. The last we saw of Sushi, she was crawling on all fours along the roof of the bar.

    I told the director to cut away. Seeing a drag queen actually drop off a roof is not how I wanted to kick off the new year.

    Under the roof, however, and inside the gay bar — well, that's a whole different story.

    Just Say No to New Year's Eve [CNN.com]

    ]]>
    Tue, 01 Nov 2005 11:44:12 EST Jesse http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=134449&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Remainders: Anna Nicole Feeds Her Dogs Herbalife ]]> annadog.jpg• In more PETA news, the organization has kidnapped Anna Nicole Smith's dogs and forced them to protest Iams pet food. Anna Nicole, however, thinks Iams tastes great. [AP/Yahoo]
    Details has a major scoop: Colin Farrell drinks beer! And next month, Details water as being really wet. [Hollywood Machine]
    • Best name for a college sex column: Cornellingus. [The Atlantic (subscription req'd)]
    • Men don't read. They also can't listen, don't understand you, and never take you anywhere nice. [BusinessWeek]
    Voice gossipette Michael Musto cannot be blamed for Gawker's sins. [NY Blade]
    • Has anyone yet figured out why Manhattan smells like pancakes? Is it terror sugar? [AP/ABC]
    Project Runway reject Austin Scarlett thinks blackface is always in style. [PMc]
    • Shame on Daily News staffer Bill Hutchinson for failing to note that jailed rapper Lil' Kim's lyrics channel the genius of Biggie Smalls. [NYDN]
    • Depeche Mode tickets can be yours for just a little breast grope. Okay, not really a little grope — it's got to be at least 10 minutes' worth of heavy petting. [Craigslist]

    ]]>
    Fri, 28 Oct 2005 18:55:25 EDT Jessica http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=133975&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Anderson Cooper Is Probably Getting Very Sick Of Us ]]> Many readers wrote in to protest that we had not devoted enough attention to yesterday's remaindered Anderson Cooper essay on gray hair. In our defense, it's from August of 2003. Though the fact that it was originally published in Details did pique our interest. When we checked our vast glossy back-issue library, we found the original, pre-CNN version of the essay. Excerpts are presented here:

    -I still refuse to admit I'm gay.
    -In the TV news business, gay equals gravitas. In fact, in just about any line of work being prematurely gay is an advantage.
    -I don't get it, but gay on guys drives a lot of folks wild.
    -Translation: Gay is nature's way of whispering "You're dying."
    -The other thing that happens when you start getting gay: You begin checking out every other gay-haired guy.
    -This can deteriorate into something of an obsession. For a while, every time I saw Phil Donahue, I had to reassure myself: It's okay. I'm not as gay as he is.
    -My advice? Give in to gay.

    Ah, find/replace. The parodist's greatest friend.

    Going Gray [CNN]

    ]]>
    Fri, 07 Oct 2005 11:05:50 EDT Pareene http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=129733&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ The New 'Details': Is This The Little Mag I Carried? ]]> 20050927details.jpgThe new Details is out, and — who'd have thunk it — it's the mag's fifth anniversary issue. Well, it's not the fifth anniversary of the magazine, exactly, but the fifth anniversary of this iteration of the magazine. And it seems like just yesterday this version was born. Where does time go?

    Could it really be five years ago that the mag was freshly arrived at Fairchild from Conde Nast, that Dan Peres was freshly arrived from Paris to edit it, and that Mark Golin and his laddiness was only recently shitcanned? Apparently it can.

    At the same time, we can't escape the feeling that so much has changed. There's a permanence to the magazine now, a feeling of reliability and success. Five years ago, it seemed like Details could disappear at a moment's notice — it had, after all, gone through four editors in five years before Peres came on. Now it's a fixture.

    But what makes it seem so much more, well, comfortable with itself?

    First we went looking through the data, to find numerical evidence of this change. But we found something funny: Details's stats don't seem any better today than they did in that relaunch issue, in October 2000.

    Circulation, fourth quarter of 2000: 445,996
    Circulation, first half of 2005: 407,167

    Ad pages, October 2000: 132.01
    Ad pages, August 2005: 75.78

    Ad revenue, October 2000: $4.41 million
    Ad revenue, August 2005: $3.76 million

    [Sources: Advertising Bureau of Circulations, Publishers Information Bureau. 2005 numbers cited are the most recent available.]

    Hmm. So if that's out, what could it be that makes the mag seem so much more settled today than it did five years ago?

    We started flipping through the issue, and we found the answer when we reached Peres's "Letter from the Editor":

    "Is Details gay?"

    Since becoming editor-in-chief of this magazine five years ago, no other question has been put to me, if you will, more often.

    To be clear, from the beginning I have maintained that Details would be a magazine for intelligent, sophisticated men — both gay and straight. After all, I said at the time, the line between homo and hetero has become so undetectable, you can barely tell the difference anymore. Most men don't care anyway, I'd add.

    I was, of course, lying.

    Ah yes, that's it. Finally coming out can make anyone — or anything, apparently, including a magazine — seem so much more comfortable with itself.

    Congrats, Details. We'll see you at Beige tonight.

    Details [Official site]

    ]]>
    Tue, 27 Sep 2005 17:34:36 EDT Jesse http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=127781&view=rss&microfeed=true