<![CDATA[Gawker: diebold]]> http://tags.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gawker.com.png <![CDATA[Gawker: diebold]]> http://gawker.com/tag/diebold http://gawker.com/tag/diebold <![CDATA[Diebold Quits US Election Game, But Replacement No Improvement]]> In 2001, security giant Diebold bought its elections division for $31 million. Today, it sold it to a competitor for $5 million. The company said elections had become a "distraction" and now a sad chapter in democracy has closed. Maybe.

The company in question, Premiere Election Solutions, became a constant drag for Diebold after it was revealed that the company's CEO was a major George Bush supporter. As if that weren't bad press enough, it soon became clear that Diebold's machines were easily hacked, a revelation that led some local election commissions to ban the machines. Some even accused Diebold of breaking the law, which shouldn't really come as much of a surprise.

With the controversy swirling about them, Diebold executives decided to distance themselves from Premiere Election Solutions. And now this sale means the company will no longer play a role in national elections.

Many of Diebold's opponents will cheer this move, but the division's new owner, Election Systems & Software may not be much better. The company, the largest of its kind in the United States, and its products have also been implicated in malfunctions, including the 2004 presidential election. In 2006, three states filed complaints about ES&S machines. The company blamed poll workers, of course, but did end up paying the state of Indiana $775,000 for its troubles.

The most politically-alarming incident was way back in 1996, when Republican Sen. Chuck Hagel won 56% of the vote in an election that many thought he would lose. It was later revealed that Hagel was once the CEO of American Information Systems Inc., which would later rename itself Election Systems & Software and produced a majority of the machines that led to Hagel's big win. Not a very reassuring coincidence.

Thus, the virtual shadow hanging over American elections has simply shifted, not dissipated. As for Diebold's election career, it will continue in Brazil, where it supplies machines for the national elections. Those poor saps.

Image via markth314's flickr.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5352395&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Obama leads in the widget race]]> barack_obama.jpgHillary Clinton and Barack Obama traded states again last night, but Obama is only a handful of delegates away from securing the Democratic Party's nomination. The latest Web metric — widgets embedded on social-network pages — puts him firmly in the lead against John McCain. If only widgets counted as much as having a Republican running voting-machine maker Diebold. [ReadWriteWeb] (Photo by Steve Jurvetson)

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=392473&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[San Francisco to hand-count Tuesday's vote]]> Voting machine-haters, take heart. In August, California Secretary of State Debra Bowen withdrew approval of San Francisco's ESS InkaVote optically scanned ballots for tomorrow's election. That means the city known for its Web 2.0 boomlet will have to hand-count the election, a process that could take weeks to determine the outcome of tight contests. Way to go, Frisco! If you're looking to catch up on e-voting shenanigans, BradBlog isn't as nutty as the site's design suggests. My favorite twist: Disgraced machine maker Diebold has renamed itself to — wait for it — Premier Election Solutions.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=319168&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Anonymous Wikipedia editors are being watched]]> Despite Wikipedia's growing sophistication and greater scrutiny placed on content manipulation, individuals and organizations are still tempted to edit Jimmy Wales's online encyclopedia for personal gain by posting under the veil of anonymity. But that veil just became a little more tattered. Virgil Griffith, a Cal Tech graduate student, has an eye on you, Wikipedia tinkerers. He's developed Wikipedia Scanner, a database that correlates the IP address of anonymous posters with the owners of the associated block of IP addresses. That data does not identify individuals, but it's usually good enough to pinpoint organizations from which they make the edits.

Although newly launched, and currently down due to traffic directed from a Wired story, the database has already revealed that Diebold employees really don't want you to know how insecure their e-voting machines are; that Congressional aides have mostly ceased making edits since being busted last year; that Wal-Mart, surprisingly, understands Web public relations by leaving negative content but buffing its image with minor tweaks; and that CIA employees, rather than being guided by self-interest or politics, are much like ordinary Wikipedia users, obsessed with the most extensive and accurate entry for Buffy the Vampire Slayer... no wonder they want to remain anonymous. (Photo courtesy of Virgil Griffith)

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=289311&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Clearly Diebold has some special definition of "glitch-free" that only the Post understands]]>

Tech Firm Shows Off Glitch-Free Software [Washington Post]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=203279&view=rss&microfeed=true