@Voyou_Charmant: Amen. Honestly, who the fuck, when they really think about it, doesn't want to see a live T-Rex? I think even the most vocal ethical complaints would be replaced with "Holy shit...that's the tits."
Yeah,but Hans, you were so preoccupied with whether or not you could, you didn't stop to think if you should.
You stood on the shoulders of geniuses to accomplish something as fast as you could and before you even knew what you had, you patented it and packaged it and slapped it on a plastic lunchbox, and now you're selling it, you want to sell it!
@GitEmSteveDave_SameGreatTaste!: Incidentally I thought that one of the worst speeces in the movie. There isn't a scientist alive who didn't stand on the shoulders of geniouses - remember the quote from Sir Isaac Newton, circa 18th century?
With us humans, the thing is that if we can do something, at least one of the six billion of us will. That's why it's best to do the questionable things publically for a good purpose, since if you don't, someone else will do the same in secret for nefarious ends.
Still, I wonder what this guy is aiming at. Whatever the movie says, there's not much money or use in dino-birds in themselves. What theory is being proved, or discovery made with this experiment? That's what I'd like to know, but this bit of news doesn't tell us. Link to a more serious science news site about the matter, please.
@Lightice: His point was, that unlike karate or excellent marksmanship, there was no discipline required. A man who can kill with his bare hands or shoot the eye out of a king of hearts from 1,000 yards off is not likely(I didn't say never) to do so if he's angry because his team lost. That kind of skill and knowledge also comes with discipline from the many hours/days/months/years spent honing the skill.
What Hammond's scientists had done was read the work of others and took the next step. What that means is they didn't have to deal with the consequences/outcomes of the previous research. They also weren't in it FOR research. They were in it for pure profit. Before they had a chance to test every outcome, they went ahead full steam and cranked out dinosaurs, with no guarantee that they could not escape the park and become an invasive species that could kill people. Satler's part also reinforced that point when she brought up that they had plants in the visitor center that could kill a child if they put one LEAF in their mouth.
I really feel sorry for male Nothy Graffies. The perils of their adolescence make nearsightedness pale in comparison and gathering in circles downright lethal.
I honestly thought that pic was off the cover of an old Dungeons and Dragons campaign book or something, until I clicked the link. Is THIS what unemployed D&D artistes do now? Scientific illustration? I can't decide if that's awesome or sad.
11/02/09
08/27/09
Science is amazing. Real dinosaurs would be a dream come true.
Sounds like the ones being too influenced by Jurassic Park are you guys. Luddites.
08/26/09
08/26/09
08/26/09
08/26/09
08/26/09
08/26/09
08/26/09
08/26/09
Yeah,but Hans, you were so preoccupied with whether or not you could, you didn't stop to think if you should.
You stood on the shoulders of geniuses to accomplish something as fast as you could and before you even knew what you had, you patented it and packaged it and slapped it on a plastic lunchbox, and now you're selling it, you want to sell it!
08/26/09
With us humans, the thing is that if we can do something, at least one of the six billion of us will. That's why it's best to do the questionable things publically for a good purpose, since if you don't, someone else will do the same in secret for nefarious ends.
Still, I wonder what this guy is aiming at. Whatever the movie says, there's not much money or use in dino-birds in themselves. What theory is being proved, or discovery made with this experiment? That's what I'd like to know, but this bit of news doesn't tell us. Link to a more serious science news site about the matter, please.
08/26/09
What Hammond's scientists had done was read the work of others and took the next step. What that means is they didn't have to deal with the consequences/outcomes of the previous research. They also weren't in it FOR research. They were in it for pure profit. Before they had a chance to test every outcome, they went ahead full steam and cranked out dinosaurs, with no guarantee that they could not escape the park and become an invasive species that could kill people. Satler's part also reinforced that point when she brought up that they had plants in the visitor center that could kill a child if they put one LEAF in their mouth.
08/26/09
08/26/09
08/26/09
08/26/09
[en.wikipedia.org]
08/26/09
08/17/09
08/16/09
08/16/09
08/16/09
Can't be worse than this.
08/16/09
08/16/09
08/16/09
08/16/09