This is not doubt preaching to the choir, but eventually Congress needs to act, right? (Executive Order or no). So we should be lobbying our Reps and Senators really hard now that he's made this public statement. Who is the best candidate to lead the charge with legislation? I am not that familiar with which legislators would support it, which would not, and which are swing votes, other than assuming that do some degree it would fall along party lines.
Not to be adversarial, but he DOES have some power to end "don't ask, don't tell." I'm a lawyer, and my understanding is that he can issue an Executive Order to suspend enforcement of the law by ordering the military to stop making a legal "finding" that a person is gay. He can also suspend enforcement under the national emergency powers (basically the president can do anything he/she sees fit to protect us in "wartime."). Thus, while Congress makes the law, he has a loophole around it (keeping the law unaffected technically, but ordering the military to not "find" anyone gay) or to confront it head on under the emergency powers doctrine. The first method simply walks around the law, the second trumps it for security purposes, but both have the effect of rendering it null and void in practice.
I personally think he should suspend the law, but that's open for discussion. The legal possibilities available to him as Commander-in-Chief are not open to discussion.
Here's a very accurate article that explains his power in readily accessible prose. http://74.125.95.132/search?q=cache:-YCKHbce8tsJ:www.huffingtonpost.com/aaron-belkin/obama-to-fire-his-first-g_b_199070.html+can+obama+end+don%27t+ask+don%27t+tell+executive+order&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
@TulsaVisitor919: I agree that suspending the law would be a good choice, but is still only a short-term solution. It may be that he fears that Congress's willingness to actually change the law might be weakened if they saw him just suspend it.
@TulsaVisitor919: You're completely right (forgot about executive orders) but all this will do is suspend it, not remove the law meaning if they cant get the removal of the law passed in congress, then any president who takes over would be able to overturn the suspension.
Likewise Obama's not been one to flat out use tools like executive orders to get his way like Bush was. I have a feeling while he will push to end it, he will leave an executive order as something of a last resort.
@friendlynerd: Because he does not have the power at the stroke of a pen. The executive order would be illegal, and if it were to be tested or revoked with the next president before legislation, we're back at square one.
An executive order would only make the politicians lazy about legally repealing the LAW. It is a law, which means it is required by congress to overturn.
@friendlynerd: Well I am sorry to make you sick, even I don't know how I am an apologists by pointing out that President Obama has 4 years to achieve the things he wants to do. Not a few months, or a year, or 2 or 3, but 4 years.
Anyone see the SecNav on The Daily Show this week? Hot hot hot, and verrry willing to do what we the people ask. (I have some ideas cute SecNav. Come here.)
whatever he just wants their money. and the little bourgeois vanilla beans will give it to him.
he just talks. in fairness, i didn't listen to the speech (nor will i). i will take everyone's word that it was magnificent. i got tired of his bloated rhetoric last year. at this point i could care less what he has to say. i want to see things done.
he is a liberal democrat with a democratic house and a democratic senate (both with liberal democratic leadership). if not now, then when? he needs to grow a pair and shove his agenda down the throats of america. if the republicans had the white house and congress they would not hesitate to do exactly as they pleased. they would enact every reactionary, corporatist, civil rights shredding law they saw fit.
the dems picked the wrong candidate. too late of course. fucking excellent.
@spotted-dog: I'm not certain I understand or agree with the idea that just because someone else does something, you have the right to do it too. I hated the last 8 years, + I don't want another American to endure what I did simply because there's a Dem in the White House. There is something to be said for civility, even if a good portion of the country seems to have lost all sense of it.
@spotted-dog: I appreciate your fire and agree to a point. But I don't think Obama is that liberal (as his actions demonstrate). And the Dems picked the candidate that could get elected. I doubt any of the others, though they have may fine qualities, were more electable.
Magnificent speech. I understand the skepticism, but listen to him. It's historic, I slowly realized as I watched. What other President has ever given such a major speech in heartfelt defense of GLBT people? The practicalities of what can be done on the road ahead might be bumpy- and he was quite honest about that- but I do not doubt his sincerity.
It really is a powerful moment in not just gay history, but American history, to have a President address gay issues so directly, supportively, sometimes movingly, sometimes humorously. Gaga!
Obama blows me away again tonight.
@Dot: @Baroness: with all due respect, I'm assuming neither of you is gay.
I am and I'm sick of being a second class citizen. If I can't have all of the privileges of every other US citizen, then please lower my taxes. I'm sick of paying for other people's kids to attend school, for subsiding health care, for assisting married folks who get tax breaks and some more stuff I can't think of right now.
Talk is cheap and until Obama takes action on the things he mentioned tonight, then I'm not holding my breath.
@BowlingForDollars: Exactly. I'm pretty disappointed in Obama right now. The Pentagon has issued an opinion that DADT be revoked, and he still hasn't acted. What is he waiting for? I served in the Army for 4 years, and was an Arabic translator in the first Gulf War. I may have reenlisted if I had been able to serve openly and honestly. It's a shame, really.
@RedLineRage: Your story is one that has been told over and over--how many enlisted speak freakin' Arabic? And at this stage of the game (8 years now) we think we can be choosing people based on sexual orientation, because it may undermine the camaraderie of the fox hole? They should have done something about the rapists who have caused so many female enlisted to go AWOL rather than face the lack of justice on that front. BASS-ACKWARDS!
@BowlingForDollars: Agreed. I really do appreciate the gravity of this speech, and I am very glad that the president continues to publicly espouse support for the LGBT community, but...after a while it's all talk, and talk alone only goes so far before it starts seeming disingenuous.
I don't understand if this is a good thing or not. Does that mean that it's okay to be gay and a Marine, or does it just reaffirm the no gay military thing in more explicit fashion.
Also: if we're going to say to gay recruits, "here's your rifle, Iraq's that way," could we also legalize gay marriage? That way their partners could at least inherit what few possessions they have when they get blown in half by an IED.
He should make it happen now and be crystal clear about it. What is he waiting for, his next speech before to Congress? Enough talk and lofty ideals. Play hardball Obama and make this happen. Now.
@Meiyou Wenti: Sadly, Obama's not so good with the hardball thing. He's too busy trying to play nice with everyone in the sandbox.
He should enlist Rahm to scare the bejeezus out of errant Democrats. As for the Republicans? He should tell them to fuck off and remind them - again! - that he won.
So what's he waiting for? Wouldn't an Executive order take care of this in one day?
Is ever going to carry out ANY of his campaign --and subsequent-- promises?
@Lizawithazee: I'm sure Congress will be just as cooperative on this front as they've been with health care.
I'm ecstatic he's doing this, as it's about time and it needed to be done, but why announce this now? Couldn't he wait, I dunno, another month or so? He can barely get Democrats to toe the line on health care - this gives them, especially the ones up for re-election in 2010, another reason to push back on his initiatives.
Sigh. Who are the next batch of crazies this announcement will bring forth?
@Novaload: The law needs to be overturned by Congress, but you are technically right; he could stop DADT dismissals with an executive order as a stop-loss measure until the law is overturned.
@Aatom: He's the President now, so presumably he has more power to make it happen. Can't wait for further announcements and some action. I'd almost like to see him make some deals with the military.
@Lizawithazee: Yes, that's what makes it even more frustrating now, because he has the power to end this policy immediately and hasn't, which he promised to do once in office. This headline is misleading, it should read: Breaking: Obama Once Again Pushes Off Action to End Military's Don't Ask Don't Tell Policy
Good. Hopefully in a generation or so this moronic homophobia will be nothing but a memory. Although, I'm sure people have been saying that about racism as well as many other kinds of discrimination too...
@taiki24: My thoughts exactly. I'm going to give him the benefit of the doubt, but if he doesn't follow through with this or at least give some sort of timetable, I'ma be PISSED.
@KefkaticFanatic: I'm not sure if you were being sarcastic or not, but it's not as simple as it may sound. "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" is mandated by federal law -- he can't just end it by making a speech saying he will.
*If you weren't being sarcastic, please disregard my comment and accept my apologies*
@KefkaticFanatic: Unfortunately, I don't think it's that simple. He still has to tread a fine political line; if he looks to much like he's going completely over the heads of his Senior Military Officials a lot of people will be upset.
Of course, this group probably has a lot of overlap with the group that get's angry every time their thoughts stray onto the fact that gay people do in fact exist, but I digress.
10/11/09
Anyone? I know some of you follow this closely.
10/11/09
I personally think he should suspend the law, but that's open for discussion. The legal possibilities available to him as Commander-in-Chief are not open to discussion.
Here's a very accurate article that explains his power in readily accessible prose. http://74.125.95.132/search?q=cache:-YCKHbce8tsJ:www.huffingtonpost.com/aaron-belkin/obama-to-fire-his-first-g_b_199070.html+can+obama+end+don%27t+ask+don%27t+tell+executive+order&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
10/11/09
10/11/09
10/11/09
Likewise Obama's not been one to flat out use tools like executive orders to get his way like Bush was. I have a feeling while he will push to end it, he will leave an executive order as something of a last resort.
10/11/09
I wish people will give him his 4 years to fulfill those promises instead of a few months.
10/11/09
10/11/09
An executive order would only make the politicians lazy about legally repealing the LAW. It is a law, which means it is required by congress to overturn.
10/11/09
Sorry if you don't like that.
10/10/09
10/10/09
he just talks. in fairness, i didn't listen to the speech (nor will i). i will take everyone's word that it was magnificent. i got tired of his bloated rhetoric last year. at this point i could care less what he has to say. i want to see things done.
he is a liberal democrat with a democratic house and a democratic senate (both with liberal democratic leadership). if not now, then when? he needs to grow a pair and shove his agenda down the throats of america. if the republicans had the white house and congress they would not hesitate to do exactly as they pleased. they would enact every reactionary, corporatist, civil rights shredding law they saw fit.
the dems picked the wrong candidate. too late of course. fucking excellent.
10/10/09
10/10/09
10/10/09
10/11/09
10/10/09
It really is a powerful moment in not just gay history, but American history, to have a President address gay issues so directly, supportively, sometimes movingly, sometimes humorously. Gaga!
Obama blows me away again tonight.
10/10/09
10/11/09
I am and I'm sick of being a second class citizen. If I can't have all of the privileges of every other US citizen, then please lower my taxes. I'm sick of paying for other people's kids to attend school, for subsiding health care, for assisting married folks who get tax breaks and some more stuff I can't think of right now.
Talk is cheap and until Obama takes action on the things he mentioned tonight, then I'm not holding my breath.
10/11/09
10/11/09
10/11/09
10/11/09
10/10/09
They don't give Nobel Prizes for promises. Oh, wait...
10/10/09
Also: if we're going to say to gay recruits, "here's your rifle, Iraq's that way," could we also legalize gay marriage? That way their partners could at least inherit what few possessions they have when they get blown in half by an IED.
10/10/09
10/10/09
He should enlist Rahm to scare the bejeezus out of errant Democrats. As for the Republicans? He should tell them to fuck off and remind them - again! - that he won.
10/10/09
Is ever going to carry out ANY of his campaign --and subsequent-- promises?
10/10/09
10/10/09
I'm ecstatic he's doing this, as it's about time and it needed to be done, but why announce this now? Couldn't he wait, I dunno, another month or so? He can barely get Democrats to toe the line on health care - this gives them, especially the ones up for re-election in 2010, another reason to push back on his initiatives.
Sigh. Who are the next batch of crazies this announcement will bring forth?
10/10/09
Yeah, but he still didn't announce he was introducing any legislation. It's the usual Obama trust-me sweet-talk.
10/11/09
For more information, read this:
[www.huffingtonpost.com]
(this professor devotes most of his research to DADT)
and www.palmcenter.org
10/10/09
10/10/09
10/10/09
10/10/09
10/10/09
10/10/09
10/10/09
I applaud him for working to end this barbaric policy, but I just really want to see some specifics.
10/10/09
10/10/09
10/10/09
10/10/09
*If you weren't being sarcastic, please disregard my comment and accept my apologies*
10/10/09
10/10/09
Of course, this group probably has a lot of overlap with the group that get's angry every time their thoughts stray onto the fact that gay people do in fact exist, but I digress.
10/10/09
The biggest issue is the President cant just repeal a law. Someone from congress has to get a bill through to remove it.
10/10/09
10/10/09
09/02/09
09/02/09