Did you know, Mr. Cook, that the ancient Greeks thought the uterus could detach itself and wander all over the body, causing all kindsa sinister havoc for the be-wombed, better known as "hysteria"? #doublex
Peggy White, the exiting publisher of Double X, strikes me as eminently employable elsewhere: She was formerly the general manager of Yahoo Finance. Could former boss Scott Moore, now at Microsoft, be calling? #scottmoore#tips#peggywhite#valleywag#doublex
@City_Dater: But that's what they did, didn't they? And segregated black issues to The Root. So they could have their Slate playpen to themselves, white male graduates of good schools pretending their positions are radically contrarian, when in fact they're just conservatism in some odd Reagan sense gussied up as "contrarian".
Slate sucks, actually. Geek smartasses in the backwater of DC trying to pretend they aren't presenting the dreariest conventional wisdom out there. #slate
I still don't understand why "women's" articles need to be divided off from the "mainstream" into their own little section. There aren't men interested in reading articles written by/about women? I certainly don't mind reading articles written by men about men. It's the convention! To not read those articles would practically be to not read.
What would be best, in my opinion, would be to have a media format that equally integrates articles written by men and women, about men and women, and our various issues. The idea that women are a certain subset of reader is ridiculous.
For example, there was recently an interesting XX article about why birth control is not included in the heath care bill. One of the reasons why it is not included is that BC is considered a women's issue, and our good men in congress don't see why everyone should have to cover the cost. How they don't see the critical role BC plays in their own lives is beyond me. Anyway, it was a great article. Ironically, few men will read it, because it was written for and placed in the XX Factor.
People don't need a gender binary label to tell them what issues are important to them, or what they'll find interesting. People can determine that on their own.
If we want "women's" issues to matter to others, and become SOCIETY'S issues, we need to not be sectioned off, we need to be MAINSTREAMED. #slate
No great sympathy here. A few years ago, there was a post on the XX Factor about the great progress women were making.
I wrote (under a different name), that things weren't actually all that great and that there was plenty of data to support that conclusion. I was criticized for being soooo negative.
If I want to read about feminist issues I go to www.feministing.com. #slate
I prefer Double Y. The articles on weight lifting, prison life, big-and-tall fashion, and Australian tourism are nice, and I enjoy the Zeb Atlas advice column—though, truth be told, I’m in it for the centerfolds. #slate
@Seeräuber Jenny: I don’t know; the XXY editorial perspective is kind of impotent, and the original reporting always delivers such a small payload. #slate
@Seeräuber Jenny: You raise a good point, and an underlying question: Is the lack of women in traditional punditry:
A. Due to the good old boys club
B. Because traditional punditry, in print and in broadcast media, is just bullshit shouty playacting and posturing, hence the relatively high number of talibangelical conservatard authoritarian women pundits imitating the dominant men, compared to actually intelligent liberal pundits
C. Because women just can't have intelligent opinions
@Tara Incognita: Aaaand...my comments on Jezebel have been disabled in last 24 hrs. I'm assuming it's for the above comment, as I haven't commented on anything else?
Jezebel is an awful site most of the time. They do occasionally have worthwhile stories and reporting, but even those degenerate into hateful clustefucks in the comments eventually anyway, ruining the whole experience. It's worthwhile only as a document on how not to live your life happily.
@BookishLookish: Yep - that's exactly the passive-aggressive BS I don't like about Jezebel. "Oooh, I'm so embarrassed that I'm not a raging slut like the rest of you whores! Giggle!"
Please, I have enough negative experiences like that in real life with other women. I don't need them online, too.
@T.A.N.: I mean, yeah, I get it, the ladyflower is a precious gift for He or She you choose to bestow it upon, but just for the comedy element I think you should fuck a lot of people before you die. There is also the fun, awe and pleasure to consider. It is also good exercise.
@VoxPopuli: Now, now, Vox, only YOU can make yourself feel like a whore. A crocheted-bikini-wearing, UPS man-straddling freaky whore, or is my take on you completely off?
11/17/09
11/17/09
11/17/09
11/17/09
11/17/09
11/17/09
Hearing that just gave me the vapors. #doublex
11/17/09
11/16/09
Oh, right; I'm not married to someone who reads Slate. #slate
11/16/09
But probably not. #slate
11/16/09
Slate sucks, actually. Geek smartasses in the backwater of DC trying to pretend they aren't presenting the dreariest conventional wisdom out there. #slate
11/17/09
11/16/09
What would be best, in my opinion, would be to have a media format that equally integrates articles written by men and women, about men and women, and our various issues. The idea that women are a certain subset of reader is ridiculous.
For example, there was recently an interesting XX article about why birth control is not included in the heath care bill. One of the reasons why it is not included is that BC is considered a women's issue, and our good men in congress don't see why everyone should have to cover the cost. How they don't see the critical role BC plays in their own lives is beyond me. Anyway, it was a great article. Ironically, few men will read it, because it was written for and placed in the XX Factor.
People don't need a gender binary label to tell them what issues are important to them, or what they'll find interesting. People can determine that on their own.
If we want "women's" issues to matter to others, and become SOCIETY'S issues, we need to not be sectioned off, we need to be MAINSTREAMED. #slate
11/16/09
I wrote (under a different name), that things weren't actually all that great and that there was plenty of data to support that conclusion. I was criticized for being soooo negative.
If I want to read about feminist issues I go to www.feministing.com. #slate
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
My fave is XXY. Klinefelter's Magazine. #slate
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
Men? More intellectually pretentious superannuated frat boys. #slate
11/16/09
11/16/09
1. Jobs
2. The economy
3. Foreign policy, engineering, technology, math, science
4. Hair, makeup, diets
5. Kids, family, pets #slate
11/16/09
A. Due to the good old boys club
B. Because traditional punditry, in print and in broadcast media, is just bullshit shouty playacting and posturing, hence the relatively high number of talibangelical conservatard authoritarian women pundits imitating the dominant men, compared to actually intelligent liberal pundits
C. Because women just can't have intelligent opinions
i. A
ii. B
iii. A & B
iv. C #slate
11/16/09
11/17/09
05/23/09
05/24/09
05/24/09
05/23/09
05/23/09
[jezebel.com]
05/23/09
05/23/09
Please, I have enough negative experiences like that in real life with other women. I don't need them online, too.
05/23/09
05/23/09
05/23/09
05/23/09
05/23/09
05/23/09
"My neck is all tight."
"Do you want me to rub it?"
"No, I want a blowjob."