"[A] statement that Mr. Torrosian was 'a douche' or 'douche bag' . . . is not capable of being proven false." The Honorable Judith J. Gische has spoken. No further discussion of this matter shall be necessary. Court is adjourned.
Now that D-bag has been so mainstreamed I'm gonna lobby for bringing "f*ckwad" back into circulation. It hasn't been worn out yet and it can be effectively weaponized against D-bag ex-boyfriends. #newyorktimes
"Oh Tom? He's a douche." Something about the way it rolls off the tongue conveys a certain finality, a dismissive disregard.
"Tom is a fucker!" sounds angry and maybe a little unhinged. "Tom is a douche" sounds like you're completely over Tom and wish him nothing but the best, but, well...he's kind of a douche.
I don't actually know anyone named Tom, by the way. #newyorktimes
I think the reasons people like "fuck" and "douchebag" and any curse word, really, are, as you said, the way they roll of the tongue, their supposed shock value, and how they communicate this basic sense of frustration or anger or just plain dislike when eloquence fails us.
In that regard, I don't really see what distinguishes "fuck" or "douchebag" or any other curse words from each other. Maybe "douchebag" offends the ladyfolk's delicate sensibilities (<-- this is sarcasm), but — like most swear words — they're pretty much stripped of any literal meaning when we re-appropriate them into curse words anyway.
In other words, if "douchebag" is empty and meaningless and simply, so is "fuck," etc. If that's the logic by which we judge the usefulness of swear words, aren't they pretty much all "Already Over?"
I think the fact that the word is so contentious, and has provoked so much commentary speaks to how great it is.
Sure, as Foster eloquently stated, it's a discount counter brand insult, but tell me it just doesn't feel right when used to describe the subject of your disdain.
Azzwizard is simply trying to hard. An insult isn't so much about showing off as it is an instinctual reaction.
At the end of the day, I'm just glad Foster enjoyed my douchenozzle. #newyorktimes
11/23/09
11/23/09
Defamashuns - ur doin it rong.
11/23/09
11/15/09
11/17/09
11/14/09
A true patriot would say freedom irrigator. #newyorktimes
11/15/09
11/15/09
11/14/09
11/14/09
11/14/09
11/14/09
11/14/09
11/14/09
11/14/09
11/14/09
11/14/09
11/14/09
"Tom is a fucker!" sounds angry and maybe a little unhinged. "Tom is a douche" sounds like you're completely over Tom and wish him nothing but the best, but, well...he's kind of a douche.
I don't actually know anyone named Tom, by the way. #newyorktimes
11/15/09
11/14/09
11/14/09
In that regard, I don't really see what distinguishes "fuck" or "douchebag" or any other curse words from each other. Maybe "douchebag" offends the ladyfolk's delicate sensibilities (<-- this is sarcasm), but — like most swear words — they're pretty much stripped of any literal meaning when we re-appropriate them into curse words anyway.
In other words, if "douchebag" is empty and meaningless and simply, so is "fuck," etc. If that's the logic by which we judge the usefulness of swear words, aren't they pretty much all "Already Over?"
(That said... Really, Times?)
11/14/09
11/14/09
I thought I'd become inured to all profanity until I read "axegash" yesterday. #newyorktimes
11/14/09
11/14/09
Sure, as Foster eloquently stated, it's a discount counter brand insult, but tell me it just doesn't feel right when used to describe the subject of your disdain.
Azzwizard is simply trying to hard. An insult isn't so much about showing off as it is an instinctual reaction.
At the end of the day, I'm just glad Foster enjoyed my douchenozzle. #newyorktimes
11/14/09