<![CDATA[Gawker: election night]]> http://tags.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gawker.com.png <![CDATA[Gawker: election night]]> http://gawker.com/tag/electionnight http://gawker.com/tag/electionnight <![CDATA[America's Most Inept Racists Strike Out]]> On the night of Barack Obama's election, a group of young idiots in "a makeshift clubhouse" in Staten Island decided to go out and beat up some black people. They tried hard. But they made the following mistakes:

Strike One: First, they jumped a Liberian immigrant and beat him with a metal pipe. He did not get the chance to educate them on the distinction between "African" and "African-American."

Strike Two: They "demanded that a Hispanic man tell them how he had voted."

Strike Three: They got in the car and ran down Ronald Forte—a white guy wearing a hoodie. They thought he looked black.

Now all four of them have been sentenced to prison terms ranging from five to nine years.

Race-blind racists. MLK's dream is here.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5357234&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Reporter: 'Did You Make Love In The Name Of Obama?']]> Barack Obama's historic presidential victory aroused so much emotion: Tears on an Oprah level, ecstasy on a spontaneous street party level and anger at a loudly-interrupt-an-old-war-hero level. So Newsweek can't help but ask... did it turn you on? And did you then have hot, hope-filled change sex, or maybe change-filled hope sex, possibly ending in someone yelling "Yes We Can?" Because, seriously, that would be perfect. Read the magazine's written inquiry after the jump.

Newsweek's Jessica Bennett sent the following query to flack Peter Shankman's Help A Reporter Out, the wildly successful service for matching attention-hungry experts with reporters desperate to make a point. We're guessing she was thinking of going to the far more appropriate Daily Kos first, but then realized she needed to talk to folks with a sense of humor. (She should have stuck with Kos and then just made fun of her sources, duh.)

obamaBabies.jpg

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5084060&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Obsessive Daily Show Fan Enraged By Line Fiasco]]> SafariScreenSnapz007.jpgElection night might have been a hopeful triumph for most Americans, but it was an evening of screaming and insults for Canadian Sharilyn Johnson, according to the epic rant she just uploaded to Huffington Post. Johnson had to be in the live Daily Show audience on election night, because she's been watching everything Jon Stewart has ever done since 1994, is also super-into Stephen Colbert, has friends on staff, knows line-runners by name, etc. etc. Johnson (on left in photo) lined up a ticket seven months in advance, confirmed and reconfirmed, traveled to New York from Toronto, waited in line and then watched as her world ENDED.

Only maybe 21 people from line got into the studio, due to VIPs taking seats, and Johnson was approximately number 40. Out of 250. She yelled, looked for "Teri and Jessica from the audience department," called a friend on staff — nothing. Then the bitterness set in.

The Daily Show must have known this was going to happen. That's why it weirdly made everyone re-confirm on Oct. 27! And if Johnson had only known, she could have totally called in some favors and gotten VIPed. But the bastards never warned her. AFTER ALL JOHNSON DID FOR THEM!

I am owed. Not the cost of my flight. Or the cost of my hotel. Or even the vacation days I took, which I could have used to visit my family. What I'm owed is the experience of witnessing history take place somewhere other than alone an empty bar on 11th Avenue, sucking on a can of Bud Light, feeling completely emotionally empty.

Because of the incompetence of others, I was robbed of an experience that should have been sublime, moving, and meaningful.

What was taken away from me cannot be remedied with a VIP ticket — essentially a shorter wait in line NEXT time. At this point, I can't plan to have a next time. How do I stand outside under that awning again, without being reminded of what was done? How do I look at the heads of the audience department, knowing how negligent they were through this entire situation? I don't plan to ever go back.

At least her friend "Tracey" from Britain made it in. Bittersweet. OMG, this is just like that time a dolled-up Mary Rambin got ditched by Julia Allison and Megan Asha outside the Sex And The City premiere, which was also disastrously overbooked! It's also just as sad and profound.

Seriously, though, why do shows treat their live studio audiences so almost sadistically poorly like this? Don't they know the fans who show up for these tapings are INSANE and already have impossibly high expectations and told 200 of their closest friends, in advance, about how awesome everything was going to be, thus guaranteeing they will curse your name endlessly online if they ever get locked out? (NB to David Letterman: I'm still sorry I mauled your cameraman that one time, but he always set up his shots so as to MOCK YOU. You should really fire that jerk. Anyway call me!)

(Photo above from Johnson's website.)

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5083854&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[CNN Knows The Hologram Sucked, Says Fox]]> SafariScreenSnapz002.jpg He's not the most trustworthy source, granted, but Fox News host Chris Wallace claims to have heard that CNN is all embarrassed about its election-night holograms, which teleported the likes of singer Will.I.Am and correspondent Jessica Yellin into CNN studios in New York. Wallace, who serves as Fox's ambassador to the Godless liberals at the Daily Show, also maintains ties to CNN, via an old college roommate who is a technical producer there. He called this buddy at 5 pm on election night, resulting in the following exchange, according to Broadcasting & Cable:

“I've avoided e-mailing him,” Wallace confesses. “So finally at 5 o'clock, I broke down: How's the hologram? And he said, Oh my God. I said, is that good, bad?

“So we saw it. We were like, phew; OK, it's not this great thing that we have to catch up to. 'A' for effort, but sometimes these things don't pan out. For every perceptive pixel magic wall, there's that stuff out there.”

Not to be outdone, Fox deployed its own magic trick on election eve: Brit Hume made himself disappear from his last election night anchoring job two hours earlier than scheduled. We knew he was feeling burned out, but, just, wow:

At 1 a.m. Hume, who is scheduled to stay on for another hour, has made an executive decision to call it a night. Bret Baier is summoned to slip into Hume's seat at the anchor desk. Hume's panel looks a bit forlorn as the PAs swoop in to remove his microphone. The switch is made, unceremoniously, during a commercial break.
Asked how he feels to have anchored the final presidential election of his career, Hume pauses a moment and says: “Mostly relieved.”

A young female assistant helps him into his raincoat. In the elevator on the way down from the Fox News 12th floor studios, a staffer says: “Brit, you're leaving already?” “The story's kind of over,” Hume says.

Ladies and gentleman: Brit Hume has left the building!

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5082707&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Oprah Cry-Guy Identified!]]> As Barack Obama delivered his presidential acceptance speech, Oprah Winfrey prominently led the nation in a good cry. But when the cameras caught her, she was leaning heavily up against some white guy. Who was that?? Oprah basically owns Chicago, so the Sun-Times promptly deployed an investigative team to find out. The man is Sam Perry of California's Silicon Valley, he is an Obama volunteer and contributor, a former wire-service reporter, and basically one of the nicest guys ever, according to his wife, who should know. Her quote and a clip of the Daily Show making fun of Perry, after the jump.

Perry, a Harvard man, is fluent in Swedish and loves hockey, photography, and soccer. And he's nice!

His wife, Lisa Olson, described him as a man with a "generous heart" who would gladly give his shoulder to anyone to lean on.

"He just has the most open heart," Olson said. "He's just this guy if you need a shoulder, that's fine."

Winfrey said she didn't know him but that "he was very nice to me" and let her sob mascara all over his shoulder. Awww. She's putting him, of course, on her show today. She's calling him "Mr. Man" and everything. Multimillion-dollar TV deal to follow, along with tire-slashings courtesy Gayle and Stedman.

(Daily Show video up top.)

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5079304&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[CNN's Election Night Team Walks Into A Bar...]]> "They went to the Coliseum, to be exact, a watering hole conveniently located across the street from CNN’s office at the Time Warner Center in midtown Manhattan." [TV Decoder]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5076902&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Obama Calls For Sacrifice To Change 'Arc Of History']]> Yes, Barack Obama promised his children a new puppy. The president elect also thanked his supporters and praised opponent John McCain as someone who has "endured sacrifices for America most of us could not begin to imagine." But he also seized upon his historic moment to highlight the changes that have swept America over more than two centuries, and to call, in a moment that recalled both the pageantry and message of John F. Kennedy before him, for a spirit of unified sacrifice in the populace.

As much as it was a crystallization of a historic moment, Obama's speech was also a chance to get his presidency off to a running start. There was a dramatic bit of global statecraft — "to those who would tear the world down, we will defeat you" — but mainly a look inward and across the political aisle. He called for Americans to resolve to "pitch in and work harder."

To McCain supporters, some of whom were loudly disappointed at their candidate's defeat tonight: "I may not have won your vote tonight but i hear your voices. I need your help and I will be your president too."

To the nation more broadly: "We rise or fall as one nation, as one people. Let's resist the temptation to fall back on the same partisan ship."

"There is new energy to harness... the road ahead will be long, our climb will be steep..... but I have never been more hopeful that we will get there. We, as a people, will get there."

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5076753&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Drudge Questions Obama Victory With Devious Question Mark]]> Poor sad Matt Drudge lost his influence this year, forever, and no one cares about him or takes him seriously anymore. This was his headline a couple minutes ago, until he lost the question mark. Still, the inference is there: this is an illegitimate win. Matt will now probably lead not the MSM but the crazier fringes of the opposition. Not so much the ones working to formulate a new, smarter conservatism, but the ones who just retreat further and further into conspiracy theories and nuttiness. Goodbye, Matt! We'll be back as soon as hurricanes threaten Florida! [Drudge Archives]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5076679&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Murdoch's Papers Call It For Obama]]> Rupert Murdoch's pet Gotham tabloid may have endorsed John McCain and Murdoch's favorite lady politician, Sarah Palin, but the Post appears to be the first wing of the News Corporation empire to call the election for Barack Obama. The Post appears to have beaten even Murdoch's Fox News to the punch. It's a fast, scrappy call by a dead-trees publication. The paper's editorial page may declare McCain its true love, but the Post's front-page "wood" makes it clear Murdoch has plenty of love leftover for the Democrat (especially now that he's, uh, won). UPDATE: And after the jump, Murdoch's Wall Street Journal loudly puts Obama "on the verge:"

SafariScreenSnapz011.jpg

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5076674&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Send In Your Election-Night Party Pics!]]> The above shot is from the swank party at Gawker Media overlord Nick Denton's SoHo loft. Obviously we can't all have elite LCD wall projectors and a fancy media crowd because some of us are stuck in John McCain's REAL America, or maybe Brooklyn. All the more reason to send us pictures of your electoral shindigs tonight. Help us diversify this post! Mail your shots (however blurry/explicit/incriminating) to tips@gawker.com or post in the comments. We'll keep your name out of it unless you tell us otherwise. (Elitist parties are OK too. Heck, encouraged, even.) After the jump, the exciting scene at Gawker HQ. UPDATE: And more! (Last new photo: 11:52 p.m.)

Gawker HQ:

photo-1.jpg

The scene at a neighborhood bar in Obama's hometown of Chicago, via commenter psych101 and a "shitty cell phone camera." Looks fun!

Photo-0030.jpg

Spotted on the Web: Tumblr's HQ:

oDmgEczobfwv4jbiQF4vR8dro1_400.jpg

Commenter supergoddess and her pals are living it up in style, in the tank: "We're pigging out on chili & artichoke dip & maple-bacon cupcakes at my house (and no small amount of wine and bourbon), and totally screaming at the TV. When this photo was taken the photographer said "ONE... TWO... THREE... MAVERICK!"

"And we all laughed."

(Are maple-bacon cupcakes elitist? In the best possible way?)

DSCN7138.JPG

This one had the subject line "Election Layover" in the subject line, and a terrorist gang sign in the pic:

Photo 89.jpg

And another! Clearly in the tank:

Photo 29.jpg

From Pareene's cell phone:

2.jpg

From Blakeley's friend Kate!

PreviewScreenSnapz004.jpg

A night editor whose wife snuck up on him, with a cellphone:

Picture039-1.jpg

"All the gays who can't marry in FL love them some holograms on CNN...:"

photo-2.jpg

More from the Denton party:

photo-3.jpg

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5076577&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Election Report Beamed To CNN From Nearby Galaxy]]> We just knew CNN's magical holodeck was going to be hours of fun: Here's political correspondent Jessica Yellin delivering a report to election-night anchor Wolf Blitzer and looking, as Yellin herself pointed out, like no one so much as Star Wars' Princess Leia. The election may remain uncalled, but the future is now! Click the video icon to watch.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5076535&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Election Night To Be Hosted By Holograms, Shouting Heads]]> PreviewScreenSnapz003.jpg The TV news networks have very exciting plans tonight, beyond just calling the election nice and early so you can accelerate your drinking! MSNBC, for one, is poised to bring back its fun, bitchy insanity: Though Keith Olbermann and Chris Matthews were supposed to just be "analysts" on election night following their Democratic National Convention bickering, Matthews now says they'll be "hosts." Maybe Rachel Maddow, who has already taken Pat Buchanan in hand, is going to keep them in line. CNN will combat this combustible crew with an actual human transporter, like on Star Trek, reports the Wall Street Journal:

CNN has a device that renders three-dimensional holographic images of the network's far-flung contributors in the channel's New York studio.

Anderson Cooper should have a ball with that. No teasing poor holographic Candy Crowley, Anderson. She's tired enough as it is.

CNN's competitors have to content themselves with mid-1990s videogame technology:

General Electric's NBC has two new "virtual-reality studios" where anchors will update animated maps. NBC and MSNBC will feature a running electoral count projected on the side of the networks' headquarters in Rockefeller Plaza. News Corp.'s Fox News Channel, Fox Business Network and the Fox broadcast network will use a new virtual-reality studio to provide graphics and polling data. News Corp. also owns Dow Jones & Co., publisher of The Wall Street Journal.

It's a good thing the TV people are sexing up this election with magical effects. Because otherwise it would be such a snoozer!

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5075722&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Networks So Ready To Call This Election]]> Network news divisions got skittish about calling presidential elections following their colossally terrible performance in 2000. In case you forgot, they all called Florida for Al Gore, then uncalled it, then called it for Bush (following in the trustworthy footsteps of Fox News!), then uncalled the whole election. Their newfound prudence was rewarded in 2004 when leaked exit polls said John Kerry had the whole thing in the bag (oops). But this year the TV guys have their swagger back. Here's a CBS News executive telling the Times why California can suck it:

“We could know Virginia at 7,” he said. “We could know Indiana before 8. We could know Florida at 8. We could know Pennsylvania at 8. We could know the whole story of the election with those results. We can’t be in this position of hiding our heads in the sand when the story is obvious.”

Eight o'clock on the East coast is, of course, before most voters in California even get off work.

CBS News is not the only one that's cocky. Slate is refusing to "engage in a weird Kabuki drama that pretends McCain could win California," editor David Plotz told the Times. NBC News said it's an "unfortunate circumstance" that it may be calling the election before polls close elsewhere, but OH WELL.

It's actually true, as we said ourselves, that the presidential race could be wrapped up around 8 p.m. There's really no way California is going for McCain or Texas for Obama. But an early call for the Democratic nominee could hold down lefty turnout in California, thus helping anti-gay-marriage Proposition 8 as well as Proposition 4, which imposes certain restrictions on abortion rights.

Not that the nets will or should care about those unintended side effects. Where they should probably be careful is in calling the swing states. With interest in this election so intense, and cable and online competition at new highs, the pressure to extrapolate from early precinct returns in states like Ohio, Indiana and Florida will be high. Exit polls, set for initial release at 5 p.m., will add only add to the pressure.

And the "swing" states only start to matter if the election ends up way closer than is now expected. As things stand at present, it looks like the only real dilemma will be determining when Obama supporters should put their elitist French champagne on ice.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5075658&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Goodnight, Sweet Neaner]]> We'll miss you, Jeanine Pirro. You lost the New York attorney general's job to Andrew Cuomo, who's just garden variety sleazy on occasion. How could anyone compare to your wire-tapping amore? Your relentless belligerence when caught in impropriety? Your weakness for man about town and fellow disgraced politico Bernard Kerik? You even inspired us to song. Despite a wooden attempt at reconcilation with her estranged nutty husband, most predict at least a future in TV for Pirro. She's brave enough to wear red, so anything is possible.

Pirro Lights Up Her Crowd Even As She Concedes Race [NY Sun]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=213237&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Dan Rather to Play Grumpy Grandpa on Comedy Central Tonight]]> Finding himself with time on his hands post-CBS — despite that bitchin' new job at HDNet — Dan Rather will ... co-host? co-anchor? something ... with Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert tonight on Comedy Central. The trio will analyze election results live starting at 11 p.m. ET, though unfortunately Rather says he will clamp down on his trademark insane folksy witticisms. We'll be heading out shortly to get our hands dirty with some participatory democracy here in New York, where we're already hearing rumbles of poll chaos around the city due to lost voter rolls and technical foul-ups. If you've run into inadvertent disenfranchisement today in NYC through agencies human or otherwise, let us know your tales of voter angst.

Dan Rather to 'play it straight' on Comedy Central tonight [Philadelphia Inquirer]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=213039&view=rss&microfeed=true