Gawker 
Enter your username and password.
New York, 1:41 PM
Wed Nov 25
49 posts in the last 24 hours
Tip Your Editors:
tips@gawker.com
Tipline: 646-214-8138
Editor-in-Chief:
Gabriel Snyder | Email
West Coast Editor:
Richard Rushfield | Email
Contributing Editors:
Valleywag:
Ryan Tate | Email
Media:
Hamilton Nolan | Email
Politics:
Alex Pareene | Email
Investigations:
John Cook | Email
Entertainment:
Brian Moylan | Email
Nights:
Adrian Chen | Email
Azaria Jagger | Email
Ravi Somaiya | Email
Weekends:
Foster Kamer | Email
Video Editor:
Richard Blakeley | Email
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.
11/14/09
11/14/09
11/14/09
11/14/09
11/14/09
11/14/09
11/14/09
11/14/09
11/14/09
In that regard, I don't really see what distinguishes "fuck" or "douchebag" or any other curse words from each other. Maybe "douchebag" offends the ladyfolk's delicate sensibilities (<-- this is sarcasm), but — like most swear words — they're pretty much stripped of any literal meaning when we re-appropriate them into curse words anyway.
In other words, if "douchebag" is empty and meaningless and simply, so is "fuck," etc. If that's the logic by which we judge the usefulness of swear words, aren't they pretty much all "Already Over?"
(That said... Really, Times?)
11/14/09
11/14/09
I thought I'd become inured to all profanity until I read "axegash" yesterday. #newyorktimes
11/14/09
11/14/09
Sure, as Foster eloquently stated, it's a discount counter brand insult, but tell me it just doesn't feel right when used to describe the subject of your disdain.
Azzwizard is simply trying to hard. An insult isn't so much about showing off as it is an instinctual reaction.
At the end of the day, I'm just glad Foster enjoyed my douchenozzle. #newyorktimes
11/14/09
11/14/09
11/14/09
11/14/09
How about cob nobbler, lamestain or tom-tom club?
Ahh, the old days, swingin' on the flippity-flop. #newyorktimes
11/14/09
11/14/09
11/14/09
[en.wikipedia.org]
[books.google.com] #newyorktimes
11/14/09
11/14/09
11/14/09
11/14/09
11/14/09
I laughed and do not find it offensive. I also am still currently staying with douche and all my derrivatives because it perfectly describes what I need to say.Often, actually. #newyorktimes
11/14/09
That said, I'm a lover of filthy language, and cuss like a sailor on shore leave. Perhaps we could come up with a intergender substitute? Enema bag, perchance?
Say it. Let it roll off your tongue, you disgusting motherfucking enema bags.
It has a certain something, no? #newyorktimes
11/14/09
A common Romanian phrase mocks the aimless soul who meanders "like a fart in a bucket of water". So I suppose one could use fart-bucket with continental finesse. #newyorktimes
11/14/09
I don't find it offensive -- but only because there are a lot of male anatomy curses. Like Rush Limbaugh is a Dick, Rush Limbaugh is a Wanker, Rush Limbaugh is a Motherfucker (that one could arguably be used for both sexes but it's most often applied to a guy), and any type of variation of cock+adjective (my fav is cocksmoker...Rush Limbaugh is a cocksmoker). Rush Limbaugh is an enema bag? Hmmmm, let me try it out for a week. #newyorktimes
11/14/09
I'm going to heart you. #newyorktimes
11/14/09
11/14/09
Let us not forget: "farting into silk" #newyorktimes
11/14/09
11/14/09
11/14/09
It speaks to me as someone who is out of their depth, who the general consensus from those housed at said depth have decided is continuing to make a tremendous embarrassment of themselves. Dipshit! It works. #newyorktimes
11/14/09
11/14/09
Also I co-sign the call to action in this post, although the ever-despondent side of me thinks that there are probably preliminary battles that need to be won first. #newyorktimes
11/14/09
I would like to say that banning douche is too extreme. It's become an effective shorthand phrase that really pinpoints a certain type of people. The problem is people who thing just using the word "douche" is a hilarious witty joke in of itself. #newyorktimes