• Profile logout login

#endorsements#nogamesconsoleintheworksconsoles#discussed

Gawker

Share Cancel
   
Upload an image | Add an image URL
×

logging in
  • FAQ. Include # before tag:
  • #tips,
  • #stalker,
  • #opencaption,
  • #internalmemos,
  • etc.

New York, 11:09 AM
Wed Dec 9
47 posts in the last 24 hours

Team

Tip Your Editors:

Tipline: 646-214-8138

Editor-in-Chief:
Gabriel Snyder |

West Coast Editor:
Richard Rushfield |

Contributing Editors:

Valleywag:
Ryan Tate |

Media:
Hamilton Nolan |

Politics:
Alex Pareene |

Investigations:
John Cook |

Entertainment:
Brian Moylan |

Nights:
Adrian Chen |
Azaria Jagger |
Ravi Somaiya |

Weekends:
Foster Kamer |

Video Editor:
Richard Blakeley |

SUBSCRIBE TO Gawker RSS

New: Breaking news and daily top stories via email
4260 Subscribers
Gawker
  • Your version of Internet Explorer is not supported. Please upgrade to the most recent version in order to view comments.
    Dsmvwl  Admin  Promote to frontpage Approve user Ban user ×
    Image of lobstr lobstr
    10:38 AM

    In reply to Before You Even Knew It, All the Tiger Woods Ads Were Gone
    motherfuck. I was staring at this 8:1 shot posted on Bodog about 4 days ago if any of his sponsors dropped him before May 2010.. This was a day before the whore came out, where it dropped to 3.5:1 .. and now that Gatorade is the first to drop him, the bets have been paid :p
     Reply
    lobstr was starred lobstr was unstarred
    Image of AzureTexan AzureTexan
    10:19 AM

    In reply to Before You Even Knew It, All the Tiger Woods Ads Were Gone
    Yeah, but if I'm the marketing director for Trojan-brand condoms, Tiger's my guy.
     Reply
    AzureTexan was starred AzureTexan was unstarred
    Image of Eustace Silly Eustace Silly
    10:08 AM

    In reply to Before You Even Knew It, All the Tiger Woods Ads Were Gone
    Ah yes, but the print ads - pretty much all of which seem to be from Accenture - still seem to be trickling out.

    And yes, almost all of Accenture's copy in the Tiger ads is unintentionally hilarious.
     Reply
    momof3wildkids promoted this comment Eustace Silly was starred Eustace Silly was unstarred
    Image of momof3wildkids momof3wildkids
    10:10 AM

    @Eustace Silly: "Be a Tiger" has a lot more meaning that it did before.
     Reply
    momof3wildkids was starred momof3wildkids was unstarred
    Image of yourfriendandneighbor yourfriendandneighbor
    10:02 AM

    In reply to Before You Even Knew It, All the Tiger Woods Ads Were Gone
    There is a huge, Accenture billboard on I-35 smack in the center of downtown Austin that features Tiger's picture and the headline, "It's your next move that counts." I'm not sure if they did that on purpose.
     Reply
    yourfriendandneighbor was starred yourfriendandneighbor was unstarred
    Image of AzureTexan AzureTexan
    10:10 AM

    @yourfriendandneighbor: Tiger's next move just might be to a Residence Inn, albeit to its nicest suite.
     Reply
    AzureTexan was starred AzureTexan was unstarred
    Image of miss_msry miss_msry
    09:55 AM

    In reply to Before You Even Knew It, All the Tiger Woods Ads Were Gone
    They're just hibernating until golf season opens next Spring.

    I don't see any of the Bimbos or Elin having any kind of value added brand.
     Reply
    Edited by miss_msry at 12/09/09 9:55 AM miss_msry was starred miss_msry was unstarred
    Image of drunkexpatwriter drunkexpatwriter
    09:49 AM

    In reply to Before You Even Knew It, All the Tiger Woods Ads Were Gone
    Is there really some stupid bastard out there who is thinking to himself "Fuck it! Tiger cheated on his wife, I'm never buying Gatorade again!"
     Reply
    drunkexpatwriter was starred drunkexpatwriter was unstarred
    Image of miss_msry miss_msry
    09:59 AM

    @drunkexpatwriter:

    No, they're waiting for the book to come out so they can find out how to get "beautiful" women in Vegas to act as your PIMP.

    Oh that's right, you have to be a Billllllionaire.
     Reply
    miss_msry was starred miss_msry was unstarred
    Image of FitnessMadeSimple FitnessMadeSimple
    10:00 AM

    @drunkexpatwriter: No...but women drink Gatorade, too. And some of them may be thinking that.
     Reply
    FitnessMadeSimple was starred FitnessMadeSimple was unstarred
    Image of drunkexpatwriter drunkexpatwriter
    10:05 AM

    @FitnessMadeSimple: Man, if I liked a product I wouldn't care if Jigsaw, Jason and Freddy Krueger endorsed it, I'd still buy it.
     Reply
    drunkexpatwriter was starred drunkexpatwriter was unstarred
    Image of FitnessMadeSimple FitnessMadeSimple
    10:08 AM

    @drunkexpatwriter: I'm with you. But some people take endorsements seriously.
     Reply
    FitnessMadeSimple was starred FitnessMadeSimple was unstarred
    Image of NorthernLite NorthernLite
    10:35 AM

    @drunkexpatwriter: I'm getting a new cell phone and I actually paused at the thought of going Samsung *Rogue* because I realized that word now reminds me of you-know-who.
    Yes, I'm highly suggestible.

    As for Woods - I'm surprised that people fell for the "good-guy" B.S. First of all, at this point you're better off starting with the assumption that most male pro-athletes are, at the least, cheating douchebags. And then being surprised by the exceptions.

    And I always got a weird vibe from him - such a cold fish with a plastered on smile.
     Reply
    NorthernLite was starred NorthernLite was unstarred
    Image of drunkexpatwriter drunkexpatwriter
    10:58 AM

    @NorthernLite: This is what I was saying yesterday. If someone is male and they are:

    1. A rock star

    or

    2. A Hollywood actor

    or

    3. A pro-athelete

    then they are going to cheat on you.

    The only variant is that if the male is both a Hollywood actor a scientologist it won't be women he cheats on you with.
     Reply
    drunkexpatwriter was starred drunkexpatwriter was unstarred
    Image of invisibill invisibill
    11/03/09

    In reply to Gawker Endorsement: Don't Vote for Bloomberg
    I'm not the biggest Bloomberg fan, but this is bad write-up. I know it's about his 8 years at a glance but you don't have to look too deep under the surface to poke holes into many (most) of your points. Grouping every hot button issue into a box like the West Side stadium, real estate price, gay marriage and the WTC and saying, "see? toldya!" doesn't quite fly here when you look at the cause & effect reality. I'm fine if you don't want to vote for Bloomberg, just don't vote for anyone else. #michaelbloomberg
     Reply
    allyzay promoted this comment invisibill was starred invisibill was unstarred
    Image of allyzay allyzay
    11/03/09

    @invisibill: Maybe if you could provide maybe even one counterexample to show holes in the points being made your argument would be a little stronger? How is the argument about the West Side stadium wrong, for example? #michaelbloomberg
     Reply
    allyzay was starred allyzay was unstarred
    Image of invisibill invisibill
    11/03/09

    @allyzay: sheldon silver did his best to kill the west side project more to protect contributor$ cablevision and his msg relationship. It's still a wasteland down there and will be for some time to come. a massive construction project and extensive new infrastructure to that dead part of the of the city went well beyond the olympic attempt. It was a long-term plan sparked by the long shot of getting the games. we probably weren't going to get them either way but a massive public works project would have been under way that, unlike yankee stadium, would have been tried to bring life to an area and bring dollars back to the city that would otherwise be sitting in the meadowlands. criticism for buying people off? that's a pretty clear buyoff of mr. silver. So, I can understand being against the stadium but the explanation was misrepresented. Other than that, there are sweeping connections to ressults over the past 8 years that are beyond the power of the mayor. #michaelbloomberg
     Reply
    invisibill was starred invisibill was unstarred
    Image of Mediahohoho Mediahohoho
    11/03/09

    In reply to Gawker Endorsement: Don't Vote for Bloomberg
    Yeah, but he's definitely your guy if you like construction cranes falling out of the sky. #michaelbloomberg
     Reply
    Mediahohoho was starred Mediahohoho was unstarred
    Image of adiam7 adiam7
    11/03/09

    In reply to Gawker Endorsement: Don't Vote for Bloomberg
    Alex, Bravo! Now that you are done breaking Bloomie down I have a few other "questionable" elections I need looked into: The student body president run-off at a certain school on the upper east side. I think we know what kind of "student body" they mean. There is also a very suspicious homecoming "queen" in Virginia that does not embody what I would consider a "queen". Finally , my friend's Grammy has been denied the opportunity to lead her canasta team to glory by a certain woman of a certain income who by the way is also the head of the mahjong delegation that went to AC. #michaelbloomberg
     Reply
    adiam7 was starred adiam7 was unstarred
    Image of OrneryBabe OrneryBabe
    11/03/09

    In reply to Gawker Endorsement: Don't Vote for Bloomberg
    Excellent post, Pareene. Aggressive high-end development is Exhibit A for Bloomberg's clear preference for the interests of the wealthy. New construction is everywhere, everyday in my neighborhood. One new condo building across the street remained vacant for over a year, and is now being marketed as a rental. Naturally, they're all high-end condos and rentals. Because why build middle-class housing? What are they still doing here anyway, right, Bloomberg?

    Giuliani always defended police whether they were merely wrong or downright criminal, never letting facts get in the way and sliming their victims in the process. At least Bloomberg waits for details before weighing in, and does not engage in Giuliani-style blanket defense of them. I'll give him that. Not much else, though.

    Repealing term limits by referendum was pretty loathsome, but guess what? He'll benefit from the reliably short memories that people have.

    Bloomberg failed miserably to read the tea leaves about not having enough support for congestion pricing. You don't start such high-profile shit in Albany unless you're pretty certain you're gonna get your way. Colossal blunder, in my opinion.

    Bloomberg has yet to achieve a significant, high-profile accomplishment. I wish I could promise to deliver for 8 years, fail to do so, and still keep my job. #michaelbloomberg
     Reply
    allyzay promoted this comment OrneryBabe was starred OrneryBabe was unstarred
    Image of mizzgoa001 mizzgoa001
    11/02/09

    In reply to Gawker Endorsement: Don't Vote for Bloomberg
    While I'm not voting Bloomberg, this elections reminds me very much of Bush-Kerry election. The entire democratic campaign was based on a lot of people shouting " Whatever you do, don't vote for that guy!" and not enough people saying why I should vote for this guy. I have a feeling tomorrow isn't going to turn out too well for Thompson.
     Reply
    Phyllis Nefler promoted this comment Gabriel Snyder approved this comment mizzgoa001 was starred mizzgoa001 was unstarred
    Image of musicmope musicmope
    11/02/09

    In reply to Gawker Endorsement: Don't Vote for Bloomberg
    Whither Mark Green? #michaelbloomberg
     Reply
    musicmope was starred musicmope was unstarred
    Image of shana.r.stephenson shana.r.stephenson
    11/02/09

    In reply to Gawker Endorsement: Don't Vote for Bloomberg
    Well written article, but as it stands, I'm still uncertain as to who'll get my vote tomorrow. I dislike Bloomberg just as much as the next person, but I don't think I can bring myself to vote for Thompson. Merely not competent enough, in my opinion. He certainly didn't do a good job of proving why he's the right leader for this concrete jungle that we live in. I hate being undecided this late in the game. It's very unfortunate that we didn't have a "real" candidate to challenge Bloomberg. On a state and federal level, we're screwed.
     Reply
    allyzay promoted this comment Gabriel Snyder approved this comment shana.r.stephenson was starred shana.r.stephenson was unstarred
    Image of Buttafooco Buttafooco
    11/02/09

    In reply to Gawker Endorsement: Don't Vote for Bloomberg
    Sorry, I kind of like Bloomy.........especially when pitted against his competition. He's certainly got his faults but taken as a whole, I'll take his management style over those who are running against him.
     Reply
    Edited by Buttafooco at 11/02/09 8:25 PM Buttafooco was starred Buttafooco was unstarred
    Image of musicmope musicmope
    11/02/09

    @Buttafooco: He managed the middle class out of its jobs and homes. #michaelbloomberg
     Reply
    musicmope was starred musicmope was unstarred
    Image of Buttafooco Buttafooco
    11/02/09

    @musicmope: Really? I thought there were other factors responsible for that, many beyond his control. You know.......... the financial crisis, many middle class New Yorkers trying to live a class above which they can afford. Granted, there are quite a number of people who lost jobs, homes etc but I don't know that I'd lay all the blame on the mayor for those things. So far, I also haven't heard any brilliant ideas from his opponents as to how they plan to balance the city's budget (again, given the loss of revenue) while still maintaining services, quality of life etc. It's always easy to criticize; a bit more difficult to make difficult choices and come up with constructive ideas in dire times. #michaelbloomberg
     Reply
    Buttafooco was starred Buttafooco was unstarred
    Image of kneetoe kneetoe
    11/02/09

    In reply to Gawker Endorsement: Don't Vote for Bloomberg
    I think you overstate your position, Pareene. I think the Mayor's record is decidedly mixed, but no where near as bad as you say. First, politically, Bloomberg's team has built (and not just bought) an effective and diverse coalition when it comes to city matters, while he/they have been far less successful at influencing Albany (hardly his fault--no one can manage the mess in Albany). As for how he's done in the outer Boroughs with people making less money, my guess is that he'll be pretty successful with that demographic tomorrow. Where he's not the issues will be property taxes and not most of the matters you raise. It's more like places like Park Slope where I wouldn't be surprised he has a hard time (also, as a writer for the esteemed Gawker empire, I'm sure you are a rich white guy from Manhattan and so can't speak for the working class--right?). There are also plenty of areas--the environment and the city's 20-year garbage plan are the two I know most about--where the Mayor has pushed extremely aggressive, progressive policies that will benefit all New Yorkers.

    Last, you make him seem both omnipotent and impotent--he is destroying the world while failing to win any political battles. This isn't possible. In reality the power of a city mayor, even the one in NYC, is severely limited by state and federal authority. If he gets too much credit elsewhere, he gets too much blame here. #michaelbloomberg
     Reply
    Gabriel Snyder promoted this comment kneetoe was starred kneetoe was unstarred
    Earlier discussions Other discussions Show all discussions Show featured discussions only Start a new discussion

Login

Enter your username and password.

Please enter a username.
Please enter your password.
logging in
Login via Facebook | Sign Up | Forgot Password?

Reset Password

Please enter your email address to have your password reset.

Please enter your email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
requesting password reset

Register

Registering will give you a user profile and the ability to add other users as friends. To become a commenter, however, you need to audition.

Want to know more? Consult the Comment FAQ and legal terms.

Please enter a username.
Please enter a password.
Please confirm your password.
Passwords are not identical.
Please enter a valid email address.
registration sent, waiting for reply

Submit Your Comment

You don't need to login to comment. Just enter your email address below.

See how your address will be displayed in the Comment FAQ.

Please enter a valid email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
logging in

Login with your Facebook or Gawker account.

Sign up here.



  • Archives
  • About
  • Advertising
  • Legal
  • Help
  • Report a Bug
  • FAQ
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.