• Profile logout login

#entertainmentweekly

Gawker

Share Cancel
   
Upload an image | Add an image URL
×

logging in
  • FAQ. Include # before tag:
  • #tips,
  • #stalker,
  • #opencaption,
  • #internalmemos,
  • etc.

New York, 2:47 AM
Mon Nov 9
14 posts in the last 24 hours

Team

Tip Your Editors:
tips@gawker.com
Tipline: 646-214-8138

Editor-in-Chief:
Gabriel Snyder | Email

West Coast Editor:
Richard Rushfield | Email

Contributing Editors:

Valleywag:
Ryan Tate | Email

Media:
Hamilton Nolan | Email

Politics:
Alex Pareene | Email

Investigations:
John Cook | Email

Entertainment:
Brian Moylan | Email

Weekends:
Foster Kamer | Email

Video Editor:
Richard Blakeley | Email

SUBSCRIBE TO Gawker RSS

New: Breaking news and daily top stories via email
4260 Subscribers
Gawker
  • posts about #entertainmentweekly more →

    EW Layoffs

    Entertainment Weekly: Still Endangered

    Annoying Pop-Up Ads Come to Magazines

    We Still Don't Know Whether Inglourious Basterds is Going to Suck or Not

    Guy On Magazine Cover Is Latest Thing to Discuss

    Megan Fox's 50 Best (& Worst) Bon Mots

    'Entertainment Weekly' Hates Directors Who Are Good, Foreign, Or Female

    Popular Magazine Continues to Fluff Sad Vampire Books

    Consider This Your Giant, Missing 'Spoiler Alert' For EW's 'Lost' Cover Story

    'Entertainment Weekly' Oscar Recall Forces Gwyneth And Renée To Declare 'No Takebacks'
  • Your version of Internet Explorer is not supported. Please upgrade to the most recent version in order to view comments.
    Dsmvwl  Admin  Promote to frontpage Approve user Ban user ×
    Image of Mo MoDo Mo MoDo
    11/04/09

    In reply to EW Layoffs
    Were there eleven employees at Entertainment Weekly? #timeinc
     Reply
    Mo MoDo was starred Mo MoDo was unstarred
    Image of BowlingForDollars BowlingForDollars
    10/10/09

    In reply to Entertainment Weekly: Still Endangered
    So that's why I got an offer to renew for a year for only $10!
     Reply
    BowlingForDollars was starred BowlingForDollars was unstarred
    Image of thursdaynext27 thursdaynext27
    10/09/09

    In reply to Entertainment Weekly: Still Endangered
    I'd be more concerned if EW hadn't become a PR vehicle for the Twilight franchise while reducing the parts of the magazine I did read (book reviews). Now I just want to know if they'll refund the rest of my subscription.
     Reply
    secretagentman promoted this comment thursdaynext27 was starred thursdaynext27 was unstarred
    Image of secretagentman secretagentman
    10/09/09

    @thursdaynext27: That's my question, seriously. How does that work?
    I still like it but it gets thinner and thinner each week.
     Reply
    secretagentman was starred secretagentman was unstarred
    Image of TedSez TedSez
    10/09/09

    In reply to Entertainment Weekly: Still Endangered
    Yes, half the magazine sucks (hey, vampire pun!), but the reviews are still good. As long as Ken Tucker has a job, I'm with 'em.
     Reply
    TedSez was starred TedSez was unstarred
    Image of OldTowneTavern OldTowneTavern
    10/09/09

    In reply to Entertainment Weekly: Still Endangered
    I had to stop renewing this damn thing when it started to resemble US magazine. It's not being called "Entertainment Weakly" for nothing.
     Reply
    OldTowneTavern was starred OldTowneTavern was unstarred
    Image of Airvault Airvault
    10/09/09

    In reply to Entertainment Weekly: Still Endangered
    Entertainment mags really lost something when Premiere went under. Sure it's on the web now, but for a while there it was a first-rate publication. It was never as smug as Film Comment or as French as Cahiers. Just a decent movie magazine. This? Good riddance.
     Reply
    Airvault was starred Airvault was unstarred
    Image of Astigmatism Astigmatism
    10/09/09

    In reply to Entertainment Weekly: Still Endangered
    I work in their building in NYC and can't remember the last time I saw someone from EW on the elevator. Are we sure they still have any employees and aren't just churning out content from some giant PR-aggregating hyperintelligent (well, not that intelligent) artificial brain somewhere?
     Reply
    Astigmatism was starred Astigmatism was unstarred
    Image of Spirit Fingers Spirit Fingers
    10/09/09

    In reply to Entertainment Weekly: Still Endangered
    I would not count that large craniumed twinkle-chested teen swoon-hound to be one of the 20 greatest vampires of all time. Shame on the world for perpetuating this utter, complete nonsense. I'd like his head weighed for confirmation that its mastodonic size isn't somehow compelling people into thinking he's somehow interesting.
     Reply
    Spirit Fingers was starred Spirit Fingers was unstarred
    Image of skahammer skahammer
    10/09/09

    @Spirit Fingers: Some days, SF, you're just on, aren't you?
     Reply
    skahammer was starred skahammer was unstarred
    Image of pufflehuff pufflehuff
    08/31/09

    In reply to We Still Don't Know Whether Inglourious Basterds is Going to Suck or Not
    I'm a Brit, but I bloody loved it, and I've never been a massive Tarantino fan (Jackie Brown aside). Shame about it shoring up Weinstein, but do go and see! It's unique.
     Reply
    Edited by pufflehuff at 08/31/09 5:17 PM pufflehuff was starred pufflehuff was unstarred
    Image of BowlingForDollars BowlingForDollars
    08/20/09

    In reply to Annoying Pop-Up Ads Come to Magazines
    If I were CBS, I'd be trying to get the flyover states to watch my show - thus putting the adverts in mags going there. They're the people actually sitting at home, not NYCers and Los Angelenos.

    Industry people already know their shows suck.
     Reply
    BowlingForDollars was starred BowlingForDollars was unstarred
    Image of Cheap Shot Cheap Shot
    08/20/09

    In reply to Annoying Pop-Up Ads Come to Magazines
    What is the point of that?
     Reply
    Cheap Shot was starred Cheap Shot was unstarred
    Image of naugahydeinplainsight naugahydeinplainsight
    08/20/09

    In reply to Annoying Pop-Up Ads Come to Magazines
    So $11 to $15 per copy? Wow indeed. (I see on Wired that the video will be "only in some subscriptions delivered to New York and LA," but still. Big Bucks for Big Bang Theory! (I admit it, I really like that show.)
     Reply
    naugahydeinplainsight was starred naugahydeinplainsight was unstarred
    Image of BxgrlJeri BxgrlJeri
    08/20/09

    In reply to Annoying Pop-Up Ads Come to Magazines
    If I open a magazine and more than two subscriber cards fall out (and usually land under the subway seat of the stinky homeless guy and I don't retrieve them and get the evil eye from fucking transplants who don't remember when you had to worry about your LIFE on the subway and not some random piece of litter), I never buy that rag again.

    Now this.

    Subway patrons beware. The whole damn magazine is coming your way the first time I come across one of these things.
     Reply
    BxgrlJeri was starred BxgrlJeri was unstarred
    Image of hilikusopus hilikusopus
    08/20/09

    In reply to Annoying Pop-Up Ads Come to Magazines
    Surprise: worst fucking advert for worst fucking television show.

    Is it possible to reach 100% commercial saturation? At a certain point, can I just have some fucking ad exec garnish my wages and leave me the fuck alone?
     Reply
    Swifter promoted this comment Edited by hilikusopus at 08/20/09 11:03 AM hilikusopus was starred hilikusopus was unstarred
    Image of hilikusopus hilikusopus
    08/20/09

    @hilikusopus: Pardon my language, Gawkerati.
     Reply
    hilikusopus was starred hilikusopus was unstarred
    Image of lobstr lobstr
    08/20/09

    @hilikusopus: Why do you think they put lounge chairs in Times Square? So you can absorb the marketing!
     Reply
    lobstr was starred lobstr was unstarred
    Image of hilikusopus hilikusopus
    08/20/09

    @lobstr: I'm waiting for them to put in those moving chairs, like they have for rides in Disney World.
     Reply
    hilikusopus was starred hilikusopus was unstarred
    Image of Edward Lionheart Edward Lionheart
    08/18/09

    In reply to We Still Don't Know Whether Inglourious Basterds is Going to Suck or Not
    Also, anyone who didn't like Jackie Brown has no credibility whatsoever. Obviously doesn't like movies full stop.
     Reply
    Edward Lionheart was starred Edward Lionheart was unstarred
    Earlier threads | All threads | Show hidden threads | Show featured threads only | Start a new discussion

Login

Enter your username and password.

Please enter a username.
Please enter your password.
logging in
Login via Facebook | Sign Up | Forgot Password?

Reset Password

Please enter your email address to have your password reset.

Please enter your email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
requesting password reset

Register

Registering will give you a user profile and the ability to add other users as friends. To become a commenter, however, you need to audition.

Want to know more? Consult the Comment FAQ and legal terms.

Please enter a username.
Please enter a password.
Please confirm your password.
Passwords are not identical.
Please enter a valid email address.
registration sent, waiting for reply

Submit Your Comment

You don't need to login to comment. Just enter your email address below.

See how your address will be displayed in the Comment FAQ.

Please enter a valid email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
logging in

Login with your Facebook or Gawker account.

Sign up here.



  • Archives
  • About
  • Advertising
  • Legal
  • Help
  • Report a Bug
  • FAQ
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.