• Profile logout login

#ethics#gtblogging

Gawker

Share Cancel
   
Upload an image | Add an image URL
×

logging in
  • FAQ. Include # before tag:
  • #tips,
  • #stalker,
  • #opencaption,
  • #internalmemos,
  • etc.

New York, 7:41 PM
Wed Dec 2
51 posts in the last 24 hours

Team

Tip Your Editors:

Tipline: 646-214-8138

Editor-in-Chief:
Gabriel Snyder |

West Coast Editor:
Richard Rushfield |

Contributing Editors:

Valleywag:
Ryan Tate |

Media:
Hamilton Nolan |

Politics:
Alex Pareene |

Investigations:
John Cook |

Entertainment:
Brian Moylan |

Nights:
Adrian Chen |
Azaria Jagger |
Ravi Somaiya |

Weekends:
Foster Kamer |

Video Editor:
Richard Blakeley |

SUBSCRIBE TO Gawker RSS

New: Breaking news and daily top stories via email
4260 Subscribers
Gawker
  • Your version of Internet Explorer is not supported. Please upgrade to the most recent version in order to view comments.
    Dsmvwl  Admin  Promote to frontpage Approve user Ban user ×
    Image of belltolls belltolls
    10/17/09

    In reply to New York Times to Washington Post's Executive Editor: Liar, Liar, Liar.
    The Chatham House Rule, eh? Goodnight you princes of DC, you kings of the Mid-Atlantic. #washingtonpost
     Reply
    belltolls was starred belltolls was unstarred
    Image of Uncle_Billy_Slumming Uncle_Billy_Slumming
    10/17/09

    In reply to New York Times to Washington Post's Executive Editor: Liar, Liar, Liar.
    Trial balloon: The public can offer journalists hookers and blow, cash and vacations, to win their loyalty. #washingtonpost
     Reply
    Uncle_Billy_Slumming was starred Uncle_Billy_Slumming was unstarred
    Image of If_I_Had_a_Poodle If_I_Had_a_Poodle
    10/17/09

    In reply to New York Times to Washington Post's Executive Editor: Liar, Liar, Liar.
    scruples. ethics. discuss. #washingtonpost
     Reply
    If_I_Had_a_Poodle was starred If_I_Had_a_Poodle was unstarred
    Image of applejuice applejuice
    10/17/09

    In reply to New York Times to Washington Post's Executive Editor: Liar, Liar, Liar.
    What's wrong with thise dudes pic on the main page? It shows up like it is the opposite of the coneheads pic.
     Reply
    Edited by applejuice at 10/17/09 3:31 PM applejuice was starred applejuice was unstarred
    Image of Wrapitup Wrapitup
    08/28/09

    In reply to Mark Penn and Wall Street Journal Now Equally Pathetic
    You can see why Hillary lost to Obama in the primaries right here. The guys from BM (heh)are stuck in their self-made echo chamber of lies and excuses and have completely lost touch with how people really perceive them. They can get away with not giving a shit about that when it comes to corporate clients. But when you're marketing a person directly to consumers, like in politics, Penn's tone-deafness, excessive focus on dumbshit buzzwords and terrible ideas cost them the prize.

    This is about marketing honchos, who follow Mark Penn's 'advice,' being too lazy and too arrogant to get out into the trenches and actually listen to people and get clear first-hand information. Instead they use some erratic, semi-delusional, self-congratulatory insider as their go-between and promote his work like crazy because he says cool-sounding things. All this applies to Thomas Friedman too.
     Reply
    Wrapitup was starred Wrapitup was unstarred
    Image of heartbreakturnip heartbreakturnip
    08/28/09

    In reply to Mark Penn and Wall Street Journal Now Equally Pathetic
    Does anyone else find Burson-Marsteller domain name amusing? Awesome brand management, PR guys! Or am I just being fecal? (See Gottheimer's email address.)
     Reply
    heartbreakturnip was starred heartbreakturnip was unstarred
    Image of daveyjonesisdead daveyjonesisdead
    08/28/09

    In reply to Mark Penn and Wall Street Journal Now Equally Pathetic
    Mark Penn is not a journalist and is not understood as a journalist. So who cares? Can't we take aim at their anti-Obama "news" stories instead?
     Reply
    daveyjonesisdead was starred daveyjonesisdead was unstarred
    Image of daveyjonesisdead daveyjonesisdead
    08/28/09

    @daveyjonesisdead: And frankly, I think you may be the only who reads him, Ham. Stop! You're just encouraging him! He probably thinks he's the cat's meow because you care what he says and does. Eventually the WSJ will realize that Clinton didn't win the election and they will can him.
     Reply
    daveyjonesisdead was starred daveyjonesisdead was unstarred
    Image of Uncle_Billy_Slumming Uncle_Billy_Slumming
    08/28/09

    @daveyjonesisdead:

    Waitapicosec... If "there's no such thing as bad publicity" and HamNo knows this, and knows he's boosting Penn and BM, and he knows that non-insane-fat-white-guy posts get minimal page views...

    ..............what's this post really all about? Hmmm?
     Reply
    Uncle_Billy_Slumming was starred Uncle_Billy_Slumming was unstarred
    Image of daveyjonesisdead daveyjonesisdead
    08/28/09

    @Uncle_Billy_Slumming: I felt that way about Gawker's relentless discussions of Politico stories, which in accordance with netetiqute included a link to the stories. And then there was the fact that Politico did some kind of ad-revenue sharing with sites that linked to them. THINGS ARE NEVER WHAT THEY SEEM! Except glamping, of course.
     Reply
    Edited by daveyjonesisdead at 08/28/09 5:40 PM daveyjonesisdead was starred daveyjonesisdead was unstarred
    Image of Jasper Reardon Jasper Reardon
    08/28/09

    In reply to Mark Penn and Wall Street Journal Now Equally Pathetic
    So, there's no denying that the WSJ is having an ethical problem here. A particularly egregious one. But does anyone else find Gawker's attempts at policing others a bit...ah...ridiculous?
     Reply
    Jasper Reardon was starred Jasper Reardon was unstarred
    Image of NoelleBlue NoelleBlue
    08/28/09

    @Jasper Reardon: I don't think it's policing others... Gawker has always focused on the going ons at other media outlets. It's a big part of their MO.
     Reply
    NoelleBlue was starred NoelleBlue was unstarred
    Image of AndPreciousLittleofThat AndPreciousLittleofThat
    08/28/09

    In reply to Mark Penn and Wall Street Journal Now Equally Pathetic
    Dear Mr. Penn - I have an old Hypercolor t-shirt you could write about. Kids love the Hypercolors.
     Reply
    Smitros promoted this comment AndPreciousLittleofThat was starred AndPreciousLittleofThat was unstarred
    Image of Smitros Smitros
    08/28/09

    @AndPreciousLittleofThat:

    I'm seeing him as more the Thundercats type, or Kroft Superfriends.
     Reply
    Smitros was starred Smitros was unstarred
    Image of blix blix
    08/28/09

    @Smitros: The new Scooby-Doo has a different celebrity guest voice in each episode. Edgy!
     Reply
    blix was starred blix was unstarred
    Image of Smitros Smitros
    08/28/09

    @blix:
    With who knows what personalities for the Mark Penn client list . . .
     Reply
    Smitros was starred Smitros was unstarred
    Image of Uncle_Billy_Slumming Uncle_Billy_Slumming
    08/28/09

    @blix:

    I so wanted to do the goofy scooby laugh in response, but how do you do that in text?
     Reply
    Uncle_Billy_Slumming was starred Uncle_Billy_Slumming was unstarred
    Image of jaxdesert jaxdesert
    08/28/09

    @Uncle_Billy_Slumming: Somebody needs to try that. I am hanging on the edge of my seat--Must. See. It. In Text.
     Reply
    blix promoted this comment jaxdesert was starred jaxdesert was unstarred
    Image of blix blix
    08/28/09

    @Uncle_Billy_Slumming: That is a tough one. I'd wimp out and post a link to a .wav file.
     Reply
    blix was starred blix was unstarred
    Image of blix blix
    08/28/09

    @jaxdesert: eee-HEE-HEE-Hee
     Reply
    blix was starred blix was unstarred
    Image of If_I_Had_a_Poodle If_I_Had_a_Poodle
    08/28/09

    In reply to Mark Penn and Wall Street Journal Now Equally Pathetic
    time for a flaming bag of doggie doo on his doorstep, as that is apparently all he is capable of understanding. a disgrace. and the wsj has lost whateve few shreds of dignity it still clings to
     Reply
    If_I_Had_a_Poodle was starred If_I_Had_a_Poodle was unstarred
    Image of Smitros Smitros
    08/28/09

    In reply to Mark Penn and Wall Street Journal Now Equally Pathetic
    But if they're both pathetic, isn't it kind of touching that they've found each other? Commonalities are the foundation of a strong relationship.
     Reply
    Edited by Smitros at 08/28/09 11:11 AM Smitros was starred Smitros was unstarred
    Image of Aaron Altman Aaron Altman
    08/28/09

    In reply to Mark Penn and Wall Street Journal Now Equally Pathetic
    Let's just co-opt "glamping" already and make it into an adjectival phrase. The Journal really glamped it up on this one.
     Reply
    Aaron Altman was starred Aaron Altman was unstarred
    Image of Uncle_Billy_Slumming Uncle_Billy_Slumming
    08/28/09

    @Aaron Altman:

    Glamping is what the Glampetts do.

    O the next thing ya know ol' Mark's a millionaire. ♫
     Reply
    Uncle_Billy_Slumming was starred Uncle_Billy_Slumming was unstarred
    Image of daveyjonesisdead daveyjonesisdead
    08/28/09

    @Aaron Altman: Glamping leads to Santorum, no?
     Reply
    daveyjonesisdead was starred daveyjonesisdead was unstarred
    Image of MrInBetween MrInBetween
    08/28/09

    In reply to Mark Penn and Wall Street Journal Now Equally Pathetic
    The WSJ wants to keep rewarding The Fail-Master for running Hillary's campaign into the ground.
     Reply
    MrInBetween was starred MrInBetween was unstarred
    Image of BlinkyMcChuck BlinkyMcChuck
    08/27/09

    In reply to Leak: How Mark Penn Converts His Wall Street Journal Column into P.R. Clients
    le ZING...
     Reply
    BlinkyMcChuck was starred BlinkyMcChuck was unstarred
    Image of Mo MoDo Mo MoDo
    08/26/09

    In reply to Leak: How Mark Penn Converts His Wall Street Journal Column into P.R. Clients
    Maybe Mark Penn and Ben Stein can get together and start their own newspaper. They can call it Conflicting Interests.
     Reply
    Mo MoDo was starred Mo MoDo was unstarred
    Earlier discussions Other discussions Show all discussions Show featured discussions only Start a new discussion

Login

Enter your username and password.

Please enter a username.
Please enter your password.
logging in
Login via Facebook | Sign Up | Forgot Password?

Reset Password

Please enter your email address to have your password reset.

Please enter your email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
requesting password reset

Register

Registering will give you a user profile and the ability to add other users as friends. To become a commenter, however, you need to audition.

Want to know more? Consult the Comment FAQ and legal terms.

Please enter a username.
Please enter a password.
Please confirm your password.
Passwords are not identical.
Please enter a valid email address.
registration sent, waiting for reply

Submit Your Comment

You don't need to login to comment. Just enter your email address below.

See how your address will be displayed in the Comment FAQ.

Please enter a valid email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
logging in

Login with your Facebook or Gawker account.

Sign up here.



  • Archives
  • About
  • Advertising
  • Legal
  • Help
  • Report a Bug
  • FAQ
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.