Enter your username and password.
-
posts about #eureka more → Anti-Gay Miss California: 'It's About Being Biblically Correct'
| posts about #eureka more → |
Anti-Gay Miss California: 'It's About Being Biblically Correct' |
04/21/09
04/21/09
04/21/09
true story.
04/21/09
04/21/09
Remind me again why I should give a shit what she thinks about anything?
04/21/09
04/21/09
04/21/09
04/21/09
04/21/09
04/21/09
04/21/09
You're welcome.
04/21/09
"I am opposed to the emancipation of Negroes. Not for economic reasons, but for Biblical reasons*."
Whether or not we're impressed with Perez Hilton personally, a beauty contest judge can be reasonably argued to have the right to expose a belief that he finds reprehensible and dehumanizing.
*Certainly in that time, some interpreted Biblical 'advocacy' of slavery.
04/21/09
04/21/09
04/21/09
04/21/09
04/21/09
04/21/09
Come to Massachusetts! The original and still the best gay marriage state, baby!
04/21/09
I have to admit, i does love me some Boston, but Mr. Hydroceph, who has next to no body-fat, would freeze to death during the first autumn.
04/21/09
End times.
04/21/09
04/21/09
04/21/09
04/21/09
04/21/09
When entitlement to the wrong opinion metastasizes into legalization to enforce misery upon others, we overlook an emotional Holocaust. Inevitably, paradox that intolerance is itself the thing that should be least tolerated is upon us. Gay civil union is a War that will one day be won, but eloquence most be alloyed with surpassing organization for that to happen. Sadly, we are a decade or so away from victory.
04/21/09
04/21/09
Second, last I checked, the woman is entitled to her beliefs, and according to the last election she isn't the only one who feels that way.
Third, if gays start to embrace Perez Hilton as their defender they're going to be fighting a losing battle. He's a disgusting human being, and that has nothing to do with him being gay.
04/21/09
04/21/09
04/21/09
04/21/09
BTW, $10 says she has no idea what passage of the bible prohibits M2M action.
04/21/09
04/21/09
04/21/09
04/21/09
I am for gay rights, but I am also for religious freedom.
How big of you. What you really mean, of course, is that you are for gay rights so long as it doesn't interfere with your sect's particular brand of bigotry. If you don't want anyone interfering with your religion, GTFO and go live in Vatican City. So long as your here, you have to respect the pluralistic society in which you live.
For your information, separation of church and state works both ways. If the Catholic church wants total freedom to do whatever they want in accordance with their beliefs, then they need to get out of the public sector.
No one is making them or any other religion marry gay people. No one is making them open hospitals to the public or run public adoption agencies that receive taxpayer money. As long as they do, however, they play by the state's rules and not Joey Ratz's rules.
04/21/09
Our founding fathers came here to have religious freedom, not freedom from religion.. [www.pbs.org]
The US give many faith-based organizations federal dollars to facilitate the various charitable works they do for the public, not just members of their religion. I hope you don't believe that they too should not be banned from receiving federal monies too?
04/21/09
04/21/09
If a religious org helps those less fortunate, for instance church based soup kitchens, then why not give them federal dollars, especially if they have the infrastructure to do it better and cheaper?
FYI: From Wikipedia: Faith is the belief in the truth of or trustworthiness of a person, idea, or thing.
04/21/09
04/21/09