• Profile logout login

#exclusive#insidertellsall

Gawker

Share Cancel
   
Upload an image | Add an image URL
×

logging in
  • FAQ. Include # before tag:
  • #tips,
  • #stalker,
  • #opencaption,
  • #internalmemos,
  • etc.

New York, 4:52 PM
Thu Dec 10
63 posts in the last 24 hours

Team

Tip Your Editors:

Tipline: 646-214-8138

Editor-in-Chief:
Gabriel Snyder |

West Coast Editor:
Richard Rushfield |

Contributing Editors:

Valleywag:
Ryan Tate |

Media:
Hamilton Nolan |

Politics:
Alex Pareene |

Investigations:
John Cook |

Entertainment:
Brian Moylan |

Nights:
Adrian Chen |
Azaria Jagger |
Ravi Somaiya |

Weekends:
Foster Kamer |

Video Editor:
Richard Blakeley |

SUBSCRIBE TO Gawker RSS

New: Breaking news and daily top stories via email
4260 Subscribers
Gawker
  • Your version of Internet Explorer is not supported. Please upgrade to the most recent version in order to view comments.
    Dsmvwl  Admin  Promote to frontpage Approve user Ban user ×
    Image of NotReadyForPrimeTime NotReadyForPrimeTime
    12/02/09

    In reply to A Bravo Contract Delivered White House Gatecrashers to the Today Show
    Give these people their own show. Except that the storylines should revolve around their various grifting scams. Any monies earned from the show should go to pay back all the people they've bilked over the years.

    They're obviously pathological liars and psychopaths, and need to be made an example of.
     Reply
    NotReadyForPrimeTime was starred NotReadyForPrimeTime was unstarred
    Image of hatey hatey
    12/01/09

    In reply to A Bravo Contract Delivered White House Gatecrashers to the Today Show
    Those extensions are vile.

    (I've been thinking about them all. damn. day. and couldn't keep quiet any longer.) #fakehair
     Reply
    hatey was starred hatey was unstarred
    Image of RollsRoyceRevenge RollsRoyceRevenge
    12/01/09

    In reply to Rush Sets Wedding Date!
    I, for one, wish nothing but the best for Rush's fourth marriage.

    And his fifth, sixth, seventh and--who knows?--eighth marriages.
     Reply
    RollsRoyceRevenge was starred RollsRoyceRevenge was unstarred
    Image of TheBusinessGuy TheBusinessGuy
    12/01/09

    In reply to A Bravo Contract Delivered White House Gatecrashers to the Today Show
    These people are getting exactly what they wanted. Crime does pay. And I don't necessarily mean in money.
     Reply
    TheBusinessGuy was starred TheBusinessGuy was unstarred
    Image of unclevanya unclevanya
    12/01/09

    In reply to A Bravo Contract Delivered White House Gatecrashers to the Today Show
    Even a lefty-hippie due process pussy like myself wants these two ghouls locked up for their little "prank", not interviewed by Matt Lauer. This kind of stunt can't be taken lightly. Let them be the last two residents of Gitmo for a few days, with all the amenities. Maybe put Speidi in the cell next door, to show them what they look like to the real world.
     Reply
    unclevanya was starred unclevanya was unstarred
    Image of Bunsy Bunsy
    12/01/09

    @unclevanya: I agree.
     Reply
    Bunsy was starred Bunsy was unstarred
    Image of hhpeterson13 hhpeterson13
    12/01/09

    In reply to A Bravo Contract Delivered White House Gatecrashers to the Today Show
    Obama's veto power should extend to reality show gigs. These Salahi assholes should not profit from breaking the rules.
     Reply
    hhpeterson13 was starred hhpeterson13 was unstarred
    Image of Sergio Hernandez Sergio Hernandez
    12/01/09

    In reply to A Bravo Contract Delivered White House Gatecrashers to the Today Show
    Hm, interesting. How would this reconcile with LuAnn de Lesseps' appearance on GMA yesterday? (She was on to talk about the Salahis)

    Since RHONY ended in May, she'd still be in the "Reality Hold Period," right? Seems strange that Bravo would sign off on her GMA appearance to talk smack about the franchise's (inevitable) new stars.

    Eh, more exposure, I guess.
     Reply
    Sergio Hernandez was starred Sergio Hernandez was unstarred
    Image of BowlingForDollars BowlingForDollars
    12/01/09

    In reply to A Bravo Contract Delivered White House Gatecrashers to the Today Show
    I've got a THIRD UPDATE for you: The first two are lies. ALL LIES!
     Reply
    BowlingForDollars was starred BowlingForDollars was unstarred
    Image of BowlingForDollars BowlingForDollars
    12/01/09

    In reply to A Bravo Contract Delivered White House Gatecrashers to the Today Show
    Matt Lauer, as part of the NBC "News" (and I use the term loosely) team, never bothered to ask if Michaele Salahi was going to be part of "Real Housewives".

    Is that because he already knew the answer and he forgot to ask? I mean, that's the whole reason they were at the White House, right? With cameras in tow?

    Seems as though NBCUniComcast is waiting to see how this plays out. If people continue to hate on these two, perhaps they won't be part, but if it blows over, then a million dollars says they are part of the cast.
     Reply
    BowlingForDollars was starred BowlingForDollars was unstarred
    Image of Matt Cherette Matt Cherette
    12/01/09

    In reply to A Bravo Contract Delivered White House Gatecrashers to the Today Show
    Am I too late for the influx of unapproved Drudge commenters? It's always so fun.
     Reply
    Matt Cherette was starred Matt Cherette was unstarred
    Image of wrongneighborhood wrongneighborhood
    12/01/09

    @Matt Cherette: oh, they're coming. It's still early in parts of Midwest and West - give them time.
     Reply
    wrongneighborhood was starred wrongneighborhood was unstarred
    Image of mimigoliath mimigoliath
    12/01/09

    In reply to A Bravo Contract Delivered White House Gatecrashers to the Today Show
    So now you don't have to be a shitty reality show star, you can still become temporarily famous by being an aspiring shitty reality show star.

    Aspiring shitty reality show star - we have really let ourselves go, America.
     Reply
    mimigoliath was starred mimigoliath was unstarred
    Image of wrongneighborhood wrongneighborhood
    12/01/09

    In reply to A Bravo Contract Delivered White House Gatecrashers to the Today Show
    Drudge is linking to Gawker, I never thought I would see the day. Unapproved commenter deluge in 3... 2... 1...
     Reply
    wrongneighborhood was starred wrongneighborhood was unstarred
    Image of Tremonius Tremonius
    12/01/09

    In reply to A Bravo Contract Delivered White House Gatecrashers to the Today Show
    Next you'll tell us all those actors who appear on talk shows are merely plugging other network product.

    And which newscasts are "unscripted, reality-based programs"?

    I'll take my answer on the air.
     Reply
    Tremonius was starred Tremonius was unstarred
    Image of Richard Petty Bourgeoisie Richard Petty Bourgeoisie
    12/01/09

    In reply to A Bravo Contract Delivered White House Gatecrashers to the Today Show
    That contract has as a defined term "Reality Hold Period." I feel like that includes the last ten years.
     Reply
    Richard Petty Bourgeoisie was starred Richard Petty Bourgeoisie was unstarred
    Image of lobstr lobstr
    12/01/09

    In reply to A Bravo Contract Delivered White House Gatecrashers to the Today Show
    the key phrase is "If I appear in the series.." .. but the series hasn't begun yet, so can they be held to that clause?
     Reply
    lobstr was starred lobstr was unstarred
    Image of OrneryBabe OrneryBabe
    12/01/09

    @lobstr: That's what I was wondering, too.
     Reply
    John Cook promoted this comment OrneryBabe was starred OrneryBabe was unstarred
    Image of John Cook John Cook
    12/01/09

    @lobstr: The language is also "from the date of this agreement," which in the New Jersey case was obviously executed before decisions were made about who would be appearing in the show. So it looks like the contract says, "if a decision is made in a future about your appearance on the show, then you're obligated from this date to appear exclusively on Bravo unless we say otherwise." If Bravo said to the Salahis, "you're on the show," then the clause would be in force. There's also the clause about being "reasonably available" to market the show, which isn't dependent on appearing on the show. Not to mention the general pressure that Bravo could exert on them by holding the decision about whether they will join the cast over their heads.
     Reply
    John Cook was starred John Cook was unstarred
    Image of Nick Denton Nick Denton
    12/01/09

    @John Cook: Don't you think there must have been some understanding that they would be on the show? Not contractual, maybe. But certainly a nod and a wink from someone senior at NBC Universal that they could expect to be on the show with reasonably generous terms.
     Reply
    Nick Denton was starred Nick Denton was unstarred
    Earlier discussions Other discussions Show all discussions Show featured discussions only Start a new discussion

Login

Enter your username and password.

Please enter a username.
Please enter your password.
logging in
Login via Facebook | Sign Up | Forgot Password?

Reset Password

Please enter your email address to have your password reset.

Please enter your email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
requesting password reset

Register

Registering will give you a user profile and the ability to add other users as friends. To become a commenter, however, you need to audition.

Want to know more? Consult the Comment FAQ and legal terms.

Please enter a username.
Please enter a password.
Please confirm your password.
Passwords are not identical.
Please enter a valid email address.
registration sent, waiting for reply

Submit Your Comment

You don't need to login to comment. Just enter your email address below.

See how your address will be displayed in the Comment FAQ.

Please enter a valid email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
logging in

Login with your Facebook or Gawker account.

Sign up here.



  • Archives
  • About
  • Advertising
  • Legal
  • Help
  • Report a Bug
  • FAQ
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.