@Julia Allison: Wait so, help me understand. Who's sweeter: Andrew Ross Sorkin ("super sweet") or this dude ("exceedingly sweet")? And who makes for a better namedrop? I guess it probably depends on which coast you're on at the time, huh. #thesocialnetwork
I figured that the picture on the left was a JT candid, the one on the right was Parker (which it is), and that I'd see JT-as-Parker after I clicked on the post. Are they seriously just having him grow his hair out a bit and letting that be enough to supposedly look like Parker? This should be interesting. #thesocialnetwork
Well, this is how all technologically advanced things monetize; they wait for the morans to clue in (thanks Oprah and Aplusk!) and then the scammers target them. #facebook
It's interesting to me that most of the people commenting here seem to feel that it's more shameful to be naive than to be someone who exploits others' naivete, in that I see multiple comments aimed at "gullible idiots" and none aimed at "sleazy bastards". I don't play any of the FB games because they're a timesink, and I'm old and suspicious anyway, but I don't expect teenagers, for example, to have my hard-won paranoia, and I think the shame should be for the people who take advantage of them. It's the dishonest people who are doing harm, not the trusting ones. #facebook
Echoing a comment on the TC article, and from my own experience, clicking yr naive way thru the entire IQ Test game, and then getting stuck with a $15 mobile subscription, does indeed give you some useful test results.
As in "Congratulations! Your IQ equivalent is: Gullible Moron!" #facebook
Having never, ever been stupid enough to fall for any kind of a scam, let me remind the world of one important thing: You can't get something for NOTHING. When someone or some website or some email is telling you that you can get XYZ (item with monetary value) by doing ABC (action that will supposedly not cost you anything), it should send up a red flag.
Maybe everyone would be making more money if they were doing productive things instead of spending hours playing Farmville and answering quizzes. Jesus H. Christ on a motherfucking crutch.
@hoffman.kate: Offering an opportunity to enter a lottery in return for a minor purchase, or even just giving address information, is a time-honored marketing ploy. It's what the Publisher's Clearinghouse sweepstakes are based on, and as they keep stressing, people actually win those prizes; meanwhile, Publishers Clearinghouse markets the mailing lists it gathers from the entries.
There's really nothing necessarily stupid about being gulled by many of those ploys. They could easily assume that they're being offered a chance to win something in return for doing something that looks easy and free, at the cost of putting their spam filter to good use.
Also, fingerwagging about others' unproductive and non-remunerative timewasting in a Gawker comment is kind of funny.
11/10/09
Sean Parker would never make such a provincial sartorial decision. #thesocialnetwork
11/10/09
11/10/09
11/09/09
Shawn Fanning, lost to history. Pour one out. #thesocialnetwork
11/09/09
11/09/09
11/09/09
11/10/09
11/09/09
11/09/09
11/10/09
11/10/09
11/10/09
11/04/09
11/04/09
11/02/09
11/02/09
11/02/09
As in "Congratulations! Your IQ equivalent is: Gullible Moron!" #facebook
11/02/09
11/02/09
I personally recognize a scam pretty fast but she is still learning. #facebook
11/02/09
11/02/09
Because 1 woman = all women, right? #facebook
11/02/09
11/02/09
11/03/09
11/02/09
11/04/09
11/02/09
Maybe everyone would be making more money if they were doing productive things instead of spending hours playing Farmville and answering quizzes. Jesus H. Christ on a motherfucking crutch.
11/03/09
There's really nothing necessarily stupid about being gulled by many of those ploys. They could easily assume that they're being offered a chance to win something in return for doing something that looks easy and free, at the cost of putting their spam filter to good use.
Also, fingerwagging about others' unproductive and non-remunerative timewasting in a Gawker comment is kind of funny.
11/02/09