I left MySpace when Uncle Rupert bought them. I stopped fussing with Facebook after the press started accessing photographs to add to news stories. I'll give Twitter a shot but frankly - I feel safest here at Snark Central where the beer is cold and nobody knows my name.
People who are upset over changes to Facebook need to get a life. In real life YOU actually get to control the features. Imagine that! What will they think of next?
Personally, if you're on facebook, you're a fucking loser.
Day by day, this is proven. Facebook users perceive themselves as a "Clean" and "Elitist" site. Well, now we all know why the world isn't run by juvenile college shits in glorified chatrooms.
I haven't used facebook in 2 years. If this is what matters to you, you live a dismal life. Yes, you have a voice, but no one cares.
@Widget Economist: To clarify, I mean you're a loser by virtue of DNA and natural selection. Not just you being on facebook. Facebook is the "telling point" of your genetic abnormality.
Also it's your bad personality and poor music taste.
Not to mention out of touch. "Well, now we all know why the world isn't run by juvenile college shits in glorified chatrooms" Except for the whole social networking (and specifically some of the people behind facebook) being a HUGE factor in Obama getting elected, the majority of media people being on facebook and/or twitter, major companies getting behind facebook as a means of connecting with consumers, etc. etc.
You being too old/bitter/pretentious to effectively use facebook doesn't mean that it's not a revolutionary social tool that is becoming an ever more integral part of life.
@mattymcd: Let me be more specific. Gawker: I love you, you're perfect, don't ever change. But let's be serious, the last redesign of this very site pushed it straight into some serious twitter territory. And I'm not complaining about, in fact I like it, but let's leave the kettle out of this, OK pot?
I hope they're listening...the other day they added your own profile pic to EVERY comment box in the feed, people freaked out and by the end of the day they were gone. It gives me a slight ray of hope.
I would say the problem is that they took away some of the sorting control. They already had a live feed under one of the tabs in their previous system. Before I had tabs where I could look at just status feeds, or just photos, etc etc. That worked. Why don't they find a happy medium between the old facebook and the new facebook? Rounded corners & design changes to don't bother me, but the loss of some features that I used all the time plus the difficulty of finding certain features makes this a lose. There are some nice new features with the new facebook, keep those, but give me my tabs and everything back.
@Cassi Haggard: Try creating friend groups as a form of filtering. I find that a great way to review what my close friends, coworkers, and other are doing, all in a batch, and quickly.
I hate that it doesn't seem to let you edit down the amount of status updates you receive from annoying people who post 3 times a day. Before, you could just hit "see less about X" - now the only way to clean up your page is to de-friend them, which is kinda harsh.
@automata: Got it. So maybe my gripe stems as much from my computer aptitude than the redesign. But I'll still jump on the anti-redesign bandwagon anyway, because I am inherently cranky and enjoy having things to complain about.
@Wendy_Kroy: I meant "as much from my lack of computer aptitude as the redesign." Yeesh. I guess spending all your time online DOES make you illiterate.
@ChanRasit: After getting used to the last change and actually getting more addicted, I wasn't against them changing it up again. But I have been trying to give this one a chance, and I just don't want to use it. Maybe now I'll check it like twice a day, or just log on when I see an email notification. All the addictive gossipy little things I loved in the live feed are completely gone, so it's of no use to my procrastination anymore.
The worst thing about the redesign is people's quiz results showing up constantly in the news feed because people have nothing better to do than to take pointless quizzes. I think earlier there was a quota of how many of these useless results would be shown on the main news feed page.
@automata: See, but that makes me not see things about that person anymore, not that kind of message. So while I may not care that my high school crush should live in Australia, I still very much want to see his cute ass tagged in random pictures.
@HeyThatsMyBike: @automata: Yes, those quiz results will continue to silently mock me. Clicking the "X" is throwing the girl I secretly like out with the proverbial bathwater. The question is whether I would want to be with someone who obviously enjoys completing inane and vaguely exhibitionistic Facebook quizzes.
Criticizing a Web developer as a conformist masquerading as an individualist is kind of illogical. I mean, he's a Web developer, not a poet or something -- his goal is to build stuff enjoyed by the masses, after being enjoyed by a bunch of other tuned-in-to-the-masses Web developers and their backers. I don't think any of the people on the circuit you mention are using their quirkiness or "individualism" to stand apart,either -- they are using it to stand out, which is itself more of a "I stand out" and "You stand out" San Francisco-style bonding thing than some kind of serious outsider's club. I think there's a lot to criticize in that crowd, but this post hasn't got a very convincing angle on it.
She displays all the idiocy of someone who studied something as stupid as "feminism".
Anarcho-Transexual [sic] Afro-Chicano American Feminist Studies Major
anarcho-transexual doesn't mean anything. The only times you can link words by hyphen are when they are related intimately or intellectually, such as "socio-political" (referring to interlinked social and political phenomena) or "judeo-christian" (again, linked ideas referred to by a single term.
anarcho-transexual would have to mean her anarchy and transexualism were somehow ideologically linked into a single term.
But in this case, the term should probably be "aggradizo-moronism" or something equivalent.
Not to say that Ton That is or isn't a huge twat, but anarcho-transexual definitely means "her anarchy and transexualism were somehow ideologically linked into a single term." And that makes a lot of sense.
As I understand it, one of the fundamental beliefs of anarchy is that current power structures are wrong and should be abolished. And easily the most dominant power structure in the world is the male/female binary. Pretty freaking easy to see how those could be linked.
Yeah I studied feminism, and yeah a lot of it is BS. But you're totally wrong in your grammar-snob assholery, and there are some useful bits in feminist study.
@ristretto_dreams: thanks. Don't like feminism haters. If it's done right, no one gets hurt. It's the rising tide that lifts all boats and differentiates us from lower mammals and the Taliban.
@ristretto_dreams: "Feminist" study is total bull which has for at least the last 15 years been firmly supplanted by the term "gender studies" (at the very least). Because with the revelation that the male/female binary is not actually a binary at all, but a complex web of interrelated biological and social identifications, you can no longer say "feminist studies" and be really taken seriously.
The only reason anyone ever says "feminist" is because it's a hot-button jingo-laden banner for people to hold up because they want people to look at them. Which is what this person is doing.
And apparently what you're doing. So my grammar "Assholery" aside, you're totally full of shit, and it was pretty fun to smack you around a little bit.
feminist study still has coherency as a discipline in that it is one possible lens on many of the issues caught under the broader umbrella of "gender studies"
Now, I certainly advocate gender studies as the clear and more accurate understanding of the ever-evolving field. But feminist study can still be referred "seriously" to in that: a. It an occasionally useful outward identifier that people not immersed in the academic field are familiar with, whereas "gender studies" and the like are less so. b. Big F Feminism has been the greatest historical defining factor of the academic, social and political movement towards greater understanding of issues of sex, gender and sexuality and as such is very much worthy of study for historical context and c. There are still plenty of people who identify as feminists in that they believe that the proper response to historical patriachy is a focus on achievement, recognition and power for the Woman, as opposed to, for example, a radical disintegration of the historical understanding of gender as binary as might be advocated by other schools of gender studies.
But mainly I think it's cute how you decided to take my post that pointed out how you were completely wrong in your contrived grammar-nazis by making an abtuse, tangentially related personal attack.
@Shamoononon has a hebetudinous dog: if you're not going to air conditioning school what kind of career does any liberal arts undergrad go into? Sky's the limit.
@Shamoononon has a hebetudinous dog: I would assume so. Furthermore I don't like seeing feminism co-opted by the Limbaugh/Paglia/Palin Feminazi Mafia. Not saying Peeps is.
03/20/09
03/20/09
03/19/09
03/19/09
03/19/09
03/19/09
Day by day, this is proven. Facebook users perceive themselves as a "Clean" and "Elitist" site. Well, now we all know why the world isn't run by juvenile college shits in glorified chatrooms.
I haven't used facebook in 2 years. If this is what matters to you, you live a dismal life. Yes, you have a voice, but no one cares.
03/19/09
Also it's your bad personality and poor music taste.
03/19/09
Wow. Bitter much?
Not to mention out of touch. "Well, now we all know why the world isn't run by juvenile college shits in glorified chatrooms" Except for the whole social networking (and specifically some of the people behind facebook) being a HUGE factor in Obama getting elected, the majority of media people being on facebook and/or twitter, major companies getting behind facebook as a means of connecting with consumers, etc. etc.
You being too old/bitter/pretentious to effectively use facebook doesn't mean that it's not a revolutionary social tool that is becoming an ever more integral part of life.
03/19/09
No. You are a revolutionary social tool.
03/19/09
03/19/09
03/20/09
03/19/09
03/19/09
03/19/09
03/19/09
03/19/09
And the HUGE font.Ick.
03/19/09
03/19/09
03/19/09
03/19/09
03/19/09
03/19/09
03/19/09
03/19/09
03/19/09
03/19/09
03/19/09
03/20/09
03/20/09
02/26/09
02/25/09
02/26/09
02/25/09
sheesh...
who do I sue for the pain and suffering I've endured due to involuntary eye-rolling?
02/25/09
Anarcho-Transexual [sic] Afro-Chicano American Feminist Studies Major
anarcho-transexual doesn't mean anything. The only times you can link words by hyphen are when they are related intimately or intellectually, such as "socio-political" (referring to interlinked social and political phenomena) or "judeo-christian" (again, linked ideas referred to by a single term.
anarcho-transexual would have to mean her anarchy and transexualism were somehow ideologically linked into a single term.
But in this case, the term should probably be "aggradizo-moronism" or something equivalent.
02/25/09
02/25/09
02/25/09
Not to say that Ton That is or isn't a huge twat, but anarcho-transexual definitely means "her anarchy and transexualism were somehow ideologically linked into a single term." And that makes a lot of sense.
As I understand it, one of the fundamental beliefs of anarchy is that current power structures are wrong and should be abolished. And easily the most dominant power structure in the world is the male/female binary. Pretty freaking easy to see how those could be linked.
Yeah I studied feminism, and yeah a lot of it is BS. But you're totally wrong in your grammar-snob assholery, and there are some useful bits in feminist study.
02/25/09
02/25/09
The only reason anyone ever says "feminist" is because it's a hot-button jingo-laden banner for people to hold up because they want people to look at them. Which is what this person is doing.
And apparently what you're doing. So my grammar "Assholery" aside, you're totally full of shit, and it was pretty fun to smack you around a little bit.
02/25/09
feminist study still has coherency as a discipline in that it is one possible lens on many of the issues caught under the broader umbrella of "gender studies"
Now, I certainly advocate gender studies as the clear and more accurate understanding of the ever-evolving field. But feminist study can still be referred "seriously" to in that:
a. It an occasionally useful outward identifier that people not immersed in the academic field are familiar with, whereas "gender studies" and the like are less so.
b. Big F Feminism has been the greatest historical defining factor of the academic, social and political movement towards greater understanding of issues of sex, gender and sexuality and as such is very much worthy of study for historical context and
c. There are still plenty of people who identify as feminists in that they believe that the proper response to historical patriachy is a focus on achievement, recognition and power for the Woman, as opposed to, for example, a radical disintegration of the historical understanding of gender as binary as might be advocated by other schools of gender studies.
But mainly I think it's cute how you decided to take my post that pointed out how you were completely wrong in your contrived grammar-nazis by making an abtuse, tangentially related personal attack.
02/25/09
What kind of career do you go into?
02/25/09
02/25/09
02/25/09