I don't think it's a good idea to make fun of an addict's addiction, unless said addict is also a deadbeat man-whore who likes cute blond boys. Then all bets are off.
@braak: You are, as usual, completely correct.: and my favorite part of this logic is that by switching writers, everything written on gawker about this guy will be so much more positive.
Like gawker's mission is to post nice sweet puff pieces about people. BWAA HAAA!
Hopefully Hams will take this as a greenlight to gleefully double his coverage of this skeeve. If he wanted to do the right thing he'd have gone ahead and paid Hamilton himself, whether HE got paid or not. Maybe he's so busy spending his money on cute blond boys he can't afford to settle legitimate overdue debts now?
Blech. Mehmehmeh I love women. Yeah good for you. So become an amateur pornographer if pro porn is so evil and capitalistic, but stop trying to dress up what gets you hot as something high brow/arty/etc. You're not photographing with your whole self. You're photographing with your cock (how does he press the shutter?) and talking in circles until people buy that there's something more to it.
I attended the opening myself, feeling decidedly shabby in the face of so much careless display of herringbone tweed and quilted jackets: the gallery was packed to F Train levels. People outside coughed discreetly behind clouds of clove-scented smog and made small-to-microscopic talk. Ten minutes after entering, I noticed a tall comely-looking chap wearing a hat made out of a mastodon’s navel who was the only person in the gallery other than myself who was actually looking at the pictures (or those fragments that could be glimpsed behind the guests). Mr. Somaiya, I presume, as everyone else was discussing silk mixes and finger-fucking.
I will make a gross generalization and say that I was probably the only person at the gallery, not counting the staff, who had any professional connection to the art world. In fact, I AM counting the gallery staff. Nothing personal and I’m sure they’re all sweeties, but Half Gallery is an art gallery the way the way James Frey is a novelist or Olivier Zahm is an artist or the hideously decorated lounge down the street where the bill for a jalapeño martini came to $35 is a bar. Short version—they’re not. (The longer version has to do with pornographic simulacra, and it’s just too early in the morning, kids.)
But surely there is something to the pictures as pictures? Let’s see. Naked female bodies on glossy antique furniture in underlit or unlit but luxurious spaces, the bodies splayed, prone, leaping, the faces either obscured or out of the shot altogether, one girl, shot from the waist-down, squatting to pee into what looked like a highball glass. Zahm may take a photograph with his whole self, but he denies his subjects theirs.
This type of thing was last shocking…actually, to a certain class of people, this was never shocking. Think Warhol, think the Surrealists, think Zola, think Beardsley, think Courbet’s "Origin of the World," hell, think The Venus of Urbino, or Bronzino’s less well-known but fascinating nude portrait of Cosimo I de’Medici, an upright musical instrument in Cosimo’s hand taking the place of an erect penis.
These are ostensibly pictures of sex, but they are also pictures of class—the bohemian ultra-rich (and their hangers-on) for whom limits are there to be transgressed. None of the young ladies I saw in Zahm’s pictures are recognizable—so their collusion with his art costs them nothing. It’s a rumor, an intrigue, a liaison sans danger. Tee-hee-hee, I peed in Daddy’s highball glass—hush! Nanny mustn’t know! Note Zahm’s refusal to share his porno sites with Somaiya—for someone who claims that sex is life, he’s eager to brandish a closed door in another man’s face.
To put it bluntly, Stipe had the right idea. These are pictures that those who want to be seen are desperate to be seen not looking at. Blasé is the new dandyism.
By the way--hi James! Hope your shiny little toy make-believe gallery churns along and gives you some hot downtown cred! Personally I think this as likely as the reemergence of the whalebone bustle. But whatever floats your flab.
@BookishLookish: Agreed. And this is why I hate Williamsburg... I moved out here--naiively--thinking that I would learn something. But it's about people who inject money like heroine, and smother my eager heart in ash with their snide and willful ignorance. There's no sophistication out here. There are people too cool to be sophisticated. It's a 24-7 game of poker, and if anyone knows what hand you're holding, you're out.
@pureblarney: Get the fuck out of W'burg if you want to make art. Move to Sunnyside, or Jersey City, or Mott Haven and get out with the people. W'burg will suck the very goodness from your marrow, honey.
@BookishLookish: Lol! I'm not an artist. Please don't think that of me. (I'm an elementary school teacher.) And--thank god--to be fair, I don't live in the hole of the 'Burg proper, but rather, on its less harrowing outer edges, away from the hypocrisy and the herpes and the coke-bearing Gavins, who make me dream of pinning their eyelids open and forcing them to watch Love Actually and Lord of the Rings and Yellow Submarine until the TOTAL HELL OMGz of popular culture sends them crying back to Indiana and South Dakota, or wherever their kind are begat.
@BookishLookish: I see no reason why good art could not be made in Williamsburg or by rich people. It's exactly the "with the people" bullshit that has led to spending insane amounts of money to look like you never wash your hair being equated with authenticity.
@RollsRoyceRevenge: I have nothing against rich people, Roy, and some of them are very, very good artists. Getting the hell away from hipsters making bad art was my suggestion.
04:58 PM
12:28 PM
12:17 PM
12:08 PM
12:06 PM
11:59 AM
And Hamilton, I envy you for only ever having been ripped off by one editor.
11:57 AM
(Dudes, there are like 4 clips of this epic. I didn't know which was funnier.)
11:56 AM
11:54 AM
11:58 AM
11:47 AM
12:32 PM
01:14 PM
01:47 PM
Like gawker's mission is to post nice sweet puff pieces about people. BWAA HAAA!
11:47 AM
11:45 AM
01:58 PM
12/02/09
12/02/09
I will make a gross generalization and say that I was probably the only person at the gallery, not counting the staff, who had any professional connection to the art world. In fact, I AM counting the gallery staff. Nothing personal and I’m sure they’re all sweeties, but Half Gallery is an art gallery the way the way James Frey is a novelist or Olivier Zahm is an artist or the hideously decorated lounge down the street where the bill for a jalapeño martini came to $35 is a bar. Short version—they’re not. (The longer version has to do with pornographic simulacra, and it’s just too early in the morning, kids.)
But surely there is something to the pictures as pictures? Let’s see. Naked female bodies on glossy antique furniture in underlit or unlit but luxurious spaces, the bodies splayed, prone, leaping, the faces either obscured or out of the shot altogether, one girl, shot from the waist-down, squatting to pee into what looked like a highball glass. Zahm may take a photograph with his whole self, but he denies his subjects theirs.
This type of thing was last shocking…actually, to a certain class of people, this was never shocking. Think Warhol, think the Surrealists, think Zola, think Beardsley, think Courbet’s "Origin of the World," hell, think The Venus of Urbino, or Bronzino’s less well-known but fascinating nude portrait of Cosimo I de’Medici, an upright musical instrument in Cosimo’s hand taking the place of an erect penis.
These are ostensibly pictures of sex, but they are also pictures of class—the bohemian ultra-rich (and their hangers-on) for whom limits are there to be transgressed. None of the young ladies I saw in Zahm’s pictures are recognizable—so their collusion with his art costs them nothing. It’s a rumor, an intrigue, a liaison sans danger. Tee-hee-hee, I peed in Daddy’s highball glass—hush! Nanny mustn’t know! Note Zahm’s refusal to share his porno sites with Somaiya—for someone who claims that sex is life, he’s eager to brandish a closed door in another man’s face.
To put it bluntly, Stipe had the right idea. These are pictures that those who want to be seen are desperate to be seen not looking at. Blasé is the new dandyism.
By the way--hi James! Hope your shiny little toy make-believe gallery churns along and gives you some hot downtown cred! Personally I think this as likely as the reemergence of the whalebone bustle. But whatever floats your flab.
12/02/09
12/02/09
12/02/09
12/02/09
12/02/09
12/02/09
12/02/09
12/02/09
12/02/09
12/02/09
12/02/09
Me being the Rolls Royce outside.