I don't think it's a good idea to make fun of an addict's addiction, unless said addict is also a deadbeat man-whore who likes cute blond boys. Then all bets are off.
@braak: You are, as usual, completely correct.: and my favorite part of this logic is that by switching writers, everything written on gawker about this guy will be so much more positive.
Like gawker's mission is to post nice sweet puff pieces about people. BWAA HAAA!
Hopefully Hams will take this as a greenlight to gleefully double his coverage of this skeeve. If he wanted to do the right thing he'd have gone ahead and paid Hamilton himself, whether HE got paid or not. Maybe he's so busy spending his money on cute blond boys he can't afford to settle legitimate overdue debts now?
Be prepared for O'Reilly's self-congratulatory broadcast whenever Moyers dies (hopefully many years hence), when he takes credit for having convinced God to kill him.
12/10/09
12/10/09
12/10/09
12/10/09
12/10/09
12/07/09
12/07/09
12/07/09
12/07/09
12/07/09
12/07/09
12/07/09
And Hamilton, I envy you for only ever having been ripped off by one editor.
12/07/09
(Dudes, there are like 4 clips of this epic. I didn't know which was funnier.)
12/07/09
12/07/09
12/07/09
12/07/09
12/07/09
12/07/09
12/07/09
Like gawker's mission is to post nice sweet puff pieces about people. BWAA HAAA!
12/07/09
12/07/09
12/07/09
11/24/09