<![CDATA[Gawker: frank gehry]]> http://tags.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gawker.com.png <![CDATA[Gawker: frank gehry]]> http://gawker.com/tag/frankgehry http://gawker.com/tag/frankgehry <![CDATA[The Meek Shall Inherit the Earth, Which Is Pretty Weird]]> The image associated with this post is best viewed using a browser.The Way We Live Now: Differently. Everything is all ass-up. Teachers are getting wealthy. North Dakota is richer than California. And Frenk Gehry can't keep a fucking job.

This charter school in Washington Heights had a crazy notion: Maybe if we pay teachers a lot of money, we will get good teachers. Did it work? It's too early to tell, until the kids all get old enough to be either in jail or in Goldman Sachs. But one thing is for sure: teachers at this school are getting paid $125K. Per year! They are bankin' it. If they can avoid being robbed for crayon money by other, public school teachers, they'll live to tell the tale of this wild magical "livable wage" experiment.

Even crazier? North Dakota, the state that still conducts all business transactions with beaver pelts, is maybe the most financially stable state in our disintegrating union! They are "cutting taxes and fretting over how much of its budget surplus to spend or save." This is because no humans live in North Dakota so what will you spend all the money on? That's right, on millions and millions of luxurious beaver pelts.

Finally, celebrated architect Frank Gehry. He's been fired. From building a basketball arena. Back to sketching out plans for new Papa John's outlets, Gehry. Leave the moneymaking to the North Dakota teachers HERE IN CRAZYWORLD.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5280494&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Diggbrow: How The Internet Redefined Art]]> "Art" is just another headline-filler word for "amazing." At least for children, who are the future, and geeks, who are the new trendsetter-influencer-coolhunters. Since K-12 art education is virtually dead, and no one reads books, these heavy Internet users have no preconceptions of art and they don't follow that world's big names. A new Cy Twombly or Lucien Freud painting won't get attention on Digg (Chris Ofili maybe, for the controversy), but a painted Lamborghini is one of the social news site's all-time favorite "art" posts. But it's not all bad. The Diggbrow movement isn't destroying art any more than the Dadaists or post-modernists did; it's reinventing it.

The heavy Internet users of Digg, YouTube, Fark, and StumbleUpon have little background in the usual experience of art: a rich education that lets viewers appreciate a work in context. They get their news as a stream of unrelated stories. (While the rest of this story concentrates on Digg, the same rules apply to many other sites including Fark and StumbleUpon. Stories on these sites trickle out to millions of Internet users through blogs, e-mail, and IMs. Plus I've already ripped YouTube apart for its own aesthetic.)

Right now, Digg's front page includes election news, iPhone tips, clips from last night's Conan O'Brien, a video of a panda, and the story of a drunk driver who put a seat-belt on her beer and not her baby. Art is presented the same way: One story at a time, usually focusing on a single work, surrounded by unrelated items.

This format has encouraged five aspects of the Diggbrow aesthetic:


The Lowest Common Denominator
Most of Digg's favorite items are, well, crap. The all-time top Digg item described as "art" is just a composite photo of a tree:

dugg-tree-four-seasons.jpg

It's pretty, but it's more "cute photo illustration" than "high art." Still, over five thousand Digg users voted for the item (headlined as "1 Tree, 1 Picture, 4 Seasons. (Pic)" and described only as "A beautiful piece of art work"), and over 240 thousand people saw it on Flickr.

The second-favorite artwork is a gallery of desktop backgrounds. The third-favorite is this custom-painted Lamborghini:

dugg-custom-lamborghini.jpg

This barely even works as a paint job, much less art. And Digg commenters hated it. But 3800 of them still voted for it, driving tens of thousands of people to look at it.

So far, Digg fails at appreciating and promoting art. But the fourth all-time favorite art on Digg, while nowhere near highbrow, at least demonstrates an artist's attention to craft and an appreciation of artistic tradition. It's the work of three sidewalk chalk artists, Edgar Mueller, Julian Beever, and Kurt Wenner. Wenner particularly seems to transcend the medium's trompe l'oeil novelty:

dugg-kurt-wenner-chalk.jpg


Accessibility and Novelty
Of course, those are just the crowd-pleasers. Plenty of worthier art gets onto Digg. But just like Clinton makes it to Digg news not for her fiscal policy but for crying, art gets onto Digg not for its value to traders and artists but for novelty reasons. A recent link featured this YouTube video of a sculpture that makes eerie noises in the wind:

It's not that Digg rejects the traditional measures of good art, but it focuses on the novel bits. Duchamp could make it here if an author focused on the "he put a toilet in a museum" aspect. Art stories from online newspapers come from the "offbeat" section of the news as often as "Arts and culture." The work must have an immediately catchy effect, as above, or a "what'll they think of next" quality in its creation, like the photo-realistic drawing below, composed freehand in ballpoint pen:

dugg-biro-photo.jpg

Artist Juan Casas told the Daily Mail that his ballpoint drawings "started off as a joke," and though he's now serious about them, he worried that serious art competitions would write him off.


Post-post-modernism
The Diggbrow crowd also appreciates a good prank. Art with a populist, ironic meaning has an advantage, which helps post-modern artists with stunt-like work.

dugg-fake-damien-hirst-skull.jpg

This playful recontextualization of Damien Hirst's "For The Love Of God" made Digg as "Prank on Artist Who Created $100 Million Diamond Skull." Diggers appreciated the turnaround and criticized Hirst's work.

Among household-name artists, the most obvious Diggbrow hero is Banksy, who, while lacking nuance and arguably not worthy of canonization under traditional terms, is still a Digg favorite for his lucid messages and his reputation as a renegade. This street cred puts his work on the same scale as the Lamborghini art and "Hammer time" stickers on stop signs, though at the opposite end.


Personal expression
Diggbrow has a low barrier to entry; while some works earn their place in its canon because they represent hundreds of hours of labor, others make it despite minimal effort because of their novel concept. One encouraging aspect of that thirst for novelty is how Diggbrow appreciates the artistic value of personal expression.

At first, the work below (linked on Digg at one of the site's favorite sources, Neatorama) might seem worthless: some kid drew on herself. But here Diggbrow shows an unexpected appreciation for the context of the work, showing that sometimes these kids can actually read a paragraph instead of flicking through an image gallery.

dermatographia-itchy-art-russell-2.jpg

Artist Ariana Page Russell explains:

My own skin frequently blushes and swells. I have dermatographia, a condition in which one's immune system exhibits hypersensitivity, via skin, that releases excessive amounts of histamine, causing capillaries to dilate and welts to appear (lasting about thirty minutes) when the skin's surface is lightly scratched. This allows me to painlessly draw patterns and words on my skin, which I then photograph.

Diggers might even click through to Russell's web site, which shows she's not just screwing around but an artist whose work ranges far beyond these skin drawings.

If Digg readers can follow stories past the initial link, they may learn about an artist's entire body of work, its themes, the movement into which it fits, and about the tradition that gives context to every wind sculpture and skin drawing. Which leads to Diggbrow's final redemptive theme.


Piecemeal Art Education
The Internet is a tough place to learn about art. There's little structure, and there are too few high-quality images. The online galleries of major museums only carry as much explanatory information as the real-world exhibit. Serious guides to art are hard to search for.

But piece by piece, blogs are picking out art history and explaining it, so that reading enough could amount to a skim through an art textbook. One great example from Digg is this exploration of Frank Gehry's first deconstructivist building. Diggers are also particularly fascinated with scientific advances in art, such as a new device to detect painted-over paintings.

Internet culture isn't the end of art. It's not exactly a classical education, but it's instilling some artistic value in viewers. And after enough time figuring out what the hell Damien Hirst's point is, I can appreciate a little Diggbrow.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=353015&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[MIT sues Gehry for negligent design]]> MIT is suing famed architect Frank Gehry, for negligence. Let's get this straight: The man designs his buildings by piling up cardboard and crumpled paper, and yet his customers expect sturdiness? Predictably, the $300 million Stata Center is not withstanding New England's weather. Cracks have emerged, leaks have sprung, drainage is faulty, mold is growing, and snow and ice fall dangerously from its many curved surfaces and sharp edges. Beacon Skanska Construction is also named in the suit, but it argues that Gehry ignored warnings that the design was flawed. What did the brainiacs at MIT expect?

Gehry's Disney Center in downtown Los Angeles allegedly gives passers-by sunburn, Case Western has experienced the same problems of falling ice, and the University of California had to demolish a leaky Gehry building in 1986. It doesn't take a slide ruler to add this one up. (Photo from Wikimedia Commons)

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=320184&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[MIT Sues Frank Gehry For Drunk Robot Building]]> Frank Gehry, whose daring and whimsical sheet-metal buildings all basically look the same, is being sued by MIT for flaws in his goofy $300-million design for their Stata Center. The center looks, in Gehry's words, "looks like a party of drunken robots," and MIT is apparently surprised that it might not have very good drainage or other things found on non-$300 million buildings that nonetheless have stood up quite well for some time without "masonry creaking" or what have you. Why did everything go wrong? Because fancy architecture is basically like extortion!

Mr. Gehry said "value engineering" — the process by which elements of a project are eliminated to cut costs — was largely responsible for the problems.

"There are things that were left out of the design," he said. "The client chose not to put certain devices on the roofs, to save money."
gehrysimpsons.jpgYeah, you want a building where snow doesn't block the emergency exits? That's a three-hundred-fifty million dollar building right there, pal. For three-hundred mil we might leave out "certain devices."

You'd think that smarty-pants MIT might've noticed these huge design flaws before they started construction though? They couldn't let some of the engineering and design nerds take a peek at the blueprints?

Not everyone at MIT is upset. "It is a joy to work in this building," said Rodney Brooks, a professor of robotics. Drunk robotics.

M.I.T. Sues Frank Gehry, Citing Flaws in Center He Designed [NYT]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=319831&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Frank Gehry Designs Playground]]> What goes together better than titanium panels and razor-sharp edges than hundreds of small young dumb human beings engaging in running, skipping, falling and playing? Nothing! Or so thinks Mayor Bloomberg and the Battery Conservancy, who announced that Frank Gehry, the world's trickiest one trick pony, will be bestowing his whimsical architectural derring-do on a one-acre playground in Battery Park. Seriously, I used to babysit in TriBeCa and those kids will injure themselves on like, grass. They're rich but lack motor skills. But hey, it's TriBeCa, the land where parents barely even notice as their kids skid across their loft's whitewashed hardwood floors and slam into the Mies Van Der Rohe daybed with a impish sickening thud before returning to peruse the latest issue of Architectural Digest.

Gehry To Design Playground [AMNY]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=266938&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Inside the Ugly: Gehry's IAC HQ Opens]]> Frank Gehry's IAC headquarters arouses either rapturous mooning or fierce antipathy. Like with pregnant chicks, one is either inappropriately attracted to its curvaceous body or horrified. But when the IAC finally opened on Monday, only one man's opinion counted, that of father, Barry Diller. As the LA Times reports, he did what all dads do: Bitch about stuff.

"Today I'm walking in for the first time," he said. "Of course, all I see is 'unfinished.' ...Around the corner, linen and flowers decorated a long table below a much larger video wall—120 feet wide—showing scenes of the High Line park being created atop 22 blocks of deserted elevated train tracks in Lower Manhattan..."Is this what you're going to see when the people come in?" Diller asked several technicians, gesturing at the park-to-be images on the wall. "Why have you chosen to have the frames so small? Make it big. OK? Soon after, by a bank of elevators, he had another question, about the up-and-down buttons: "Why do we only have these on one side?"
Later he upbraided the building for making him feel like shit and called the frosted-glass edifice a "thoughtless little pig."

Frank Gehry Drops Anchor in New York [LAT]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=255247&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[More Condé Nast fact-checking]]> The next time I venture into the Condé cafeteria, I will be sure to pack an architect, a gourmet, and a copyeditor.

re VF's mysterious second bank of elevators:

as an architect of highrises here in the city (employed by a certain large firm involved in a recent competition you may have heard something about), i'm sorry to have to disappoint you about at least one possible conspiracy dimension in the conde nast edifice.

that mysterious second bank of elevators in the VF offices is just an unfortunate (or poorly planned) result of how their offices got distributed in the building. highrises divide their elevator banks by groups of floors—about a third for lowrise floors, a third for midrise, another third for highrise. i.e. not all elevators go to all floors. sounds like VF's offices got caught on the frontier between elevator zones so that you have to switch between lowrise and midrise banks to get up that one additional floor in the other zone...

a simple technical rationale. still, the question remains: who's responsible for allocating the floor space like this....?

btw, one other note: i can't comment on the difference between iceberg and romaine, but i'm pretty sure the gehry partitions in the cafeteria are actual double-curvature glass, not plexiglas, as you spied. a very expensive and much lusted after fetish detail among architects.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=11705&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Q&A with Frank Gehry]]> Frank GehryFrank Gehry on why he's staying out of the world trade center debate:
"I was invited to be on one of the teams, but I found it demeaning that the agency paid only $40,000 for all that work. I can understand why the kids did it, but why would people my age do it?"
Towering vision [NYT Magazine]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=10635&view=rss&microfeed=true