This fella (and his ilk) is really only half the problem. Like DC, the media is so polarized, it's impossible to get a straight answer on anything.
For example, I don't have the fucking time to read the health care bill, nor do I have a team of interns to read and distill it for me. So, I look to various media sources. According to Beck, Obama's programs represent the end of American democracy and will inevitably lead to the US becoming an evil hybrid of Nazi Germany and the USSR. On the other hand, opinion in the mainstream media (kinda liberal (let's not be silly and quibble about this)) seems to be "This bill sucks because it doesn't put private insurers out of business and create a single payer system, but it must be a good idea because Super Barack [for whom I voted] supports it." Neither of these ridiculous points of view answers any fucking questions I have about the legislation.
So, fuck this guy, but fuck everyone else in the media, too.
@Nice Beaver: You're not going to Glenn Beck to hear intellectual discourse; you go for entertainment and banshee-like shrieking. I think NPR is a fairly calm and balanced perspective. Or at least the closest we have right now.
@Nice Beaver: The members of congress don't have time to read the whole thing either, but I will break it down for you:
1) Everybody's gotta get some insurance or pay a penalty.
2) Companies have to insure their employees or pay a penalty
3) People who are uninsured can get the Public Option, which will most probably be much cheaper and better run than anything these private insurer dipshits are offering right now.
4) Eventually, people will say, why do we put up with these weasly corporations making a buck off of denying people the healthcare that they need, and ditch the whole, stupid, unworkable private health insurance system.
@Mikey-B: You raise an important point: Beck and Rush are clearly just trying to entertain and make some bucks, and it seems that they both try to accomplish these goals by making people laugh. But here's the thing: Neither of them are remotely funny. At least Hannity delivers his bullshit in a straight-forward, C-plus-GPA-at-SUNY-Cortland kind of way. Beck and Rush go for laughs (in between calls for armed revolution (Beck yesterday)) and fail miserably, yet these fuckers make tens (or hundreds) of millions of dollars. This country needs a smart, funny centrist on the airwaves to put these shitheaps out of business.
All I need is a microphone (and a billionaire radio station owner willing to bet that Americans will listen to someone who doesn't tell them that Barack is a commie and the Mexicans are taking over).
Just look at this amazing example of self-righteous buffoonery. Her twitter is just outstanding.
# An email to a reviewer is hate mail? But a a hateful review is a love letter?about 22 hours ago from web
#
Critics can say as they please, but no one else can? You open the door and it's open.about 22 hours ago from web
#
Interesting, reviewers can say what they want. But when writers speak up they're "going after" reviewers.
#
@roncharles I'm not going after anyone Ron -- It's about editors who allow reviewers to give the plot away. You should try reading the books
#
Thanks for your support and kindness. I love that writers have a way to talk back now.
Just look at it! Fucking Alice Hoffman, presenting herself as fighting some sort of virtuous crusade against the evils of reviewing. Christ. Man up hoffman. Man up in that non-gendered way. You're lucky enough to have a career where people read the things you produce. There are lots of people in the world who have as much talent as you, but simply never got a break. You LUCKED OUT and now you feel entitled. Why not treat your career with respect, and good humour, and the ability to learn that maybe you're not perfect.
@Pope John Peeps II: Glad you grabbed these -- she just deleted her account. These entries remind me of nothing so much as fights in middle school: "She called me a bitch, so I'm allowed to call her a bitch!"
I've now used my intellectual vigilance to Google both Hoffman and Silman, having never heard of either, I've learned exactly why I've never heard of either. If both of their careers went straight to the pulp mill, nobody'd be the better or worse for it. A gallon of milk would cost exactly the same.
Well okay. Writers also used to NOT SUCK ASS, ALICE HOFFMAN. This is the most ungracious, ungrateful, inbred, insane, idiotic tirade I've ever heard. What a giant baby.
I wrote a book review column for an "alternative weekly" and mocked a new book for its pretensions. (It really was bad and by that time, I'd been reviewing for a few years and was over seeing my name with rude witticisms in print.) For over a year after the book review was published, the publisher (author? editor?) sent other more positive reviews, including news of an unknown award the book won, etc. My own editor and I snickered endlessly over this pathetic attempt at getting back at me. In the end, I'm inclined to side with Woody Allen, who said (in a movie, I think?) "There's a special level of hell for book reviewers."
@Mama Penguino: Haha! Love it! This is why the best artists/writers/performers just shake it off -- you're not going to convince anyone you're great by being a bawlbaby.
I mean, this wasn't a shining star of a comment; it doesn't add much to the conversation besides a little snark, but isn't that what we're here for? And sorry LostTurntable, this isn't an endorsement so much of your comments or anything, but it just struck me as odd that this particular comment was singled out of the thread as "crossing the line".
Is it because she's a "dumb" bitch here, or because it directly addressed her...? I'm sorry if this comes off as being a smart-ass, I'm trying to keep my tone as earnest as possible. Just very curious.
@TruPhan: If you don't SAY something and ONLY insult, you're likely to be dsmvwlld. If you say something coupled TO an insult, you're likely to get through.
07/18/09
07/17/09
For example, I don't have the fucking time to read the health care bill, nor do I have a team of interns to read and distill it for me. So, I look to various media sources. According to Beck, Obama's programs represent the end of American democracy and will inevitably lead to the US becoming an evil hybrid of Nazi Germany and the USSR. On the other hand, opinion in the mainstream media (kinda liberal (let's not be silly and quibble about this)) seems to be "This bill sucks because it doesn't put private insurers out of business and create a single payer system, but it must be a good idea because Super Barack [for whom I voted] supports it." Neither of these ridiculous points of view answers any fucking questions I have about the legislation.
So, fuck this guy, but fuck everyone else in the media, too.
God bless America.
07/17/09
07/17/09
1) Everybody's gotta get some insurance or pay a penalty.
2) Companies have to insure their employees or pay a penalty
3) People who are uninsured can get the Public Option, which will most probably be much cheaper and better run than anything these private insurer dipshits are offering right now.
4) Eventually, people will say, why do we put up with these weasly corporations making a buck off of denying people the healthcare that they need, and ditch the whole, stupid, unworkable private health insurance system.
07/17/09
All I need is a microphone (and a billionaire radio station owner willing to bet that Americans will listen to someone who doesn't tell them that Barack is a commie and the Mexicans are taking over).
07/17/09
To them, Glenn Beck is taken as their comedian/pundit/preacher all rolled into one.
07/17/09
07/18/09
06/29/09
06/29/09
06/29/09
06/29/09
06/29/09
06/29/09
# An email to a reviewer is hate mail? But a a hateful review is a love letter?about 22 hours ago from web
#
Critics can say as they please, but no one else can? You open the door and it's open.about 22 hours ago from web
#
Interesting, reviewers can say what they want. But when writers speak up they're "going after" reviewers.
#
@roncharles I'm not going after anyone Ron -- It's about editors who allow reviewers to give the plot away. You should try reading the books
#
Thanks for your support and kindness. I love that writers have a way to talk back now.
Just look at it! Fucking Alice Hoffman, presenting herself as fighting some sort of virtuous crusade against the evils of reviewing. Christ. Man up hoffman. Man up in that non-gendered way. You're lucky enough to have a career where people read the things you produce. There are lots of people in the world who have as much talent as you, but simply never got a break. You LUCKED OUT and now you feel entitled. Why not treat your career with respect, and good humour, and the ability to learn that maybe you're not perfect.
06/29/09
One final note: At 57, you get the neck you deserve.
06/29/09
@BookishLookish: At 57, you get the neck you deserve.
I love you.
06/29/09
06/29/09
06/29/09
06/29/09
Also? Boston's a fucking Clowntown.
06/29/09
Well okay. Writers also used to NOT SUCK ASS, ALICE HOFFMAN. This is the most ungracious, ungrateful, inbred, insane, idiotic tirade I've ever heard. What a giant baby.
06/29/09
06/29/09
06/29/09
06/29/09
06/29/09
06/29/09
I mean, this wasn't a shining star of a comment; it doesn't add much to the conversation besides a little snark, but isn't that what we're here for? And sorry LostTurntable, this isn't an endorsement so much of your comments or anything, but it just struck me as odd that this particular comment was singled out of the thread as "crossing the line".
Is it because she's a "dumb" bitch here, or because it directly addressed her...? I'm sorry if this comes off as being a smart-ass, I'm trying to keep my tone as earnest as possible. Just very curious.
06/29/09
06/29/09
06/29/09