<![CDATA[Gawker: freelance]]> http://tags.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gawker.com.png <![CDATA[Gawker: freelance]]> http://gawker.com/tag/freelance http://gawker.com/tag/freelance <![CDATA[The 'Times' Wants the Truth: Are You a Liar?]]> 20050705nytco.jpgWe know it's been bugging you. Why can't the Times have freelancers and stringers who are as ethical as its staff reporters? (Because Times staffers are always paragons of ethics, right, David Pogue?) But now there's no more need to worry, kids. A mere three years after the Jayson Blair scandal broke, and a lickety-split year after the Siegal Committee delivered its report, the paper is pleased to announce its finally figured out how to ensure freelancers' integrity. Effective today, all Times freelancers and stringers won't be allowed to work for that paper until they have — of all onerous burdens — completed a questionnaire.

The questionnaire will ask about a freelancer's "affiliations, work history, financial and personal connections and any past instances when questions were raised about the accuracy or originality of their work," according to today's memo from Al Siegal and Craig Whitney, and we particularly like that last part. We're sure they'll now catch untold ne'er-do-wells and fabricators when they answer that, yes, legitimate questions have been raised about their previous work. Ah, the power of questionnaires.

Full memo is after the jump.

To the Newsroom:

Nearly three years ago, the Siegal Committee recommended that The Times learn more about its stringers and freelancers, to ensure that their ethical standards and credentials are equal to those of our regular staff. It has taken some time to develop electronic tools to put this recommendation into practice, but we are now ready to do so.

Effective on Monday, April 10, all of our freelance writers will be asked to fill out a questionnaire about their affiliations, work history, financial and personal connections and any past instances when questions were raised about the accuracy or originality of their work.

The questionnaire, which each freelancer will submit via the special Web site we have established for the new freelance assignment and payment system, will be reviewed by senior editors in the department for which the freelancer works. On the basis of the information submitted, the editors will determine what future assignments are appropriate for the stringer or freelancer.

Just as we have required signed contracts in recent years as a prerequisite for freelance work, we will now also require submission of the questionnaire. And just as we have required editors to verify that a freelancer has signed a contract before assigning work to that freelancer, we will also require editors to verify that the freelancer has been vetted. Both checks can be made using the new freelancer assignment and payment system.

This policy applies to freelance writers only, not to illustrators or photographers. In departments that are not yet using the new freelance payment system, the vetting requirement will go into effect when the new system is adopted.

Your desk administrators have been given detailed information about how the vetting system works. Please check with them for instructions.

If you have any questions about this policy, please e-mail Al Siegal, Craig Whitney or Nancy Sharkey. For technical help with the system, please e-mail James Wilkerson in News Technology.

thanks,
Al Siegal and Craig Whitney
]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=166254&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Conde Nast Starves Its Freelancers]]> One freelancer was troubled by Monday's anointment of Conde Nast as the company that treated her sort best in 2005. "Was this posted as a joke," she asked. Flummoxed freelancer then forwarded this tale:

This one department [at Conde Nast] has a weekly status meeting. Usually the attendees at this meeting are just the department head and some of the managers. However, at this one particular meeting, the entire department was invited because lunch was being ordered. A department-wide email was sent out saying, "EVERYONE, and I mean EVERYONE, is invited so COME!"

So the food arrives, an email is sent to the department AGAIN saying "COME NOW! FOOD's HERE!" Peeps arrive at the meeting and someone DECIDED that there wasn't enough food for everyone. Their solution?

Decision Maker: There's not enough food for the freelancers.
Freelancers: ............ ????!!!!

And so the freelancers don't eat.

But don't you get it, little 'lancer? At No. 2 Time Warner, they would have eaten the freelancers.

Earlier: Conde Nast: Special Friend to the Freelancer

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=159614&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Conde Nast: Special Friend to the Freelancer]]> condebuilding.jpgSometimes it pays to fabulously frivolous. Conde Nast was ranked the top company for New York City's freelancers, according to a survey released today by The Freelancers Union. 1,000 people were asked to vote on the one company that treated them the best of those they worked for in 2005; not surprisingly, the money-throwers at Conde Nast came out on top. The rest of the list includes:

2. Time Warner
3. BBC
4. MTV Networks
5. HBO
6. MJM Creative
7. The New York Times
6. Curious Pictures
9. McGraw Hill
10. Viacom

Noticeably absent from the list is Radar magazine, which we're sure is aiming for the top slot next year, in its third incarnation — once finishes paying off every jilted freelancer from the most recent endeavor, of course.

New Survey Shows Conde Nast Tops the List of Best Companies for Freelancers [Business Wire]


]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=158680&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Media Bubble: Kargo vs. 'Cargo']]> &#8226; Wireless-entertainment provider Kargo Global sues Cargo magazine for copyright infringement. Also, one imagines, for poor newsstand. [Mediaweek]
&#8226; Freelancers often go without health insurance. Who knew? [MetroNY]
&#8226; Are Americans getting growing tired of celeb news? God we hope not. [Economist]
&#8226; Time Inc. EIC John Huey — who ousted Jim Seymore to install Rick Tetzeli as Entertainment Weekly's editor a few years ago, is now jumping back in to shuffle Tetzeli's top editorial ranks after a crappy 2005. [NYP (second item)]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=156824&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Do Pretty People Freelance?]]> prettybarbie.jpgHere's one you won't find on Gawker Jobs:

Pretty Freelance Writer/ Gossip, Nightlife, Fashion, Modeling
Reply to: gamcontrol@aol.com
Date: 2006-01-16, 1:20PM EST

An online blog community is looking for a pretty freelance writer that can contribute awesome content!

We need gossip, trend, nightlife, fashion and modeling writers. Anything to do with Pretty People! Send an example of something recent you have done along with your pictures for review.

We need some really spicy stuff!

And to think, you were blogging because it was safe to be ugly.

Craigslist

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=149588&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[The Life of a Freelance Writer]]> hostelbill.jpgWriter Bill Schulz visited the set of gore flick Hostel for a Stuff magazine assignment; short on extras, the movie crew started grabbing anyone available for some blood-soaked scenes. Lucky for Bill, he had the chops to nab a plum role as the recipient of a testical-removal.

Poor freelancers, always having their balls cut off.

Hostel [IMDb]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=148143&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Remainders: Ricky Martin's Super-Hetero Vacation]]> rickygay.jpg&#8226; Bikini-clad Ricky Martin and his friend aren't gay. They just fuck like they are. [Dlisted]
&#8226; Now that Peter Braunstein has been caught, we can go back to freely discussing pantyhose. [Slate]
&#8226; Federal anti-terror funds pay for faux-fancy Circle Line dinner cruises. Terrorists do balk at the sight of old white people wearing Sperry Top-Siders. [NYP]
&#8226; The year in crappy celebrity wrist watches. [OAN]
&#8226; The year in odd news. [MSNBC]
&#8226; The year in random freelancers who happen to appear on Jeopardy. [FishbowlNY]
&#8226; Get the cool gadget and games your relatives didn't get you for Christmas or Hanukkah with Gizmodo and Kotaku's holiday gift guides. Click on the Best of the Year polls to choose the top gadget and game of the year, and maybe score a $500 gift certificate. Get to it, nerds. [Gizmodo]
&#8226; And finally, we end on a very serious note: Kevin Federline has launched his own website. It is a thing of mysterious, painful beauty, built from the ashes of dead souls and flecked with the vomit of those who manage to survive its launch. [Kevin Federline]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=145306&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Remainders: But Then, There Was Julie Chen]]> chenquad.jpg&#8226; Many of you know CBS Early Show anchor Julie Chen as the wife of CBS showboat Les Moonves. But she has another talent: The ability to pull an insipid catchphrase out of her ass. [TVgasm]
&#8226; If you're desperate for freelance, check out the opportunities at the forthcoming men's mag, Cotton Tales. It's guaranteed to give Details and Men's Vogue a run for their big, gay money. [Craigslist]
&#8226; Trying to curb curse words in media? Good fucking luck. Asking us to stop swearing is like asking Graydon Carter to start wearing a patch. [NYT]
&#8226; Is getting an Extreme Makeover from the ABC reality show worth dying for? In the case of these remarkably fragile women, the show's rejection might lead to suicide. And by might, we mean has. [Defamer]
&#8226; Does Times restaurant critic Frank Bruni know the muffin man? And, if so, does he have a thing for him? [Bruni Digest]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=126625&view=rss&microfeed=true