Enter your username and password.
New York, 12:04 AM
Wed Dec 2
50 posts in the last 24 hours

Tip Your Editors:
Tipline: 646-214-8138
Editor-in-Chief:
Gabriel Snyder |
West Coast Editor:
Richard Rushfield |
Contributing Editors:
Valleywag:
Ryan Tate |
Media:
Hamilton Nolan |
Politics:
Alex Pareene |
Investigations:
John Cook |
Entertainment:
Brian Moylan |
Nights:
Adrian Chen |
Azaria Jagger |
Ravi Somaiya |
Weekends:
Foster Kamer |
Video Editor:
Richard Blakeley |
Please enter your email address to have your password reset.
Registering will give you a user profile and the ability to add other users as friends. To become a commenter, however, you need to audition.
Want to know more? Consult the Comment FAQ and legal terms.
You don't need to login to comment. Just enter your email address below.
See how your address will be displayed in the Comment FAQ.
09/04/09
09/04/09
He didn't seem very nice.
09/04/09
09/04/09
Was it more like a headlock? Or maybe a punch in the face? Oh, wait. You only dish those out, so you don't really know what they're like.
09/04/09
09/04/09
09/04/09
Own your problems. Get help. Grow up. And be quiet, stupid boy.
09/04/09
09/04/09
09/04/09
09/04/09
09/04/09
09/04/09
09/04/09
09/04/09
09/04/09
Message to his idiot publicist: There's a reason most male defendants at criminal trials and mourners at funerals are dressed in dark suits and ties.
09/04/09
09/04/09
09/04/09
09/04/09
09/04/09
Time to slink away into obscurity now.
09/04/09
A fracking slap in the face. Which lately you've been giving, not receiving. Please STFU.
09/04/09
09/04/09
09/04/09
06/09/09
06/09/09
"Woodward, a registered Republican, did not vote. He couldn't decide whether he was more uneasy with the disorganization and naive idealism of McGovern's campaign or with Richard Nixon's conduct. And he believed that not voting enabled him to be more objective in reporting on Watergate- a view Bernstein regarded as silly."
Oh, yes. Big news.
06/09/09
Hamilton Nolan had a point when he said that it's hard not to form an opinion of who's better when you're a reporter. Especially in the last election. That was a pretty clear decision, wasn't it?
Furthermore, Woodward is confused, which doesn't jive with his status as a highly respected legend in journalism. He confuses objectivity with journalistic integrity and transparency. Just to make it clear, let me outline the difference: Your objectivity is instrumental in your being able to pick a side to vote for, your journalistic integrity requires you to be fair to both parties even after having done so and your transparency requires you to be upfront your reasons for having done everything. That's my definition of a good journalist. Woodware conflates everything into one term, which makes it completely meaningless.
06/09/09
06/09/09
06/09/09
06/09/09
He more than did his part to get Bush re-elected in 2004.
[www.amazon.com]
Contrast this with the books he published after the election.
[www.amazon.com]
06/09/09
"What seems most remarkable in this new Woodward book is exactly what seemed remarkable in the previous Woodward books, each of which was presented as the insiders' inside story and each of which went on to become a number-one bestseller: these are books in which measurable cerebral activity is virtually absent."
06/09/09