Sorry, just getting to this now. Was on a three-day junket on Vancouver Island with Coast Hotels for the BC Wine and Oyster Festival, Sea Cider cidery, Spinnaker's GastroPub, Harbour Ferries, BC Ferries (deluxe lounge service), Royal BC Museum for an exhibition on loan from the British Museum, and I can't remember what else because we consumed nothing but organic meat, cheese and alcohol for three straight days. Do I have to pay taxes on this? Hell no.
I remember an article in Spy, many years ago, in which a writer recalled how he supplemented his meager income as the editor of a free business-related newspaper with enough swag, "review" items and catered news conferences to make for a pretty decent lifestyle.
I imagine that these days, all you'd have to do is go up to a publicist and say, "Hi, I write for the Huffington Post -- please feed me."
"If the FTC is truly interested in protecting consumers, it will start its anti-shilling campaign with the media that accept the biggest gifts, make the most money and reach the most people. For the moment, at least, that means traditional media."
Unless this somehow leads to Julia Allison getting lock up in jail. If so, go FTC!!!!!
I can sympathize with the journalism student. He doesn't want to be shot. And the cops and the DA's office couldn't care less whether anything happens to him.
Snitching is a dangerous thing to do nowadays. Remember how vicious the Gawker people reacted to snitching in the Kerri Ferrel case? Imagine how it will play out for a college kid who "snitches."
I'm sure Owen Thomas is a nice guy, and I wish him well. But let's face it: he was not very good at this job. Better, perhaps, than Nick Douglas, but really, what is his legacy at the 'Wag? A steady stream of posts trying to interpret every financial move made by Google, Facebook, Yahoo, Apple, and Twitter. What a snoozefest.
Why was there no liveblog of the Hans Reiser trial? Why is no attention paid to the utter hilarity of the Ruby on Rails "community"? (Pound for pound, Rails blogs have replaced LKML for the highest density of quotable insanity in the programming world. Even TechCrunch knows this.)
Owen's problem was the he saw himself as an analyst, rather than an anarchist. It was a problem for two reasons. First, the 'insider' approach is at odds with everything Gawker has ever done successfully. But more importantly, Owen doesn't know anything. He's divorced from both the technical realities that frequently influence business decisions in the Valley, and from the madness of the engineering community.
Because that is where the meat falls off the bone: it's not in the comings and goings of a couple of mid-level Valley execs (which are amply covered by about 900 other media outlets), but rather in the engineering teams and the mid-level management. These are the dark places; where a multi-billion dollar industry is built on the backs of talented but basically crazy people:
- Smart engineers who have been Peter Principled into management positions where they are no longer effective
- Open source projects who have "rejected" traditional industry power structures by replacing them with even more byzantine social constructions of their own devising
- Fairly gross, persistently male-dominated communities that don't understand where all the women went
- A narcissistic toy culture which is different in focus, but not degree, from that of the Manhattan elite
There is material enough for a dozen weblogs, if anyone had the gumption (and the sources) to make it happen. So best wishes to Owen, and best of luck to Ryan Tate. The Valley desperately needs a better 'Wag. We deserve the abuse.
"But antitrust cops look askance at efforts to use market power in one field to move into another."
Are we living in the same country? When was the last time you heard of these so-called "antitrust cops" that are out their somewhere riding into battle on their unicorns looking askance at anything?
Oh, wait. The Whole Foods takeover of Wild Oats Markets. Thank god the Feds took a hard line with that one. Excessive consolidation in the hippie/yuppie grocery sector posed a serious threat to our economy.
Terrific incentive for all you guys who want to build a business - as soon as you succeed, Uncle Sam wants to make sure you get cut down to size. Were it not for Google, I'd still be struggling with Dogpile, etc. They had the better mousetrap and now are getting punished for it. Go capitalism!
@FormerEnglishMajor: oh yeah, uncle sam is REALLY taking away all 12 of Sergey's yachts away. whatever will he do. sarcasm. sarcasm. more sarcasm here.
@Antilles_Prime: they're not going after the yachts. They are going after the company itself, to make it smaller. Do you remember when IBM was "too big" in the 70s and 80s and was dragged through years upon years of anti-trust, all the way through the product lifecycle, draining management time and attention, and company funds, until - hey, look - it's Cisco and other competitors! Same principle.
Where there's profits, there's opportunity for others. Cutting down the top company, in my mind, is not right.
10/15/09
[socialspark.com]
#tips
#FTC
06/23/09
Canuckistan: blogger's tax haven.
06/22/09
What will be interesting is seeing, say, Rex Reed come up with new ways of saying "for which I attended a free screening".
06/22/09
06/22/09
06/22/09
I imagine that these days, all you'd have to do is go up to a publicist and say, "Hi, I write for the Huffington Post -- please feed me."
06/22/09
Unless this somehow leads to Julia Allison getting lock up in jail. If so, go FTC!!!!!
05/20/09
NothingCredit05/20/09
NothingCreditSnitching is a dangerous thing to do nowadays. Remember how vicious the Gawker people reacted to snitching in the Kerri Ferrel case? Imagine how it will play out for a college kid who "snitches."
05/19/09
NothingCredit05/07/09
Why was there no liveblog of the Hans Reiser trial? Why is no attention paid to the utter hilarity of the Ruby on Rails "community"? (Pound for pound, Rails blogs have replaced LKML for the highest density of quotable insanity in the programming world. Even TechCrunch knows this.)
Owen's problem was the he saw himself as an analyst, rather than an anarchist. It was a problem for two reasons. First, the 'insider' approach is at odds with everything Gawker has ever done successfully. But more importantly, Owen doesn't know anything. He's divorced from both the technical realities that frequently influence business decisions in the Valley, and from the madness of the engineering community.
Because that is where the meat falls off the bone: it's not in the comings and goings of a couple of mid-level Valley execs (which are amply covered by about 900 other media outlets), but rather in the engineering teams and the mid-level management. These are the dark places; where a multi-billion dollar industry is built on the backs of talented but basically crazy people:
- Smart engineers who have been Peter Principled into management positions where they are no longer effective
- Open source projects who have "rejected" traditional industry power structures by replacing them with even more byzantine social constructions of their own devising
- Fairly gross, persistently male-dominated communities that don't understand where all the women went
- A narcissistic toy culture which is different in focus, but not degree, from that of the Manhattan elite
There is material enough for a dozen weblogs, if anyone had the gumption (and the sources) to make it happen. So best wishes to Owen, and best of luck to Ryan Tate. The Valley desperately needs a better 'Wag. We deserve the abuse.
05/07/09
05/07/09
Are we living in the same country? When was the last time you heard of these so-called "antitrust cops" that are out their somewhere riding into battle on their unicorns looking askance at anything?
Oh, wait. The Whole Foods takeover of Wild Oats Markets. Thank god the Feds took a hard line with that one. Excessive consolidation in the hippie/yuppie grocery sector posed a serious threat to our economy.
05/07/09
Didn't the Gov lose that battle with Wholefoods?
Also, is mobile search a market in and of itself; is it that different from regular search that it needs separate protection?
05/11/09
05/07/09
05/07/09
05/07/09
Where there's profits, there's opportunity for others. Cutting down the top company, in my mind, is not right.
05/07/09
Though I'm hard-pressed to see where the losses from abuse of monopoly power are in Google's case.