funbags - Gawker

posts about #funbags more →
Oh, Scarlett, We Were Talking About Your Tits
Bra War Brews On Upper Breast Side
AIM Invites You To Examine Carmen Electra's Pulchritude

Your version of Internet Explorer is not supported. Please upgrade to the most recent version in order to view comments.

Dsmvwl Admin Promote to frontpage Approve user Ban user ×

If_I_Had_a_Poodle
04/13/09

In reply to Oh, Scarlett, We Were Talking About Your Tits
does that mean u can date her now that she called out ur story?
Reply

If_I_Had_a_Poodle was starred

eatsshootsleaves
04/13/09

In reply to Oh, Scarlett, We Were Talking About Your Tits
How dare Defamer make the suggestion that Scarlett Johansson is only famous because of her tits!

Everyone knows it's because of her ass:

Reply

eatsshootsleaves was starred eatsshootsleaves was unstarred

RonMwangaguhunga
04/13/09

@eatsshootsleaves: thank you.
Reply

RonMwangaguhunga was starred RonMwangaguhunga was unstarred

Dave J.
04/13/09

@eatsshootsleaves: I was under the impression that was a body double.
Reply

Dave J. was starred Dave J. was unstarred

eatsshootsleaves
04/13/09

@Dave J.: Do you also go around telling children that Santa Claus is not real?
Reply

eatsshootsleaves was starred eatsshootsleaves was unstarred

Dave J.
04/13/09

In reply to Oh, Scarlett, We Were Talking About Your Tits
Why all this discussion of Scarlett's boob shrinkage and yet not a word of the far greater loss to civilization: the transition of Jennifer Connelly from the Holy Crap!! level of boobage in "Career Opportunities" to the Um Where Are They Plz? level in her more recent films. THAT, friends, is the real crime.
Reply

Dave J. was starred Dave J. was unstarred

skahammer
04/13/09

@Dave J.: My God, so I'm not the only one who's been wondering that all these years?

What a relief.
Reply

skahammer was starred skahammer was unstarred

quickqueenof
04/13/09

In reply to Oh, Scarlett, We Were Talking About Your Tits
But one must note that in those 2 pics there are very different systems holding up her breasts. In the "big boobie" she is wearing a corset top, which will make any boobs look bigger and bolder, while in the other pic she is not wearing a corset top and is wearing black, which minimizes. As a big boobie gal, I know that it seems like the girls change volume based on the top I wear and bra I wear underneath, yet between tops I am not dramatically losing weight nor getting enhancement surgery.

Just some boob physics for y'all.
Reply

quickqueenof was starred quickqueenof was unstarred

CaptainFantastic
04/13/09

@quickqueenof: Yes, I did that before( [gawker.com] ) and I was informed that it's not a corset, it's a bustier. Cheers, and I fully support your girls!
Reply

CaptainFantastic was starred CaptainFantastic was unstarred

Smitros
04/13/09

@quickqueenof:

That last line would be a great name for a science requirement.
Reply

Smitros was starred Smitros was unstarred

Spirit Fingers
04/13/09

In reply to Oh, Scarlett, We Were Talking About Your Tits
Okay, let's play a game.

How many movies/videos has ScarJo been in where her body was a deliberate costar?

I mean, really, chickie. You were in your underpants in that movie about nannies. I'm thinking you're causing these body image issues more than leading the torch of goodwill against them. Pffftttt!

Deep Thoughts by Scarlet Johandey. Heh.

Reply

Spirit Fingers was starred Spirit Fingers was unstarred

fileunder
04/13/09

In reply to Oh, Scarlett, We Were Talking About Your Tits
Ah, so the second 't' is silent.
Reply

fileunder was starred fileunder was unstarred

orisci
04/13/09

In reply to Oh, Scarlett, We Were Talking About Your Tits
You all should be ashamed. I usually love gawker's snark, but when Scarlet called you on it, you shoulda taken your comeuppins and apologized. Jeez. Don't act like 'US' and 'Star'... ya'll are better than that.
Reply

orisci was starred orisci was unstarred

Richard Lawson
04/13/09

@orisci: Apologized for what, exactly?
Reply

Richard Lawson was starred Richard Lawson was unstarred

orisci
04/13/09

@Richard Lawson: Well, I at first read the Ryan Tate as you all making fun of the tabloidy coverage of ScaJo's weight. I didn't read it as more of the same promotion of the dominant body paradigm and picking ScaJo apart. In fact I even liked the line it ended on, "Particularly if one is insane with jealousy at Johansson's frankly elegant new look." But you really went on the attack with this response, and so I have to conclude I was wrong as "the defamer doth protest too much," and you did in fact intend to promote lascivious body-shrinkage idolatry. What you shouldn't have done, Lawson, is dig yourself into a deep hole (perhaps with your sister column, Jezebel as well)with this blatantly offensive post. You started off by saying her assistant wrote it and then proceeded to slobber all over her breasts (and not in a good way). Your last line in particular made my gut turn. "But we were just talking about your cans, love. Your precious, precious, career-making cans." Really dear Lawson? REALLY? Wow. Way to snatch her touching performance in Lost in Translation right out of her hands and place all of her career success on her ta-tas. That's just idiotic.
Reply

orisci was starred orisci was unstarred

Richard Lawson
04/13/09

@orisci: Celebrity apologists are the worst.
Reply

Richard Lawson was starred Richard Lawson was unstarred

orisci
04/13/09

@Richard Lawson: I guess that's the most coherent response you could manage for my dig at your post? Sad for you
Reply

orisci was starred orisci was unstarred

Richard Lawson
04/13/09

@orisci: Let's try another go around. The point of this post is to gently tell Ms. Scarlett that we weren't applying any "Skinny is Better!!!" rubric on her body with that first post. It was merely a comment. "Oh, she looks different."

This is just an attempt to talk her off the sopabox. With a little crass humor thrown in.
Reply

Richard Lawson was starred Richard Lawson was unstarred

J-No
04/13/09

@orisci: Her acting is mostly a distraction in every movie she has been in since LIT. If not for her breasts, she would be unemployed right now.
Reply

J-No was starred J-No was unstarred

mmstk101
04/13/09

@orisci: Given that the title of the post is Oh Scarlett, We Were Talking About Your Tits , you were expecting to read an apology? An undeserved one, at that.
Reply

mmstk101 was starred mmstk101 was unstarred

LilyBlue
04/13/09

@orisci:

You had me at "comeuppins."

But then you lost me at "snatch."
Reply

LilyBlue was starred LilyBlue was unstarred

allyzay
04/13/09

@Richard Lawson: she's right about being on her stupid, stupid soapbox though, which is unfortunate because she's a terribly vapid, stupid woman who thinks of herself as being very, very clever. i'm not really sure how many people had to comment on tate's first post about this that she doesn't appear to have lost weight -- she just isn't wearing an incredibly tacky titty top in the "skinny" picture -- to get the subject dropped around here but c'mon. you are right, gawker/defamer/valleywag/where am i? was just referring to the level she's put her cans at but it is actually totally dismissive and nasty towards people who actually have problems to speculate like this.

rant has nothing to do with your actual post btw, which i think this "orisci" person is completely f'ing overreacting to. has a lot to do with tate's 3 (4?) posts about scarjo's "deflating" rack.
Reply

allyzay was starred allyzay was unstarred

Uncle_Billy_Slumming
04/13/09

In reply to Oh, Scarlett, We Were Talking About Your Tits
Scar,

Meet me at the urth cafe on santa monica tomorrow at noon. I'll explain everything then.
Reply

RonMwangaguhunga
04/13/09

In reply to Oh, Scarlett, We Were Talking About Your Tits
To paraphrase Joan Rivers' new book title, "Men Are Stupid ... And They Like Big Boobs"

so true.
Reply

RonMwangaguhunga was starred RonMwangaguhunga was unstarred

Smitros
04/13/09

@RonMwangaguhunga:

And she says that like it's a bad thing?
Reply

Smitros was starred Smitros was unstarred

skahammer
04/13/09

@RonMwangaguhunga: I just want it known that I never authorized that biography.

The authorized one is titled World's Greatest Lover Tells All. Accept no substitutes.
Reply

skahammer was starred skahammer was unstarred

iplaudius
04/13/09

In reply to Oh, Scarlett, We Were Talking About Your Tits
What’s strange about her response is that Ryan Tate was complimentary of he "deflated" physique, calling it "frankly elegant."
Reply

iplaudius was starred iplaudius was unstarred

orisci
04/13/09

@iplaudius: She doesn't want to encourage that sort of fatphobia
Reply

orisci was starred orisci was unstarred

iplaudius
04/13/09

@orisci: Yeah, I know, but based on the past and persistent admiration of her body by the editors and commenters alike, I thought it was clear that he was saying she looked good either way.
Reply

iplaudius was starred iplaudius was unstarred

Jenmcb
04/13/09

In reply to Oh, Scarlett, We Were Talking About Your Tits
I still don't see the difference between the photos. It's a called a push up bra/dress/whatever. It...pushes them up. Therefore looking bigger...and you know, pushed up. She is most likely the same weight.
Reply

Jenmcb was starred Jenmcb was unstarred

bytememehard
04/13/09

@Jenmcb: I agree -- it appears to be a matter of dress cut and undergarmentage.
Reply

bytememehard was starred bytememehard was unstarred

raincoaster
04/14/09

@bytememehard: Negitori. Even her SHINS are thinner now. Check out her upper arms for a really obvious change. Engineering can do amazing things for boobage, but her weight loss shows all over, including her face.

And she's not that hung up on health, of course. Smokes like a chimney.
Reply

raincoaster was starred raincoaster was unstarred

JudgeFudge
04/13/09

In reply to Oh, Scarlett, We Were Talking About Your Tits
I hear she's auctioning the tissues that she now stuffs with on Ebay right now.
Reply

JudgeFudge was starred JudgeFudge was unstarred

LeeroySpitzer
04/13/09

In reply to Oh, Scarlett, We Were Talking About Your Tits
Fun Fact: If they do deflate, the skin never really contracts, leaving them to look like circus tents with no circus.
Reply

LeeroySpitzer was starred LeeroySpitzer was unstarred

mmstk101
04/13/09

@LeeroySpitzer: That brings to mind a very unpleasant picture.
Reply

mmstk101 was starred mmstk101 was unstarred

Mount_Prion
04/13/09

In reply to Oh, Scarlett, We Were Talking About Your Tits
Well he Tate no journalist, but we love him anyway.

(This is supposed to be a pun, not a typo.)
Reply

Mount_Prion was starred Mount_Prion was unstarred

bytememehard
04/13/09

@Mount_Prion: 'taint funny
Reply

bytememehard was starred bytememehard was unstarred

TedSez
04/13/09

In reply to Oh, Scarlett, We Were Talking About Your Tits
Meanwhile, Woody Allen is trying to sign Christina Hendricks for his next six movies. (Don't do it, Christina -- it's a trap!)
Reply

TedSez was starred TedSez was unstarred

Earlier discussions Other discussions Show all discussions Show featured discussions only Start a new discussion

#funbags

Gawker

SUBSCRIBE TO Gawker

Oh, Scarlett, We Were Talking About Your Tits

Bra War Brews On Upper Breast Side

AIM Invites You To Examine Carmen Electra's Pulchritude

Login

Reset Password

Register

Submit Your Comment