Enter your username and password.
New York, 3:38 PM
Thu Nov 26
21 posts in the last 24 hours

Tip Your Editors:
tips@gawker.com
Tipline: 646-214-8138
Editor-in-Chief:
Gabriel Snyder | Email
West Coast Editor:
Richard Rushfield | Email
Contributing Editors:
Valleywag:
Ryan Tate | Email
Media:
Hamilton Nolan | Email
Politics:
Alex Pareene | Email
Investigations:
John Cook | Email
Entertainment:
Brian Moylan | Email
Nights:
Adrian Chen | Email
Azaria Jagger | Email
Ravi Somaiya | Email
Weekends:
Foster Kamer | Email
Video Editor:
Richard Blakeley | Email
Please enter your email address to have your password reset.
Registering will give you a user profile and the ability to add other users as friends. To become a commenter, however, you need to audition.
Want to know more? Consult the Comment FAQ and legal terms.
You don't need to login to comment. Just enter your email address below.
See how your address will be displayed in the Comment FAQ.
10/15/09
10/15/09
10/15/09
09/25/09
09/24/09
09/24/09
09/24/09
09/24/09
09/24/09
09/24/09
Denton's Tweet was quoted, though!
[www.people.com]
09/24/09
09/24/09
09/24/09
09/24/09
09/24/09
09/24/09
[cocatalog.loc.gov]
09/24/09
(1) How is (#x) a blind item?
(2) All of them.
Anybody using either will pay plenty or hear from whatever shyster I can dredge up.
09/24/09
09/24/09
09/24/09
Damn, Denton, they have a pretty solid claim. I'm not liking your fair use odds.
09/24/09
I still think Denton comes out on top.
09/24/09
09/24/09
09/24/09
09/24/09
I was thinking the same thing about the participant who might have given it to Gawker, and maybe giving them implicit permission to publish it, but that seems a little iffy to me. Particularly since the guy (Dreamy, whatever) appeared to be the one filming it, and therefore the "author" (and presumably the legal owner of the copyright). A participant has no legal right to authorize distribution.
At best, the participant is a co-author, and probably entitled to give a license to Gawker. I am guessing Gaby is might be making a new friend in the near term.
09/24/09
All the more reason I don't know WHY they filed this lawsuit. If they hired her, what drugs they were doing in the video, etc. is all going to come out in the discovery process. Why would they want this dirty laundry re-aired? I know its publicity, but it doesn't seem like the kind that will help their careers.
09/25/09
09/24/09
09/25/09