Enter your username and password.
New York, 11:55 AM
Mon Dec 7
26 posts in the last 24 hours

Tip Your Editors:
Tipline: 646-214-8138
Editor-in-Chief:
Gabriel Snyder |
West Coast Editor:
Richard Rushfield |
Contributing Editors:
Valleywag:
Ryan Tate |
Media:
Hamilton Nolan |
Politics:
Alex Pareene |
Investigations:
John Cook |
Entertainment:
Brian Moylan |
Nights:
Adrian Chen |
Azaria Jagger |
Ravi Somaiya |
Weekends:
Foster Kamer |
Video Editor:
Richard Blakeley |
Please enter your email address to have your password reset.
Registering will give you a user profile and the ability to add other users as friends. To become a commenter, however, you need to audition.
Want to know more? Consult the Comment FAQ and legal terms.
You don't need to login to comment. Just enter your email address below.
See how your address will be displayed in the Comment FAQ.
11/16/09
"Just call me Soylent." #thepoors
11/16/09
11/16/09
10/21/09
10/21/09
10/21/09
(and maybe good for Goldman - quality books of business will move to a firm that can pay for them) #bailouts
07/10/09
07/10/09
07/10/09
07/10/09
07/10/09
07/10/09
07/10/09
07/10/09
07/10/09
07/10/09
07/10/09
07/10/09
07/10/09
07/10/09
07/10/09
We've got 99.44% problems, and a salt lick ain't one?
07/10/09
07/10/09
06/03/09
@EVERYONE: Of course, this certainly doesn't help: [www.pbs.org]
Basically: Both sides share responsibility, or lack thereof.
Sí, se puede?
06/02/09
It's not about the little man versus the big corporation. Unions distort what should be a normal "reward for performance and risk for nonperformance" dynamic that everyone else outside of the union faces on a daily basis. If there is no downside to union workers, what incentive do they have to be productive, create quality work product, etc.? Judging from what I've seen of union shops, the answer is none. Most do their eight and hit the gate.
06/02/09
Then you must really hate executives. Which I think is taking things a bit too far.
06/02/09