I solve this problem with the Michael Scott smokescreen method -- half my emails are admissions of actual criminal behavior, half are outlandish, easily falsifiable lies. Foolproof!
I am the most knee-jerk liberal in the world, but I have no problem with what Google did in the Bear Stearns case. If you have something sensitive to say, don't do it in an e-mail. We've known that for years. What's amazing is that the most sophisticated and powerful people still seem to get caught by e-mail's ease of utility.
@depardoo: totally agree. It's evidence. Deleting an email account to hide evidence is like throwing a murder weapon in the ocean and assuming it's gone forever.
Sorry, you do the crime - and the authorities search for evidence - it shouldn't matter if they find that evidence via a CD-ROM that has to be asked for or a sonar that has to be conducted.
If Ryan Jenkins was emailing that he hated his wife, had bought a knife, and was going to kill her, would subpoena-ing Google for his old email account NOT be OK? Is it just that it was a financial crime? To me, crime is crime. You email, you know the ramifications.
@theartdodger: OK, I'll bite. If they are admissions of illegal activity - of COURSE they're going to be deleted! Again, it's like throwing out a murder weapon, or throwing out a license plate from a stolen car. I guess I don't understand why - when these are educated guys who know how things work - that they should be given protection from their own stupidity. They WROTE DOWN that they thought their fund was going to blow up. Damn straight that's evidence, and of course they'll try to hide it.
@FormerEnglishMajor: I worry about the ends justify the means attitude here. Is the idea that we should be able to access deleted email if and only if the emailer is a criminal? Kind of a hard call to make.
Don't get me wrong, I'm glad it worked out in this particular case. But I wouldn't trust the government to get it right every time, or even most of the time.
@Conchie Birdie: if you were an investor in that fund, or a person being harrassed by someone hiding behind a gmail account.... I'm not one for active Secret Police, but Google isn't doing that, they are reactive, not proactive, in giving information.
@FormerEnglishMajor: To clarify - My disdain is over the fact that Google has so much power and information at their fingertips. The way in which they use it seems like a more complicated matter concerning where the lines of privacy are drawn.
@Conchie Birdie: oh - sorry - got it. Google to me is like COnde Nast for others in publishing - doubt I'd work there, just nice to know it exists (in that "built in a garage and made a billion dollars" way).
@FormerEnglishMajor: I admire the whole "story" and reasoning behind Google, but the amount of power they hold with all of that information - holy crap.
A few former friends work there... seems a bit too 'cultish' for me.
So is there a legal recourse people have to have their historical emails deleted when they shut down the account? Or does Google just have blackmail rights over the entire world?
I think warnings are helpful in America. Like, our new toaster has a caveat: do not take item into your bath. Now if I could just figure out how to feed it.
@adoringava: Who was it, Descartes? Said, nothing that is conceived but what exists. Go ahead, try. By that reasoning, there is indeed out there somewhere some lone lorn widow of the Nigerian finance minister yearning for her accumulated family fortune to breathe free.
@pufflehuff: Okay, do the math on the numbers. I don't mean the $11.5 mil. I mean Whitacker calling himself "0014" because he's "twice as smart as 007." Not by my calculator.
@Tremonius: Saw it last Fri - teehee! And the ever-increasing numbers, teehee! As for the 0014, I knew that was coming, and still I teehee'd - and I'm not easily pleased.
@pufflehuff: I was a little unnerved that one symptom of bipolar disorder was elaborate daydreaming. And I was glad to know that every single calamity befalling ol' Mark was exclusively of his own doing. He was making - what? $360K - and on the up escalator when his daydreams started leaking out of his mouth. #email
I'll never forget my first glimpse of that shit back in 1995.. some shitty animated .gif banner that said Click on the Flapping Pelican to Win Free AA Batteries! .. and then it forwarded to some .ru site that asked for your AOL password... ah, the ol' days!
i guess this is why i was emailed that i won £750.000.00 in a Toyota promotion this morning. All they need is all my pertinent info and the money is mine.
@yourfriendandneighbor: It's slightly more clever than just demanding personal data. The usual pitch is that the wife of the finance minister of the Nigerian regime needs to bribe customs to relase the ten million in gold bullion to you.
I used to laugh at all this - until I read how often it works. Sort of eerie to think you live in a world where anybody around you may be dumb enough to fall for the Nigerian scam. #email
10/09/09
10/09/09
10/09/09
10/09/09
10/09/09
Sorry, you do the crime - and the authorities search for evidence - it shouldn't matter if they find that evidence via a CD-ROM that has to be asked for or a sonar that has to be conducted.
If Ryan Jenkins was emailing that he hated his wife, had bought a knife, and was going to kill her, would subpoena-ing Google for his old email account NOT be OK? Is it just that it was a financial crime? To me, crime is crime. You email, you know the ramifications.
10/09/09
If so, I would have a problem with that.
10/09/09
I
10/09/09
Don't get me wrong, I'm glad it worked out in this particular case. But I wouldn't trust the government to get it right every time, or even most of the time.
10/09/09
10/09/09
10/09/09
10/09/09
10/09/09
Wow, I apologize for that last sentence.
10/09/09
10/09/09
A few former friends work there... seems a bit too 'cultish' for me.
10/09/09
10/09/09
10/09/09
10/09/09
10/09/09
10/06/09
10/07/09
10/06/09
10/06/09
10/06/09
Email hacked
vs.
My dick gets bigger
Hmmm.... hard choice...
10/06/09
10/06/09
Speaking of which, anybody see The Informant!?
10/06/09
10/06/09
10/08/09
10/14/09
10/15/09
10/06/09
10/06/09
10/15/09
I used to laugh at all this - until I read how often it works. Sort of eerie to think you live in a world where anybody around you may be dumb enough to fall for the Nigerian scam. #email
09/01/09