Gawker 
Enter your username and password.
New York, 7:33 AM
Fri Dec 18
46 posts in the last 24 hours
Tip Your Editors:
Tipline: 646-214-8138
Editor-in-Chief:
Gabriel Snyder |
West Coast Editor:
Richard Rushfield |
Contributing Editors:
Valleywag:
Ryan Tate |
Media:
Hamilton Nolan |
Politics:
Alex Pareene |
Investigations:
John Cook |
Entertainment:
Brian Moylan |
Nights:
Adrian Chen |
Azaria Jagger |
Ravi Somaiya |
Weekends:
Foster Kamer |
Video Editor:
Richard Blakeley |
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.
12/08/09
12/07/09
Nothing will freak out the fringe or mainstream more than a comment like this.
12/04/09
Man, are we gonna laugh at this one years from now when google becomes the new evil overlord (or as some say, "microsoft")
12/04/09
Maybe he was unprepared for the question, but his answer was essentially, " only freaks and perverts need privacy". Hasn't EVERYONE googled something they would not want revealed to the world?
...I'm starting to regret googling "bi-racial midgets on crank" 1000 times. I mean, what if I wanna run for office someday?
12/05/09
12/04/09
12/04/09
"4. If you have something that you don’t want anyone to know, maybe you shouldn’t be doing it in the first place, but if you really need that kind of privacy, the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated..."
12/04/09
Shit. Schmidt knows I just wrote that. I hope my appointments don't get erased off of my Google Calendar. Oh, wait- that already happened when I was using the Google Sync function with my blackberry. Never mind, then.
12/05/09
12/06/09
10/30/09
That being said, people who score 1's, or at least, the 99% who do, many of them wouldn't be able to hack it. If you don't have the social skills you need to have the technical skills. If you don't have either, makes sense that you'd get bounced.
Also, word on the street is that Google is pretty widely hiring right now--not laying off.
10/30/09
10/30/09
10/30/09
10/29/09
I've got 20 years on the little snot-nosed recent PhD interviewing me and he starts throwing these lame-ass puzzles at me. He speaks, throughout, in the most condescending imaginable tones. Some of them are trivial as in "why are you wasting my time with this, I've already offered to send you code samples and some of my algorithm work". Some of them are so poorly phrased as to have no good answer. A final one was an old saw of a problem - one I'd seen decades ago, once knew the "trick", but that would take more more than 1m to remember the trick. It wasn't even a very practical problem or trick to know for any utilitarian purpose - just one of those old puzzles that geeks trade around as useless toys. Since it was taking me more than about a minute to reconstruct the answer he grew impatient and started talking to me like I was a three year old. The interviewer said several other idiotic things in the course of discussion (not rude, I mean -- technically stupid (although he was also rude)). Our mutual disrespect was mutually clear, I think, by the end of the interview.
A serious problem with Google's culture, I learned that day, is that their declaration of owning "the world's best engineers" has the very bad side effect of giving every loser hired into engineering there the unsubstantiated belief that they are a member of that species.
What I've learned, over the years, is that you have to pretty much (not absolutely, but close) *never* trust an engineer who regards himself as anything other than an average plodder, prone to mistakes, who might be *slightly* better than most at this or that specialty. Those are the only honest engineers you'll find, for the most part. They are the only ones who are appropriately skeptical of their own brilliance. And they do the best work.
The founders of Google set a really bogus tone, from the outset.
10/29/09
10/29/09
10/29/09
First, they come up with a battery of ridiculous questions, then they look at the people that do the worst at answering them and then hire one of those people they just REALLY LIKED.
Wow. That makes a lot of sense. #google
10/29/09
I remember there was an article about a Google (?) HR person (?) who had ridiculously strict ideas of who would make a good employee.
10/07/09
10/07/09
10/07/09
Google has invested in Wojcicki's company at the behest of a founder. Google is not subject to the marriage contract and because 23andMe is still in the startup phase, it hasn't produced any value for Google's shareholders. Any future investments would be subject to the whim of Sergey;
So, what does NOW think of this power dynamic?