• Profile logout login

#googleplex#br

Gawker

Share Cancel
   
Upload an image | Add an image URL
×

logging in
  • FAQ. Include # before tag:
  • #tips,
  • #stalker,
  • #opencaption,
  • #internalmemos,
  • etc.

New York, 10:56 PM
Mon Nov 16
59 posts in the last 24 hours

Team

Tip Your Editors:
tips@gawker.com
Tipline: 646-214-8138

Editor-in-Chief:
Gabriel Snyder | Email

West Coast Editor:
Richard Rushfield | Email

Contributing Editors:

Valleywag:
Ryan Tate | Email

Media:
Hamilton Nolan | Email

Politics:
Alex Pareene | Email

Investigations:
John Cook | Email

Entertainment:
Brian Moylan | Email

Nights:
Adrian Chen | Email
Azaria Jagger | Email
Ravi Somaiya | Email

Weekends:
Foster Kamer | Email

Video Editor:
Richard Blakeley | Email

SUBSCRIBE TO Gawker RSS

New: Breaking news and daily top stories via email
4260 Subscribers
Gawker
  • Your version of Internet Explorer is not supported. Please upgrade to the most recent version in order to view comments.

    Dsmvwl  Admin  Promote to frontpage Approve user Ban user ×
    Image of xckack xckack
    10/30/09

    In reply to Google's Broken Hiring Process
    In order to be hired there even though you scored a 1, you essentially have to be a total rockstar. Let's say you've got your PhD in crypto, worked for some other huge tech firm but you suck at interviews and you're so specialized it's not even relevant. Yeah, you're going to get a 1, but when they look at your resume, see your publications and qualifications you get hired. Are you going to be a good employee with those stats? Yeah, most likely.

    That being said, people who score 1's, or at least, the 99% who do, many of them wouldn't be able to hack it. If you don't have the social skills you need to have the technical skills. If you don't have either, makes sense that you'd get bounced.

    Also, word on the street is that Google is pretty widely hiring right now--not laying off.
     Reply
    Kaila Hale-Stern promoted this comment xckack was starred xckack was unstarred
    Image of Moonshine Mike Moonshine Mike
    10/30/09

    In reply to Google's Broken Hiring Process
    Hard to say, because I flunked a phone interview with them (second or third one) and got bounced. #google
     Reply
    Moonshine Mike was starred Moonshine Mike was unstarred
    Image of raincoaster raincoaster
    10/30/09

    In reply to Google's Broken Hiring Process
    The guy who wrote Dress for Success in the 70's is a statistician by trade, and he once analyzed the success of various hiring techniques. The best indicator of later success? Passing the interview with experts in the field the person would be working in; the worst? Impressing the HR drones. #google
     Reply
    raincoaster was starred raincoaster was unstarred
    Image of Moonshine Mike Moonshine Mike
    10/30/09

    @raincoaster: Sure, but the people giving the tests at google may be experts, but they lack social skills. #google
     Reply
    Moonshine Mike was starred Moonshine Mike was unstarred
    Image of lord002 lord002
    10/29/09

    In reply to Google's Broken Hiring Process
    I went through an interview with Google and, of course, this is going to sound like sour grapes, but it ain't ... really.

    I've got 20 years on the little snot-nosed recent PhD interviewing me and he starts throwing these lame-ass puzzles at me. He speaks, throughout, in the most condescending imaginable tones. Some of them are trivial as in "why are you wasting my time with this, I've already offered to send you code samples and some of my algorithm work". Some of them are so poorly phrased as to have no good answer. A final one was an old saw of a problem - one I'd seen decades ago, once knew the "trick", but that would take more more than 1m to remember the trick. It wasn't even a very practical problem or trick to know for any utilitarian purpose - just one of those old puzzles that geeks trade around as useless toys. Since it was taking me more than about a minute to reconstruct the answer he grew impatient and started talking to me like I was a three year old. The interviewer said several other idiotic things in the course of discussion (not rude, I mean -- technically stupid (although he was also rude)). Our mutual disrespect was mutually clear, I think, by the end of the interview.

    A serious problem with Google's culture, I learned that day, is that their declaration of owning "the world's best engineers" has the very bad side effect of giving every loser hired into engineering there the unsubstantiated belief that they are a member of that species.

    What I've learned, over the years, is that you have to pretty much (not absolutely, but close) *never* trust an engineer who regards himself as anything other than an average plodder, prone to mistakes, who might be *slightly* better than most at this or that specialty. Those are the only honest engineers you'll find, for the most part. They are the only ones who are appropriately skeptical of their own brilliance. And they do the best work.

    The founders of Google set a really bogus tone, from the outset.

     Reply
    Kaila Hale-Stern promoted this comment lord002 was starred lord002 was unstarred
    Image of pepelicious pepelicious
    10/29/09

    In reply to Google's Broken Hiring Process
    To be fair, most of the questions are about cupcakes. #google
     Reply
    Cynical Media Bitch promoted this comment pepelicious was starred pepelicious was unstarred
    Image of Swifter Swifter
    10/29/09

    @pepelicious: You're hired. #google
     Reply
    Swifter was starred Swifter was unstarred
    Image of edosan edosan
    10/29/09

    In reply to Google's Broken Hiring Process
    So let me see if I get this:

    First, they come up with a battery of ridiculous questions, then they look at the people that do the worst at answering them and then hire one of those people they just REALLY LIKED.

    Wow. That makes a lot of sense. #google
     Reply
    Seeräuber Jenny promoted this comment edosan was starred edosan was unstarred
    Image of Seeräuber Jenny Seeräuber Jenny
    10/29/09

    @edosan: I wonder if doing poorly in an interview reflects not giving the interviewer what s/he expects or wants, in other words, it's a predictor of independence or original thinking. Of course the candidate generally has to be intellectualy solid, not just contrary, so s/he has to ace the other three and be liked well enough to be faught over.

    I remember there was an article about a Google (?) HR person (?) who had ridiculously strict ideas of who would make a good employee.
     Reply
    Edited by Seeräuber Jenny at 10/29/09 6:20 PM Seeräuber Jenny was starred Seeräuber Jenny was unstarred
    Image of Niko Bellic Niko Bellic
    10/07/09

    In reply to Google Honchos: Our Employees Should Be Grateful They're Not Starving in Gutter
    Google is The Devil.
     Reply
    Niko Bellic was starred Niko Bellic was unstarred
    Image of TheBusinessGuy TheBusinessGuy
    10/07/09

    In reply to Google Honchos: Our Employees Should Be Grateful They're Not Starving in Gutter
    Hey, Google isn't alone here. Conde Nast eliminated the free Orangina.
     Reply
    TheBusinessGuy was starred TheBusinessGuy was unstarred
    Image of Magister Magister
    10/07/09

    In reply to Google Honchos: Our Employees Should Be Grateful They're Not Starving in Gutter
    I realize that this may come across as harping, but...

    Google has invested in Wojcicki's company at the behest of a founder. Google is not subject to the marriage contract and because 23andMe is still in the startup phase, it hasn't produced any value for Google's shareholders. Any future investments would be subject to the whim of Sergey;

    So, what does NOW think of this power dynamic?
     Reply
    Edited by Magister at 10/07/09 7:22 PM Magister was starred Magister was unstarred
    Image of BadUncle BadUncle
    10/07/09

    In reply to Google Honchos: Our Employees Should Be Grateful They're Not Starving in Gutter
    I just like it when they stop using the cattle prod.
     Reply
    BadUncle was starred BadUncle was unstarred
    Image of If_I_Had_a_Poodle If_I_Had_a_Poodle
    10/07/09

    In reply to Google Honchos: Our Employees Should Be Grateful They're Not Starving in Gutter
    Expect us to add benefits rather than pare them down over time. We believe it is easy to be penny wise and pound foolish with respect to benefits that can save employees considerable time and improve their health and productivity.

    ... until they don't
     Reply
    If_I_Had_a_Poodle was starred If_I_Had_a_Poodle was unstarred
    Image of shostakobitch shostakobitch
    10/07/09

    In reply to Google Honchos: Our Employees Should Be Grateful They're Not Starving in Gutter
    doesn't every company started by some fruit-booted shitass in a garage that makes it big go through the same tired cycle of plucky-futurist-luxuriating in cash-cutthroat-obsolete- bankrupt? isn't that observation also cliched? where am i? why don't i have any pants? can i borrow change for the bus?
     Reply
    shostakobitch was starred shostakobitch was unstarred
    Image of valet_of_the_dolls valet_of_the_dolls
    10/07/09

    @shostakobitch: You may have a token for the bus, as there's no telling what you'd spend the change on.
     Reply
    valet_of_the_dolls was starred valet_of_the_dolls was unstarred
    Image of shostakobitch shostakobitch
    10/07/09

    @valet_of_the_dolls: the hell with you i'll sell the token to get the mongoose malt liquor i crave.
     Reply
    shostakobitch was starred shostakobitch was unstarred
    Image of jrhys jrhys
    10/08/09

    @shostakobitch: Hearted for that comment.
     Reply
    jrhys was starred jrhys was unstarred
    Image of Sandogg Sandogg
    09/03/09

    In reply to Top Chef Flunks Google
    When I'm running late to the neighborhood potluck, and I don't have time to go to the market, pasta salad is my go to dish that I can whip up little to no time.
     Reply
    Sandogg was starred Sandogg was unstarred
    Image of TedSez TedSez
    09/03/09

    In reply to Top Chef Flunks Google
    Seriously, that pasta salad was the kind of thing I used to make for my college food co-op.

    On the other hand, it seemed unfair for the show to keep patting itself on the back about feeding the troops for around 40 of its 60 minutes, and then have the judges mark down chefs for thinking that was more important than the competition.
     Reply
    TedSez was starred TedSez was unstarred
    Image of DahlELama DahlELama
    09/03/09

    @TedSez: Sure, it seems unfair, and it probably is, but how dumb is it of these chefs, who've probably seen all five seasons of this show, to think that there was anyway that the element of competition wouldn't be paramount? Did Jersey Douche really think it was OK to make a crappy salad because it was a "team thing" and he wouldn't be judged on his individual contribution? He seemed floored by this concept. Though, he also seems floored by the concept of stopping after four spray tan applications in one day, so, yeah.
     Reply
    DahlELama was starred DahlELama was unstarred
    Image of __ __
    09/03/09

    In reply to Top Chef Flunks Google
    Is it just me or are the competitors on Top Chef this season incredibly uneven? Preeti and some of the others(including that large girl with all the metal fastened to her face who keeps making soup) are just terrible while others like the brothers are some of the best ever.
     Reply
    naugahydeinplainsight promoted this comment __ was starred __ was unstarred
    Image of naugahydeinplainsight naugahydeinplainsight
    09/03/09

    @Fancy Pants: Not just you. Plus it seems to me that the talent is heavily weighted toward the men, other than Jennifer and Ashley. And haven't all three chefs eliminated been women?
     Reply
    naugahydeinplainsight was starred naugahydeinplainsight was unstarred
    Image of otherginger otherginger
    09/03/09

    @Fancy Pants: We have five strong ones and the rest are mediocre-to-weak; kind of the same as always, I think.
    (Strong ones are the pickle brothers, the real brothers, and Jen).
     Reply
    naugahydeinplainsight promoted this comment otherginger was starred otherginger was unstarred
    Image of __ __
    09/03/09

    @otherginger: I have a hunch that while the hosts are drooling over the concept of two brothers reaching the final a "dark horse" will come up from the rear and win the whole thing.

    I think that rotund guy with the beard from down south who did the pulled pork barbecue for the soldiers is my bet for the "dark horse" who takes home the grand prize. What do you think?
     Reply
    Edited by __ at 09/03/09 12:44 PM __ was starred __ was unstarred
    Image of __ __
    09/03/09

    @naugahydeinplainsight: Ashley is a WOMAN?
     Reply
    __ was starred __ was unstarred
    Earlier discussions Other discussions Show all discussions Show featured discussions only Start a new discussion

Login

Enter your username and password.

Please enter a username.
Please enter your password.
logging in
Login via Facebook | Sign Up | Forgot Password?

Reset Password

Please enter your email address to have your password reset.

Please enter your email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
requesting password reset

Register

Registering will give you a user profile and the ability to add other users as friends. To become a commenter, however, you need to audition.

Want to know more? Consult the Comment FAQ and legal terms.

Please enter a username.
Please enter a password.
Please confirm your password.
Passwords are not identical.
Please enter a valid email address.
registration sent, waiting for reply

Submit Your Comment

You don't need to login to comment. Just enter your email address below.

See how your address will be displayed in the Comment FAQ.

Please enter a valid email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
logging in

Login with your Facebook or Gawker account.

Sign up here.



  • Archives
  • About
  • Advertising
  • Legal
  • Help
  • Report a Bug
  • FAQ
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.