<![CDATA[Gawker: graphics]]> http://tags.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gawker.com.png <![CDATA[Gawker: graphics]]> http://gawker.com/tag/graphics http://gawker.com/tag/graphics <![CDATA[The iPhone Map of the World]]> Did you know that there are people in certain parts of the world who have never even seen an iPhone? Fortune has helpfully mapped out the fetishized Apple product's availability. The countries where one can procure an iPhone (at least by this summer) are marked in red. (Sucks to be you, Russia!) Of course, the map does not include black-market iPhones. [Fortune]

]]> http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=388994&view=rss&microfeed=true <![CDATA[Indie Rockers As Fashion Icons]]> tmagazine.jpegThe NYT's T Magazine has a handy graphic breaking down the fashion styles of indie rockers, and confirming once and for all that nobody should aspire to be an indie rocker. Each band profiled corresponds to a luxury brand. Doesn't that violate some sort of tenet of indie cred? PLUS they are all matched with smiley fashion slogans summing up their look, which just makes you realize that it is always an unwise decision for a band to agree to participate in a story in T Magazine. Below, a picture of each band and their supposed "look"; which is most preposterous? [I vote "Williamsburg prep"]

vampireweekend.jpeg

Band: Vampire Weekend
Look: "Paul Simon circa 'The Graduate.'"


beirut.jpeg

Band: Beirut [pic via NY Mag]
Look: "French intellectual meets Bulgarian farmer." [THEN GETS BEAT UP, HA!]


deerhunter.jpeg

Band: Deerhunter
Look: "If Kurt C. met Karen O."


grizzlybear.jpeg

Band: Grizzly Bear
Look: "Williamsburg prep: boat shoes for everyone!"

]]> http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=365935&view=rss&microfeed=true