<![CDATA[Gawker: hachette filapacchi]]> http://tags.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gawker.com.png <![CDATA[Gawker: hachette filapacchi]]> http://gawker.com/tag/hachettefilapacchi http://gawker.com/tag/hachettefilapacchi <![CDATA[Irresponsible Rumormongering: Hachette Sell-off]]> A tipster writes:

Rumor has it that Hachette Filapacchi is getting ready to sell all of its titles, except Elle, Woman's Day, and Woman's Day Special Interest Publications. An email was sent out to the production department to gather the last 6 copies of all titles, except the ones listed above.

Really? We're Shocked. If you know any more, fill us in.

UPDATE: Hachette spokesfolk deny: "The gossip item on gawker.com regarding the sale of Hachette titles is completely unfounded and false."

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=212729&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Magazine For Illiterates Blends Elements of 'Maxim,' 'The Economist']]> A friend passes along a promotional e-mail from Shock magazine, Hachette Filapacchi's attempt to nail down the market of those who find mouth breathing a challenge. Along with an opportunity to preview the new issue, the e-mail offers the following manifesto:

Shock is the eyes and ears of a young generation of readers starving for visual stimulation in global news and pop culture. It is an uncensored and unapologetic look at a world that American consumers have not seen before and have trouble believing even exists. It is fast, funny, dazzling and dripping with attitude. It is also smart and informative. It is not a lad book, celebrity rag, sports book or stodgy newsmagazine...yet it is packed with elements of each of these delivered with a completely unique tone and attitude that resonates with a mass audience of young consumers. It should be clear to a reader in just one read that committing to this magazine will help him acquire so much arresting and topical information and images of the vast world around him that he'll very quickly become the go-to authority in his peer group. That's a clear, valuable user benefit nobody else can provide.

After the jump, a look at the November cover.

We're guessing "Tara Reid: Hollywood sag lady" falls under the "smart and informative" rubric.

Earlier: Gawker's coverage of Shock

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=203408&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Magazine for Illiterates Removed From Its Rightful Place Alongside Fall Out Boy Records]]> againshock.bmpSo Shock, Hachette Filapacchi's effort to create a publication that speaks to readers who find words and punctuation too intrusive, continues to struggle for a place in the nation's newsracks. AdAge reports that Tower Records has joined the growing list of outlets that have yanked it from the shelves, although in this case the removal comes because of the ongoing conflict with photographer Michael Yon (as opposed to Rite Aid's rationale, which was that the magazine is crap.) Hachette is understandably aggrieved at the campaign against its publication. President/CEO Jack Kliger says, "There's no question that... efforts to convince retailers that it is consumers who are upset at the issue have succeeded in some cases, even though that's not what the fact is... [T]hese are not complaints being made by Shock readers — these are complaints being made by Michael Yon's followers. There's a big difference."

Without being seen to take sides, we're going to have accept Kliger's argument. You'd know if the complaints were coming from actual Shock readers: They'd be the ones written in crayon on lined paper.

Hachette Defends 'Shock' as Retailers Pull Premiere Issue [AdAge]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=181416&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Magazine for Illiterates Removed From Venue Not Exactly Staffed by Rhodes Scholars]]> Sad news for those of you who get your Valtrex prescriptions filled at the Rite Aid: The chain has pulled Shock magazine - Hachette Filapacchi's appeal to the all-important borderline retarded demographic - from its shelves. Surprisingly, the magazine's removal had nothing to do with the ongoing conflict between Hachette and photographer Michael Yon; it reflects an aesthetic judgment on Rite Aid's part. Company spokesperson Judy Cook says, "We did pull it. The content wasn't really what we were expecting and it didn't fit with our product mix." Apparently our nation's Medicare Advantage Plan participants are already getting all the shots of blown-up Iraqi children and celebrity ass cleavage through the mail.

Drugstore Chain Pulls Shock Magazine; Blogger Rejects Settlement [pdnonline]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=180967&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Magazine for Illiterates Disregards Opinions of Semi-Literates]]> shockandyawn.bmpRemember Michael Yon? He's the photographer who blew a gasket when Shock magazine - Hachette Filapacchi's new offering for the recently lobotomized - allegedly used his photo of an American soldier cradling an injured Iraqi child without permission. A reported settlement has fallen through, and Yon is none too pleased about it. Hachette Filapacchi (a French company, and therefore evil) "resorted to delay tactics, equivocation, and the same kind of thinly veiled threat that has characterized their style of doing business." Their greatest sin, however, appears to be having shown disdain for the blogosphere.

Okay, Hachette, you win. Where can we subscribe?

Actions Speak Louder [Michael Yon]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=180187&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Mag for Illiterates Can Live to Shock Again!]]> 20060605shock.jpgWorried you wouldn't get your chance to see photos of Chernobyl victims, self-immolation, and a bearded Val Kilmer making out with Paris Hilton? You can relax. Ad Age is reporting that late Friday night Hachette's new Shock magazine — which contains all those delightful images, plus so much more — reached a deal with photog Michael Yon, who claimed the mag had no right to put on its cover his image of a U.S. soldier carrying a wounded Iraqi child and had demanded all issues be pulled from newsstands.

Hachette is paying Yon money and making a charitable donation; Yon is dropping his threats and agreeing that Hachette acted in good faith when purchasing rights from a photo agency, Polaris. But Yon also claims he'd never worked with or heard of Polaris, which raises the entirely unanswered question of whether he's simply lying or the agency is going around selling rights to photos it doesn't own. We'd be curious to look into that — but, hey, we're too busy looking at pix of an elephant taking a dump (p. 81).

'Shock' Reaches Settlement With Photographer [Ad Age]
Earlier: Magazine for Illiterates Can't Even Rip Off Photos Right

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=178385&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Magazine For Illiterates Can't Even Rip Off Photos Right]]> So Shock magazine, Hachette's attempt to corner the market on readers who find Us Weekly too intellectual, got in a bit of a kerfuffle with Michael Yon, the photographer who took the picture that graces the magazine's first cover. (The picture of the soldier cradling the Iraqi kid, not the one of Jessica Simpson.) Seems that Yon didn't approve the use of the photo, saying in a statement, "I regularly turn down usage requests for this photo — uses that could earn money — because this photo is sacred to me and is representative of the U.S. soldiers I have come to know. It is also representative of the horrors of the enemy we all face." Hachette, for its part, claims to have "obtained publishing rights for the image from a reputable photo agency," and is looking into the matter.

No word yet on who's responsible for the incredibly hacky headline "War Is Still Hell!"

'Shock' Surprises Photographer of Cover Image [AdAge]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=177146&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Not Shockingly, 'Shock' Aims to Shock You]]> shockcover.jpgHachette's Shock magazine hits the newsstands on May 30, but early copies are floating around Mediaville, and a greasy copy has thus arrived at HQ And, dare we say, it's a thing of lowbrow beauty. If the National Enquirer bound and gagged Life and forced it to sift through Rotten.com, it would result in something like this. Cheap ($1.99), low on words (there has to be well under 1000 in the entire issue) and bravely independent of advertising (FishbowlNY dutifully notes a mere 3 ad pages), Shock just might be the perfect publication for happily deranged voyeur within us all.

Visually, the mag looks like a studly version of Us Weekly, taking the celebrity rag's signature bright pinks and purples asscracksm.jpgand beefing them up to manly reds and yellows (it even mocks Us with its own "Who Wore It Best?" feature, pitting Juliette Lewis, Flava Flav, and Thor against one another in viking hats; the jury was "seven gay homeless guys a the bus station"). Other celebrities uncensored-style treats include the requisite Kate Moss-with-blow pic from 1998, plus such gems as Eddie Van Halen's rotting teeth, Val Kilmer sucking Paris Hilton's face and, our personal favorite, the celebrity asscrack guessing game (at right, click to enlarge).

While the celebs-looking-stupid schtick is fun, it's not Shock's strong point (mostly because tinhostage.jpgone can find similar pictures on the web). Rather, its skanky allure is in its newsy photos that you don't typically see any mainstream American publication, presented in full-page, high-res fashion: a Japanese river running bright red with dolphins blood ("Blood Bath!"), a Congolese woman setting herself on fire ("Girl, Erupted!"), and children in danger ("Tiny Hostage"). They're not exactly breaking or relevant (save for the pictures from Iraq), but they certainly make for interesting eye candy.

With little more than big, crazy-ass pictures and a dash of tabloidian prose, Shock won't likely have much cultural impact or media influence. Nor is Shock particularly shocking, but it is stupidly entertaining. And it works — because for once, we're looking at a magazine that's not trying too hard.

Related: Shock Is Here! Shock Is Here! [FishbowlNY]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=176538&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Media Bubble: Was the 'Wardrobe Malfunction' Really So Terrible?]]> &#8226; Networks sue FCC to make it stand up to Parents Television Council right-wing nutjobs. One can dream. [WSJ]
&#8226; Joanne Lipman wants to steal James Stewart from The New Yorker for her new Conde biz mag — which nearly has a name. [NYP]
&#8226; More books were sold in 2005 than 2004. A sales uptick for a print medium? How unusual. [NYT]
&#8226; Former Conde editorial director James Truman has a prototype for his new Culture & Travel, which is not — not at all, he says — the art mag Si wouldn't let him do. [NYP]
&#8226; Mike Wallace once tried to kill himself. [NYDN]
&#8226; Hachette to launch Shock mag next week. It's "Life magazine for the new millennium," says founder Mike Hammer, formerly of Maxim and Stuff. We suppose this means its gross pictures — such as one of a rotting human head in the first issue — are shot by Margaret Bourke-White and Alfred Eisenstaedt. [WSJ]
&#8226; In his forthcoming bio, Ed Kosner is not very nice to Mort Zuckerman. We're just shocked. [WWD]
&#8226; Jack Shafer, de facto Times ombudsman, doesn't care for Howell Raines' new memoir. [Slate]
&#8226; NYTer Sharon LaFraniere wins $25K Michael Kelly Award. [Kelly Award]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=175093&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Media Bubble: Slow News on Good Friday]]> &#8226; Hachette looks to trim payroll costs (huh, feel like we've heard that before someplace); and Time's Jim Kelly throws a party for Joe Klein. [NYP]
&#8226; Feeling you haven't been reading enough memoirs lately? (And, really, don't we all feel like that?) Not to worry: There'll be twice as many next year. [WSJ]
&#8226; And the newspaper business continues to slowly die. [NYT]
&#8226; In new Howell Raines memoir, only two chapters of 43 are about the Jayson Blair saga. [E&P]
&#8226; Jann Wenner's longtime assistant is set to leave the company, and, remarkably for that shop, everyone likes her. [WWD]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=167359&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA['ELLEgirl' Closes; Kliger Spins]]> 20060405ellegirl.jpgELLEgirl is still shutting down, and its staffers are still confused about why. As FishbowlNY pointed out yesterday, all the mag's numbers were looking good. "We feel that it's inexplicable," a source on staff emailed. "We worked our asses off on a shoestring budget to make — sorry — the best teen magazine out there. The numbers showed it, and so did the content. It's unbelievable."

After the jump, Hachette chief Jack Kliger's staff memo, which extols the magazine's work, extols the brand's online future — ELLEgirl ringtones are coming soon! — and, curiously, says absolutely nothing about placements or severance for the mag's soon-to-be-unemployed staffers.

From Jack Kliger, president and CEO, Hachette Filipacchi Media U.S.

I am announcing today that, in light of ongoing research combined with five years of experience in the teen market, we are redirecting the strategy for the ELLEgirl brand. Following the June/July 2006 issue, ELLEgirl magazine will be discontinued, and the company will increase its substantial investment in the brand's digital formats focusing on ELLEgirl.com and wireless content.

It is always unfortunate to have to close a magazine; but today the teen market is increasingly fragmented. To effectively reach these girls, we must invest in the media where they spend most of their time and where we see our greatest growth potential.

I want to recognize that Editor-in-Chief Christina Kelly and VP/Publisher Deborah Burns have done extraordinary jobs of establishing this strong brand. ELLEgirl was twice named on the Adweek "Hot List", recognized by Delaney Report as the "Best Publication" and led in ad sales growth and newsstand growth year over year. We are thankful for their dedication and creative vision and want to extend that appreciation to their teams and the other Hachette colleagues who have been dedicated to publishing this title.

Going forward ELLEgirl.com will become the cornerstone of the brand's digital initiative. The ELLEgirl Web site, which launched before the magazine, was successfully received from the onset. In the past year alone, ELLEgirl.com has tripled its unique visitors, doubled its page views and doubled its ad revenue. ELLEgirl.com was recently listed in Media Metrix as one of the top ten teen sites.

With our partner Alloy, a leading teen marketing company, there are immediate plans for an extensive redesign, expanded content and increased staffing. This area will be managed by Marta Wohrle, VP/Director of Digital Media, and Carol Smith, SVP/ELLE group publishing director.

When teen girls are not on the Web, they are on their cell phones. Working closely with our sister company Lagardere Active North America, which launched in the U.S. eighteen months ago, we are developing ELLEgirl ring tones and wallpaper mobile pages, as well as a number of projects in the mobile blogging area.

We recognize that there are times when print works best. With this in mind, we will evaluate targeted magazine opportunities; for 2007, we are considering two themed issues which will join ELLE Accessories in the ELLE specials division.

Jack Kliger

'Elle Girl' to Fold [FBNY[
'ELLEgirl' Shuts Print Edition, Moves to Web Only [Ad Age]
Girl Trouble [WWD]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=165309&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Media Bubble: Watching O'Reilly]]> &#8226; Nick Lemann has 5,000 words on Bill O'Reilly. Which we'll get around to reading soon. [NYer]
&#8226; David Carr thinks VF, underneath all its bullshit, is actually a pretty good mag. [NYT]
&#8226; And Jon Friedman thinks that all the other magazine editors are ganging up on poor David Remnick. [MW]
&#8226; We always thought Bill Beutel was kind of a little crazy, but that's probably because we only really watched him in his later years. He helped invent Eyewitness News, and he died Saturday. [NYT]
&#8226; Bloggers "are the new media darlings," and — shockingly — many hope to get paid gigs with traditional media. [Newsday]
&#8226; More breaking insights: An attractive grad student who is raped and murdered makes for great tabloid fodder. [Baltimore Sun]
• No Hachette mags were among the Ellie finalists. Again. [
WWD]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=161653&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Hachette Filipacchi Discovers Crazy New Internet Thingie]]> Hachette Filipacchi Media, the devish Franco-publishers behind Elle, Woman's Day, Premiere, Car & Driver and a slew of others, has pioneered itself into a spanking-new corporate partnership with Zinio Systems, some techie company that plans to get all 18 of HF's titles online by early 2006. No more lugging around 3 pounds of Elle just to get some monthly sense slapped into you by E. Jean.

Since we deal mostly online (what's a newsprint?), this is a huge development. Maybe we're just a bit overexcited, but it feels like the magazine industry is hurtling towards 1999 at the speed of light!

All 18 Hachette U.S. Magazines Will Be Digital... [MIN]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=118876&view=rss&microfeed=true