• Profile logout login

#im#discussed

Gawker

Share Cancel
   
Upload an image | Add an image URL
×

logging in
  • FAQ. Include # before tag:
  • #tips,
  • #stalker,
  • #opencaption,
  • #internalmemos,
  • etc.

New York, 7:12 AM
Thu Nov 12
59 posts in the last 24 hours

Team

Tip Your Editors:
tips@gawker.com
Tipline: 646-214-8138

Editor-in-Chief:
Gabriel Snyder | Email

West Coast Editor:
Richard Rushfield | Email

Contributing Editors:

Valleywag:
Ryan Tate | Email

Media:
Hamilton Nolan | Email

Politics:
Alex Pareene | Email

Investigations:
John Cook | Email

Entertainment:
Brian Moylan | Email

Weekends:
Foster Kamer | Email

Video Editor:
Richard Blakeley | Email

SUBSCRIBE TO Gawker RSS

New: Breaking news and daily top stories via email
4260 Subscribers
Gawker
  • Your version of Internet Explorer is not supported. Please upgrade to the most recent version in order to view comments.
    Dsmvwl  Admin  Promote to frontpage Approve user Ban user ×
    Image of macbeach macbeach
    01/18/09

    In reply to Obama's Staff Facing Life Without IM
    Why should text of any kind (e-mail, IM, or something else) be on the record and voice be off? I see no reason not to have a public record of all phone calls as well. there should be no distinctions made based on the FORM of the message.


    On the other hand, you have a perceived right of privacy for certain personal communications that have nothing to do with public policy. You have a need for ultra-secrecy in other communications regarding foreign policy etc. And then you have all sorts of things in between those two extremes.


    It's hard to imaging a solution that addresses all these needs simultaneously and at the same time is actually usable. Even if the President is perfect in deciding which category a particular IM fits into, all the people he might be IMing will NOT be perfect and there will be leakage from one type of message to another.


    Of course the Obama administration won't be helped by the left's obsession with Bush, including downright outrage that they carried (gasp) cell phones.


    Gotta roll back all those illegally obtained Presidential powers you know?

     Reply
    macbeach was starred macbeach was unstarred
    Image of Uncle_Billy_Slumming Uncle_Billy_Slumming
    01/18/09

    @macbeach: This expresses something I've been thinking about for a while. I would go further. All conversations of politicians and the people who work for them to be recorded during working hours. You want the life, you submit to complete transparency. I guess they could still cook up the pork through their wives, but seems like it would cut way down on the corruption.
     Reply
    Uncle_Billy_Slumming was starred Uncle_Billy_Slumming was unstarred
    Image of MincnglyWhrdL'mer MincnglyWhrdL'mer
    01/18/09

    In reply to Obama's Staff Facing Life Without IM
    um, I have a possibly very stupid question. where I work, we pass thru a log in screen reminding us of the fines for HIPPA violations, every time we log in


    is in inconceivable to create an IM system with a reminder that your IM's are being archived, something which would remain in the header AT ALL TIMES? I'm no tech guy - tell me if this is an incredibly dumb idea, pls.

     Reply
    MincnglyWhrdL'mer was starred MincnglyWhrdL'mer was unstarred
    Image of FourInchHeels FourInchHeels
    01/18/09

    @Monsigor Xtravagante D'ouchestache★: Not a dumb idea at all, it makes a lot of sense. My last job had the same thing. It was a civil engineering firm in a large office on many floors, so IM was often the easiest way to bounce a quick idea off of someone three floors away.


    I don't know how often the system would be abused - in my experience, most office gossip happened in person; most people kept the IMs professional.

     Reply
    FourInchHeels was starred FourInchHeels was unstarred
    Image of 18thCFox 18thCFox
    01/18/09

    In reply to Obama's Staff Facing Life Without IM
    Here's the thing about not having 24-hour instant access to everyone you know: you learn to manage your time better at work, you t figure out things for yourself instead of messaging people for the answers, you learn to write down a list of messages or questions to send people and when you roll into the office you do it all in one go. Obama's administration is arleady super-streamlined, the exact opposite of the shambling operation of the last Democratic administration. Shutting off the white noise that IM services provide will make them even more focused.
     Reply
    18thCFox was starred 18thCFox was unstarred
    Image of PandoraSpocks PandoraSpocks
    01/18/09

    @18thCFox: That's how I feel, too.
     Reply
    PandoraSpocks was starred PandoraSpocks was unstarred
    Image of spitneybeers spitneybeers
    01/18/09

    @18thCFox: Are you old? You sound old.
     Reply
    spitneybeers was starred spitneybeers was unstarred
    Image of 18thCFox 18thCFox
    01/18/09

    @spitneybeers: I'm 25. Not everyone that is intelligent is old.
     Reply
    18thCFox was starred 18thCFox was unstarred
    Image of FourInchHeels FourInchHeels
    01/18/09

    @18thCFox: Interestingly, not everyone who is old is intelligent!


    *pointed glance at the monkey who is mercifully vacating office in TWO DAYS!*

     Reply
    FourInchHeels was starred FourInchHeels was unstarred
    Image of CaptainFantastic CaptainFantastic
    01/19/09

    @18thCFox: Yes. No one can make a decision for themselves anymore.
     Reply
    CaptainFantastic was starred CaptainFantastic was unstarred
    Image of Duke Duke
    01/18/09

    In reply to Obama's Staff Facing Life Without IM
    Wasn't he on Hill Street Blues?
     Reply
    Duke was starred Duke was unstarred
    Image of jasonelias jasonelias
    01/18/09

    @Duke: Yep. Officer Leo Benedetti 85-86 season.
     Reply
    jasonelias was starred jasonelias was unstarred
    Image of tunamelt tunamelt
    01/18/09

    In reply to Obama's Staff Facing Life Without IM
    Dude, AIM saves all your AIM convos. I have some from 2005.
     Reply
    tunamelt was starred tunamelt was unstarred
    Image of GirlyWhirl GirlyWhirl
    01/18/09

    In reply to Obama's Staff Facing Life Without IM
    Looks like Axelrod is gearing up to go to some of those leather parties scheduled in D.C.
     Reply
    GirlyWhirl was starred GirlyWhirl was unstarred
    Image of jasonelias jasonelias
    01/18/09

    In reply to Obama's Staff Facing Life Without IM
    There's always carrier pigeons. They could also hire a young boy from the '40s to deliver messages from a sandwich board
     Reply
    jasonelias was starred jasonelias was unstarred
    Earlier discussions Other discussions Show all discussions Show featured discussions only Start a new discussion

Login

Enter your username and password.

Please enter a username.
Please enter your password.
logging in
Login via Facebook | Sign Up | Forgot Password?

Reset Password

Please enter your email address to have your password reset.

Please enter your email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
requesting password reset

Register

Registering will give you a user profile and the ability to add other users as friends. To become a commenter, however, you need to audition.

Want to know more? Consult the Comment FAQ and legal terms.

Please enter a username.
Please enter a password.
Please confirm your password.
Passwords are not identical.
Please enter a valid email address.
registration sent, waiting for reply

Submit Your Comment

You don't need to login to comment. Just enter your email address below.

See how your address will be displayed in the Comment FAQ.

Please enter a valid email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
logging in

Login with your Facebook or Gawker account.

Sign up here.



  • Archives
  • About
  • Advertising
  • Legal
  • Help
  • Report a Bug
  • FAQ
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.