<![CDATA[Gawker: image]]> http://tags.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gawker.com.png <![CDATA[Gawker: image]]> http://gawker.com/tag/image http://gawker.com/tag/image <![CDATA[Fundamentally Dishonest Industries: 'Love Us!']]> "There's an old saying, 'The cobbler's children have no shoes,'" flacks would say to me every single fucking time I wrote about the PR industry's reputation, at my old job. Advertising people: equally bad.

Any time that people who work in industries that are widely despised by the public get together for some sort of conference, the real underlying topic of conversation is "Why don't they like us?"

The answer, of course, is that they are all, to varying degrees, con artists, by profession, and quite well paid for it, so STFU. But still, everyone wants to be liked! The topic of the latest ad agency conference? You guessed it, it's about how to get people to like ad people!

THE advertising industry needs to do a better job of advertising itself, speakers and attendees at the 2009 American Association of Advertising Agencies leadership conference here said.

That rebranding began close to home. On Tuesday, the association's president and chief executive, Nancy Hill, announced the group would now go by the name 4A's, since the "American" was too limited (advertisers do business internationally), as was "Advertising Agencies" (firms now offer public relations services as well).

There's a winning strategy: Burnish your image by pointing out that you're now flacks, too. We'll be reading this same story for next year's conference, and on unto infinity, the end.
[NYT]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5232601&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[The Editorial Dream Lifestyle is Dead]]> Remember Sex and the City? Where writing a dating column for a living supported Carrie's extravagant lifestyle? Well, those days are over. As is your hope for a luxurious life. The middle class is back!

Confessions of a Shopaholic is out now, starring an imaginary magazine writer who's able to be, you know, a Shopaholic. This is not even remotely workable in reality any longer, no matter how you contort your imagination. Former Radar editor Willa Paskin points out what's become only too obvious to all of us boots on the ground: magazine work is not the path to upper class lifestyle. Make up another dream job for aspiring Queens of New York, Hollywood:

If Shopaholic and its ilk are short on the paltry pay, long on the stilettos, that's partially thanks to the fact that very few people have a clear idea of what an editor actually does all day (or what they get paid to do it). The title has become shorthand for a creative, fun, professional white-collar job that involves very few set tasks. Since the particulars of the profession are so little known, screenwriters are free to present magazine work (inaccurately, it sadly turns out) as the ultimate fantasy, which requires employees to attend fancy fetes and photo shoots, groom and gossip compulsively, date handsome men and spend zero time on e-mail.

In fact, the lifestyle elements most magazine workers currently have in common are layoffs, pay cuts, student loan debt, and overwork. Whee, the Big Apple! But really, it's nothing to feel bad about. The idea that you could come to the big city and live the life of an heiress while working in such a pedestrian field as the print media was mostly a pipe dream from day one; and for those who did manage to do it, it was a passing anomaly.

You know who's happy about all this? The actually rich.

The survey, which polled 108 private jet owners with a mean net worth $116 million, found that 94% of those surveyed defined luxury as "for oneself," rather than for the masses (2.8%). That marks a big change from last year, when 37% agreed that luxury should also be for the masses...

"What you're seeing is a shift to real elitism," says Russ Alan Prince, the president of Prince Assoc. "The rich like it better that everybody can't be part of the luxury boom anymore."

See you guys at Gray's Papaya tonight! Then maybe Netflix? [Daily Beast, WSJ]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5153319&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Private Jets: PR Poison]]> It used to be that private planes inspired hatred simply because their occupants were probably over-wealthy environmental hypocrites. But thanks to the recession, private jets are an even more radioactive populist issue. Fly and die!

Sure, private planes were always an easy target. They're incredibly expensive, they're luxurious to an offensive degree, and they destroy our precious, precious ozone layer warm our planet till everything dies for the comfort of the rich. Plus, as commercial airline travel got more and more terrible and inconvenient, the average person's desire for the rich to share in that pain grew.

But now it's on a whole other level. Private jets are now resented, merely for existing! You could see the issue taking shape when there was the big outcry over the GM executives flying private to Washington to ask for bailout money. And now the new consensus seems to be: if your crappy failure of a company got any bailout funds from taxpayers, riding in a private jet for anything but the strictest business reason is a PR disaster.

The Post slammed Citigroup exec Sandy Weill this weekend for charging the company to fly him and his family to a Mexican resort for Christmas. Today, he's swearing off jets, just like that!

Weill used the jet to fly him and his family to the One & Only Palmilla beachfront resort in San Jose del Cabo, Mexico, where they stayed from Dec. 26 through Jan. 3. The cost of using the plane was estimated at $70,550 to $90,550.

The jaunt came just weeks after Citigroup, which has lost $28.2 billion over the past five quarter, avoided total collapse with a $45 billion federal bailout, courtesy of taxpayers.

What a bastard! But what's coming is not just anger at abuse of private jets; soon it will be taboo for business people to ride a private plane for any reason. With all the layoffs and stupid corporate recession cutbacks, it will just be considered unconscionable. What kind of capitalist monster could blithely go burning thousands of gallons of jet fuel just so they don't have to associate with the unwashed masses?

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5144312&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Black Professionals in Ad Industry: 5%]]> The ad industry doesn't have too many black people working in it, which has never been that much of a concern to the whites. Until now, because a fancy lawyer might start suing everybody:

Cyrus Mehri is the lawyer (who has sued the hell out of plenty of big corporations before), and for months his firm has been investigating the racial situation on MAD AVE. Numbers:

Blacks remain underrepresented on Madison Avenue, according to the report, “Research Perspectives on Race and Employment in the Advertising Industry,” which concluded that only 5.3 percent of managers and professionals at agencies in 2008 were black.

And those blacks who do manage to land jobs on Madison Avenue are significantly underpaid, the report said, earning 80 cents for each dollar earned by their white counterparts.

Not to mention:

Compared with the overall U.S. labor market, the advertising industry fares significantly worse on eight measures of employment for black managers and professionals — by an average of 36.7%.

Mehri wants to get the industry to make changes voluntarily, which he's had success doing elsewhere in the past. If not he will surely sue their asses.

[Ad Age, NYT]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5127383&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Banks Now Just Trying Every Possible Ad]]> The economy's in trouble. Have you heard? Banks would be much happier if you hadn't, but alas, that dude who was repossessing your car probably said something about it. So now our financial institutions are faced with their toughest challenge: deciding what kind of ads to run. They can't do anything about the actual economy—your money is toast. But maybe they can make you feel better about it! Does JPMorgan Chase see a smile on your face? Yes, JPMorgan Chase does!

There are a few different strategies. Some, like failed failure WaMu, use humor, along the lines of "We've dragged our dessicated carcass to a safe place now. LOL!"

Others are going for the old "reassure you despite all evidence to the contrary" tactic:

In advertising, many financial institutions are racing to reassure consumers with soothing messages — that focus on important “S” words: strength, safety, stability, security.

“There is a safe and smart place to put your money,” ads for Commerce Bank tell newspaper readers.

Simultaneously, some institutions are continuing to communicate as if the recent upheavals had not happened. Ads for Discover Financial Services, for instance, try to coax consumers to sign up for yet another credit card, offering enticements like free balance transfers.

Ha, well I guess that's appropriate. The truth is advertising is just a buffet of bad options right now for banks. They can laugh it off and look stupid. They can try to reassure you and look like liars. Or they can try the "straight talk" approach and scare you even worse than you already are.

Or they can do what the FDIC did and hire scary blond Suze Orman. Which is the worst option of all. [NYT]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5059935&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Corporate Bullshit At Its Finest]]> The whole concept of "branding" is a vacuous hustle, the majority of the time. You can spend outrageous amounts of money "improving" your "brand" with only vague ideas and doublespeak. Nowhere is this more evident than in "rebranding" and logo redesign and shit like that, that could be accomplished by one guy with a pencil in 45 minutes, but instead is farmed out to consultants for ridiculous sums. Mindshare, a big media agency, just paid half a million bucks for this:



The network’s branding retains the signature colour purple, which was established at its inception, but includes a complete refresh of the agency’s brandmark and visual identity. The new brandmark consists of a bespoke wordmark and Mindshare’s new partner symbol. The symbol has been created to reflect the structure and form of Mindshare’s business. It shows two forms coming together to create a new, strong form reflecting Mindshare’s partnerships with clients, suppliers and other agencies. The flow of colour symbolises the flow of creativity across the business and the segmentation mirrors the bringing together of specialist expertise within Mindshare’s “open source” approach to client business which enhances a platform neutral approach. The bespoke wordmark shows Mindshare in upper case [as shown above]. When written in prose Mindshare no longer has the upper case “S” previously used – hence the company’s name will now be written Mindshare and not MindShare. In visual form on the printed page, this will represent the agency’s new simplified approach, re-engineering its structure from more than a dozen separate specialist departments to four integrated, collaborative groups: Client Leadership, Business Planning, Invention and The Exchange. The bold new brandmark expresses Mindshare’s progressive attitude to new technology and the connected way in which the network views the media landscape.

Idiots. [via AgencySpy]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5054329&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Financial Brands In The Toilet]]> Every year "brand consultancy" (the fake industry to get into, btw) Interbrand puts out a numerical ranking of the world's "best" brands. They have a long bit in the press release about their methodology, but I always assume they just count up the Google hits for "(Brand) sucks." The new list is out, and it seems to follow the "sucks" method to perfection:

For the eighth year in a row Coke is the world's best brand, (drug joke). The biggest gainers this year were Google, Apple, and Amazon; the group of biggest losers included financial brands like Merrill Lynch (#1 loser with a bullet!), Morgan Stanley, and Citi. As you would expect.

Also plunging into massive suckdom: Ford and The Gap.

The lesson here is that in order to have a strong band, be massive yet innocuous-to-boring. I am now a brand consultant. Here's the top 20:

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5052304&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[YourCompanySucks.Com]]> Sure, the internet is great, but you never know when some disgruntled person will go out and register a domain name that has to do with you. So 35% of companies "own the domain name for their brand followed by the word 'sucks.'" As well they should! Some companies are more thorough than others. Xerox has XeroxStinks.com and IHateXerox.org, for example, whereas Dell could buy DellIsEvil.com, but doesn't think it's worth it. Either way, it's clear corporations aren't doing their homework—the following domain names are, unconscionably, still available right this minute for anyone to buy:

  • Dellcapturedandrapedmydaughter.com
  • Xeroxcorporationslippedmearoofie.com
  • Walmarttouchedundermyclothingwithoutconsent.com
  • IBMrunsacockfightingring.com
  • Gawkermediahasmetieduppleasehelpmeohgod.com

[WSJ]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5045842&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Rafael Nadal: Mature In Neon]]> You thought that Rafael Nadal's pensive, shirtless pose on the back cover of New York magazine last week was just one more coup by the mag's upscale media trendsetters? Think again! Nadal himself—or, more accurately, his corporate overseer Nike—is in the midst of remaking his entire image, shifting it from that of a wild young ball-slinger to something "more mature" (and better able to sell polo shirts). The first casualty: his capri pants. Sorry, ladies:

Now, as Mr. Nadal sets his sights on the U.S. Open, the hunky rebel known for his muscle shirts, capri-length pants and bandanna will morph into more of a traditionalist, starting with his on-court wardrobe.The shift appears part of a larger strategy by Mr. Nadal's tight-knit management team to transform the sublime baseliner from a teenage heartthrob into a grown-up star.

Supposedly Nadal himself has now grown up and spontaneously decided to update his image. But he's "worked closely" with Nike designers to build himself a new wardrobe composed of polo shirts (with mesh side panels!) in "chlorine blue, orange blaze, white and concord [purple]." All at the expense of boring old has-been Roger Federer. Your move, Anna Wintour.

[WSJ]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5041254&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Activists Demand More Married Boning On TV]]> The sad television image: while single people run around coupling with any and all sweaty bodies in their path, married people are sick of each other and never have sex. Not tonight, honey! The happier truth: in real life married people actually do have sex! Or so we hear. This disconnect is a matter of concern to certain segments of the right wing pro-marriage fringe, who feel that TV's bias against showing boring husband-and-wife sex is—I don't know—making people not get married? It's unclear. What we know for sure is that our networks must do more to promote fucking within marriage; particularly NBC, which has an obvious preference for "bestiality and necrophilia":

In 46 hours of programming, NBC contained only one reference to marital sex, but 11 references to nonmarital sex and one reference to adultery. On NBC, there were as many depictions of adults having sex with minors as there were scenes implying or depicting sex between married partners...

References to incest, pedophilia, partner swapping, prostitution, threesomes, transsexuals/transvestites, bestiality and necrophilia combined outnumbered references to sex in marriage on NBC by a ratio of 27 to 1.

[Ad Age]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5033670&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[You Can't Trademark Sexy]]> sexyhair2.jpegI don't claim to be an expert on hair, or sexiness, but I'd be willing to wager that far fewer people have heard of "Sexy Hair Concepts LLC" than have heard of Victoria's Secret. Nevertheless, Sexy Hair Concepts somehow managed to persuade a Trademark Board that "consumers were likely to confuse the lingerie giant's 'So Sexy' trademark for haircare items with Sexy Hair Concepts' various trademarks using the word 'sexy' for its coiffure line." Consumers will be wandering around in a sheer sexiness daze! Victoria's Secret's response to the ruling: you trademark people must be crazy:

In papers filed in Manhattan Federal Court, Victoria's Secret said it wants the court to consider a study it conducted.

The survey found only five of 308 people who bought hair care products associated the word "sexy" with a single company and made any reference to Sexy Hair Concepts and its offerings.

Victoria's Secret, which also introduced the Very Sexy bra, said its study proves "that the word 'sexy' has not acquired distinctiveness among purchasers of hair care products."

To be fair, if Sexy Hair Concepts loses their Sexy monopoly, they will have some serious branding problems. Their product line:


sexyhair.jpeg

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=393327&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Your Brand Is Crap]]> stupidbrands.jpegBrandTags.net is a website with a deceptively simple idea: it shows you a brand's logo, and you enter the first word that comes to mind. Then it combines all the thousands of responses into a tag cloud, showing the overall consumer perception of each brand. Smart! So what great truths do these responses show, besides the fact that many people associate Adidas with "shoes?" They show that your brand is crap, stupid, and sucks! Corporate image gurus, take note:

Brands that are "Crap": Ford, H&M, Myspace, Mcdonald's, AT&T.

Brands that are "Stupid": Evian, Twitter, YouTube, MTV, Harley-Davidson.

Brands that are "Retarded": Skype, Microsoft, Twitter, MTV, London 2012.

Brands that are "Douchebag": Blackberry, Dodge, BMW, Puma, Corona

Brands that are "Suck": Yahoo, London 2012, Skype, HP, Microsoft

[Brand Tags via WSJ]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=390401&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[The Kiddies Are Abandoning Miley Cyrus!]]> hannahmontana.jpegHannah Montana, the kids' show starring exploited teenager (or, alternately, picture-posing strumpet) Miley Cyrus, ran its first new episode in two months last Sunday. And the ratings were down 24%! Could this be the end for our hero—done in by Annie Leibovitz, Vanity Fair, and a child-unfriendly wave of bad publicity?

The Daily News' Richard Huff points out that ratings for the previous episode, which aired before the photo controversy broke, were also down:

Compared to the first original show of the year, which aired in January, viewership for Sunday's show was down 33%.

That suggests the hubbub over series star Miley Cyrus' questionable photos in Vanity Fair neither helped nor hurt with viewership. Rather, "Hannah" was on a decline before the photo dustup.

Disney CEO Bob Iger has the obligatory quote about how the Miley "franchise" is "incredibly robust." But Huff suggest that she could already be on an inevitable downward slide, at least among young fans. Which would certainly cause her advisers to tell her to grow up, quick.


Experience shows that kid franchises such as "Hannah" that hit the rare white-hot phase are good for roughly 18 months, then start to fade.

"Hannah Montana" had been the top-rated show with young viewers the past two seasons, but because of the slow rollout this year, the heat has moved to the "Wizards of Waverly Place," starring Selena Gomez (who has appeared on "Hannah"), which now holds the slot as Disney's top show.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=388021&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[9/11 Ads Are Just A Bad Idea]]> WTCad2.jpegYou'd think at some point, in a creative review meeting, some advertising exec would stand up and say, "Maybe the 9-11 picture's not such a good idea." Such a simple sentence. But no! The latest example of incorporating a nationally traumatic terrorist mass murder into an ad: this spot for SABC Radio [via AdScam], with the tagline "There's More To See On Radio." Such as the Twin Towers burning. So hey, listen to the radio! Click through for a larger image, and pictures of the five worst 9-11 ads we've covered in the past:

WTCad.jpg

Greatest Hits: Smoking Is Terrorism

ashad.jpeg


At Least It Helped Literacy In Spain

ElPaiswtc2.jpeg


Scary Foreshadowing By Pakistani Airlines

pakistanad.jpg


Nature Has 9-11 Too!

nature911.jpeg


MTV Is Concerned About Hunger As Well As 9-11

mtv911.jpeg


]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=382136&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Shocking The Public With Scorpions]]> scorpionpic.jpegWhat is the single most repellent image that humans can conjure up? Apparently, it's scorpions. Trendhunter has a list of the Top 50 "Shockvertisements" in recent history—ads that stirred up a controversy. The most common thread, obviously, is sex; but three different campaigns on the list chose to shock people by picturing scorpions. Scorpions that are touching you! Advertisers find that no other bug comes close in its ability to disgust. Below, pictures of the three scorpion ads: one is shocking but effective, one is weird but effective, and one is just misguided.

In France, the scorpion represents the threat of AIDS. Always use condoms when having sex with a scorpion

scorpionad.jpeg


This scorpion-shaped carrot is Greenpeace's way of scaring you away from genetically engineered vegetables. That is some nasty engineering.

scorpionad2.jpeg


Stella Espresso Coffee should probably fire the ad agency that decided to depict the "bite" of their coffee with an image of a scorpion crawling up some lady's nose.

scorpionad3.jpeg

[via Adrants]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=373054&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Classic Kellogg's Ads: Pep, Poop, Freedom]]> kellogs3.jpegBack in the 1930s and 40s, Kellogg's cereal was a steamroller. It didn't have all types of boutique designer cereals to compete against, so you were damn well going to eat it. And Kellogg's wasn't shy in positioning itself. It's not just something you consume; its products will cure constipation, calm your nerves, and give your man the PEP he needs to do you all night long, baby. Not to mention: single-serving Kellogg's boxes defeated Hitler. All that, and a 13-year-old girl in—I'm sorry—ugly clothes, after the jump.

kellogs2.jpg


kellogs.jpg


kellogs4.jpg


kellogs5.jpg

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=372903&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[No More Mornings For Reagan Ad Man]]> reaganad.jpegSan Francisco-based advertising guru Hal Riney died this week at the age of 75. He masterminded a ton of corporate ad campaigns, but he'll go down in the history books as the man whose ads helped re-elect Ronald Reagan in 1984 [NYT]. His masterpiece for Reagan was "It's Morning Again In America," a minute-long spot that reassured Americans that everything is okay—with the rich, fatherly voice-over provided by Riney himself. Barack Obama really could have used this guy for the next several months. After the jump, the full version of Riney's "Morning Again" spot. Welfare moms probably didn't appreciate its success.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=372356&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Dove Abandons Real Women For Alicia Keys]]> aliciakeys.jpegRemember that whole "Campaign For Real Beauty" by Dove that was all about showing that real, non-model women can be pretty too? Well, they're moving on from all that. They have a new, more fitting face now: beautiful, famous, shapely singer Alicia Keys. Screw you, real women! Dove is sponsoring a new "micro-series" called "Fresh Takes" starring Keys. It will air, appropriately, during The Hills on MTV. They've also used research to uncover this critical fact: "96 percent of women in their twenties say their inner voice speaks to them on a typical day." Psychosis? From the looks of the preview, this show will be stilted and terrible; the trailer, after the jump.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=371564&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[The Next Ironic L Train Accessory]]> When iPods first came out, you obviously had to replace the headphones so no one would think you were showing off that you had an iPod. But then everyone started doing that, so you went back to the white headphones to prove that you couldn't give a fuck if people knew what kind of mp3 player you had. Plus, you weren't going to get caught in the consumer cycle of buying unnecessary goods to validate your uniqueness. But now people are starting to catch on to that, so the only way out is to buy this new colossal mp3 player for $21.99. With 256 mb and a stunning quartz crystal display, it says, "I care about the music, not my image." [via The Triumph of Bullshit]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=367931&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Joe Francis Entrusts His Reputation To Professionals]]> joefrancis.jpegSoftcore porn king and "Girls Gone Wild" founder Joe Francis was set free today after spending the past year in a Nevada jail. He pleaded no contest to charges of filming naked underage girls, and was let off with time served . Who is he turning to to rehabilitate his shattered image during this critical period? None other than woman-cursing flack Ronn [sic] Torossian's 5WPR, home to more than a few disgruntled ex-staffers. Francis worked with 5W before, and I guess the whole "women as stupid cunts" angle does fit in with his normal M.O. Rock on! [TMZ] UPDATE: And here is Ronn's perfectly tone deaf quote to the media about Francis:

His publicist, Ronn Torossian, said the jiggle-happy entrepreneur planned to return to his home in Los Angeles later tonight.

"He's looking forward to watching Girls Gone Wild movies and is excited about the launch of the magazine," the rep said. "We're going to be doing some things tonight in L.A. with family and friends."

[via E! Online]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=367073&view=rss&microfeed=true