On a side note, what is that thing she is wearing around her neck? A ring of fossilized used condoms? Aboriginal chewed kangaroo neckbone, fastened together with paper clips? Or maybe limited production claymation set supplies from the Mr. Bill Show? What? Please tell me.
@DoctorNine: Watch out, Bill, she'll eat you up (Oh, oh, here she comes, she's a man-eater...) btw, are those sprinkles in your eyes? Come closer, my little dough-boy...
@BookishLookish: Thank you. And hate to join the parade, but yes that numeral in her name was distracting. Like, some Chinese restaurant superstition thing. What's wrong with "Eight"? Spelled out at least it would look reassuringly sort of Jewish.
@Balsa Wood: Look, I don't know who's responsible, you or your parents, and it doesn't matter anyway. But this is what happens when you browse the internet without SafeSearch being properly activated: You might get occasional, abstract exposure to bewbs.
@Balsa Wood: Just because your tits are made of a light wood best used to carve out airplanes by Boy Scouts, don't take it out on me, sugar pop. Green is so not your color.
Really a masterful series of insights here. Maybe I just set my sights too high after that great party post yesterday. Then again, maybe I didn't. Some posts are going to be better, just like some are going to be worse. Having high hopes could have led to me getting smoked. Then again, I thought it was worth the gamble.
But you never know. How much would I pay to read Gawker right now? I don't have an e-reader. But am I less likely to come back? Changing that dynamic is what Gawker needs to worry about.
Ha: "Today, four prestigious magazine publishers, and News Corp..." Appreciate Murdoch's not in the mag biz, but still qualifies as a veiled swipe in my book - er, tablet/slate/e-thingy.
I only know what's in the post and under the link and yes, my initial instinct was to make a Pathfinder joke.
But I don't see why this couldn't complement a publication's website and perhaps provide them with some extra income.
Off the top of my head - A lot of magazine sites don't include the pretty pictures and this appears to let them to publish in the original layout.
Right now it's just the big boys, but if they open it up to smaller publications, it could be a boon for them.
I know that I sometimes see something on Hulu that's on a network, I don't get, so I'll sample it. The same could be true with this service, though it may sound a little like Pathfinder, but a one-stop electronic newsstand could introduce someone to a tiny publication from a regional source.
And though it may not be part of the current thinking, but if they make some of the additional advertising location-aware, they'll have another source of income, they can't access right now. Not to mention that adding location info to their formally static ads could give their sales a needed boost.
(For example, A Starbucks ad could include a map to the nearest location or a Holiday Inn Express advertisement could list those on the road ahead.)
@Magister: PS) Location-aware advertising could also open up untapped ad markets. Right now, there's not a lot of supermarket ads in magazines because supermarkets are regional, but if the magazine knew where you were in the country, they could serve you whatever Kroger division is nearby.
(Though of course, your e-reader would have to know where you are)
You shouldn't let the horrible buzz words make you too bearish on the e-Reader versions of magazines. What magazine people are good at -- making pretty packages out of words and pictures over the course of days, weeks and months -- has never translated well to the web. The magazine publishers' various stabs at creating ways to sell digital versions of their work to people with shiny new e-Readers represent a much more promising path to survival than anything newspapers have come up with.
@Gabriel Snyder: A valiant effort, for sure. But I'm not convinced. In some ways, it seems a lot like they're trying to sell me a glossy .pdf. And that did not work the last time. However, if they start shutting down their sites in favor of e-reader content, that could be a huge shift. But competing against the web is never a safe bet. Someone can turn mediocre content into a huge numbers game just by offering it up for free.
01:10 PM
12:37 AM
cuz 7 8 9.
12/09/09
12/09/09
12/09/09
12/09/09
Well.... she certainly was agile enough to dodge the label "interesting"....
12/09/09
12/09/09
12/09/09
12/09/09
12/09/09
12/09/09
I h8ted reading her overly-cutesy bullshit.
12/09/09
12:49 AM
Sorry, but it's a rough world out there.
12:58 AM
She does seem to have a lot of luck.
02:13 AM
11:30 AM
12:51 PM
Okay, that might've been a little awkward/obscure.
12/09/09
12/09/09
12/09/09
12/09/09
12/09/09
12/09/09
12/09/09
12/08/09
But you never know. How much would I pay to read Gawker right now? I don't have an e-reader. But am I less likely to come back? Changing that dynamic is what Gawker needs to worry about.
12/08/09
12/08/09
12/08/09
But I don't see why this couldn't complement a publication's website and perhaps provide them with some extra income.
Off the top of my head - A lot of magazine sites don't include the pretty pictures and this appears to let them to publish in the original layout.
Right now it's just the big boys, but if they open it up to smaller publications, it could be a boon for them.
I know that I sometimes see something on Hulu that's on a network, I don't get, so I'll sample it. The same could be true with this service, though it may sound a little like Pathfinder, but a one-stop electronic newsstand could introduce someone to a tiny publication from a regional source.
And though it may not be part of the current thinking, but if they make some of the additional advertising location-aware, they'll have another source of income, they can't access right now. Not to mention that adding location info to their formally static ads could give their sales a needed boost.
(For example, A Starbucks ad could include a map to the nearest location or a Holiday Inn Express advertisement could list those on the road ahead.)
12/08/09
(Though of course, your e-reader would have to know where you are)
12/08/09
12/08/09