<![CDATA[Gawker: issues]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gawker.com.png <![CDATA[Gawker: issues]]> http://gawker.com/tag/issues http://gawker.com/tag/issues <![CDATA[ Retailer Pulls Catalogs With Death Camp-Thin Models—Can We Get Some Pictures? ]]> The president of a venerable Montreal retailer is pulling some 450,000 of the the store's catalogs because he decided the models were too thin. Says Peter Simons of La Maison Simons, who claims he was on vacation when the catalogs were printed: "We are into social responsibility here.... I'm fully aware of what it is and I'm taking full responsibility… It's my job to ensure that we are a constructive actor in the community. I should have done better. I should have seen it." Well, holy overblown contrition, Pete, it's not like you asked the models to watch you masturbate like I hear is the retailing executive custom up there in Montreal! In any case, this is the most emaciated-looking picture I could find on the internet from the La Maison Simons catalog — its private label is called "Twik" — so for good measure thought I'd go back and upload my favorite pic from the pages of that other great publication and crusader against eating disorders, Teen Vogue.

That's more like it!

]]>
Thu, 28 Aug 2008 17:28:09 EDT Moe http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5043169&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Kate Beckinsale Demands a Booty Double ]]> Katebeckinsalefriskedattheairpor-1Flaming hot Underworld star Kate Beckinsale thinks her butt's too big! "She has a slim, toned figure that most women would die for. But Kate Beckinsale has demanded a body double for her latest film—because she 'loathes' her bottom. Producers have had to hire a £1,000-a-day nude stand-in after Kate, 34, refused to bare her derriere in a shower scene. In the past the actress, who earns £3.2million for a film, has not been shy of squeezing into sexy clothing and almost showed her bottom in Uncovered in 1994. But a source on her new film Whiteout said: 'Kate has a terrible self-image. She thinks she is fat and she is always complaining how certain outfits make her bottom look big. Of course, the reality is that she has the most amazing body.'" Almost showed her bottom in Uncovered you say? Screen grab after the jump!

Article-1026531-019Bbf8800000578-733 468X349-1

[Daily Mail]

]]>
Sun, 15 Jun 2008 13:08:16 EDT ian spiegelman http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5016574&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Nick Kristof's Sexy Sex Speech ]]> Times columnist Nicholas Kristof, who is much better at heroically rescuing orphans from warzones than he is at writing a regular political column, has a very great and original idea. He thinks that Barack Obama, who is now the Democratic nominee for president, should write and deliver a speech about gender, much like he did about race, that one time. What a great and original suggestion! We loved the idea when some HuffPo lady suggested it back in April, when Slate ladies suggested it for Hillary in March, when Ellen Goodman suggested it in May, and we love it now. Unlike all those ladies who suggested it, though, Kristof has manly suggestions for a manly speech on gender issues.

Obama should point out shocking facts like "We aren't always aware of our biases" (people love to be told that!) and "A conservative may end up the first woman president" (why would Obama say this??) and "Politics can make a difference for women" (can it get them a MAN? lol j/k).

Then he suggests that Obama use this speech on gender issues, the speech it would probably condescending for him to make, as it usually is when smart boys play "feminist," to save all the ladies and babies in Iraq and Africa, which, while a very noble and important cause, really has fuck-all to do with the gender issues that colored coverage of Hillary Clinton's campaign and exposed deep reservoirs of sexism in the American body politic.

Then Kristof invites you to comment on this column on his Facebook page! You can be a Knight or a Vampire.

The Sex Speech [NYT]

]]>
Thu, 12 Jun 2008 11:05:22 EDT Pareene http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5015810&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Public Will Pay For Checked Bags Over The Airline Industry's Cold, Dead Body ]]> americanair.jpegOne night last week I found myself watching the NBC Nightly News—a rare occurrence, because I am not yet old. The lead story was about how American Airlines was going to start charging a $15 fee for each checked bag. Grumbling! Populist outrage! What will these dang companies do next?! It became clear at that early moment that despite the economic necessity of the move, American was going to get absolutely slammed in the court of public opinion. And now the verdict is in: they did!

The company had a big PR plan in place for the announcement: talking points, economic facts, carefully crafted statements. Which was all a big waste of time, because people are going to be pissed about losing their sacred bag-checking rights, high oil prices be damned:

"We understood that consumers would be frustrated with another fee," said Mike Flanagan, senior VP at Weber Shandwick, American's public-relations shop of record. "Precisely for that reason; we did our best to communicate the full impact that oil is having on our business." Predictably, the public had little sympathy...

Regardless of American's honesty, consumers were still angered by the fee. "It's only a matter of time before airlines begin charging for our carry-on bag," wrote one commenter on Chris Elliott's travel blog. Blogs such as Sky Talk gauged traveler reaction, including a flier who said that "they're trying to nickel and dime us for too many things."

Hey, Joe Public, you're right: It is only a matter of time before they start charging you for carry on bags. Along with food and everything else on planes these days. The alternative is to raise ticket prices. But of course, the airlines can't do that because of... populist outrage!

As hard as it is to sympathize with the airline industry, they deserve a little sympathy. They were the victim of an easy cheap shot by the national media, which cried "Not another price increase!" while knowing full well that revenue needs to go up one way or another. American's only mistake here was being the first one to put in this fee. Now that they've broken the cherry, watch as all their fellow airlines fall in line.

The littlest victims in all this: the poor flacks.

[Ad Age]

]]>
Tue, 27 May 2008 10:56:37 EDT Hamilton Nolan http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=393350&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Learn Conflict Resolution With Ronn [sic] Torossian ]]> ronnt.jpegIncompetent and angry superflack Ronn [sic] Torossian and his agency, 5WPR, are all about creating powerful connections among the real movers and shakers in New York. So if you're a client or "FRIEND OF THE FIRM"—and if you are, you have some serious self-examination to do—you're invited to a special 5WPR Speaker Series event featuring Dr. Keith Ablow, succinctly described on his website as a "Forensic psychiatrist and author of thrillers." His topic for the evening? "Friction in the workplace and the necessity for conflict/resolution and chemistry building." What better subject for a night with Ronn, a man popular with employees, potential clients, the media, and feminists alike? Anyone lucky enough to attend this ironic event, please send us a report. The full—and predictably ineloquent—invitation is below.

5winvite.jpeg

]]>
Mon, 07 Apr 2008 10:22:47 EDT Hamilton Nolan http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=376742&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Save This Monkey From Modeling! ]]> sianimal.jpgChimpanzee Sanctuary Northwest, a chimp-rights group, is assailing Sports Illustrated with a vicious letter-writing campaign! The group is upset that the magazine used a macaque (FANCY WORD FOR "MONKEY") and a bear in its photo shoot for this year's Swimsuit Issue [Folio]. S.I. is like, whoa! We take care of the animals, and besides, what mammal wouldn't be happy nestled up against the thighs of a swimsuit model? The two bear/ model-relations pictures, which have caused all the human outrage, after the jump. The bear does look kind of annoyed by that muzzle.

sianimal2.jpg

sianimal3.jpg

]]>
Fri, 04 Apr 2008 11:32:21 EDT Hamilton Nolan http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=376147&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ The Circus: Evil? ]]> elephant.jpegIn the wee hours of this morning, Barnum & Bailey's Circus paraded their elephants into Manhattan, in what has become an annual tradition and spectacle. PETA is not too happy about this sort of thing. Is the circus really bad? On one hand, they're cruelly exploiting majestic mammals for the pitiful bemusement of humanity. On the other hand: elephants! Below, a clip of last year's NYC elephant march. Is there an easy answer to this one?

]]>
Wed, 19 Mar 2008 15:37:44 EDT Hamilton Nolan http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=369858&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Barack Obama's Own Professor Griff Might Get Him in Trouble ]]> tdspreacher.jpgBarack Obama's favorite preacher is this guy named Jeremiah Wright, Jr., a black man who heads a black church and preaches utterly crazy conspiracy theory nonsense like "[America's] got more black men in prison than there are in college" and "[America] bombed Cambodia, Iraq and Nicaragua, killing women and children while trying to get public opinion turned against Castro and Ghadhafi" and other demonstrably true statements. This makes him "divisive," a special media term for "being a negative Nelly." Or "being an aggrieved black man." Now Barack Obama has staked much of his campaign on his not being even remotely aggrieved, which is called being "inspiring," a term that means "not threatening." So naturally some people find it a bit odd that he is friends with this aggrieved preacher, and attends his services, and even named one of his books after a Wright sermon. It might become a big scandal! But on the plus side, every time voters are introduced to Obama's crazy preacher friend they will be reminded that Barack Obama might not secretly be a Muslim. After the jump, a clip of Jon Stewart explaining how Reverend Wright is "not helping."

]]>
Fri, 14 Mar 2008 14:08:29 EDT Pareene http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=368084&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ <em>Times</em> Gym Teacher: Must We Stretch? ]]> stretch.jpegThe newest entrant in the New York Times' strangely pedestrian fitness beat is today's piece asking, "To Stretch or Not to Stretch?" Short answer: If you're a gymnast or swimmer, yes; if you're a distance runner, no; for other activities, it's still an open question. So if you eliminate backflips and butterfly strokes from your workout routine, you can probably get away with no stretching at all, until a scientist tells you better. We just saved you so much time. How about the Times doing us all a favor by dispensing with this nonsense and replacing its entire Fitness & Nutrition section with nothing but empty white space and one single Amazon link to THIS:

supersquats.jpeg

]]>
Thu, 13 Mar 2008 09:56:30 EDT Hamilton Nolan http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=367387&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Sex Is Not Part Of The American Way Of Life ]]> couple.jpegMay we speak bluntly? We Americans are a bunch of undersexed sissies. So says the new Global Sex Survey from Durex, maker of good-enough condoms. Barely half of Americans are having sex once a week, meaning that we rank above only the stuffy, sexually repressed Japanese in amount of fucking [NYDN]. And all of humanity has a big problem: we don't even like having sex.

"Sex worldwide could be better," according to the survey. We'd say so! Only 60% of people worldwide say sex is "fun, enjoyable, and a vital part of life."

Let that sink in for a moment. Only three out of five people on earth believe sex is fun. Further, less than half—only 44%—say they are fully satisfied with their own sex lives. Well, hard to be satisfied if you don't even think it's fun.

So who is winning the global sex race? Greece, where almost 90% of people say they get laid weekly. They are either very sexy, or very big liars. Following closely are Brazil, Russia, and China. Clearly, Americans need to get to screwing—possibly with the help of some pleasure-enhancing Durex products!—or our empire will surely fall to the onslaught of the Greeks.

At least the cause of our poor showing is clear: Fancy men's underwear.

]]>
Tue, 04 Mar 2008 15:00:27 EST Hamilton Nolan http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=363728&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Tomorrow's Eating Disorders Today ]]> so%20cute.jpgUpper East Side children's store Bonpoint held a children's fashion show for their reopening. And yes the little kids are so cute. But what is the psychological cost of this adorable event? Body dysmorphic disorder before elementary school? Drinking diet juice boxes? Whatever, this city is savage. No sense in waiting until middle school for these insecurities to start. [New York Social Diary]

]]>
Mon, 03 Mar 2008 17:05:43 EST rebecca http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=363259&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ I Feel Bad About Your Earlobes, Butt, Stomach, and Ill-Fitting Bra (This Week) ]]> bramechanics071210_560.jpgSince Monday, NYC women have been assaulted by a clusterfuck of articles pointing out our possible body inadequacies—more than usual, actually! In fact, it's utterly confusing for us gals to figure out which flaw to hate the most. Has femiladyism taken a step backward, or is this just what inevitably happens right before the December glut of top ten lists hits next week?

Obviously, there was the duly noted Spanx explosion/debacle.
But there are other, more pressing problems for urban women: possibly your "flaccid, exposed [ear]lobes." Yeah, you might want to get that taken care of. Or is the real issue your ill-fitting bra? New York magazine temporarily morphed into Cosmo with its "Everything Guide to Bras." Except, we've read this article about eight times already. When we were fourteen. Like: Did you know you're supposed not supposed to wear the same bra two days in a row? Yawn.

And is it even possible that a city of grown women well-versed in the intricacies of different types of bikini waxing still can't buy the right size bra? How hard is it, right? After all, what else were Seventeen and YM training us for all those years?

]]>
Wed, 05 Dec 2007 15:00:00 EST Sheila http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=330387&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Our Nation Is Gripped By A Turkey Carving Crisis! ]]> 21carve-190.jpgThe hard part about writing News You Can Use isn't finding the solution; it's proving there's a problem to be solved. Consider today's Times, wherein dining reporter Julia Moskin has a nice Thanksgiving Eve article (accompanied online by a thrilling instructional video) about a new low-stress, expert-approved way to carve up your turkey. But is the old hack-and-slice regime really so problematic? Yes. "Before breakfast on Thanksgiving," begins Moskin's tale, "as the first Americans rise to preheat the oven, the question of who is going to carve the bird starts to ripple anxiously across the land." This being journalism (of sorts), the burden of proof requires at least some civilian testimony, which is where things take a decided turn toward the gothic.

By mealtime, many cooks will be tired of hovering over the turkey and ready to unload it, but just try to find a taker.

"One year my 13-year-old nephew, Josh, was the only one willing to take it on," said Nissa Goldstein, a retired teacher in West Hartford, Conn. "Of course, everyone was shouting instructions at him, and he ended up locking himself in his room and refusing to come out."

Of course. Who hasn't experienced an adolescent nervous breakdown over poultry?

But Josh isn't alone; the turkey terror lurks everywhere! "One year the turkey took a long time to cook and I went to carve it after about 13 beers," said Maurice Landry, who lives near Lake Charles, LA. "The way I remember it, I bore down to take off the leg and the whole thing went shooting off the platter and knocked over the centerpiece." Indeed, why wield a knife at all if you aren't a little bit buzzed?

With the proof of a problem's existence established rather indisputably by just two "One year..." recollections, Moskin moves on to the meat of her story. The Goldsteins and Landrys aren't heard from again—which makes one wonder: how exactly were these folks from "West Hartford" and "Lake Charles" identified as prime sources on holidays hysteria? And who's making sure they stay in treatment for good this time?

Butcher's Method Takes Carving Off the Table
[NYT]

]]>
Wed, 21 Nov 2007 09:40:44 EST JonLiu http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=325291&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Is Paige Davis The Victim Of The Strike or Her Own Suck? ]]> paige1_1087845813.jpgVivacious redhead Paige Davis has agreed to return as host of a new HD version of the once-geisty TLC home-swap design show Trading Spaces. What does this all mean? Well, for one thing, that the Broadway dreams of one Paige Davis, who's played Roxie in the stage version of Chicago —she's a thespian on the level of Lisa Rinna and Ashlee Simpson!— are dashed. Tail between legs, she slinks back...but wait! Perhaps Paige Davis is merely the Terry Malloy of the troubled labor times! She does kinda look like a young Brando.

Ms. Davis can just blame it on the stagehand strike! Still, she has to come to terms with the step backwards into the reality dregs—I mean, she couldn't even get on a Lifetime serial? But wait some more! There's a writer's strike on; no scripted TV! Little by little, the week's bicoastal labor unrest has acheived its goal: excusing one lady's career failure. [AP]

]]>
Fri, 16 Nov 2007 09:50:56 EST JonLiu http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=323399&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ The Dentsu Brothel Scandal, As Covered by Pravda ]]> Photo credit: www.thebrothelnyc.com
The largest advertising company of Japan was involved into huge sexual scandal. The former creative director of its U.S. arm accused it of pressing him to visit a brothel and engaging in engage in other sexually explicit activities on company outings and said he was fired because of complaint.
Though actually we can't decide it that's as funny as the Ad Age story's charming and succinct subhed, "Emphasizing Crotches." Also, "The lawsuit comes at an awkward time for the company, as it seeks to penetrate the U.S. market."

Japanese company accused of brothel outing [Pravda]
Former Dentsu Creative Sues Over Trips to Brothel, Bathhouse, Sharapova Shoot [Ad Age]

]]>
Thu, 01 Nov 2007 16:00:18 EDT Pareene http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=317890&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ "Very, Very Wide Legged Jeans With Experimental, Unknown Sneakers" Appall Fabian Basabe ]]> fabian.jpg Faded it-boy Fabian Basabe has left our city for his true spiritual home, Los Angeles, and he's finally stopped "furniture shopping, car shopping and well... tanning" long enough to update his Paper magazine blog. But now he's encountering some culture shock! At a recent awards show, he was confronted not only by fashion faux pas like the aforementioned "experimental, unknown sneakers" that "even the boys from 'NSYNC would have ditched," he also faced "an extravaganza of sushi next to pasta next to cookies next to caramelized apples the size of a New York studio. A selection that would make any self-respecting New York girl with body issues (and some boys — you know who you are) purge from ten feet away." He and his "posse" "took off for saner pastures." But wherever you go, there you are, Fab!

]]>
Tue, 30 Oct 2007 11:00:15 EDT Emily Gould http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=316707&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Doree Shafrir Ankles New Media Sweatshop ]]> grrNear the end of day yesterday, Gawker's Doree Shafrir handed in her two weeks notice. She'll be leaving us for the New York Observer, where she'll write and report on "ideas." (That role has been, it seems, officially unfilled since the departure of Sheelah Kolhatkar for Portfolio over the winter.) Doree began here as an "associate editor" last October, and early this year transitioned to reporting on the media full-time. She can only be replaced here at Gawker with a terrifying room full of jerry-rigged threshing machines held together with baling wire and lubricated with grain alcohol. We sincerely wish her the best of luck in destroying Jared Kushner from inside his own shop—or, at least, in bringing that paper what the boy publisher may not know it so desperately needs.

]]>
Tue, 28 Aug 2007 12:09:32 EDT Choire http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=294199&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ The War At 'Portfolio' ]]> septembercoverThe new Portfolio hits the racks today. Before we get to the actual magazine, you'll have to console yourself with gossip about Portfolio, most of it centered around EIC Joanne Lipman's recent firing of second-in-command Jim Impoco. The Observer and the Post, obviously suckling at the teat of different sources, bring you the different perspectives.

From the Lipman camp:

Even supporters of Mr. Impoco will use words like "pugnacious," in describing him, and one staffer said that he had been "sparring publicly" with Ms. Lipman for some time.
In a recent editorial meeting, Mr. Impoco harshly challenged her, belittling one of her story ideas as "breathless." As one staffer said: "I think the people who are not the greatest fans of the boss were taken aback by that."

And few fail to mention Mr. Impoco's support of Kurt Eichenwald, the embattled investigative reporter who spent two decades at The New York Times before joining Portfolio a year ago.

From the Impoco camp:
Lipman's management problems are said to be deeper than just a personality clash with Impoco.

One source said that she has never put out a magazine before and doesn't seem to have clear ideas of what she wants. And while she has many veterans across the editorial, design and photo departments, she doesn't defer to anyone.

"She thinks she is 100 percent right, 100 percent of the time," said one insider, who said the disaffection runs deep. "She just isn't very collegial. The dissatisfaction is spread across all departments."

That said, she is not prone to shouting matches or temper tantrums.

"It's definitely a Captain Bligh thing going on, but she has that permanent Joker smile," said the insider, referring to both the taciturn captain from the book "Mutiny on the Bounty," who was tossed over board by his crew, and to one of Batman's foes.

This one will probably play out for a few more days until everyone actually reads Portfolio and realizes that the idea of a Vanity Fair for finance, instead of, you know, an actual finance magazine with news, is a deeply flawed concept. Still, good news: According to Keith Kelly, the third issue will carry 121 ad pages, only one down from the current issue. So Portfolio we will have with us for at least a brief while.

]]>
Wed, 15 Aug 2007 10:30:58 EDT abalk http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=289657&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Does This Kitten Look Like Lindsay Lohan? ]]> When we first saw this picture on Cute Overload we were like, "nah." And then we looked at this picture of everyone's favorite embattled former child star and started to see a resemblance. We think this is such an important issue that it should be put to a vote.

Gawker Media polls require Javascript; if you're viewing this in an RSS reader, click through to view in your Javascript-enabled web browser.

]]>
Fri, 03 Aug 2007 13:45:11 EDT Emily Gould http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=285653&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Ketchup-Loving Crazy Here To Teach You Black Folks About Reconstruction ]]> 23.jpgRemember how, during the 2004 presidential race, there was that idiot rumor that buying Heinz ketchup would somehow aid the Kerry campaign? And remember how a couple of clever entrepreneurs, banking on the craziness and paranoia of the extreme right wing, put out a rival "W Ketchup"? We always wondered who was dumb enough to fall for it. Thanks to today's Sun, we know of at least one satisfied costumer. That's right, it's our old friend Alicia Colon:
Naturally, I ordered a case of W ketchup, and later a W cap, bumper stickers, and decals. It was just a gesture of support for President Bush's reelection, but the ketchup was a real surprise that was enjoyed by everybody in my family.
In the course of a column where Alicia spends some time with the ketchup's creators (two fine young men who "have the type of esprit de corps that molded our Founding Fathers."), Staten Island's defender of the faith drops a little history on us:

The concept of freedom before wealth is hard for Democrats to understand, but it is this principle that defines conservatism. Smaller government, less regulation, strong defense, and civil rights for all — these are radical concepts today, but one forgets that the original Republican Party members were radicals. Abraham Lincoln was hated just as much as Mr. Bush, only his vice president was a Democrat, Andrew Johnson. Maybe having Vice President Cheney around is keeping the president out of harm's way. After Lincoln was assassinated, the Democrats did all they could to unravel his Emancipation Proclamation. Not many blacks know that it was the Democrats who formed the KKK, and Jesse Jackson sure isn't going to clue them in.
We're going to advise against consuming this ketchup, should you have any lying around: the ingredients very likely contain lead.

Rebels With A Cause - Conservatism [NYS]

Earlier: Gawker's coverage of Alicia Colon

]]>
Tue, 14 Nov 2006 18:25:58 EST abalk2 http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=214758&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ September Issues: Fall Fashion Weigh-In #3 ]]> You see that? That's 28.5 POUNDS OF MAGAZINE. 28.5 lbs. is the ridiculous sum total of all our fall fashion magazine weigh-ins; the combined weight of these 13 glossies exceeds that of all the models who appear in them.

But anyhow: Last night we made our last trip to the newsstand for magazine-weighing purposes; naturally, it was our most grueling burden. But, for the sake of research, we lugged 13.5 pounds of aspirational luxury back to HQ and added them to the monstrous pile. Our back could be feeling better, thanks.

After the jump, the final weigh-in, featuring heavyweight champ Vogue and the other fatties.

sf1.jpg

sf2.jpg

sf3.jpg

sf4.jpg

sfrandom.jpg

Notes:
• Good to see Bazaar hanging in there with the African queen.
• Fuck you, Vogue.
• You know exactly why we included Details.


Earlier: September Issues: The First Fall Fashion Weigh-In
September Issues: Fall Fashion Weigh-In #2

]]>
Thu, 17 Aug 2006 15:00:06 EDT Jessica http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=194923&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ September Issues: Fall Fashion Weigh-In #2 ]]> Last night we took another trip to the newsstand to fetch more of the beastly September fashion glossies, but this time things were toned down a notch. Rather than haul another 9.5 pounds of aspirational crap, we went more towards the featherweights. Next round, we'll suck it up and grab the heavyweights like InStyle or the 650-page Vogue. And when we're all done? Just you wait. We're going to take all these fuckers and build ourselves a coffee table.

In this featherweight installment, we put Jane, Cosmopolitan, Marie Claire and Elle on the Tanita scale. After the jump, round two of our fat-circling project.

septjane.jpg

septcosmo.jpg

septmarieclaire.jpg

septelle.jpg

Notes
Jane definitely weighs less than a pound but, when combined with all the other magazines, the scale kept reading 6.5 lbs., as opposed to the more accurate 6 lbs. But who needs the rules of arithmetic? Not our scale! Tanita is so Jane.
• Who the hell is on the cover of Cosmo? Fake Denise Richards? Poor man's Jessica Simpson?
Elle weighs more than Lohan herself.

Earlier: September Issues: The First Fall Fashion Weigh-In

]]>
Mon, 14 Aug 2006 15:45:56 EDT Jessica http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=194081&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ September Issues: The First Fall Fashion Weigh-In ]]> Last night we bought four of the glossies' September issues, those typically being the most behemoth of the year. Why only four? Because we had to walk a few blocks, and we could only carry four. Once the Bengay kicks in and we can use our biceps again, we'll grab another round of these bitches.

For our first weigh-in, we went with Glamour, Lucky, W and Vanity Fair (seeing as it's VF's inaugural "Style Issue," we'll group them with the fashion rags. Just this once). After the jump, we'll take a Sharpie and circle their fat.

weightglam.jpg

weightlucky.jpg

weightvf.jpg

weightw.jpg

Notes:
• Jessica Joffe accounts for approximately .75 lbs of Glamour's total weight.
• We actually think Vanity Fair was a little heavier than the other 2-pounders, but the poor Tanita scale lacks that level of precision.
• It's unfair to include beastly W amongst the mere mortals — like putting a rottweiler in a room with a bunch of chihuahuas, really. But 3.5 lbs cannot be ignored.

]]>
Tue, 08 Aug 2006 14:30:05 EDT Jessica http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=192827&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Gawker's Special Correspondent for Brown-People Issues: Remembering Mrs. King ]]> 20060131csking.jpgCoretta Scott King died last night. The widow of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., she was a civil-rights legend and an American icon. Her death should be noted, and her life remembered, even here. And so it seemed a good time to turn to Gawker's Special Correspondent for Brown-People Issues, the blogger who calls himself The Assimilated Negro and who we prefer to call TAN, for his thoughts.

TAN's tribute is after the jump.

The Kings, Martin Luther and Coretta Scott, were the ultimate power couple, both in life and in death. While he was dreaming, leading marches on Washington, and changing history as we know it, she supported him and raised their four children. And when he was killed, she stepped up to fill the moral void left by his absence and hoisted his whole legacy on her back, continuing to nurture the civil-rights movement and helping to carry a whole generation toward the finish line.

So when a woman like Coretta Scott King passes, in addition to feeling appropriate awe at her legacy, I mostly find myself thinking, "Goddamn! I need a woman like that in my life."

Yes, I now realize that I need to find my Coretta Scott King. Beause while I'm not yet worthy of being assassinated, there is a possibility of my suicide, for fame — not money — and a byline. Were that to happen, I'd need someone to keep my legacy alive. And so I'm changing all my online personal ads so they better help me locate that woman who can inspire me to motivate the masses, CSK style.

Here are the bullets on what I'm looking for. A potential Mrs. TAN must be willing to

• Be cool and raise the kids after I die (or "disappear");
• Lobby for a holiday in my honor;
• Found and run a center in my memory; and
• Generally dedicate her life to fulfilling my dreams.

Awwwwww, yeah. Now that's the kind of woman I need. Thank you, Coretta Scott King, for teaching me this.

(All applications — to be judged solely on content of character — may be submitted via The Assimilated Negro.)

Coretta Scott King, 78, Widow of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., Dies [NYT]
















]]>
Tue, 31 Jan 2006 15:33:26 EST Jesse http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=151857&view=rss&microfeed=true