Erm, how about the Edge?Alec starred in that. Okay, he was overshadowed by Anthony Hopkins, and it started out as en ensemble but...um...Alec really hasn't carried any bigtime films. Huh.
Anyway, did anyone see this movie in a theater? I'm pretty sure this made no money. It comes on tv with some frequency (i've never rented it but I've seen it more than three times). Granted, it's a pretty pointless movie with nice cinematography but I love survival stories like it's my job and Alec is still sexy in it. Like, not just in a older-portly-guy-with-a-sexy-voice sexy, but sexy. Well, up until he starts showing signs of starvation.
The more I think about this film, the more I understand why no one ever mentions it.
I'm sure it's tough to be a character actor when you want to be a leading man, but I think he's a much better performer than, say, Viggo Mortensen and I'd rather watch him work any day of the week, no matter what the size of the part.
Everybody knows movies blow lately and the good stuff is on TV. And he's playing one of the best characters on one of the best (broadcast!) series out there, people love his work and he's complaining? Get a grip, you crank.You've got a life that those 99.99% of unemployed actors would kill for.
Maybe it's just me and my jaded ways, but I don't buy Mr. Baldwin's shtick in this vein for a second. He has given too many notable performances in supporting roles (The Cooler, for example) to make me believe that he doesn't think his work is up to snuff.
Actually, when I reread his theory of why one get's involved in acting in films, it suddenly makes sense. But, then again, using his standard of what makes a successful movie career and who is recognized as a success, those robots in the Transformers movies would qualify as exemplars of the profession, and if that's the case, he's right--it's time to sit down.
@TheSometimesWhy: He went into all of this much more in depth in a new yorker profile last year. He discussed his supporting roles and he doesn't consider them to be enough to salavage his wreck of a career. He sees Glengarry Glen Ross as basically a cameo. And his other roles to minor in the movie too be of consquence.
He is also pretty clearly a talented comedic actor but he wanted the great dramatic role.
Alec Baldwin was supposed to be the next great leading man. And he ended up more of a character actor.I don't agree with his definition of failure but I do think he strongly believes he is one.
@Cheruth: It's funny, I read that profile in the NY'er too, and it left me feeling exactly as I felt after I read this--that Mr. Baldwin is disingenuous to the point of being full of (benign) bullshit. In fact, it was that profile that got me thinking as much. It was as if he didn't voice all this cognitive dissonance about himself and his career, what would there be to talk about, and to thus justify a 10,000 word piece in the NY'er?
He was the one who chose to walk away from the "Red October" franchise. As an actor myself, I understand the choice. I just don't understand the after-the-fact bitchfest over the consequences. I don't feel as if he has taken responsibility for that part of his career.
And on an entirely different plane, the man should kiss his lucky charms. In an industry where the standard query isn't "How's work going?" but "Hey, get any work lately?", he has worked steadily in high-quality projects, he has been acknowledged (and fawned over) for being able to do comedy while transitioning into meaty character work and roles, and he is paid handsomely to do so.
If it's sympathy Mr. Baldwin wants, I don't have it for him. And if, as I suspect, his tack was taken to prop up his failing ego, he draws a blank from me as well. How much validation does it take to float a deflated runaway ego? Answer: more than there exists in the world.
In that regard, Mr. Baldwin and I agree. He is an abject failure.
12/01/09
12/01/09
12/01/09
12/01/09
B- Be
C- Complaining
Always be complaining.
12/01/09
12/01/09
Anyway, did anyone see this movie in a theater? I'm pretty sure this made no money. It comes on tv with some frequency (i've never rented it but I've seen it more than three times). Granted, it's a pretty pointless movie with nice cinematography but I love survival stories like it's my job and Alec is still sexy in it. Like, not just in a older-portly-guy-with-a-sexy-voice sexy, but sexy. Well, up until he starts showing signs of starvation.
The more I think about this film, the more I understand why no one ever mentions it.
12/01/09
12/01/09
12/01/09
12/01/09
12/01/09
12/01/09
12/01/09
12/01/09
12/01/09
12/01/09
12/01/09
Seriously though, I don't want to hear that whiny shit from anyone who was in Glengarry Glen Ross. Especially Mr. Brass Balls himself.
12/01/09
12/01/09
Actually, when I reread his theory of why one get's involved in acting in films, it suddenly makes sense. But, then again, using his standard of what makes a successful movie career and who is recognized as a success, those robots in the Transformers movies would qualify as exemplars of the profession, and if that's the case, he's right--it's time to sit down.
12/01/09
He is also pretty clearly a talented comedic actor but he wanted the great dramatic role.
Alec Baldwin was supposed to be the next great leading man. And he ended up more of a character actor.I don't agree with his definition of failure but I do think he strongly believes he is one.
12/01/09
He was the one who chose to walk away from the "Red October" franchise. As an actor myself, I understand the choice. I just don't understand the after-the-fact bitchfest over the consequences. I don't feel as if he has taken responsibility for that part of his career.
And on an entirely different plane, the man should kiss his lucky charms. In an industry where the standard query isn't "How's work going?" but "Hey, get any work lately?", he has worked steadily in high-quality projects, he has been acknowledged (and fawned over) for being able to do comedy while transitioning into meaty character work and roles, and he is paid handsomely to do so.
If it's sympathy Mr. Baldwin wants, I don't have it for him. And if, as I suspect, his tack was taken to prop up his failing ego, he draws a blank from me as well. How much validation does it take to float a deflated runaway ego? Answer: more than there exists in the world.
In that regard, Mr. Baldwin and I agree. He is an abject failure.